Impact of Photonic Integration on Optical Services Serge Melle VP Technical Marketing, Infinera.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Next-Generation ROADMs
Advertisements

A Possible New Dawn for the Future GÉANT Network Architecture
2006 © SWITCH 1 TNC'06 Panel Presentation Myths about costs of circuit vs. packet switching Simon Leinen.
ONE PLANET ONE NETWORK A MILLION POSSIBILITIES Barry Joseph Director, Offer and Product Management.
Infinera: Integración Fotónica, presente y futuro. Manuel Morales, Director Técnico Infinera España y Portugal.
Wavelength Routed Networks Wavelength Assignment Wavelength Conversion Cost Implications Network Modeling.
SMUCSE 8344 Optical Networks Introduction. SMUCSE 8344 Why Optical? Bandwidth Low cost ($0.30/yard) Extremely low error rate ( vs for copper.
Key Network Architecture Enablers for Wavelength-on-Demand and L1VPN Services Chris Liou, Infinera Vijay Vusirikala, Infinera.
Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing Food For The Internet.
DWDM GMPLS Deployment Experience Joint Tech Workshop July 2007 George Frank, Ph.D. Infinera.
Optical Circuit Switching over Wavelength Division Multiplexing Based on the article: “ Transparent Optical Switches: Technology Issues and Challenges.
Optical communications & networking - an Overview
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Reconfigurable Optical Networks using WSS based ROADMs Steven D. Robinson VP, Product Management  Five Essential Elements of the.
Serge Melle VP, Technical Marketing Infinera
Don McAuley Senior Optical Pre-Sales Engineer Interoute Barnard’s Inn London R ESEARCH N ETWORKING FROM AN O PERATOR’S PERSPECTIVE.
RIT Campus Data Network. General Network Statistics Over 23,000 wired outlets Over 14,500 active switched ethernet ports > 250 network closets > 1,000.
Dec. 6th, 1999Globecom’99 IP Over DWDM : The Next Step Niall Robinson Director - Photonics Systems Integration Qtera Corporation Building.
Lappeenranta University of Technology Valery Naumov Telecommunications Laboratory Tel: “Why Do We Need WDM Networks?”
Page 1 Page 1 Technology and Architecture to Enable the Explosive Growth of the Internet Abu (Sayeem) Reaz University of California, Davis, USA Group Presentation.
® IP over ???? ® GLOBECOM ‘99 December 6, ® Globecom ‘99 December 6, 1999OutlineOutline Concentrate on the network core Deficiencies with traditional.
An introduction to: WDM for IP/MPLS service provider networks Anders Enström Product Manager Transmode Systems.
TDC 461: Wide Area Network Services DePaul University 22 May, 2001.
Transport SDN: Key Drivers & Elements
The Optical Communications Market
1 Introduction to Optical Networks. 2 Telecommunications Network Architecture.
Selecting a WAN Technology Lecture 4: WAN Devices &Technology.
Workshop IP/Optical; Chitose, Japan; 9-11 July 2002 OTN Equipment and Deployment in Today’s Transport Networks Session 5 Dr. Ghani AbbasQ9/15 Rapporteur.
International infrastructure outsource models Eckart Zollner Safnog 2 April 2015.
Peering, network sharing, interconnects Eckart Zollner September 2014.
Lighting up the metro backbone to enable advanced services
1 | Infinera Copyright 2013 © Intelligent Transport Network Manuel Morales Technical Director Infinera.
1 | Infinera Copyright 2013 © Infinera's Photonic Integrated Circuits (PICs) Intelligent Transport Network By Dr. Abdul Hyee.
1 Reliable high-speed Ethernet and data services delivery Per B. Hansen ADVA Optical Networking February 14, 2005.
Public TeliaSonera International Carrier Daniel Sjoberg, Reykjavik, August 25th Bringing knowledge, quality and stability to the communications industry.
