Welcome! Find your “vertical team” table Be sure you know everyone at your table. We will begin at 8:30!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coaching Data Teams DEVELOPED BY JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN & BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT.
Advertisements

Beginning Action Research Learning Cedar Rapids Community Schools February, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.
Effective use of protocols: Don't waste my time Bethann M. McCain Educational Consultant, CIU #10.
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Michigan Merit Examination ELA Assessment Analysis Presented by: Dr. Joan Livingston.
An Introduction to Using the SEC Data Protocol Oregon SEC Collaborative SEC 301.
The Structure of our Dialogue An Introduction to the World Café Conversation.
Studying One’s Own Practice through Action Research
NCOSP Learning Community Forum March 2007 Science Curriculum Topic Study Examining Student Thinking.
PROM/SE Science Associates Welcome Back! Please sit at tables by grade bands K-2, 3-5, 6-8, 9-12.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Customer Focus Module Preview
PLT Professional Learning Teams Weaver Elementary School January, 2013.
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT 1. Opportunities to strengthen existing school partnerships for student achievement WELCOME & SESSION OVERVIEW.
Welcome to the 2008 Day 1 Teacher Mentor Support!.
September 12, 2014 Lora M. McCalister-Cruel BDS District Data Coach Bay District Schools Data Analysis Framework.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Key Leaders Network “Making Connections” October, 2012 Alabama Best Practices Center.
Presenting Data and Getting the Most Out of It. 4 Corner Activity.
The Comprehensive Walk Through Protocol The Comprehensive Walkthrough Protocol.
Building Leadership Teams Driving Continuous Improvement Throughout the School! Session #3 January 2012.
PLEASE SIGN IN. PLEASE WRITE YOUR NAME ON A SLIP OF PAPER AND ADD IT TO THE BOWL BESIDE THE SIGN IN SHEET. Welcome to 3rd Six Weeks Social Studies (K-1)
District Results Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Results Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 59 slides.
School Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of School Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73 slides.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Data Driven Dialogue: Practical Strategies for Collaborative Inquiry
RTI SUMMIT APRIL 28, 2010 GAIL JESSETT, SPOKANE PUBLIC SCHOOLS DEBBIE LAHUE, NORTHEAST WA ESD 101 Coaching Within Your Team Becoming Each Other’s Best.
Literature Circles Mrs. Saufroy September 14 th, 2015 Class Notes.
Coaching Data Teams DEVELOPED BY JANE COOK
Assessment Leadership October, Agenda Welcome and Norms Ice Breaker Activity Galileo Celebration Colorado Growth Model Data Driven Dialogue Lunch.
OVERVIEW PRESENTATION
Instructional Coaches Academy (ICAD3) 1.  Choose a movie title that describes your school experience and why.  Discuss in your table groups. 2.
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATOR, LEARN.
Data Use Professional Development Series Day The contents of this slideshow were developed under a Race.
Data-Driven Dialogue - Copyright 2006 – MiraVia LLC – All rights reserved Data Driven Dialogue: Practical Strategies for Collaborative Inquiry Developed.
August 19, The current situation Fall 2008 – incoming college students needing writing remediation: 36.7% of incoming students in 2 year institutions.
SUMMER INSTITUTEJULY 7-8, 2015 | TULSA, OK Maximizing Impact Using the Global Focus List to Review Interventions.
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATOR, LEARN.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, School Year Learning-Focused Interactions “Putting it all.
Science Fair By Kimberly Albertson.
School Planning Councils Collaborative Inquiry to Improve Student Achievement with Bruce Wellman Webcast February 16, 2005 Host: BC Ministry of Education.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Los Angeles Unified School District “MyData 201- Data-Based Decision Making, RtI2 and MyData” Co-hosted by your RtI and MyData Teams
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
College of Education Graduate Programs
How Students Learn College Teaching Institute Presenter: Monica McCrory The Graduate School.
Citywide Expectations for
EVAAS and Expectations. Answers the question of how effective a schooling experience is for learners Produces reports that –Predict student success –Show.
Teacher Refresher Course Professional Learning Program Program 1 Learning Leaders: Jill Flack Maureen O’Rourke.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Working Systemically To Increase Student Achievement Collecting, Interpreting, and Using Data.
Driving Instruction through the use of quality data and collaborative decision making.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Educational Psychology Jeanne Ormrod Eighth Edition © 2014, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Developing Learners.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
LW Version 1.0 August Supporting Schools and District Improvement in Massachusetts Building Professional Learning Communities to Improve Instruction.
Module II Creating Capacity for Learning and Equity in Schools: The Mode of Instructional Leadership Dr. Mary A. Hooper Creating Capacity for Learning.
Week of: November 7th, 2016 Facilitator: Jermaine T. Ausmore, Sr.
Data Driven Dialogue.
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. November 29, 2016
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN
Teaching and Educational Psychology
Welcome Please sit in groups. Thanks. January 4, 2017
Creating Coaching Cycles that Move Coach Practice Forward
Data-Driven Dialogue Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Predict Go Visual
Presentation transcript:

