1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical basics Marian Scott Dept of Statistics, University of Glasgow August 2008.
Advertisements

Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process
CE 510 Hazardous Waste Engineering
1 Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Type I and Type II Errors One-Tailed Tests About a Population Mean: Large-Sample.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 9 Hypothesis Testing Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses Developing Null and.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
BCOR 1020 Business Statistics Lecture 22 – April 10, 2008.
1/55 EF 507 QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FALL 2008 Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing.
8 Statistical Intervals for a Single Sample CHAPTER OUTLINE
Characterizing Baseline Water Body Conditions. What? Confirm impairments and identify problems Statistical summary Spatial analysis Temporal analysis.
PROSEMINAR Environmental Management ENVR E-200. DO YOU HAVE? System for keeping notes on your readings and draft writing Information on your primary target.
Chapter Sampling Distributions and Hypothesis Testing.
Inferences About Process Quality
Total Quality Management BUS 3 – 142 Statistics for Variables Week of Mar 14, 2011.
8-1 Introduction In the previous chapter we illustrated how a parameter can be estimated from sample data. However, it is important to understand how.
DQOs and the Development of MQOs Carl V. Gogolak USDOE Environmental Measurements Lab.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
1 of 39 DQO Implementation Process: Flow Chart and Wall Charts 30 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 8 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing
Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Testing - II
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
1 of 23 From Qualitative Concept to Practical Implementation Evolution of the Data Quality Objectives Concept DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 1 15 minutes.
● Midterm exam next Monday in class ● Bring your own blue books ● Closed book. One page cheat sheet and calculators allowed. ● Exam emphasizes understanding.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
1 of 55 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 - State the Problem Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 60 minutes DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 9.
 EPA’s soil sampling objectives  Technical approach  Technical assistance to DTSC/DOE  Next Steps and Schedule.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
1 of 99 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 - State the Problem Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Day 2 DQO Training Course.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 4.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
1 of 63 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 – Problem Statement DQO Case Study Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 45 minutes DQO Training Course Day 3 Module 18.
Statistical Decision Making. Almost all problems in statistics can be formulated as a problem of making a decision. That is given some data observed from.
Background chemicals are widespread Challenges: Health and Safety Contaminated Media Management Disposal Planning and Budgeting TRB Conference 2011, Portland,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
1 of 21 Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 7 (30 minutes) Steps Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 52 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 4 - Specify Boundaries (60 minutes) (15 minute Afternoon Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
1 of 39 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 7 - Optimize Sample Design DQO Case Study 45 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 3 Module.
1 of 49 Key Concepts Underlying DQOs and VSP DQO Training Course Day 1 Module minutes (75 minute lunch break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 45 How Many Samples do I Need? Part 1 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 60 minutes (15 minute 1st Afternoon Break) DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 4.
1 of 40 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 - Identify the Decisions Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (30 minutes) DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 12.
1 of 32 Systematic Planning for Environmental Decision-Making DOE EM-3 Day 2 DQO Training Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment EPA Conference.
1 of 37 Key Concepts Underlying DQOs and VSP DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 4 (60 minutes) (75 minute lunch break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall.
1 of 50 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 7 - Optimize Sample Design 60 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 3 Module 16.
TEKS (6.10) Probability and statistics. The student uses statistical representations to analyze data. The student is expected to: (B) identify mean (using.
9-1 Using SafetyAnalyst Module 4 Countermeasure Evaluation.
1 of 39 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 3 - Identify Inputs (45 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3.
BPS - 3rd Ed. Chapter 131 Confidence Intervals: The Basics.
1 of 35 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 2 – Identify the Decision Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 15 minutes (75 minute Lunch break) DQO Training Course Day.
Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
1 of 36 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances (60 minutes) (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
Framework of Preferred Evaluation Methodologies for TAACCCT Impact/Outcomes Analysis Random Assignment (Experimental Design) preferred – High proportion.
1 of 86 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 7 - Optimize Sample Design (70 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 7.
1 of 108 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 1 - State the Problem Presenters: Mitzi Miller and Al Robinson 8:15 AM - 9:30 AM (75 minutes) Day 2 DQO Training.
© Copyright McGraw-Hill 2004
Statistics for Engineer. Statistics  Deals with  Collection  Presentation  Analysis and use of data to make decision  Solve problems and design.
1 of 19 Managing Uncertainty with Systematic Planning for Environmental Decision-Making 3-Day DQO Training Day 2.
1 of 27 How Many Samples do I Need? Part 2 Presenter: Sebastian Tindall (60 minutes) (5 minute “stretch” break) DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 5.
1 of 31 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 60 minutes (15 minute Morning Break) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course.
LTP and FSS Plan Project Status Overview Presented by Bill Barley September 28, 2015.
Parameter Estimation. Statistics Probability specified inferred Steam engine pump “prediction” “estimation”
1 of 48 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 6 - Specify Error Tolerances 3:00 PM - 3:30 PM (30 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Spatial Distribution of Arsenic in Ohio Soils Nate Wanner, CPG Cox-Colvin & Associates, Inc. Ohio Brownfield Conference 2016 Columbus, Ohio April 6, 2016.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 2 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Statistical inference: distribution, hypothesis testing
Chapter 7: Introduction to Sampling Distributions
Presentation transcript:

1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5

2 of 27 Step Objective: n This step combines Steps to produce the following major elements to form decision rules: –Parameter of interest –Unit of decision making –Action level –Alternative actions Step 5: Define Decision Rules Step 4: Specify Boundaries Step 2: Identify Decisions Step 3: Identify Inputs Step 1: State the Problem Step 5: Define Decision Rules Step 6 : Specify Error Tolerances Step 7 : Optimize Sample Design

3 of 27 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Step 5- Define Decision Rules Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4

4 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s)

5 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) A descriptive measure (such as a true mean, median, or proportion) that specifies the characteristic or attribute that the decision maker would like to know about the population. By definition, this will always remain unknown. Note: The purpose of any data collection design is to produce environmental data that can be used as a reasonable estimate of this population parameter.

