US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

Minnesotas Congestion Pricing Program Road User Charging Conference January, 2009 By Bernie Arseneau Minnesota (USA) Department of Transportation.
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary Metropolitan Council Meeting September 12, 2007.
Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Expanding the Potential of Tolling: A 21 st Century Look AASHTO November 18, Brian Peters Florida DOT, Assistant Secretary of Finance and Administration.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Kenneth R. Buckeye, AICP Minnesota Department of Transportation.
How can we relieve congestion in the I-95 corridor? I-95 Congestion Relief Study.
How Politics Even Affect Good Pricing Projects Eric N. Schreffler, ESTC TRB Int’l Symposium on Road Pricing Key Biscayne, Florida November 21, 2003.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
February 26, 2012 Managed Lanes Overview Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation
Transportation Data Palooza Washington, DC May 9, 2013 Steve Mortensen Federal Transit Administration Data for Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) Analysis,
FHWA Policy and Guidance
SR520 Urban Partnership Project 2008 ITS Washington Annual Meeting November 12th, 2008 – Seattle Jennifer Charlebois, P.E. Tolling and Systems Project.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Ginger Goodin, Texas Transportation Institute Greg Jones, Federal Highway Administration.
Steve Heminger Executive Director Metropolitan Transportation Commission Transportation Research Board Executive Committee June 17, 2005 TOLL: The Four.
Reducing Congestion: Urban Partnerships and Corridors of the Future Columbia Traffic and Safety Conference May 1, 2008 Allen Masuda Division Administrator.
The USDOT Urban Partners & FHWA August 20, 2007 Webcast with Division Offices Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Washington, DC Reducing Congestion Tools of.
Transportation leadership you can trust. Electronic Tolls and Congestion Pricing Study presented to Connecticut Transportation Strategy Board presented.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Freeway Revolts: Why not the Twin Cities? Thomas More Nick Dobda Xiaozheng He.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Jennifer Tsien, PBS&J Angela Jacobs, Federal Highway Administration.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management NTOC Webinar Presented by Jessie Yung, P.E. Office of Transportation Management April.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
The Oregon Road User Fee Concept and Pilot Program Presented to National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission Washington DC September.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
CEE 8207 Design of Sustainable Transportation System CEE 8207 Design of Sustainable Transportation System Today’s Topic A tool of sustainability Types.
Technology Impacts on the Future of Transportation Mark Hallenbeck, Director of the Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington 1.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update ITS.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Looking Forward to a High Performance.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
MARYLAND FREIGHT SUMMIT Freight in the Mid-Atlantic Region Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration September.
Convergence of Transportation Policy and RFID Enabler of Future Transportation Policy Chris Body Mark IV Vice President, Business Development.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit Administration Session 11: ITS Research in the U.S. and Abroad 2007 ITSA Annual.
FAST Lanes Program Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Association of Metropolitan Municipalities August 16, 2004 Minnesota Department.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
MnPASS I-394 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Case Study 7 group: Brendon Slotterback Chris Romansky Feng Xie Gabe Gubash
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update I-95.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
Transportation Revenue Sources Presentation to the Discovery Institute October 6, 2004 Amy Arnis Deputy Director Strategic Planning and Programming Washington.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Presentation transcript:

US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Solving the Congestion Problem Shape Demand Invest in New Capacity Operate System at Peak Performance Bring Supply and Demand into Alignment -- Congestion Pricing

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing – Bringing Supply and Demand into Alignment Failure to properly price travel on highways is a root cause of congestion. The price of highway travel (gas taxes, registration fees, etc.) bears little or no relationship to the cost of congestion. Unlike other public utilities, the public expectation is that the “service” is free or does not change with changes in demand. Rationing transportation services via pricing is more efficient than rationing by delay.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing - The Options HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing of Excess HOV Facility Capacity (HOT Lanes) Fees for SOV use vary based on traffic levels - I-394 MnPass Express lanes in Minneapolis (dynamic pricing, real-time), I-15 FasTrack Lanes in San Diego (quasi-dynamic, every 6 minutes), and I-25 Express Lanes in Denver (variable pricing) all using electronic transponders. QuickRide in Houston, TX, on the Katy Freeway - HOV-3 free; HOV-2 is $2 per trip using electronic transponder.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion HOV and HOT Lanes in the U.S. Source: Texas Transportation Institute

