Getting Your Sample Results Admitted Into Court By David Restaino, Esq.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Advertisements

Science is a way of knowing.
ADMISSIBILITY OF TRACE EVIDENCE: A WHOLELISTIC APPROACH-- DESPITE DAUBERT Kenneth E. Melson.
The forensic use of bioinformation
Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations Fourth Edition
ATTACKING SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE Professor Ed Imwinkelried.
Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
Chapter Nineteen FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY
Strategies for Improving Consistency and Quality of Reporting and Testimony.
Chemistry 100 Fall 2003 Instructor: Mark Davis. Chapter One: An Introduction to Chemistry Why study Chemistry? Scientific Method.
Expert Testimony. What’s the expert’s role FOC Proffered Evidence Evidentiary Hypothesis P thumb numb Thumb numbness makes it SML that spine was injured.
Testifying Skills Julia Pallentino MSN, JD, ARNP.
By: Logan Wilson.  Forensics is a science dedicated to the methodical gathering and analysis of evidence to establish facts that can be presented in.
Forensic Science and the Law
How to Produce Courtroom Ready Forensic Scientists ASCLD Annual Meeting April 29, 2015 Professor Carol Henderson National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology.
Chapter 1 Overview of Forensics © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
Testifying in Child Abuse Cases: APSAC June 1996 James E. Butler, J.D. Catherine W. Gouldin, M.D. Charles J. Schubert, M.D. Robert A. Shapiro, M.D. Children’s.
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
1. Evidence Professor Cioffi 2/22/2011 – 2/23/
Chapter 1 Introduction to forensic science and the law.
The Nature of Evidence A Guide to Legal Evidence & the Courts.
Computer Forensics Principles and Practices
Bell Ringer 9/16 Place your HW into the appropriate folder. Clear your desk with the exception of something to write with.
Warm UP What is Locard’s exchange principle? _________________________
FORENSIC SCIENTISTS, EXPERT TESTIMONY Notes 1.3. Objectives 1. Explain the role and responsibilities of the expert witness. 2. Compare and contrast the.
Skills of a Forensic Scientist & Frye vs. Daubert Standards
Forensic Scientist Career Project -Jurisprudence By: Connor Dooley and Matt Thurmond.
The Fraud Report, Litigation, and the Recovery Process McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
SCIENCE A system of knowledge about the natural world and the methods used to find that knowledge.
What is Forensic Science? the study and application of science to matters of law… it examines the associations among people, places, things and events.
Cross examination Is the DNA a mixture of two or more people? How did you calculate the match statistic? What is the scientific basis of that calculation?
Expert witness testimony  In some impaired driving cases, it may be necessary to identify an expert witness.  As a general rule, an expert is needed.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
The Scientific process Review of HSW. Scientists come up with theories- then test them Science is about explaining HOW and WHY things happen. It is about.
Demolishing the Expert Witness Marshall B. Grossman Bingham McCutchen LLP and Expert Witness Malpractice.
1 What Is Scientific Evidence? Scientific evidence is most often presented in court by an expert witness testifying on expert opinions. It also includes.
Scientific methods. What are the steps of the scientific method? There are many different processes that scientists use. There isn’t just ONE correct.
Evidence and Expert Testimony. Expert Testimony  Two Types of Witnesses: Fact and Expert  Fact -- have personal knowledge of facts of case  Cannot.
Appraisal Institute 48 th Annual Litigation Seminar Trends Impacting Real Estate Litigation Experts Over The Next Decade November 13, 2015.
Professor Guy Wellborn
Questions for Today 1.What is the Nature of Science? 2.What are the differences between a theory and a law? 3.What are the differences between inductive.
The Scientific Method 5 Steps to Follow!.
September 10, 2012 Warm-up: Use pg. 13 in your text book to answer the following question: 1.What was the most significant modern advance in forensic science?
Admissibility. The Frye Standard  1923 – became the standard guideline for determining the judicial admissibility of scientific examinations. To meet.
Designing an Experiment &The Characteristics of Scientific Knowledge.
DAY #3: The Legal System: Trying a Criminal Case 1.What do lawyers do BEFORE a trial? 2.What are some reasons why a judge may dismiss or suppress evidence?
Forensic Science: Fundamentals & Investigations, 2e Chapter 1 1 All rights Reserved Cengage/NGL/South-Western © 2016.
 Judge  Prosecutor  Defense Attorney Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Who’s Daubert?.
Conceptual Physics Notes: Scientific Thinking
Introduction Forensic science begins at the crime scene.
Do now: What are the advantages to having physical evidence?
Chemistry Notes: Scientific Thinking
Ethical Standards in Forensic Science
The Scientific Method 5 Steps to Follow!.
Unit 1 Test Review Dana Kalachik.
Scientific Inquiry Chapter 1 Section 2.
Ethical Standards in Forensic Science
Ninth Annual Prescription for Criminal Justice Forensics Program Department of Justice Forensic Science Projects to Support the Adversarial Process Kira.
Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations Fourth Edition
Get Started Immediately!
Civil Pretrial Practice
It’s a murder trial. Get ready.
The Scientific Method 5 Steps to Follow!.
Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations Fourth Edition
1-3 Functions of a Forensic Scientist
Section 1: The Nature of Science
The Expert Valuation Witness and the Different Procedural Models in European Court Proceedings . Associate Prof. (Dr. hab. Magdalena Habdas.
Presentation transcript:

Getting Your Sample Results Admitted Into Court By David Restaino, Esq.

Why Do We Care  Translate technical information for non-scientists  Prove that the translation is not “junk science”  Recognition by the expert’s peers

Why Do We Care  Getting paid

Hiring An Expert  Do we need an expert?  Will the expert testify in court, or not?

Hiring An Expert  What will this cost?  Is this the right person? - Education, training & experience

Hiring An Expert  Who should hire the expert?

The Legal System  How it works, and why it works  Discovery - Depositions  Trial Testimony

The Expert Report  The Expert’s “Voice”  Supporting Facts - What can be discovered  Draft reports

The Opinion  To a reasonable degree of scientific certainty  Based on facts; not a “net opinion”  Not “junk science”

Odor Opinions  Personal observations  Odor characterization  Emission data and contaminants emitted  Intensity measurement

Odor Opinions  Dispersion modeling  Chemistry  Laboratory practices  Source, wind direction, etc.

We Care Because …  Our name is on the report  We are a scientist  We have used our science to come to a conclusion  The conclusion is defensible, in fact and by science

We Care Because …  Our clients care  We want to get hired again