Steinar Stapnes, LBNL 02.11.001 The ATLAS ID. zOutline : uBrief ID Overview [FIG]: ÕThe Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT) ÕThe Semi Conductor Tracker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Preparation for ATLAS SCT/ID Endcap Completion at CERN Jo Pater Manchester, 4 January 2006.
ATLAS SCT Endcap Detector Modules Lutz Feld University of Freiburg for the ATLAS SCT Collaboration Vertex m.
ATLAS SCT Barrel PARM. Tyndel 114-May-2003 ATLAS SCT Barrel PAR - Introduction uOver-view of the Barrel SCT Õ Modules Õ LM tapes & optical harnesses Õ.
CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals CMS Phase 2 Upgrade: Scope and R&D goals October 21, 2014 Jeremiah Mans On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.
H.-G. Moser, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich1 Beauty03, October 2003 The Status of the ATLAS Inner Detector Hans-Günther Moser for the ATLAS Collaboration.
LHC SPS PS. 46 m 22 m A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS - ATLAS As large as the CERN main bulding.
LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau.
UCSB CDF Group, DOE Site visit, Jan 18, J. Incandela 1 Top Physics at CDF ++ Top Quark and New Physics with an eye toward the LHC Work completed.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
1.ATLAS and ID 2.SCT 3.Commissioning 4.Integration 5.Latest Runs 6.Conclusions Commissioning the ATLAS Silicon Microstrip Tracker IPRD08 - Siena Jose E.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
Module Production for The ATLAS Silicon Tracker (SCT) The SCT requirements: Hermetic lightweight tracker. 4 space-points detection up to pseudo rapidity.
L. Greiner 1IPHC meeting – September 5-6, 2011 STAR HFT Plans for the next year A short report on review results and plans for TPC – Time Projection.
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
WP2: Detector development Summary G. Pugliese INFN - Politecnico of Bari.
March 20, 2001M. Garcia-Sciveres - US ATLAS DOE/NSF Review1 M. Garcia-Sciveres LBNL & Module Assembly & Module Assembly WBS Hybrids Hybrids WBS.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Upgrade R&D August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
M. Gilchriese Upgrade Stave Assembly and Robotics August 3, 2007 LBNL.
SLHC Pixel Layout Studies S. Dardin, M. Garcia-Sciveres, M. Gilchriese, N. Hartman LBNL November 4, 2008.
HEP GROUP MEETING work on the ATLAS UPGRADE T.J.Fraser.
WP2: Detector development Summary G. Pugliese INFN - Politecnico of Bari.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
ATLAS EXPERIMENT INTEGRATION TASK: SPACE MANAGEMENT Tatiana Klioutchnikova 05/06/
DOE/NSF Review of the U.S. ATLAS Construction Project June 3-4, 2002 WBS 1.1 Silicon Subsystem Abe Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Silicon Inner Layer Sensor PRR, 8 August G. Ginther Update on the D0 Run IIb Silicon Upgrade for the Inner Layer Sensor PRR 8 August 03 George Ginther.
L. Greiner 1IPHC meeting – May 7, 2012 STAR HFT Plans for the next year A short report on HFT/PXL plans for post May 2012 TPC – Time Projection Chamber.
Evaporative Heater Design, qualification and planning M.Olcese PRR SCT off-detector cooling PRR SCT off-detector cooling March March 2005.
Concluding Summary WBS1.1.2 SCT Subsystem A. Seiden BNL March 2001.
CERN, Main challenges for the ATLAS upgrade project in the coming year.
SLHC SG: ATLAS Pixel G. Darbo - INFN / Genova SLHC SG, July 2004 ATLAS Pixel at SLHC G. Darbo - INFN / Genova Talk overview: A table with different High.
1 US Pixel Mechanics Role Global support structureIntermediate support structureLocal support structure Stave SectorDisk Barrel x (9-11) x5 x (22,40,56)
1st Nov 2001 Nigel Hessey SCT Endcap Structures FDR1 Endcap Requirements Brief overview of SCT Endcap Requirements layout, X0, thermal, positioning, stability.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
G. Carboni – Muon Meeting – April 2002 Muon Meeting LHC schedule is now official (Council Committee) First protons (Pilot run) delayed to
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
ATLAS PIXEL SYSTEM OVERVIEW M. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory March 11, 1999.
LHCC referee meeting L.Rossi - INFN / Genova CERN - March Status of insertable pixel  Layout in 2000 (Dubna layout)  Reasons for the change.
ATLAS Pixel Detector September 2003 Services E. Anderssen LBNL Service Connectivity from Module to PP1b Eric Anderssen LBNL Pixel Services Meeting, CERN.
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Pixel Upgrade Thoughts on US Role.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
ATLAS 1 Beam Pipe Support Structure (BPSS) Interface and Assembly Final Design Review, April 2003 E. Anderssen, N. Hartman LBNL.
Local Supports to IDR Discussion ATLAS Upgrade Week November 2014.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
T. Lari – INFN Milan Status of ATLAS Pixel Test beam simulation Status of the validation studies with test-beam data of the Geant4 simulation and Pixel.
Assembly scenario of ILD Si trackers 2015/4/21 Yasuhiro 1.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Leonardo Rossi INFN Genova - UTOPIA #12 0 What we have learned from UTOPIA so far? Defined a set of gauge histos to compare layouts Exercised on barrel-part.
Joerg Dubert’s Questions as you all aware we currently do not yet know how the final mechanical design of the new Small Wheel will look like. Nevertheless,
Comments on Engineering talk by A. Catinaccio at Inner Tracker Engineering Meeting CERN ) Fixed length barrel layout drawing by C. Bault (Strawman.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
Leonardo Rossi – EB 68 – Oct 5, Pixel status and schedule Rad-hard electronics (has always been) on the critical path for the construction of the.
Steinar Stapnes, LHCC June The ATLAS inner detector TRT endcap A+B TRT endcap C TRT barrel SCT barrel SCT endcap Pixels uWhole ID sits inside bore.
Summary of IAPP scientific activities into 4 years P. Giannetti INFN of Pisa.
Atlas SemiConductor Tracker final integration and commissioning Andrée Robichaud-Véronneau Université de Genève on behalf of the Atlas SCT collaboration.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 2/27/2014
For the CMS Pixel detector
Detector building Notes of our discussion
P. Morettini Towards Pixel TDR PM - ITk Italia - Introduction 8/2/2017.
End-cap Mechanics FDR Overview of the Project
SLHC Non-Inner Detector Upgrades
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
For the CMS Pixel detector
Presentation transcript:

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL The ATLAS ID. zOutline : uBrief ID Overview [FIG]: ÕThe Transition Radiation Tracker (TRT) ÕThe Semi Conductor Tracker (SCT) ÕGeneral ID items uThen moving into the main topic of this review : ÕThe PIXEL system as a part of the ATLAS ID. ÕThe ID installation schedule with emphasis on the PIXEL system uFinal comments

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL ATLAS ID overview, TRT zThe barrel modules are built in the US and the wheels in Russia (A+B) and CERN (C). zDevelopments : uStraw production completed uStraw-reinforcements operational in two places (PNPI and Dubna) uThe ASIC situation is promising with good results from DMILL (but a cost-problem) uLab and H8 (testbeam area) measurements with DMILL electronics promising u8 plane wheel completed and measured uBarrel module production started in the US zStill too early to be specific about module production rates which in the end will be the critical parameter. zThe final assembly, integration will take place at CERN. zCritical items : uTRT module production start-up. ÕMain worry is the start-up of the end-cap production in Russia. uFurther electronics systems tests - barrel - also urgent as the module production has started.

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL ATLAS ID overview, SCT zFundamental unit a module consisting of 4 silicon detectors, hybrids and heat-spreader plate, supported by barrels or disks. zDevelopments : uDetector order in, pre-production completed, PRR completed for 80% of the sensors, production being released uASIC pre-production (DMILL) in progress, first batch received, performance promising but both performance/yield (low in this batch) will need to be verified/understood better. zModule FDRs including all surrounding items to take place in the Spring 2001 zModule production in 9 clusters around the world until zIntegration of barrels and one endcap at CERN, one endcap at NIKHEF. zCritical items : uSCT electrical system verification. ÕAs pre-production series of detectors and ASICs are becoming available, system-tests with several irradiated modules are urgent. ÕTests have been done for year in the systemtest lab (B186) and H8 but not yet with the module 0s. uProduction schedule for the optical harnesses another worry uCooling circuit layouts uModule production start-up, logistics.

