LOFAR for Pulsars Ben Stappers JBCA, Manchester. Outline:  LOFAR: briefly what we need from LOFAR  Pros and cons of low-frequency observations  How.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radio and Gamma-Ray Beams from Pulsars R. N. Manchester CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science Australia Telescope National Facility, Sydney Summary Pulse profiles.
Advertisements

Using a DPS as a Coherent Scatter HF Radar Lindsay Magnus Lee-Anne McKinnell Hermanus Magnetic Observatory Hermanus, South Africa.
Primary results of polarization survey of large-SNRs at 6cm Li Xiao, XiaoHui Sun, Chen Wang, WeiBin Shi, Wolfgang Reich, JinLin Han Partner Group of MPIfR.
Measuring Dispersion in Signals from the Crab Pulsar Jared Crossley National Radio Astronomy Observatory Tim Hankins & Jean Eilek New Mexico Tech Jared.
7/26/12W. Majid1 Crab Giant Pulses W. Majid *, S. Ellingson (PI), C. Garcia-Miro, T. Kuiper, J. Lazio, S. Lowe, C. Naudet, D. Thompson, K. Wagstaff * Jet.
Pulsars with LWA1 Paul S. Ray and Sean Cutchin Naval Research Laboratory 2012 July 26 Basic research in radio astronomy at NRL is supported by NRL/ONR.
SKAMP - the Molonglo SKA Demonstrator M.J. Kesteven CSIRO ATNF, T. J. Adams, D. Campbell-Wilson, A.J. Green E.M. Sadler University of Sydney, J.D. Bunton,
Pulsar Timing with the GBT Scott Ransom National Radio Astronomy Observatory.
The Transient Radio Sky to be Revealed by the SKA Jim Cordes Cornell University AAS Meeting Washington, DC 8 January 2002.
Discovery (?) for new population of isolated neutron star “ Transient radio bursts from rotating neutron star ” M.A. McLaughlin et al., Nat. Feb. 16, 2006.
A bright millisecond radio burst of Extragalactic origin Duncan Lorimer, Matthew Bailes, Maura McLaughlin, David Narkevic and Froney Crawford Science (in.
The Transient Universe: AY 250 Spring 2007 Existing Transient Surveys: Radio I: Pulsars Geoff Bower.
The Strongly Relativistic Double Pulsar and LISA Vicky Kalogera Physics & Astronomy Dept with Chunglee Kim (NU) Duncan Lorimer (Manchester)
Panorama of the Universe: Daily all-sky surveys with the SKA John D. Bunton, CSIRO TIP, Ronald D. Ekers, CSIRO ATNF and Elaine M. Sadler, University of.
New observations of three AXPs at low radio frequencies Daria Teplykh & V.M. Malofeev, A.E. Rodin, S.V. Logvinenko. Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Pulsar broadening measurements at low frequencies with LOFAR Kimon Zagkouris University of Oxford In collaboration with the LOFAR Pulsar Working Group.
FAST Low Frequency Pulsar Survey Youling Yue ( 岳友岭 ) FAST Project, NAOC PKU Astrophysics Colloquium 2012.
Star Formation Research Now & With ALMA Debra Shepherd National Radio Astronomy Observatory ALMA Specifications: Today’s (sub)millimeter interferometers.
The Effect of Solar Wind on Pulsar Observations Xiaopeng YOU Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Aristeidis Noutsos The Galactic Magnetic Field from Pulsar RMs and the Low-Frequency Arrays Aristeidis Noutsos Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Manchester,
Detection of Giant pulses from pulsar PSR B Smirnova T.V. Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory of ASC FIAN Pushchino Radio Astronomy.
PULSARS & TRANSIENT SOURCES Pushing the Envelope with SKA Jim Cordes, Cornell 28 Feb 2000  Frontiers of Neutron Star Science  Complete census of transient.
Random Media in Radio Astronomy Atmospherepath length ~ 6 Km Ionospherepath length ~100 Km Interstellar Plasma path length ~ pc (3 x Km)
Long-term monitoring of RRAT J HU HuiDong Urumqi Observatory, NAOC July 27, 2009 Rotating Radio Transients Observation.
Solar observation modes: Commissioning and operational C. Vocks and G. Mann 1. Spectrometer and imaging modes 2. Commissioning proposals 3. Operational.
Mean pulse profiles and spectra at the low frequencies Malov O.I., Malofeev V.M. Malov O.I., Malofeev V.M. Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory.
Which dipoles to use to optimize survey speed? –What tapering? –Trade-off between sensitivity, FOV and low side-lobe levels –Station beam stability, pointing.
Jet/environment interactions in FR-I and FR-II radio galaxies Judith Croston with Martin Hardcastle, Mark Birkinshaw and Diana Worrall.
Recent Results and the Future of Radio Afterglow Observations Alexander van der Horst Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek University of Amsterdam.
Pulsar Searching + Receivers Matthew Bailes (CAASTRO), FPGAs: Peter Mc Mahon, Terry Fibila, Jonathon Kocz. CPUs: Willem van Straten, Andrew Jameson, Mike.
