Oct 15-17, 2007 6.6: Integratability and Data Export Page 1Next VVSG Training Voting devices must speak (produce records) using a commonly understood language,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Indispensable Quality Assurance Tool for Dairy Processing Plants.
Advertisements

What Some in Congress Want Legislation Likely in next few years.
2010 ELECTION TRAINING POLL CLERK. PRECINCT OFFICIALS The precinct team consists of: The precinct team consists of:  Republican  One Inspector  One.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Ballot On Demand David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology
A technical analysis of the VVSG 2007 Stefan Popoveniuc George Washington University The PunchScan Project.
IEEE P1622 Meeting, Oct 2011 IEEE P1622 Meeting October 24-25, 2011 Overview of IEEE P1622 Draft Standard for Electronic Distribution of Blank Ballots.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Review of VVSG 1.1 Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL
Observation of e-enabled elections Jonathan Stonestreet Council of Europe Workshop Oslo, March 2010.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 1.1 Test Suite Status Mary Brady National Institute of Standards and Technology
United States Election Assistance Commission Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA.
Ballot Processing Systems February, 2005 Submission to OASIS EML TC and True Vote Maryland by David RR Webber.
United States 1 Election Assistance Commission 1 Inspiring Change & Modernization in Election Administration Seattle, WA June 10, 2015.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Electronic Poll Book Statutory Overview and VSTOP December 18, 2013 Brad King Co-Director, Indiana Election Division 2014 Election Administrators Conference.
Improving U.S. Voting Systems The Voters’ Perspective: Next generation guidelines for usability and accessibility Sharon Laskowski NIST Whitney Quesenbery.
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Overview of July TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards, ITL
Prepared by:Nahed AlSalah Data Security 2 Unit 19.
Election Assistance Commission United States VVSG Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) NIST July 20, 2015 Gaithersburg,
Administering Windows 7 Lesson 11. Objectives Troubleshoot Windows 7 Use remote access technologies Troubleshoot installation and startup issues Understand.
EAC-requested VVSG Research Overview and Status June 2008 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division National Institute of.
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting Vote-by-Phone David Flater / Sharon Laskowski National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting Presentation July 26 th, 2011 Ian S. Piper Director, Certification Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. TGDC Meeting,
TGDC Meeting, July 2011 IEEE P.1622 Update John P. Wack Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL
Data management in the field Ari Haukijärvi 2nd EHES training seminar.
Implementing the New Reliability Standards Status of Draft Cyber Security Standards CIP through CIP Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team.
TOWARDS OPEN VOTE VERIFICATION METHOD IN E-VOTING Ali Fawzi Najm Al-Shammari17’th July2012 Sec Vote 2012.
Part II : Computer Security and the VVSG October 15-17, 2007 Barbara Guttman Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting NIST Research on UOCAVA Voting Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology
1 Welcome: To the second learning sequence “ Data Base (DB) and Data Base Management System (DBMS) “ Recap : In the previous learning sequence, we discussed.
OBJECT ORIENTED SYSTEM ANALYSIS AND DESIGN. COURSE OUTLINE The world of the Information Systems Analyst Approaches to System Development The Analyst as.
IEEE P1622 Meeting, Feb 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
IEEE Working Group P1622 Meeting February 24-25, 2013 National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD.
Improving U.S. Voting Systems Security Breakout Session Improving U.S. Voting Systems Andrew Regenscheid National Institute.
The Handover Process P6.
TGDC Meeting, December 2011 IEEE P1622 Common Data Format Standardization Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Improving U.S. Voting Systems Interoperability in Election Data and Devices TGDC Meeting July 20 – 21, 2015 Improving U.S. Voting Systems 1 John P. Wack.
Scott Hilkert, Managing Principal NIST Workshop on a Common Data Format for Electronic Voting Systems. Oct , 2009.
Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,
TGDC Meeting, December Common Data Format Directions John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Briefing for NIST Acting Director James Turner regarding visit from EAC Commissioners March 26, 2008 For internal use only 1.
5.2 Scope: This standard defines common data interchange formats for event records for voting systems. Voting systems, including election administration.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Auditability Working Group David Flater National Institute of Standards and Technology r4.
VVSG: Usability, Accessibility, Privacy 1 VVSG, Part 1, Chapter 3 Usability, Accessibility, and Privacy December 6, 2007 Dr. Sharon Laskowski
Wireless Networking Nandakumar.P. Web Resource
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report of the UOCAVA Working Group John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology DRAFT.
NIST Voting Program Barbara Guttman 12/6/07
Dealing with Data Conference 26 th August Capturing Datasets….. is only the half of it!
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Help America Vote Act (HAVA) Roadmap Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report on Other Resolutions from Dec 2009 TGDC Meeting John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report on Logging Requirements in VVSG 2.0 Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.
2016 Poll Worker Training: Processing Voters Provided by the: State Board of Election Commissioners 501 Woodlane, Suite 401N Little Rock, AR
Next VVSG Training Standards 101 October 15-17, 2007 Mark Skall National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST Workshop on a Common Data Format for Electronic Voting Systems October 29-30, 2009 National Institute of Standards and Technology 1.
EAC-requested VVSG Research Overview and Status June 2008 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division National Institute of.
Voting Accessibility Barriers Survey State AT Program & Protection & Advocacy networks -- N = 76, 24 states, 2 territories & 2 national organizations (HAVA.
Support for a Common Data Exchange Format Election Systems & Software IEEE Standards Working Group P1622 Voting Systems Electronic Data Interchange February.
PREPARATIONS FOR VOTING: IN QUEST OF INTEGRITY AND PUBLIC CONFIDENCE by Roy G. Saltman Consultant on Election Policy and Technology
12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting The VVSG Version 1.1 Overview John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology
Next VVSG Training Security: Testing Requirements October 15-17, 2007 Nelson Hastings Alicia Clay Jones National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Election Assistance Commission 1 TGDC Meeting High Level VVSG Requirements: What do they look like? February, 09, United States.
Update: Revising the VVSG Structure Sharon Laskowski vote.nist.gov April 14, 2016 EAC Standards Board Meeting 1.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
IT Audit for non-IT auditors Cornell Dover Assistant Auditor General 31 March 2013.
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 UOCAVA Pilot Projects for the 2012 Federal Election Report from the UOCAVA Working Group Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of.
Powerpoint Templates Data Communication Muhammad Waseem Iqbal Lecture # 07 Spring-2016.
The VVSG 2005 Revision Overview EAC Standards Board Meeting February 26-27, 2009 John P. Wack NIST Voting Program National Institute.
ICT meeting Business needs
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Presentation transcript:

Oct 15-17, : Integratability and Data Export Page 1Next VVSG Training Voting devices must speak (produce records) using a commonly understood language, same format, same grammar Voting devices must connect and work with each other without a lot of effort, even if from different vendors

Oct 15-17, 2007 Integratabilty = able to be integrated Devices must use common hardware interfaces E.g., USB, RS-232 Manufacturers should use common industry methods for hardware connections, signaling, protocols Page 2Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, 2007 Common Data Export/Interchange Goals: All electronic records, regardless of device or vendor, are in the same format and can be read, audited, tabulated with the same sort of software Ballot definition files need be created once, not once per specific device Records from different devices, even vendors, can be easily aggregated, tabulated, and audited Page 3Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, B: Use non-restrictive public format Applies to Ballot definition files Cast vote records Generated reports Affects DREs, VVPATs, Op scan, EBM EMS Electronic poll books Page 4Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, B.4 – Explain the format Vendor must fully document the format The specification must be document so that a jurisdiction could write software to interact with formatted data The vendor must provide a sample program with source code to show how formatted data can be read, etc. Page 5Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, B.6,B.7: ‘should’ requirements Vendors should use this same format for all of their equipment All vendors should use the same consensus-based format Examples include: OASIS EML IEEE P-1622 Page 6Next VVSG Training

6.6 Voter Credentials and Ballot Activation Determining what type of ballot to present to the voter Activating the voting system to present that ballot New requirements dealing with electronic pollbooks

Oct 15-17, 2007 Terminology Issuance of voter credentials – what an epollbook or pollworker does Ballot activation – occurs on a vote-capture device to present the correct ballot style to a voter Activation device – an epollbook, handheld activator, or other specific device Token – e.g., a smartcard, holds credentials to build the correct ballot style and enable that voter to cast one ballot Ballot configuration – the ‘raw’ set of contests that groups of voters are eligible to vote, included in the credentials Ballot style – the presentation to a voter of the configuration, including options for accessibility, ordering of contests, etc. Page 8Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, 2007 Credential issuance & ballot activation Requirements for basic aspects of ballot activation and credential issuance DRE/EPB can be an activation device but not both at same time Can cast at most one ballot Activation device controls ballot configuration, e.g., Democrat contests in a primary DRE/EPB reads ballot configuration, enables only those contests for that configuration, e.g., voter’s ballot contains only Democrat contests Page 9Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, 2007 Secrecy of the ballot Secrecy of ballot must be protected at all phases Activation device records cannot be combined with other records to identify a ballot Exception made for provisional voting Page 10Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, 2007 Credentials and Tokens Sole purpose is for activating the ballot Token should be limited in size to what is needed If token re-used, must be cleared first Must be created by an authorized activation device such that… Vote-capture device can verify integrity of credential information Vote-capture device can verify it was created from an authorized activation device Can be done with shared cryptographic keys between vote- capture device and activation device Page 11Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, 2007 Connections to remote voter registration DBs Much TGDC discussion of this issue If the activation device is connected to a remote database, many potential security issues TGDC ultimately permitted this, but levied a number of security requirements Page 12Next VVSG Training

Oct 15-17, 2007 Connections to Remote DBs Activation device may connect ONLY to access or update a voter registration DB Network access cannot be used otherwise Cannot connect to a network of vote-capture devices AND remote voter registration DB at same time Must require authorization to connect, connection must be obvious to pollworker Capability for backup if remote connection fails Need wired connection to a firewall, no wireless on an epollbook. Page 13Next VVSG Training