Discharge initiation and plasma column formation in aspect ratio A=2 tokamak. R.R. Khayrutdinov 1 E.A. Azizov 1, A.D. Barkalov 1, G.G.Gladush 1, I.L.Tajibaeva.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Advertisements

Lecture 7 Circuits Ch. 27 Cartoon -Kirchhoff's Laws Topics –Direct Current Circuits –Kirchhoff's Two Rules –Analysis of Circuits Examples –Ammeter and.
Density profile changes are the result of the profile consistency effect. K.Razumova The very important feature of tokamak plasma behavior is its abilities.
CCS Method to Reproduce Tokamak Plasma Shape (Cauchy Condition Surface) F. Wang* 1, K. Nakamura 2, O. Mitarai 3, K. Kurihara 4, Y. Kawamata 4, M. Sueoka.
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture3 : Force on the plasma / Virial theorem.
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10 : Running a discharge / diagnostics.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
5. Simplified Transport Equations We want to derive two fundamental transport properties, diffusion and viscosity. Unable to handle the 13-moment system.
STREAMER INITIATION AND PROPAGATION IN WATER WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF BUBBLES AND ELECTRIC FIELD INITIATED RAREFACTION Wei Tian a) and Mark J. Kushner b)
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / some plasma physics.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / Approaches to fusion.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture4 : Quasi-neutrality Force on the plasma.
Chapter 5 Diffusion and resistivity
Usually a diluted salt solution chemical decomposition
1 ST workshop 2005 Numerical modeling and experimental study of ICR heating in the spherical tokamak Globus-M O.N.Shcherbinin, F.V.Chernyshev, V.V.Dyachenko,
Passive components and circuits - CCP Lecture 3 Introduction.
Large-amplitude oscillations in a Townsend discharge in low- current limit Vladimir Khudik, Alex Shvydky (Plasma Dynamics Corp., MI) Abstract We have developed.
Plasma start-up in tokamaks Winter School, Marianska, January 21, 2010 Jan Stockel Institute of Plasma Physics, Prague, Tokamak plasma.
Department of EECS University of California, Berkeley EECS 105 Fall 2003, Lecture 5 Lecture 5: 2 nd Order Circuits in the Time Domain Physics of Conduction.
Excitation of ion temperature gradient and trapped electron modes in HL-2A tokamak The 3 th Annual Workshop on Fusion Simulation and Theory, Hefei, March.
R. Piovan “RFX-mod: what does...”RFX 2009 Programme Workshop Padova, Jan RFX – mod: what does the present device allow to do? R. Piovan.
V.I. Vasiliev, Yu.A. Kostsov, K.M. Lobanov, L.P. Makarova, A.B. Mineev, D.V.Efremov Scientific Research Institute of Electrophysical Apparatus, St.-Petersburg,
IV–3 Energy of Magnetic Field Main Topics Transformers Energy of Magnetic Field Energy Density of Magnetic Field An RC Circuit.
Remote operation of the GOLEM tokamak Gent University, December 14, 2009 Jan Stockel Institute of Plasma Physics, Prague Vojta Svoboda.
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
Part 1 Current & Energy Transfer Electric Current.
第16回 若手科学者によるプラズマ研究会 JAEA
Introduction to Plasma- Surface Interactions Lecture 3 Atomic and Molecular Processes.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
RF simulation at ASIPP Bojiang DING Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 ASIPP.
DIII-D SHOT #87009 Observes a Plasma Disruption During Neutral Beam Heating At High Plasma Beta Callen et.al, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2963 (1999) Rapid loss of.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
Hybrid MHD-Gyrokinetic Simulations for Fusion Reseach G. Vlad, S. Briguglio, G. Fogaccia Associazione EURATOM-ENEA, Frascati, (Rome) Italy Introduction.
21th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Chengdu, China, 16 to 21 October 2006 _________________________________.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 12: Diagnostics / heating.
THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE HEAT CONDUCTIVITY COEFFICIENT AND THE HEAT CONVECTIVE VELOCITY AFTER ECRH SWITCH-ON (-OFF) IN T-10 V. F. Andreev, Yu. N. Dnestrovskij,
Work with TSC Yong Guo. Introduction Non-inductive current for NSTX TSC model for EAST Simulation for EAST experiment Voltage second consumption for different.
Lecture 3. Full statistical description of the system of N particles is given by the many particle distribution function: in the phase space of 6N dimensions.
GOLEM operation based on some results from CASTOR
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais – Laboratório Associado de Plasma 1 3rd IAEA TM on ST – STW2005 Determination of eddy currents in the vacuum.
of magnetized discharge plasmas: fluid electrons + particle ions
Integrated Simulation of ELM Energy Loss Determined by Pedestal MHD and SOL Transport N. Hayashi, T. Takizuka, T. Ozeki, N. Aiba, N. Oyama JAEA Naka TH/4-2.
HT-7 ASIPP The measurement of the light impurity radiation profiles for the impurity particle transport in the HT-7 tokamak Qian Zhou, B.N.Wan, Z.W.Wu,
Lectures 7 to 10 The Electric Current and the resistance Electric current and Ohm’s law The Electromotive Force and Internal Resistance Electrical energy.
1 SIMULATION OF ANOMALOUS PINCH EFFECT ON IMPURITY ACCUMULATION IN ITER.
Fyzika tokamaků1: Úvod, opakování1 Tokamak Physics Jan Mlynář 6. Neoclassical particle and heat transport Random walk model, diffusion coefficient, particle.
18th International Spherical Torus Workshop, Princeton, November 2015 Magnetic Configurations  Three comparative configurations:  Standard Divertor (+QF)
1 Nuclear Fusion Class : Nuclear Physics K.-U.Choi.
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
Presented by Yuji NAKAMURA at US-Japan JIFT Workshop “Theory-Based Modeling and Integrated Simulation of Burning Plasmas” and 21COE Workshop “Plasma Theory”
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
EX/P2-15 ECRH Pre-ionization and Assisted Startup in HL-2A Tokamaks in HL-2A Tokamaks Xianming SONG*, Liaoyuan CHEN, Jinghua ZHANG Jun RAO, Jun ZHOU, Xiao.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
Saturn Magnetosphere Plasma Model J. Yoshii, D. Shemansky, X. Liu SET-PSSD 06/26/11.
Decrease of transport coefficients in the plasma core after off-axis ECRH switch-off K.A.Razumova and T-10 team.
Physics of fusion power
Choongki Sung, Y. S. Park, Hyunyeong Lee, J. Kang and Y. S. Hwang
Construction and Status of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus at SNU
Design and Fabrication of Versatile Experiment Spherical Torus (VEST)
5. Conductors and dielectrics
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
Physics of fusion power
Mikhail Z. Tokar and Mikhail Koltunov
Presentation transcript:

Discharge initiation and plasma column formation in aspect ratio A=2 tokamak. R.R. Khayrutdinov 1 E.A. Azizov 1, A.D. Barkalov 1, G.G.Gladush 1, I.L.Tajibaeva 2, Ph.W.West 3 1 Troitsk, Moscow Reg., Russia 2 NNC, RK 3 General Atomics, USA

Introduction To describe a current ramp-up process at tokamaks it is important to know place where plasma is initiated, conditions for breakdown and dynamics of plasma current rise. This is necessary to create conditions for better plasma confinement, for minimization of breakdown voltage and to decrease a volt-second consumption. At the same time a study of physics of breakdown and plasma initiation is not complete yet. After avalanche and creation of “ quasi-neutral ” plasma it is necessary to jump through the “ ionization-radiation ” barrier. This is connected with phenomena that the initially plasma volume is less than the vacuum vessel one and the plasma density also is much more less than neutral density. So at the beginning a “ burn- through ” of neutrals should take place.

Plasma initiation consists of several parts: 1. Creation of maximum poloidal flux value at the plasma region by increasing of current in the inductor to the maximum available value. 2. Programmed change of currents in the inductor and PF coils to produce a required External Voltage at the plasma region (due to eddy currents at the vacuum vessel and passive structure there is delay at appearance of desired voltage at the plasma region). 3. Formation of Field Null and Programmed Voltage in the plasma region at time of breakdown with taking into account of eddy currents. 4. Avalanche Phase of initial plasma current formation (most part of plasma current flows along the opened magnetic surfaces) and density rise. 5. Quasi-neutral plasma phase, plasma current increase, formation of closed magnetic surfaces. 6. Formation of initial plasma for ramp-up phase (all neutrals are “burned-through” and magnetic surfaces inside plasma are closed).

Phases 1-3 are well studied theoretically and experimentally and are almost standard for the all existing tokamaks and ITER. Phases 4-6 are usually replaced by the only one phase, in which: There is no plasma 2D equilibrium to be solved. Plasma is considered to be a circular; Approximate equations for circular plasma are used to calculate magnetic field to be necessary to keep plasma at prescribed position; 0D equations are solved for the plasma and neutrals density, electron and ion temperature and empirical equations are applied for Impurity; Circuit equations are solved for PF coils, eddy and plasma currents. Plas ma is represented as a single filament Today’s status of plasma initiation model

In developed 2D model of plasma initiation the each 4-6 phases are considered separately: Avalanche phase: - plasma region and initial values of plasma current and density are calculated in 2D region for each grid point with use of Avalanche Model; - 2D plasma equilibrium is calculated taking into account eddy currents; -the most part of plasma current flows along the open field lines;