Strategy to Reduce Congestion USDOT’s Congestion Initiative: A Six-Point Plan 1. Relieve Urban Congestion. 2. Unleash private sector investment resources. 3. Promote operational and technological improvements. 4. Establish a “Corridors of the Future” competition. 5. Target major freight bottlenecks and expand freight policy outreach. 6. Accelerate major aviation capacity projects and provide a future funding framework.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Urban Partnership Agreements – Congestion Pricing Congestion Pricing is a key component of the USDOT Congestion Initiative (Relieve Urban Congestion element) - Urban Partnerships. Integrated “4T” Strategy. TOLLING (pricing) – Key Element Direct user charge based on use of facility; varies based on level of congestion Toll collection via electronic means (no booths) Transit Telecommuting/Travel Demand Management Technology About $850 million in USDOT Discretionary Funds.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Preliminary Urban Partners Miami Minneapolis -St. Paul San Francisco Seattle New York City

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges Minneapolis – St. Paul Miami

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Minneapolis – St. Paul Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) I-35W between downtown Minneapolis and the southern suburbs. Existing HOV lanes converted to dynamically-priced HOT lanes (similar to existing MnPASS operation). Existing HOT lanes extended. Shoulder lanes dynamically priced.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Minneapolis - St. Paul Urban Partner Technology Electronic toll collection ITS Technology to improve transit services Arterial and freeway management

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Minneapolis - St. Paul Urban Partner Transit Establish a Bus Rapid Transit lane into downtown Minneapolis. Advanced BRT stations and park and ride facilities for the North metro suburbs along the I-35W corridor. “Transit advantage” bypass lane/ramp. Contra-flow transit lanes in downtown Minneapolis.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Miami Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) 21 miles of HOT lanes on I-95 from Fort Lauderdale to downtown Miami. Raise HOV limit from HOV2 to HOV3+. Expand 10-lane highway to 12 lanes (by reducing the width of the existing lanes from 12 to 11 feet and using a portion of the shoulder).

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Miami Urban Partner Technology SunPass electronic toll collection. Transit Operate BRT on HOT lanes. Transit facility improvements. Telecommuting Flex-time incentives. Carpooling and vanpooling programs.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges San Francisco Seattle Minneapolis – St. Paul Miami

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Seattle Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) Variable pricing on the State Route 520 floating bridge. King County crossing that currently carries about 160,000 people per day between Seattle and its Eastside suburbs. Tolls on the existing bridge are intended to help pay for the new bridge.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Seattle Urban Partner Technology Electronic toll collection Real-time multi-modal traveler information Active traffic management Transit Enhance bus service and provide supporting amenities Regional ferry service Telecommuting Carpooling and vanpooling programs Telecommuting outreach

Strategy to Reduce Congestion San Francisco Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) Variable pricing on Doyle Drive, the 1.5 mile elevated roadway leading to the Golden Gate Bridge. Will charge an extra one-way-fee above the $5 toll on the Golden Gate Bridge. Revenues will help pay to reconstruct the 70-year old Doyle Drive.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion San Francisco Urban Partner Technology Electronic toll collection. SFgo Arterial Traffic Management System/Traffic Controller Upgrades. 511 Upgrades. Creation of Integrated Mobility Accounts. Dynamic message signs indicating current toll rates.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion San Francisco Urban Partner Transit Improvements to Regional Ferry Service. Improved Bus Service, including Bus Rapid Transit. Telecommuting Variable pricing of on/off-street parking and city-owned garage spaces in downtown San Francisco. Telecommuting outreach.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges New York City San Francisco Seattle Minneapolis – St. Paul Miami

Strategy to Reduce Congestion New York City Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) Will charge drivers $8 and trucks $21 a day to enter or leave Manhattan below 86 th Street on weekdays during the workday. Those who drive only within the congestion zone would pay $4 a day for cars, $5.50 for trucks.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion New York City Urban Partner Technology Electronic toll collection. Transit Bus facilities and other improvements. Initiation of Bus Rapid Transit. Regional ferry services.

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges New York City San Francisco Seattle Minneapolis – St. Paul Miami

Strategy to Reduce Congestion Congestion Pricing – Region Wide Charges Current Examples Studies in Oregon and Seattle have tested mileage-based fees and peak-period driving charges. Nationwide Truck Pricing in Germany, Austria and Switzerland – Automated weight-distance truck tolls across their national highways (Note: Sets the stage for area-wide congestion pricing).

Strategy to Reduce Congestion USDOT/FHWA Next Steps Promote HOV to HOT Conversions through Tailored Technical Assistance Urban Partners Provide Direct Support to the Urban Partners Harness and Share Experiences Provide General Resource Material - Tailored Workshops and Seminars; Reference Material Value Pricing Pilot Program Lessons Learned Model Pricing Legislation “Making the Case” Outreach and Technical Support

Strategy to Reduce Congestion For More Information Visit