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL ATLAS ID overview, integration zSome of the subsystem assembly plus the entire ID integration and commissioning will take place at CERN in zThe main tasks (summary) : uSub-system assembly (in parallel) uIntegration of sub-systems into ID barrel, end-cap A and end-cap C. uTests of the ID parts (barrel and endcaps). uSurvey and alignment (optical and X-ray) and full verification of the ID systems before installation. zThis requires large semi-clean areas (800m 2 ) at the surface, a large amount of infrastructure and a substantial amount of human resources. zOther major ID integration activities are (not covered in this talk) : uServices layout for the ID and services modelling of critical regions uThe evaporative cooling system uSurvey and Alignment of the ID components uID Software

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL PIXELs in the ATLAS ID zThe PIXEL detector is the innermost part of the ATLAS ID and plays a key role in : uThe ID tracking ub-physics and b-tagging zInitial physics goals of ATLAS : uSUSY and Higgs (leptons, jets, b-tag, E t -miss) uThe ID is therefore crucial: Full rapidity coverage, at least two PIXEL layers, out of which one is the B-layer zThree layers needed quickly for b-tagging performance : uThere is a 30% degradation of the jet rejection going from 3 to2 layers at a b-jet efficiency of 50%, due to increased fake track rates and increased number of tracks with non-unique PIXEL hit allocations. uThis has a significant impact on the SUSY, Higgs and SM physics performance in ATLAS. z

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL ATLAS ID, PIXEL-layout zThe general status of the PIXEL system : see later talks. zDue to the ASIC delays, the PIXEL schedule is not anymore compatible with the TDR layout (which requires around 1900 modules ready early 2004) for integration with the barrel SCT. uReminders and comments : ÕThe current schedule was based on having ASIC pre- production starting in September ÕThe current PIXEL schedule was determined by the barrel ID installation date (5/2004), the PIXEL detector had to be ready for integration and testing at the surface in the beginning of ÕThe close linking of the SCT barrel and PIXEL subsystems (in terms of schedule, thermal environment, shielding, testing) is only possible if the subsystems are in phase. With the radiation hard electronics problems this is not the case anymore. zThe obvious question is : can the PIXEL system be installed later as an independent unit, when the entire ID is in place : uAttractive because : ÕTo upgrade and change any part of the TDR version of PIXEL system (except the B-layers) the entire ID (TRT,SCT,PIXEL) had to be taken to the surface (both Endcaps and Barrel, opened, modified and re-installed). To miss the first installation date, even wit a part of the system, is therefore a major problem. Upgrades and repairs are very difficult. ÕFurthermore, there is still a significant uncertainty about how quickly one can reach a production version of the FE chip.

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL ATLAS ID installation schedule zID barrel : uRequired in today's schedule : uActually ready : uThere are no major delays in the barrel SCT or barrel TRT subsystems. zThis mean that the in the TDR layout of the PIXEL system 1900 modules (the fixed part) would need to ready early zID EC-C uRequired in today's schedule : uActually ready : zID EC-A uRequired in today's schedule : uActually ready : uThe main delay here is in the TRT wheels zA replaceable PIXEL system can be installed up until April 2005 for LHC startup

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL zID Steering Group September/October this year : pursue fully replaceable PIXEL system. uLaunch detailed simulations of performance (electron energy tails and b-tagging performance, material plots and TRT rate). uEngineering studies of the SCT/PIXEL interface, to present a fully replaceable 3-hit PIXEL system (6 months), within defined envelopes for the PIXEL (230mm) and SCT (260mm) to minimise engineering impact and delays for both subsystems. zThe three main constraints : uThe routing of the PIXEL services (material) ÕStudies made so far indicate that this is possible if services are routed at radius above 20cm in the EC region. uThe dimension of the SCT endcap bore (coverage and alignment grid) ÕSCT envelope is being changed to 260mm without very significant loss of performance, but with several layout consequences. uUse the detailed engineering made over the last 3-4 years in the PIXEL system to avoid a complete redesign of all aspects of the system ÕThe design shown in the next two days is very optimised, and also flexible in case of having to go to two layers followed by an upgrade. ATLAS ID, PIXEL-layout

Steinar Stapnes, LBNL Final comments zThe PIXEL subsystem is a (the) key part of the ATLAS ID as it is crucial for both tracking and tagging of long lived particles. It is definitely a part of the baseline ATLAD ID system. zThe PIXEL layout and installation scheme (which will be shown over the next two days) have the maximum flexibility we are able build into the ID system integration in terms of schedule and upgrade possibilities for the innermost layers of the ID. zFrom my point of view the baselining of the US PIXEL project is necessary now, in order to have a coherent ATLAS ID (or even ATLAS wide) baseline scope plan in the near future.