6 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The sample statistic, e.g., the sample mean, which is obtained from the sampling data is used to estimate the population parameter. It is often the upper confidence limit about the sample mean.

7 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The variable is both the COPC (chemical and physical) and the level measured. Examples of the level are concentration or activity or result.

8 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The smallest, most appropriate subset (sub-population) for which separate decisions will be made.

9 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) Spatial Boundary Temporal Boundary

10 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The total number of objects (samples of soil or sludge or sediment or air, etc.), that are contained within the spatial unit to be studied

11 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) A measurement threshold value of the parameter of interest that provides the criterion for choosing among alternative actions.

12 of 27 Major Elements of a Decision Rule: n Parameter of Interest –Population Parameter Background –Sample Statistic –Environmental Variable Chemical/Physical attribute in the population Levels measured (Quantity) n Unit of Decision Making –Geographic Area/Volume –Timeframe –Population n Action Level n Alternative Action(s) The actions that the decision maker would take depending on the value of the sample statistic which is an estimate of the population parameter.

13 of 27 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 The purpose of the data collection design is to produce environmental data that can be used as a reasonable estimate of the population (true) parameter. Step 5- Define Decision Rules

14 of 27 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 If not done in Step 3, specify the numerical value that would cause a person to choose between alternative actions. Confirm that the action level is greater than the detection/ quantitation limits for the potential measurement methods identified in Step 3. Step 5- Define Decision Rules

15 of 27 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 Develop a decision rule as an “if…then…” statement that incorporates the parameter of interest, the unit of decision making, the action level, and the action(s) that would result from resolution of the decision. Step 5- Define Decision Rules

16 of 27 Decision Rule n General Format If the [parameter of interest (4 elements)] within the [unit of decision (3 elements)] is > the [action level], then take [alternative action A]; or take [alternative action B].

17 of 27 Decision Rule Example 1 If the [“true” mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of U-238] within the [surface soil in the perimeter of the backyard to a depth of 6 inches] is > [20 pCi/g], then [dispose of soil in a radiological landfill]; or [leave the soil in place].

18 of 27 If the [“true” mean (as estimated by the one sided 90% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of cadmium] within [the metal turnings in a 55 gallon drum] is > [1 mg/kg], then [the metal turnings will be considered hazardous and will be disposed of in a RCRA facility]; or [the metal turnings will be disposed of in a municipal landfill]. Decision Rule Example 2

19 of 27 n If the vadose zone soil moisture content, contaminant concentration profiles, and soil physical properties from the 1454 site exceed or deviate significantly from the conceptual model, an additional evaluation will be performed to assess priority of performing further analysis. n The data gathered from the characterization boring located at the 1454 site combined with historical process data and geophysical logging (high resolution spectral gamma-ray and neutron logging) of existing wells located in the vicinity of the 1455 site can be used to create an analogous model for the 1455 site. If the data collected from characterization of the 1454 site and the geophysical logging data from the existing wells located near the 1455 site support the conceptual model, the analogous unit approach is valid for the 1455 site. “Typical” Decision Rules

20 of 27 Step 5- Decision Rules CS

21 of 27 Decision Rule 1a If the true mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of the contaminant within the surface soil to a depth of 6 inches of the Pad footprint and run-off zone is > the AL, then conduct remedial action; or take no further action. Contaminates/Action Limits 250 mg/kg Lead 240 mg/kg Uranium 100 mg/kg TPH 1 mg/kg PCBs (total Aroclors) CS

22 of 27 If the true mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of the contaminant within the surface soil to a depth of 6 inches of the radial buffer zone excluding the Pad and run-off zone is > the AL, then conduct remedial action; or take no further action. Contaminates/Action Limits 250 mg/kg Lead 240 mg/kg Uranium 100 mg/kg TPH 1 mg/kg PCBs (total Aroclors) CS Decision Rule 1b

23 of 27 If the true mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of the contaminant within the subsurface soil to a depth of 6” to 10’ of the Pad footprint and run- off zone is > the AL, then conduct remedial action; or take no further action. Contaminates/Action Limits 250 mg/kg Lead 240 mg/kg Uranium 100 mg/kg TPH 1 mg/kg PCBs (total Aroclors) CS Decision Rule 2a

24 of 27 If the true mean (as estimated by the 95% UCL of the sample mean) concentration of the contaminant within the surface soil to a depth of 6” to 10’ of the radial buffer zone excluding the Pad and run-off zone is > the AL, then conduct remedial action; or take no further action. Contaminates/Action Limits 250 mg/kg Lead 240 mg/kg Uranium 100 mg/kg TPH 1 mg/kg PCBs (total Aroclors) CS Decision Rule 2b

25 of 27 Step 5 - Summary n After data are obtained and undergo Data Quality Assessment, decision rules are used to make the decisions n The decision rules encompass the logic used and include inputs from Steps 1-4 and 6 n One may need to perform Step 6 and then update Step 5 to include the statistical decision criteria

26 of 27 Alternative Actions Step 2 Population of Interest Step 4 Basis for Defining Action Level Step 3 Develop a Decision Rule If/Then Decision Rule Statements Information INActions Information OUT From Previous Step To Next Step Principal Study Question Step 2 Specify the Parameter of Interest Confirm the Action Level Information Required to Resolve Decision Statement Step 3 Unit of Decision Making Step 4 Step 5- Define Decision Rules

27 of 27 End of Module 5 Thank you