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Expanded Very Large Array Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope Very Long Baseline Array Extragalactic Source.
Radio Observations of X-ray Binaries : Solitary and Binary Millisecond Pulsars Jeong-Sook Kim 1 & Soon-Wook Kim 2  Department of Space Science and Astronomy.
Finding Fast Pulsars Today andTomorrow Pulsar Timing Array - A Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Telescope July 21-23, 2005 Jason Hessels McGill University.
Giant Radio Pulses Radio Properties Mechanism High Energy Properties With Astrosat & LOFT.
Single Pulse Investigations at the Decameter Range O.M. Ulyanov 1, V.V. Zakharenko 1, V.S. Nikolaenko 1, A. Deshpande 2, M.V. Popov 3, V.A. Soglasnov 3,
Binary Pulsar Coalescence Rates and Detection Rates for Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunglee Kim, Vassiliki Kalogera (Northwestern U.), and Duncan R.
Pulsar surveys at Arecibo and Green Bank David Champion Gravity Wave Meeting, Marsfield, Dec 2007.
Investigation of different types radio sources by IPS method at 111MHz S.A.Tyul’bashev Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory, Astro Space Center of P.N.Lebedev.
RadioAstron space VLBI mission: early results. XXVIII GA IAU, Beijing, August RadioAstron space VLBI mission: early results. XXVIII GA IAU, Beijing,
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Rotating Radio Transients Maura McLaughlin West Virginia University 12 September 2007.
Pulsars: The radio/gamma-ray Connection Prospects for pulsar studies with AGILE and GLAST Synergy with radio telescopes –Timing and follow-up –Radio vs.
Pulsar luminosity distribution in 47-Tuc Tim Connors, Vacation student University of Sydney.
Aristeidis Noutsos University of Manchester. The LOFAR Ionosphere See Ger’s talk, in Hamburg last year. Variations of ~3 rad m –2 were observed in the.
Parsec-scale Constraints on the ISM From the Millisecond Pulsars in Terzan5 Scott Ransom (NRAO Charlottesville) Fernando Camilo (Columbia) Paulo Freire.
Radio Sounding of the Near-Sun Plasma Using Polarized Pulsar Pulses I.V.Chashei, T.V.Smirnova, V.I.Shishov Pushchino Radio Astronomy Obsertvatory, Astrospace.
I.F.Malov Pushchino Radio Astronomy Observatory, Lebedev Physical Institute RUSSIA Do «magnetars» really exist? AXPs and SGRs Magnetars (dP.
Low Frequency Array (LOFAR): The French LOFAR Super Station Helmut O. Rucker Commission for Astronomy Austrian Academy of Sciences ÖAW, Vienna, Dec 14.
VHE  -ray Emission From Nearby FR I Radio Galaxies M. Ostrowski 1 & L. Stawarz 1,2 1 Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University 2 Landessternwarte.
Reflection distance,, and the change in the electron number density,, at the reflecting plasma boundary: We searched for but found no echo in simultaneously.
Binary Compact Object Inspiral: Rate Expectations Vicky Kalogera with Chunglee Kim Richard O’Shaughnessy Tassos Fragkos Physics & Astronomy Dept.
Ben Stappers (ASTRON) LOFAR 101 Pizza Lunch. LOFAR Technical Concept LOFAR is a very large distributed radio telescope: LOFAR is a very large distributed.
Observational constraints on theories of pulsations Can we expect to learn something fundamental about neutron stars from their variable radio emission?
FAST and the neutron star zoo Patrick Weltevrede Jodrell Bank Centre of Astrophysics University of Manchester.
Science Drivers for Small Missions in High Energy Astrophysics Luigi PiroCAS-ESA Workshop – Chengdu Feb. 25, 2014 Science Drivers for Small Missions in.
Collaborators Peking University Guojun Qiao, Renxin Xu, Jiguang Lu, Kejia Lee Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology Yuanjie Du China West Normal University.
An Infestation of RRATs Maura McLaughlin West Virginia University 10 May 2013 Latest Results from the Neutron Star Laboratory May
Pulsars with LOFAR The Low-Frequency Array Ben Stappers ASTRON, Dwingeloo With assistance from Jason Hessels, Michael Kramer, Joeri van Leeuwen and Dan.
A Fan Beam Model for Radio Pulsars Hongguang Wang (王洪光) Center for Astrophysics, Guangzhou University 广州大学天体物理中心 Fast Pulsar Symposium 4.
p no Bhaswati Bhattacharyya On behalf of GHRSS team
The LOFAR Transients Key Project
Searching FRB with Jiamusi-66m Radio Telescope
“Astrometry through beer goggles” Adam Deller Swinburne University
Pulsar and Transient Science with the 12m Antenna
The High Time Resolution Universe Survey Backend
Observations of pulsar microstructure with the GMRT
T.G.Arshakian MPI für Radioastronomie (Bonn)
Rotating Radio Transients
Pulse Nulling and Subpulse Drifting Properties in Pulsars
Presentation transcript:

LOFAR for Pulsars Ben Stappers JBCA, Manchester

Outline:  LOFAR: briefly what we need from LOFAR  Pros and cons of low-frequency observations  How to find new pulsars with LOFAR  How many pulsars will we find?  What about Millisecond Pulsars?  Transient “pulsars” and how to catch them  Studying individual Pulsars  First Pulsar with LOFAR  Conclusions

Pulsar Survey with LOFAR: The Challenge Need to maximise FoV but LOFAR is a sparse array! M = N * FoV * (A/T) 2 * BW * ( -1.8 ) 2 D core = 2 km, D station = 30 m < 25 stations in the core N CTA > 22 (50/E) (15/r station ) 2 (r core /1000) 2 SOLUTION: Either add telescopes incoherently or have many TABs BUT: at least 35 times more data throughput and signal processing. On the other hand: It does give significantly better positions. Due to shorter integrations required also possibly less total resources Sensitivity scales as:

The Spectra Kuzmin & Losovsky 2001 Deshpande & Radhakrishnan 1992 (34.5 MHz data) Maron et al 2000 Typical pulsar spectra When 34 MHz data incl. MSP spectra, no turnover?

Pulsar Survey with LOFAR: Optimal Freq. Max(M = N * FoV * (A/T) 2 * BW * ( -  ) 2 ) FoV scales as 2 A eff scales as -2 above 140 MHz and 2 below Pulsar flux scales (on avg) as -1.5 (i.e.  = -1.5) T should be dominated by T sky and it scales as -2.6 Extra considerations for: Dispersion increases as we go to lower but we can correct for it. Scattering is the biggest problem -4.4 limits distance to which detect pulsars T scatt = 5.2 X DM 3.8 s at 140 MHz van leeuwen & Stappers 2007

Pulsar Survey with LOFAR:How Many? Model Parameters all from previous page model of pulsar luminosity (v. impt) model of birth periods & sky distribution sky seen from LOFAR in NL location dependent sensitivity of LOFAR With 60 minute pointings LOFAR could detect at least 1000 new pulsars in the Northern sky in just 60 days of observing. Survey time reduced if more Beams are available In the core. Depend. on lum fn. longer pointings not necc. more PSRs found. If use TABs pointings shorter. More than 22 TABs = survey faster or can get back some of lost sensitivity. 90% efficient 100% efficient 12 sigma, 50*24 tile stations, 80% of 32 MHz

Pulsar Survey with LOFAR: Where? Pulsars detected are mainly nearby due to scattering! Lorimer et al 2006: model PMB pulsars =>80% pulsars have L 1400 > 1 mJy kpc 2 (not SNR PSRs) If L limit exists similar to that of Lyne et al of L 400 = 1 mJy kpc 2 then LOFAR will see ALL pulsars beamed in our direction out to d = 1.4 kpc! Alternatively LOFAR will probe the limit of the luminosity function in great detail! Constraining the dN/dL is vital for knowing how many radio pulsars/NSs there are.

