WP4: Assessing capacity for CO 2 storage in selected regions of China Jonathan Pearce 23 rd October 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Solution of Benchmark Problems for CO 2 Storage Min Jin, Gillian Pickup and Eric Mackay Heriot-Watt University Institute of Petroleum Engineering.
Advertisements

Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel © NERC All rights reserved Geological Storage Theme BGS progress.
DESIGNING A WATERFLOOD Designing a water flood involves both technical and economic consideration. Economic analysis are based on estimates of water.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
Coal to Liquids Plant Site Selection in WV Douglas G. Patchen October 25, 2007.
Field Demonstration of CO 2 Miscible Flooding in the Lansing-Kansas City Formation, Central Kansas Alan P. Byrnes (KGS, PM-BP1) Class II Revisited DE-AC26-00BC15124.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration in Sedimentary Basins Module 4: Sleipner Project Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University.
CO 2 Sequestration Catherine Peters Princeton University Deep Carbon Cycle Workshop May 15-17, 2008 Carnegie Institution Geophysical Laboratory.
TTI CO2 Sequestration in Geologic Formations Terralog Technologies USA, Inc. BP Hydrogen Energy CO2 Project.
Carbon Capture and Storage Climate Change and Sustainable Development: New Delhi, April 7-8, 2006 Pernille Holtedahl, PhD, Norad NORWAY.
C. Sequestration zones & relative costs. Lake Nyos, Cameroon CO 2 “burp” formed 400 yr ago in volcanic field formed 400 yr ago in volcanic field CO 2.
Moving Permian Basin Technology to the Gulf Coast: The Distribution of CO 2 EOR Potential in Gulf Coast Reservoirs Mark H. Holtz, Vanessa Núñez López,
Petroleum & Natural Gas Eng. Dept.
CO 2 Sequestration Options for California Larry Myer WESTCARB Technical Director California Energy Commission (916) ; ETAAC.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration Module IX: CO 2 Sequestration and Oil Recovery, Permian Basin, USA Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth.
David Cheng/Carbon Management GIS, LFEE, MIT Carbon Capture and Sequestration Analysis of Options WESTCARB Annual Meeting October 28, 2004 David Cheng.
Motivation and aims  Framework: exploitation of the huge potential of CO 2 in EOR and development of reliable sequestration processes.  Global objective:
1 Carbon Capture and Storage, CCS CCS is various methods for capturing and permanently storing anthropogenic CO 2 that would otherwise contribute to global.
Kingsley Dunham Centre Keyworth Nottingham NG12 5GG Tel © NERC All rights reserved CO 2 storage potential in India S. Holloway, A. Garg,
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
Carbon, Capture And Storage. Capture and Storage  Not quite this simple:
Robert C. Trautz Principal Technical Leader CREA Energy Innovation Summit Denver, Colorado October 27, 2014 Commercial CO 2 Storage: Around the Corner.
Dec.5, 2006 / Beijing China / 1. Dec.5, 2006 / Beijing China / 2 Sustainable Growth for Oil and Gas.
Resource Assessment of Oil & Gas, Coal-Bed Methane, and Geothermal Resources in Western Washington Department of Geology Portland State University M. Cummings,
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
CODATA 2006 Session B9 Clean Energy Recovery from Coal Objectives: Negative public feeling against Coal due to large CO 2 and other pollutants emission.
Reservoir Characterization Capstone Project Semester 1 PNG 490 – Team 26 April 29 th 2014.
1 Dr (Prof) A D Surridge Head: South African Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage Senior Manager: South African National Energy Research Institute
1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.
DOC ID © Chevron 2007 Chemical EOR Implementation for the Captain Field, UK 30 th IEA EOR Symposium and Workshop September 2009 Anette Poulsen, Chevron.
WOC 1 view on the focus and scope regarding CO 2 sequestration in WOC 1 (upstream sector) study area. (according to the experience of CO 2 problem study.
Economic assessment of the whole CCS technology cycle Ksenia Sidorova, PhD student Department of Organization and Management, National Mineral Resources.
West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
22 nd January 2008 UK-China Near Zero Emissions Coal Initiative Dr Matthew Webb Department for Environment Food And Rural Affairs, UK International Workshop.
1 Co-operation for the development of large scale CO 2 transport and storage infrastructure in the North Sea Rotterdam, 1 st July 2010 Harsh Pershad Shane.
Advanced Resources International Demonstration of a Novel, Integrated, Multi-Scale Procedure for High-Resolution 3D Reservoir Characterization and Improved.
Reserve Evaluation for Enhance Oil Recovery Purposes Using Dynamic Reserve Evaluation Model Woodside Research Facility GPO Box U 1987 Perth West Australia.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
Permanent CO 2 storage in depleted gas fields combined with CO 2 enhanced gas recovery (EGR) Idar Akervoll, SINTEF Petroleum, Trondheim Contribution to.
Enhanced Hydrocarbon Recovery Economic Analysis Presented to: West Coast Regional Partnership for Carbon Sequestration Sacramento, CA Presented by: Scott.
1 Xi Liang, David Reiner Judge Business School University of Cambridge International Conference on Climate Change Hong Kong May 29 th – 31 st 2007 Financing.
1 Carbon Capture and Storage Martin Blunt Department of Earth Science and Engineering Imperial College London.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
R K Jain. CO 2 emission responsible for global warming Development process to go unhalted. Ways and means to be found for controlling and abating CO 2.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Your name Your institute Date, place.
Member Reports on CO 2 Capture and Storage Related Activities China.
Delhi CCS R&D prorities CO 2 geological storage: Road Map, EOR, aquifers, mineral Stuart Haszeldine School of GeoSciences.
Southwest CO 2 Sequestration Partnership: Field Demonstrations of CO 2 Sequestration Exploring Carbon Science and Technology Options Western Regional Air.
CO 2 Storage Challenges to the Iron and Steel Industry John Gale General Manager IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Steel Institute VDEh Auditorium D ü sseldorf,
T HE RELEVANCE OF CCS AS A CLIMATE POLICY INSTRUMENT IN VIETNAM Presented by: Nhan T. Nguyen * (co-authors: Minh Ha-Duong and Didier Bonijoly) * Centre.
CO 2 -sequestration in abandoned coal mines Kris Piessens & Michiel Dusar Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Geological Survey of Belgium In order.
CO 2 storage capacity estimates for South Africa: The uncertainties and way forward J.H.A. Viljoen, M. Cloete, F.D.J. Stapelberg and N. Hicks.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
CO2-Prophet model based evaluation of CO2-EOR and storage potential
M idcontinent I nteractive D igital C arbon A tlas and R elational Data B ase James A. Drahovzal, Lawrence H. Wickstrom, Timothy R.Carr, John A. Rupp,
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
0 International Joint Study on CO2-EOR - Study on Applicability of CO2-EOR to Rang Dong Field, offshore Vietnam - Sunao Takagi, Komei Okatsu IEA Collaborative.
GSE - Gas Storage Europe1 GSE Investment Workshop “ Physical specificities of gas storage” Brussels, 24 May 2007.
Carbon Capture and Storage Potentials and Barriers to Deployment.
Geologic Sequestration: the Big Picture Estimation of Storage Capacity or How Big is Big Enough Susan Hovorka, Srivatsan Lakshminarasimhan, JP Nicot Gulf.
10/18/20161 Reserves Estimation and Classification.
Idar Akervoll, SINTEF Petroleum, Trondheim
Challenges in Global CCS Projects
Advance Seismic Interpretation Project
Status and Prospect on CO2 Capture and Sequestration in China
CO2 EOR and Sequestration Technologies in PetroChina
Dana M Abdulbaqi, Saudi Aramco Carol Dahl, Colorado School of Mines
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
Pitchfork Field Study Rochak Karki, Dhruba Panta, Tayyab Parvez, Rebecca Podio and Omair Sadiq.
Presentation transcript:

WP4: Assessing capacity for CO 2 storage in selected regions of China Jonathan Pearce 23 rd October 2008

Outline Introduction to WP4 Objectives Regional studies Site assessments Outputs

WP4 Partners UK British Geological Survey (BGS) BP Heriot Watt University Shell China China University of Petroleum (CUP) – Beijing and Huadong Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) China United Coalbed Methane Co Ltd (CUCBM) Jilin Oilfield PetroChina

WP4: Storage Options Objectives: –Build capacity in China for evaluating storage potential and performing appropriate first stage site characterisation for site selection. –Estimate the future potential for CO 2 storage. –Mapping of CO 2 sources and potential sinks will be carried out. Tasks: –Regional basin assessments of storage potential for EOR, ECBM and saline formations –Site-selection and assessments for demonstration of storage. –GIS-based decision support tool will be developed.

Storage Options Saline formations –Songliao Basin As part of enhanced oil recovery operations –Songliao Basin (Jilin and Daqing oilfields) –Subei Basin (onshore only, Jiangsu oilfield) As part of enhanced coalbed methane production –Qinshui Basin

WP4 Progress WP4 launch meeting in January 2008 –Agreed timetable for project –Agreed basins for assessment Basin methodologies workshop in May 2008 –Agreed methodologies for regional basin assessments –Reviewed initial results for all regions Basin Assessment Conference in July 2008 –Joint meeting with COACH and GeoCapacity –Reviews of preliminary results for all current projects estimating storage capacities in China. Interim report completed August 2008

Resource-Reserve pyramid Carbon sequestration leadership forum (CSLF) 2007 Theoretical Capacity – Assumes entire space is accessible and utilised to its full capacity. This is the maximum upper limit for storage potential. Effective Capacity – (previously known as realistic capacity) Similar to theoretical capacity, but with a number of geological and engineering limitations applied. Practical Capacity – subset of effective capacity which is gained by considering non-geological components (e.g. economics, regulation, legal infrastructure). Matched Capacity – subset of practical capacity and is obtained by matching sources to suitable sites.

