DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Run IIb DZero PMG  Status overview, issues (Kotcher)  Schedule, project status (Freeman)  AOB Jon Kotcher Fermilab PMG February 25, 2003

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Run IIb Project Organization D0 Run IIb Project J. Kotcher, Project Manager R. Partridge, Deputy; V. O’Dell, Associate; W. Freeman, Assistant M. Johnson, Technical Coordinator A. Amorn-Vichet, Budget Officer; T. Erickson, Administration WBS 1.1 Silicon M. Demarteau G. Ginther Sensors R. Demina, F. Lehner Readout System A. Nomerotski, E. von Toerne QA, Testing, & Burn-in C. Gerber 1.1.3, Mechanics & Assembly W. Cooper, K. Krempetz Monitoring M. Corcoran, S. de Jong Production J. Fast Software & Simulation F. Rizatdinova, L Shabalina WBS 1.2 Trigger H. Evans D. Wood L1 Track Trigger M. Narain L1 Cal Upgrade M. Abolins, (H. Evans), P. LeDu L2  Upgrade R. Hirosky Silicon Track Trigger U. Heintz WBS 1.3 DAQ/Online S. Fuess P. Slattery L1 Cal/Track Match K. Johns Simulation M. Hildreth, E. Perez WBS 1.5 Installation R. Smith Silicon Installation Mechanical: H. Lubatti Electronics: L. Bagby, R. Sidwell Trigger Installation D. Edmunds WBS 1.4 Project Administration Administration (D. Wood) Administration (M. Demarteau) Control Systems F. Bartlett, G. Savage, V. Sirotenko Level 3 Systems D. Chapin, G. Watts DAQ/Online Management (P. Slattery) Network & Host Systems J. Fitzmaurice, S. Krzywdzinski George Ginther is new silicon co-leader Eckhard von Toerne is new silicon readout co-leader (replaces Bill Reay) Arisara Amorn-Vichet, new Budget Officer Kurt Krempetz, K. Hanagaki plenary speakers

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, WBS 1.1: Basic Silicon Design Choices  Six layer silicon tracker, divided into two radial regions u Inner layers: Layers 0 and 1 s Axial readout only s Mounted on integrated support s Assembled into one unit s Designed for V bias up to 700 V u Outer layers: Layers 2-5 s Axial and stereo readout s Stave support structure s Designed for V bias up to 300 V  Employ single sided silicon only, 3 sensor types u 2-chip wide for Layer 0 u 3-chip wide for Layer 1 u 5-chip wide for Layers 2-5  No element supported from beampipe

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Silicon Detector Elements  168 silicon staves: basic building block of outer layers  Supported in positioning bulkheads at z=0, z=610 mm Silicon Analogue cables Hybrid  Layer 0 Support structure: University of Washington Silicon Hybrid Digital cable  Layer 0/Layer 1 mated

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Silicon Layer 0 Support Structure University of Washington  First Layer 0 prototype carbon fiber support structure delivered to Fermilab for tests in January  Integrated grounding – kapton/copper mesh  Performs very well under deflection tests – major technical achievement Silicon Analogue cables Hybrid CMM head Mounted L0 structure Mounted L0 structure, ground mesh Clamps to inner carbon shell Balls for deflection measurements

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Prototype Mechanical Stave Prototype mechanical stave being thermally tested at SiDet Dec 18 ’02 integration milestone met Al-ceramic hybrid (dummy) Stereo silicon, axial mounted underneath Input cooling channel 10/10 (upper) 20/20 (lower) mechanical modules, concatenated

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Outer Layer Silicon Module Prototypes 20/20 axial module Silicon sensors 20/20 stereo hybrid SVX4 readout chip 20/20 axial hybrid  First outer layer electrical- grade (“20/20”) prototypes fabricated  Two types: axial & stereo readout  Each are 12 sensors long, ~100 mm in length  Stereo angle obtained by rotating sensors  Testing underway Digital cable

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Module Test Results Electrical tests of 20/20 axial module (10 chips) Charge injection Pedestal Unbonded chip Total/ random noise Bonded to single (dual) sensors

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Silicon Status

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, WBS 1.2: Trigger Upgrades Level 1 projects underway  Level 1 Calorimeter  Level 1 Cal-track matching  Level 1 Tracking  Trigger simulations Level 2 projects (not discussed here)  L2 Beta upgrade & STT upgrade  Later start in schedule  VTM’s procured for STT (part of larger order) WBS 1.2: Trigger Upgrade H. Evans (Columbia), D. Wood (Northeastern) WBS 1.2.1: Level 1 Calorimeter M.Abolins(MSU), H.Evans(Columbia), P.LeDu (Saclay) WBS 1.2.2: Level 1 Cal-track match K. Johns (Arizona) WBS 1.2.3: Level 1 Tracking M. Narain (Boston) WBS 1.2.4: Level 2 Beta upgrade R. Hirosky (Virginia) WBS 1.2.5: Level 2 STT upgrade U. Heintz (Boston) WBS 1.2.6: Trigger Simulation M. Hildreth (ND), E. Perez (Saclay)

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, WBS 1.2.1: Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade  Saclay u ADC+Digital Filter (ADF) u ADF timing distribution board u Analog splitter (for in- situ tests) u ADF Crate/backplane  Nevis u Trigger algorithm board (TAB) u Global Algorithm Board (GAB) u Crates for TAB/GAB u Test system for ADF-to-GAB cables  Michigan State u Interfacing to existing system, framework u Infrastructure L1 Cal/Track Match: University of Arizona