TERENA Networking Conference 2004, Rhodes, Greece, June Differentiated Optical Services and Optical SLAs Afrodite Sevasti Greek Research and.
TTM1 – 2013: Core networks and Optical Circuit Switching (OCS)
Valentino Cavalli Workshop, Bad Nauheim, June Ways and means of seeing the light Technical opportunities and problems of optical networking.
Fujitsu Proprietary and Confidential All Rights Reserved, ©2006 Fujitsu Network Communications Simplicity and Automation in Reconfigurable Optical Networks.
Optical Networks Division 1 Role of Dynamic Optical Networks in Transitioning to IP Centric Architectures Emanuel Nachum Vice President, Marketing ECI.
Metro/regional optical network architectures for Internet applications Per B. Hansen, Dir. Bus. Dev. Internet2’s Spring Member Meeting May 3, 2005.
Intorduction to Lumentis
© Ciena Corporation The Path to 100 G Ethernet Martin Nuss VP & Chief Technologist.
1 State of the Industry – Optical Networking Mark E. Allen Infinera Corporation.
17575_03_2003 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optical Networking: From Photons to Packets Rajiv Ramaswami VP/GM Optical Technology Group.
1 Dynamic Service Provisioning in Converged Network Infrastructure Muckai Girish Atoga Systems.
Five Essential Elements for Future Regional Optical Networks Harold Snow Sr. Systems Architect, CTO Group.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CISCO CONFIDENTIAL Advancing the Carrier IP/MPLS Edge Routing Technology Group Cisco Systems, Inc. April.
Reconfigurable Optical Mesh and Network Intelligence Nazar Neayem Alcatel-Lucent Internet 2 - Summer 2007 Joint Techs Workshop Fermilab - Batavia, IL July.
1 Why Optical Layer Protection? Optical layer provides lightpath services to its client layers (e.g., SONET, IP, ATM) Protection mechanisms exist in the.
Metro/regional optical network architectures for Internet applications Per B. Hansen, Dir. Bus. Dev. Joint Techs Workshop July 18, 2005.
Presented By: Gavin Worden Leased Lines vs. Internet Based VPNs.
Rob Adams, VP Product Marketing/Product Line Management From Infrastructure to Equipment to Ongoing Operations Reducing the Cost of Optical Networking.
Burst Transmission, Burst Switching and Dynamic Circuit Switching Prof. Leonid Kazovsky, PNRL Stanford presented by 리준걸 INC Lab. Seoul Nat’l.
The Dawn of the Terabit Age 100G and 1T Transport Architectures Geoff Bennett: Director, Solutions & Technology.
© 2001 Caspian Networks, Inc. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Internet Intelligence and Traffic Growth Lawrence G. Roberts Chairman & CTO Caspian.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
The Internet2 Network and LHC Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 Given by Rich Carlson LHC Meeting 25.
The Internet2 Network and LHC Rick Summerhill Director Network Research, Architecture, and Technologies Internet2 LHC Meeting 23 October 2006 FERMI Lab,
Networks ∙ Services ∙ People Mian Usman IP Network Architect, GÉANT TNC16 13 th June 2016 GÉANT Transport Network Evolution.
The way forward for telecoms services Jeremy Steventon-Barnes Data Service Development
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Driving Architectural Change in Cloud Scale Transport Networks
Reconfigurable Optical Mesh and Network Intelligence
Optical Transport Network (OTN) Equipment Market
BASIC OVERVIEW OF AN ALL OPTICAL INTERNET
Ethernet Solutions for Optical Networks
Flexible Transport Networks
Alcatel Confidential and Proprietary
Optical communications & networking - an Overview
Presentation transcript:

Impact of Photonic Integration on Optical Services Serge Melle VP Technical Marketing, Infinera

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 2 Internet Backbone Growth  Industry consensus indicates a sustainable growth rate of 75% to 100% per year in aggregate traffic demand  Traffic increased more than 10,000x from 1990 to 2000  Traffic projected to increase an additional 1,000x from 2000 to 2010 [1]K. G. Coffman and A. M. Odlyzko, ‘Growth of the Internet’, Optical Fiber Telecommunications IV B: Systems and Impairments, I. P. Kaminow and T. Li, eds. Academic Press, 2002, pp

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 3 The Future Belongs to Tb/s Links  Carriers deployed Nx10 Gb/s networks several years ago  Now evaluating deployment of (Nx) 40 Gb/s router networks  Current Backbone growth rates, if sustained, will require IP link capacity to scale to > 1 Tb/s by 2010

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 4 Scalability Challenges  Service scaling:  Evolution to 40G and 100GbE services  Network scaling:  >1Tb/s per fiber  Nodal scaling  System size for >Tb/s nodes  Operations  Deployment, fibers, spares,

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | Gb/s Transmit 100 Gb/s Receive Single WDM channel times 32, 40 or 80 wavelengths WDM Systems Today

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | Gb/s Transmit 100 Gb/s Receive 100Gb/s Transmit 100Gb/s Receive Photonic Integrated Circuit Innovation 5mm  DIRECT BENEFITS:  Reduce size, power, cost and improve reliability over discrete optics  STRATEGIC BENEFITS:  Affordable OEO conversion re-enables digital reconfigurability at every node  Order-of-magnitude in capacity deployment & scalability  Result: Lower CapEx, lower OpEx, more flexible reconfigurable optical network

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 7 Impact of PIC Technology Conventional WDM:  Capacity deployed one lambda at a time  OEO only at network edge  Network service tied to the wavelength  Managing bandwidth occurs elsewhere PIC-based WDM:  Capacity deployed 100G at a time  OEO at all service locations  De-couple service layer from the transport layer  Integrate DWDM with digital service switching Transponder TribLineTrib Line

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 8 How PIC Capacity Is Managed  100G PIC = 10 x 10G lambdas = 40 x ODU1  Sub-wavelength bandwidth management maximizes service delivery flexibility  Super-wavelength bandwidth management supports 40G and 100G services Scalability Flexibility 4 x ODU1 per 10G 10- x 10G

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 9 PIC Capacity Scalability  Increase PIC scalability through:  More channels (ie: from 10 to 20 lambda or more)  Higher bit rates (ie: from 10Gb/s to 20Gb/s to 40Gb/s)  Also increasing WDM line capacity to >1Tb/s per fiber Scalability Flexibility 20- x 20G

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | Tbit/s DWDM Large-Scale PIC Transmitter …40 channels x 40 Gb/s Announced at OFC 2006…

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 11 Service Opportunities New Service Opportunities Bandwidth on Demand Layer 1 Optical VPNs UNI-based inter-network signaling Speed as a Sales Advantage Transition to Ethernet New Transport Services 40G and 100GbE Restorable bandwidth Sub-lambda Switching

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 12 Short Term Capacity Lease “Pay for Connectivity Only When You Need It” Optical Transport “Cloud” 10G “Port” Phase 1: Human provisioning Phase 2: GMPLS UNI automated provisioning UNI

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 13 Layer 1 VPN “A secure, private optical network without owning physical assets” EMS Customer 1 Customer 2 Complementary to a dynamically allocated service GMPLS

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 14 DB 1 and 10GbE Lightpaths “Ethernet cost with SDH Manageability and Quality” Optical Transport “Cloud” DB  10GbE LAN PHY   10GbE: LAN PHY preferred to save router/switch port cost  Full transparency  Optional restoration (differentiate vs. “wavelength” service)

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 15 40G Super-Lambda Service 40G IP Backbone Without Re-Architecting the Optical Network  Full 40G link utilization without 40G WDM link engineering or cost  Common transport network supports 40G router-router traffic  40G service using either 1 x 40G or 4 x 10G router blades  Optional GMPLS restoration maximizes service SLAs OC-768/STM-256 capacity router-to-router 4 x 10G across the optical network Optical Transport “Cloud” 40G over 4-port 10G 1-port 40G

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 16 GMPLS-based transport system GMPL S = DWDM terminal = ROADM or WSS Static Transport GMPLS-enabled In case of failure, technician must restore service. Outage may last minutes or hours. If spare bandwidth is available, GMPLS reroutes, providing a “quick fix” at no additional cost. Using GMPLS Restoration for Lower MTTR More Robust “Wave” Services

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | 17 Speed as a Sales Advantage “I Can Deliver This Circuit Faster Than My Competitor”  Not a new service, but an area for differentiation  Many carriers seeing equipment lead times of 8-16 weeks, and quoting 2-5 month lead times on 10G wave services  Capacity deployed 100G at a time significantly shortens service delivery lead times  “When we need new capacity, our IT group orders the circuit from three carriers. Whoever delivers first gets the business.” --Comment from Major Bank  “When we need new capacity, our IT group orders the circuit from three carriers. Whoever delivers first gets the business.” --Comment from Major Bank

Infinera Confidential and Proprietary | Gb/s Transmit 100 Gb/s Receive Integration: Heart of a New Strategy

Thank You