Daqing Oil Field discovered in 1959 Jilin Oil Field discovered in 1959

Note: No net to gross ratio applied Field-specific estimate 1 (Mt) CSLF effective capacity (Mt) Oil field1%2%10% Lamadian Sa’ertu Xingshugang Gaotaizi Taipingtun Putaohua Aobaota total Daqing oilfield estimated capacities 1 CUP methodology - Assumes volumetric replacement for oil and dissolution in both oil and formation water

Jillin Oilfields estimated capacities Note: No net to gross ratio applied CSLF effective capacity (Mt)Field-specific estimate 1 (Mt) Oil field Hongang Xinli Mutou Qian’an Yingtai totals CUP methodology - Assumes volumetric replacement for oil and dissolution in both oil and formation water

CUP methodology assumptions Assumptions: –Closed oil reservoir, sealed by faults and impermeable layers –When CO 2 is injected, oil and water are produced at the wells and the pressure is maintained –Pore volume of aquifers is equal to that of overlying oil field (data on aquifers is often not available publicly)

① Jinhu ② Gaoyou ③ Qintong ④ Hai'an ⑤ Baiju ⑥ Yancheng ⑦ Funing ⑧ Liannan ⑨ Lianbei ⑩ Hongze ① ⑩ ⑨ ⑧ ⑦ ⑥ ⑤ ④ ③② Troughs Caoshe Oilfield Binhai Uplift Yanfu Depression Dongtai Depression Jianhu Uplift --Oilfield

Jiangsu oilfield is operated by Sinopec, with light to medium oils, good for near-miscible CO 2 flooding There are 34 proved big oilfields in Jiangsu Oilfield, most oil reservoirs are meters deep Cumulative proven OOIP is Million tons Proven OGIP is over 8 billion m 3 Developed and producing reserves is 186 Million tons. Several CO 2 miscible displacements have been tried in the field with good EOR response. Jiangsu Oilfield

Assessment results 108 oil reservoirs of Jiangsu Oilfield have been assessed. –Total CO 2 storage potential is Mt. 75 reservoirs are suitable for CO 2 EOR. –Calculation assumes CO2 trapping during EOR process only –Storage capacity of Mt during the EOR process 33 reservoirs are suitable for CO 2 storage. –Based on volume of recoverable reserves –Storage capacity of 4.70 Mt

Assessment results For all the 108 reservoirs in Jiangsu oilfield, the total OOIP is Mt, and For the 75 reservoirs suitable for CO2 EOR, the OOIP is Mt, and the CO2 storage potential during EOR process is Mt. the incremental oil production is 4.67 Mt, and the incremental recovery factor is 5.71%. That is equivalent to 0.3t oil due by 1t CO2 injection. For the 33 reservoirs unsuitable for CO2 EOR, the OOIP is Mt, the CO2 storage potential in depleted reservoirs is 4.70 Mt.

Based on OGIP of 8x10 9 m 3 we can further estimate If we assume: –OGIP equates to a useable pore volume and gas is produced –The OGIP figure is at surface conditions and therefore is corrected for volume in reservoir (a gas expansion factor is assumed to be 200 based on North Sea experience) –A recovery factor of 70% (based on North Sea experience) and 700 kgm -3 CO 2 density Then total storage volume is 20 Mt This may refined if further site-specific data becomes available.

Stratum of Songliao Basin main saline aquifer: Qingshankou Fm well1 well2 well3 K2qn K2n K2q K2y The stratigraphic sequences are dominated by Cretaceous fluvial and lacustrine strata with volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks. 5 hydrostratigraphic units classified from bottom to top: JD, K2q, K2qn, K2y, K2n

Effective storage capacity of Deep saline aquifers in Songliao Basin (Storage coefficient of 1–2–10% applied)  Songliao Basin (260,000 km 2 )  Average height 380m  Average reservoir porosity 10%  CO 2 density at reservoir conditions 700 kg/m 3  Total regional effective storage capacity: Note: No net to gross ratio applied CSLF effective capacity (Mt) 1%2%10%

Next steps… Finalise basin reports Site assessments and reports Recommended sites for feasibility studies in Phase 2

Conclusions Jilin, Daqing and Jiangsu oilfields offer variable potential for CO 2 storage –They provide some storage potential as niche opportunities for CO 2 -EOR – especially in Jilin and Daqing –Small pilot CO 2 -EOR projects are already being undertaken –As such may provide incentives for a small-scale pilot demonstration of CCS. Theoretical calculations for a selected saline aquifer suggests that the Qingshankou Formation could offer very large storage capacities –However, this is based on very low data density (concentrated around oilfields) –Further primary data acquisition is necessary to refine this estimate. –Comparisons with underlying reservoirs suggest specific field geology likely to be equally complex.

Jonathan Pearce British Geological Survey, United Kingdom. Tel: +44 (0)115