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Level 1 Trigger Highlights  Prototype design phase concluded for three major boards in Level 1 trigger upgrade: u Level 1 Calorimeter Trigger s ADC-Digital Filter Board (ADF) - Saclay s Trigger Algorithm Board (TAB) – Columbia University s 2/3 of the PCBs required for L1 Cal –Remaining Global Algorithm Boards (GAB) being completed u Level 1 Calorimeter/Track Match s Flavor Board (MTFB) u Layouts begun  Analog splitter installed during January shutdown in Level 1 Cal rack at DZero Assembly Building, Movable Counting House u Picks off in-situ signals from four trigger towers u Data will be taken, analyzed during next few months u Preparation for tests of full L1 Cal prototype chain (ADF, TAB, GAB), beginning this summer

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Analog Splitter: Saclay & MSU  Analog splitter: allows in-situ test of digital filtering with real signals u Designed and tested at Saclay u Shipped to MSU Dec 20 th : tested there u Installed in DØ L1Cal trigger (Run IIa) during current shutdown u Noise tests in progress u Tests with beam (w/ splitter vs. w/o splitter) to follow

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, WBS 1.2.2: Cal-Trk Match: Arizona  Uses “L1mu” electronics, apart from specialized “flavor board”  Flavor board (MTFB) prototype design >90% complete  Some procurements anticipated for next month  Approval was essential for keeping this on track Run IIa MTFB (scint flavor)

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, L1 CTT: Boston Univ.  Firmware design for target algorithm began in Nov  “front end” and “back end” code from Run IIa rewritten – latency reduced  Ongoing work on maps of single fibers

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Trigger Simulation Progress  Studies of effects of trigger tower thresholds on L1 Cal global sums (missing E T )  L1 Cal tau algorithm included in trigger simulation  Output of Run IIb L1 Cal interfaced to standard DZero framework simulation package  Simulation of Cal-Track matching progressing  Central Track Trigger (CTT) as-built geometry and beam offsets incorporated into simulation u Beam offsets up to ~1 mm do not effect efficiency of Run IIb equations

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Production Readiness Reviews (PRR)  First review: “Purple Card” - sequencer/hybrid interface PC card – held 1/30/03. Committee: u C. Gerber (UIC), J. Green (Fermilab), K. Hanagaki (Fermilab), S. Lager (Stockholm), R. Lipton (Fermilab, Chair), R. Sidwell (KSU) u Report submitted – ready to go  Next review: Outer layer silicon sensors, 3/6/03. Committee: u N. Bacchetta (PISA), B. Gobbi (NWestern), J. Ellison (UCR, Chair), R. Lipton (Fermilab), H. Sadrozinski (UCSC), S. Worm (Rutgers) u $1.5M order with Hamamatsu – procurement ready to move upon receiving nod from Committee. Costed in four lots. u Placement of order was second Run IIb DOE milestone (March 24) s Project target date: Feb 18 u PRR report due March 14, procurement immediately thereafter u Project is learning from such experiences

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Labor Cost Extracted from Schedule vs. Actuals (R&D) Dec + Jan (predicted) ~ Dec + Jan (observed) Actuals in FY02 k$ Scheduled labor in FY02 k$

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Current Conclusions on Labor from 1 st Quarter  We are using very different flavors of people than the schedule predicted  Rates for given flavor consistent with average rates used as input to project cost u actual pay ~ as used in schedule  Using more labor than we thought u 10% high in hours and cost  Actual cost within 1% of predicted  Above all very good…but even though we are using more labor, we are not keeping up with aggressive schedule in all cases u Comments to follow…

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Costs Loaded Into COBRA COBRA ready to go (see monthly report) Thanks to Rissa, Dale, Colleen, Dean

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Adhering to Schedule  Creating, maintaining a schedule and using it to monitoring progress is only initial step  Essential that next step be taken: extract lessons learned from slippages, implement corrective actions where possible. Anticipate project needs well in advance.  Project has begun to turn this corner  Schedule being taken with increasing seriousness, attentiveness by all principals  This is a major step, will continue until we’ve finished

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Miscellany, Conclusions  MoU/SoWs being generated project-wide u Overhead-free MoUs for silicon MRI in place for some time u First formal agreement just completed, Run IIb PO being generated (Louisiana Tech)  COBRA loaded, ready to use u Report on equipment costs only  Technical progress continues to be excellent  Beginning to truly manage to aggressive schedule – positive and important step  No change controls on horizon

DZero Run IIb PMG February 25, Keeping Run II(b) on the Map: Next Six Months  Experiments now directly participating in BD planning. Comes with a price: u Reviews (both sides of table), associated preparation quite extensive  Above demonstrates impact of current climate, + compressed schedule u Heavy emphasis on project management at all levels FebMarAprMayJunJulAug Accelerator Advisory Committee BD Long- Range Plan for Run II due to DOE Director’s Review of BD Long- Range Plan P5 Review of Run IIb Director’s Review of Run IIb DOE (Lehman) Review of Run IIb (CD-3b) DOE Review of Accelerator All information required by DOE for long-term assessment in hand at this point DOE Review of FNAL Program Monthly PMGs: Long-Range BD, Run IIb Green = Beams Div (BD) Brick = Run IIb Detector Projects Dates shown are latest est PAC