A full census of radio emitting NSs! Sources apparently seen at low frequencies Geminga like pulsars AXPs/SGRs Pulsars that are brighter at low frequencies Steep spectrum (>-3,B0943) nearby MSPs (unbroken spectra) Long pointings mean sensitive to more transient NSs RRATs (long pointings, low-DM) Sometimes a pulsar sources (on 10%) Radio emitting magnetars Along with “normal” pulsars sensitive to:

Results 9/16 MSPs were detected J already scattered at 250 MHz No clear indication why others not seen (flux/scatt) B detected, worst DM/P combination

J vs J P= DM =  = 0.12 ms (150MHz)  = 28 ms (116MHz) measured Not seen from MHz P= DM =  = 0.06 ms (150MHz)  = 0.05 ms (116 MHz) measured NE2001

Profile Evolution PSR J PSR J PSR B PSR J PSR J see and cf. KL99, KL01 and KL96 Strong component evolution but little evolution of width with frequency

Extragalactic pulsars LOFAR will be sensitive to normal and giant pulse emission from nearby galaxies. In M33, 10 hour obsn can detect pulsars with L> 57 Jy kpc 2, 10 pulsars known Brightest could be obs’d out to 1.2 Mpc Depending on SI can detect GPs out to Mpc van Leeuwen & Stappers 2007 Crab Giant Pulse observed with the WSRT LFFEs at 141 MHz. LOFAR will have at Least 30 times sensitivity, 12 times BW

The All-sky monitor: Transients ASM will make images of sky on logarithmically spaced Intervals from 1s to 1000s Dedicated mode in both LBA And HBA can see almost all of CE beam, thus LARGE piece of SKY! Other times will piggy back using available resources. Instant alerting system available to community. RRATs bright enough to see Nullers still show flux var. AXP/Magnetars long periods! GCRT-like sources long P also 1s relatively long for NSs, BUT:

Spectra over full LOFAR range simultaneously (30-240). need multiple telescopes to do at high frequency simultaneity important due to scint. Etc…. Important physics in break/non-break with regard to emission mech. Large sample, check stats, e.g.  &  Do MSP spectra, really show less turnover Checks of RFM, aberration, retardation? Simult. wide frequency obs, DM variations Polarisation Profile evolution (incl. high freqs.) PSRs B and showing Std. RFM and non-std RFM. Izvekova etal 1993 Sensitive! 1/4 PSRs HB, 1/5 PSRs LB Plasma dynamics: -struct, drifting Polarisation, simult with HFs. Single pulses from MSPs! => Nulling/Moding/Drifting Pulsar Emission Physics PSR B  scatt ~ s Single pulses SNR~12

Plasma and the ISM A dynamic and secondary spectra for PSR B showing the influence of ~1 AU size structures in the ISM with electron densities of ~200. Hill et al Study local ISM via DS & SS Can monitor these variations Excellent probe of local electron density via large number of PSRs Unique studies of scattering RMs will be measurable -- B gal. Can also be used to study these properties of the e-gal pulsars. Dispersion & Rotation Measure in the magnetosphere Refraction effects Comparison of scattering to HI regions Lohmer et al.

LFFE MSP J ms/DM MHz. LOFAR will have at least 12 times sensitivity Single Pulses B Profiles at 3 different frequencies. Some evidence for scattering at 130 MHz but excellent SNR! B Frequency Time 116 MHz 163 MHz Scintillation B

First pulsar detection with LOFAR PSR B for 15 min. 48 X kHz subbands MHz 6 HBA tiles Approx 0.2% of LOFAR sensitivity for pulsar work LOFAR will almost double total pulsar population (Poster 15S)

Exceptional sensitivity combined with the multi-beam capabilities make LOFAR useful for monitoring programs. Regular timing to catch Glitches Regular timing to provide solutions for gravitational wave observatories and GLAST Catch transitions of “more off than on” pulsars The radio-sky monitor will find new transient pulsar sources but will also allow rapid follow-up and via the TBB a look back in time at the event itself. TBB can store 100 MHz BW for 1.3s or 200 kHz BW for 650s or anything in between. Some other possibilities

Conclusions LOFAR will find at least 1000 “normal” pulsars If there is a popn. of steep spectrum pulsars it will be more Long pointings mean it will also find “transient” pulsars A complete census of the local NS population The ASM will also reveal many more transient RNSs The raw sensitivity of LOFAR will enable many studies related to how RNSs emit (single pulses, spectra, poln) It will also provide an excellent probe of the local ISM both the local electron density and magnetic field It will also reveal things we haven’t even thought of !!!!