Welcome! Find your “vertical team” table Be sure you know everyone at your table. We will begin at 8:30!

How do we know the district curriculum is being implemented in our classrooms?  What are our barriers to implementation?  Innovation Configurations by Level  Learning Walks at Maplewood Richmond Heights  OCG/UBD – Stage I – Observations

How do we know the district curriculum is attained? Learned and retained!

Parkway Graduate? You are a professor at a University… You are a professor at a Community College… You are a “boss”…

5 SEEHEAR The first month you are with this Parkway Graduate?

Draw a picture of the Parkway Graduate and identify the desired characteristics…

What does our data tell us about the attained curriculum?

Keeping our eye on the goal…  What does our data tell us about how well we are preparing the Parkway graduate for the 21 st century?

We will be looking at…  5 th grade district MAP data  8 th grade district MAP data  High School ACT scores

10 Looking in the mirror…  Imagine you are in a special, mirrored meeting room where you can observe your reflection.  What do you see yourself doing to help the group focus, hear one another and support the development of shared understanding about the data that we will review?  Take a minute to record the specific, observable behaviors group members see themselves doing and/or hear themselves saying?

 Data mean nothing alone – The key is in the facilitation of effective conversations around what the data tell us.

Nancy Love’s Assumptions

13 Effective data conversations takes place when…  There is mutual trust among group members  Data is not used to place blame or point fingers  Everyone needs to understand what the data being presented represents and how it was derived  Everyone must acknowledge that they play a role Adapted from “The Data Dialogue”, Laurie Olsen

14 Data Driven Dialog  Phase 1: Predictions - Surfacing of perspectives, beliefs, assumptions, predictions, possibilities, questions, and expectations.  Phase 2: Observations – Examining and analyzing the data for patterns, trends, surprises, and new questions that “jump” out.  Phase 3: Inferences – Generating hypotheses, inferring, explaining, and drawing conclusions. Defining new actions and interactions and the data that is needed to guide implementation (monitor) and build ownership for decisions. Based on the work presented by Nancy Love, author of Using Data/Getting Results, (2002).

Phase I - Predictions  Phase I Predictions dialogue takes place before you see the data. During this time, you activate prior knowledge, surface assumptions, and make predictions, thus creating readiness to examine and discuss the data. You hear and honor all assumptions and ideas as “building blocks for new learning.”

5 th & 8 th grade district MAP scores and ACT Scores

Private Think Time  Please reflect privately and record several of your preliminary thoughts about the data. One or more of the following thought-starters might be helpful. (You will share your reflections in your first session.)  I assume ……….  I predict ……  I wonder …  My questions / expectations are influenced by ………..  Some possibilities for learning that this data may present …

Move to three different groups…  Phase 2: Observations – Examining and analyzing the data for patterns, trends, surprises, and new questions that “jump” out.  Phase 3: Inferences – Generating hypotheses, inferring, explaining, and drawing conclusions. Defining new actions and interactions and the data that is needed to guide implementation (monitor) and build ownership for decisions

Schedule  9:05-9:40 Group 1  9:40-9:50 Break  9:50-10:20 Group 2  10:25-10:55 Group 3  10:55 Stay in vertical team and debrief (questions provided) Group 1: Lisa Group 2: Becky Group 3: Tim 11:15-11:45 Level Group Debrief 19

Vertical Team Debrief  After seeing three levels of data, what connections do you see to:  Classroom implementation  Current initiatives 20

Level Debrief  What questions can you pose to provide insight into our work?  Criteria:  Questions!  Questions that we can collect data on