Quasi-neutral phase: -Plasma is considered to at “quasi-static” 2D equilibrium; -Time dependent equations for PF coils and eddy currents are self-consistently solved together with plasma free boundary equilibrium problem (plasma current flows along the open and closed field lines); -Plasma current density and total plasma current are calculated by use of 2-D diffusion of magnetic field and Grad-Shafranov equations. -As a result plasma current density and total plasma current are calculated; - Set of 0-D non-stationary equations are solved for neutral densities, electron and ion temperatures and for impurity species; - as a result, initial plasma is obtained for ramp-up phase (all neutrals are “burned- through” and the magnetic surfaces inside plasma becomes closed).

Plasma start-up at tokamaks can be divided into three phases: Avalanche phase, a breakdown phase and plasma current ramp-up phase. During the avalanche phase, electrons multiply until the ionization rate becomes  0.1. During breakdown phase, electric resistance due to Coulomb collisi ons becomes important and almost all hydrogen atoms are ionized, emitting bright light. Entering the ramp-up phase, joule heating increases T e, and  p bec omes low to obtain I p ramp-up.

Model description Determination of plasma initiation region (avalanche phase). Townsend’s criteria for avalanche breakdown: (1)  – first Townsend’s ionization,  =0.001  0.1 – coefficient of secondary emission, and integral is taken along magnetic field line. Magnetic lines, for which condition (1) is correct, will determine boundary of region for avalanche and plasma initiation.

As an example on the Fig., the regions of plasma initiation are presented for KTM tokamak, which were calculated for different values of hydrogen pressure p and at fixed value of loop voltage. It is seen that with increasing pressure the avalanche region is increased too. Boundary of avalanche regions in the КТМ tokamak for different values of pressure: p =1, 2, 10, 20 мP.

0-D equations for quasineutral plasma V p - volume of plasma region, V v - vacuum chamber volume, T e и T i - electrons and ions temperatures, P OH - ohmic heating power, P  - equilibration power between electrons and ions, P ion - neutral gas ionization losses, P cx - charge exchange losses,  Е,  Р - confinement times

EQUATIONS FOR MAGNETIC FIELD DIFFUSION The projection of the general Ohm’s along the magnetic field is given by:

Let’s denote by index k each magnetic surface then using relation that total is a sum of - plasma flux and - external flux Grad-Shafranov equation:

Plasma current, electrons temperature, minor radius and feedback current behavior during breakdown simulation

Algorithm of solution As first step in the iteration scheme the 2D free boundary equilibrium equation on rectangular grid is solved at given external PF and passive structure currents self-consistently with circuit equations for these currents. Plasma can flow at open and closed field lines. As second step, after finding equilibrium configuration, averaging is carried out to find all metric coefficients and coefficients for matrix equation. Value for electron temperature used to calculate plasma conductivity is taken from results of solution of 0D set of transport equations. As a result plasma current density and total plasma current I p are calculated. As third step set of 0D equations is solved. Value of I p is used to calculate Ohm ’ s heating of electrons. Average value of minor plasma radius a is calculated as  S p / , where S p is area occupied by plasma. Plasma pressure profile p  in this case is equal to zero. As a result of solution new value of electron temperature is obtained, which is used in the step 2.

Steps 1, 2 and 3 are iterated until required accuracy is achieved. Then next time step follows. Test simulation for developed model has been carried out for KTM tokamak, which includes all three stages of plasma breakdown. Examples of magnetic configuration for KTM tokamak at the beg inning of initiation and at the end of breakdown are presented be low at Figs.

Poloidal configuration of КТМ tokamak at the beginning of plasma initiation, plasma current is I p =3kA. Poloidal configuration of КТМ tokamak at the end of plasma breakdown, plasma current is I p =50kA.

Conclusion. 1.Plasma initiation model with 2D plasma equilibrium solver has been developed. 2. All necessary equations have been derived. 3. Preliminary stage with use of 2D equilibrium and 0D transport is programmed and tested. 4. Next stage will consist of in developing NEW code which will be integration of TRANSMAK [1] code and this 2D breakdown model [2]. 1. V.A. Beliakov, V.I. Vasiliev, K.I. Lobanov, L.P. Makarova, Л.П. A.B. Mineev, VII Int. Conf. of Thermonuclear Reactor Engineering Problems, Oct г. St.- Petersburg, p E.A. Azizov, A.D. Barkalov, G.G. Gladush, R.R. Khayrutdinov. Int. Conf. and School on Plasma Phys. and Controlled Fusion, Alushta, Ukraine, Sept. 16 – 21, 2002.