Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Advertisements

Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.
REICH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION SPRING SEMESTER 2008 Opening Meeting WELCOME.
Continuum of Teacher Development and Shared Accountability Leading to Increased Student Performance Teaching Quality Policy Center Education Commission.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Integrating Performance-Based Portfolios into Coursework Association of Teacher Educators Jacksonville, Florida February 17, 2003.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
International Workshop on Graduate Programs for Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers at Tokyo University of Science Tad Watanabe Kennesaw State University.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching Data Collection Information 1.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
A Comprehensive Unit Assessment Plan Program Improvement, Accountability, and Research Johns Hopkins University School of Education Faculty Meeting October.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Andy Finch, Ph.D. Vanderbilt University Mary Jo Rattermann, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation Resources
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP Code Program Code Program Quality Improvement.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
Assessment and Continuous Improvement in Teacher Education.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
College of Education Graduate Programs
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Update on Program Review Margie Crutchfield AACTE February, 2009.
AAHE-Denver04 1 Embedding collaboratively developed standards-based portfolio assessment: The process, product, and power to document student learning.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Choosing Excellence: National Board Certification Now go to the top of your profession.
NCATE Program Review Process Margaret D. Crutchfield, Ph.D. September 2006
Building Awareness of Teacher Leadership. Why Teacher Leadership?
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant (DPI)
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Improving Teaching Practices through the Use of Video-Case Analysis
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Office of Field and Clinical Partnerships and Outreach: Updates
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Opening of the University-2003
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
Association of Teacher Educators Jacsksonville, FL. February 18, 2003
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate Professor Kennesaw State University Kennesaw State University NCATE Strategic Action Team Member, MEd in Adolescent Education Program Coordinator

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Organizing Themes ► Responsibility that is Shared ► Relationships that Sustain ► Relevancy of Program ► Recognition of Impact ► Revelation of Excellence ► Reflection that Refines & Renews

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Responsibility that is Shared Professional Teacher Education Unit (PTEU) College of Education College of Humanities College of Science and Mathematics P-12 Partners Excellence In Teacher Education

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V P-12 Partners ► Serve on Advisory Boards  Provide input into program design  Provide input into course offerings  Provide feedback ► Serve as mentors for current students ► Serve as liaison between university and schools ► Engage in scholarship with faculty ► Provide feedback on program impact

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V College of Science & Mathematics, College of Humanities ► Collaboratively develop performance standards consistent with accrediting agencies (content focused and education) ► Develop course content and assignments consistent with these standards – supporting and linking to education course content. ► Collaboratively plan course schedules and offerings in four content areas (18 hrs)  English  Mathematics  Sciences  Social Sciences

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Responsibility (cont.) ► Team-teach, cross-teach with education faculty ► Education faculty teach “content” courses ► Design and embed standards based assessments into content courses ► Share data collection, data analysis, data reflection responsibilities ► Serve on and have a voice on governance committees and search committees in College of Education

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Relationships that Sustain ► Valuing & honoring expertise ► Pulling together not pulling apart ► Working for consensus ► Courageous advocates for one another ► Lots of juice and cookies

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Relevancy of Program ► M.Ed in Adolescent Education ► For certified middle grades and secondary teachers ► Content and pedagogy focused (18 hours in each) ► Aligned with NBPT Standards in 7 certification areas ► Performance standards collaboratively developed

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Relevancy (cont.) ► Course assignments directly linked to classroom practice. ► Improving teaching in P-12 classrooms explicit focus. ► Improving P-12 student learning most important measure of program impact.

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Recognizing Impact ► Accrediting agencies require the systematic collection of data documenting program effectiveness and impact. ► Build the collection of data into longitudinal design ► Combination of two designs  Trend study of M.Ed candidates and graduates (Fall 2003) ► Yearly collection of data on current candidates and those graduating & from their employers  Panel study (Began fall 2005) ► Collection of data at set intervals on previous M.Ed. graduates

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Impact (cont.) ► Trend Study  Data sources (Aligned with Candidate Performance Outcomes) ► Surveys (Graduate Diversity, Program Evaluation, Professional Accomplishments) ► E-portfolio evaluation (Portfolio Narrative Rubric) ► Impact on Student Learning ► Disposition Measures

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Sample Data Sources and Collection What is It?In What Course? Where Do I Find it? Who Completes It? Submitted Online? When? Portfolio Narrative Rubric Portfolio classOnlineProfessorsYesBy end of Semester Impact on Student Learning Analysis Rubric EDUC and/or Content course OnlineProfessors completes Rubric Candidate also complete rubric as part of narrative YesBy end of Semester Diversity Survey Portfolio classOnlineCandidateYesBy end of Semester Disposition Measure 7703 or 7704WebsiteCandidateNoEnd of Semester

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Impact on P-12 Student Learning (n= 123, Fall 05 preliminary data) ProficiencyL1L2L3L4 1.12%0%46%52% 2.22%0%33%65% 2.51%0%39%60% 2.51%0%37%62% 2.61%1%38%60% 2.61%1%38%60% 3.22%0%32%66%

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Sample Results- Disposition Measure Question Pretest Mean Posttest Mean t-test*Significance I can relate to Hispanic males who are at risk of dropping out of school p <.001 I can related to students who are gay or lesbian p =.005 I can relate to students from lower socio-economic families p =.008 Paired Samples t-test, n = 32

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V M.Ed. In Adolescent Education Candidate Professional Accomplishments ( )

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Employers Evaluation of M.Ed. In Adolescent Education Graduates (2003) Question: How well does the teacher demonstrate the following Average Ranking* Adjust practice to assess and evaluate all learners 4.43 Teach well because of deep understanding of content 4.51 Overall ability to increase student achievement and positively impact student learning 4.60 *5 = Very Well Prepared, 1 = Very Poorly Prepared, n = 15

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Revelation of Excellence ► Sharing findings with P-12 partners  Recognition of excellence results in deepening partnerships and increased involvement in schools and districts ► specialized cohorts, grant opportunities ► individualization of program of study ► Sharing findings with candidates  Recognition of excellence spreads and deepens influence ► Best sales persons- recruiting colleagues ► Builds teams of influence within schools and districts ► Sharing findings with professional colleagues  Recognition of excellence raises visibility and spreads influence beyond institution and its own graduates ► Professional conferences, publications, awards

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Reflection that Refines and Renews ► Annual, comprehensive and systematic ► Involves representatives from all faculty groups and partners ► Data based revisions and changes ► Reinforces the sense of shared responsibility ► And strengthens sustaining relationships between and among all stakeholders. ► Completes the circle!

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Program Revisions Revision Data Source Program level Admission Requirements changed to require certification in level and content area Feedback from content faculty on candidate performance. Candidates who were ECE certified had much difficulty with advanced content courses in math and science. Added required course in Advanced Assessment and Evaluation Advisory board members from P-12 schools indicted need for teachers to be more knowledgeable of assessment in the current climate of accountability. Candidates expressed need for more background in assessment.

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V What’s Next ► Formalize Panel Study design ► Incorporate final Fall 2005 data into Trend Study ► Share with Advisory Board- Feb ► Share with candidates- Spring 2006 ► Monitor, reflect, refine, revise, and repeat ► Publish

Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Contact information ► ►