Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
AdvancEd District Wide Accreditation
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
PORTFOLIO.
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
Elementary School Counselor
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Differentiated School Leadership Kentucky Principal’s Academy 2010.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
D62 Response to Intervention
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
“Commitment to Children” Report of the Quality Assurance Review Team L IMESTONE C OUNTY S CHOOL S YSTEM.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Standard 1- Leadership & Vision Sara Saffell Amy Blackwell Marilyn McDonald 1. Leadership and Vision-Educational leaders inspire a shared vision for comprehensive.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
The School Effectiveness Framework
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Accreditation External Review
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
February 21-22, 2018.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System

Survey Participants Elementary, Middle and Secondary School Administrators General Education and Special Education Teachers University of Alabama Central Office Administrators and Coordinators Tuscaloosa’s One Place School Psychometrists Community Members Crossing Points

Survey Results There are five necessary conditions of improving school districts. The rating scale described in the key helped us to assess the degree to which our district is engaged in the stated condition. Key: 1 Not Evident: Little or no evidence exists 2 Emerging: Evidence indicates early or preliminary stages of implementation of practice 3 Operational: Evidence indicates practices and procedures are actively implemented 4 Highly Functional: Evidence indicates practices and procedures are fully integrated and effectively and consistently implemented

Survey Results Necessary ConditionsMean Score Effective Leadership The leadership decisions and practices support the vision for student learning. 3.6 Policies and Practices The district has polices and practices in place that support improvement efforts. 3.7 Resources and Support Systems The district has the human, technology, and material resources to support improvement efforts. 3.1 Quality Teachers The recruitment, placement, and professional development of teachers are aligned with the district’s vision for student learning. 3.5 Quality Information An information system which collects, manages, and uses information to support the district’s vision is in place in the district. 3.4

Survey Results Each of the following categories below contains the three core tasks of continuously improving schools. Under each core task are listed the research-based effective practices of continuously improving schools that relate to that task. In examining our district’s practices in relation to the research findings listed, we used the rating scale described in the key determine the level that best describes our district’s implementation of the stated practices. Key: 1 Not Evident: Little or no evidence exists 2 Emerging: Evidence indicates early or preliminary stages of implementation of practice 3 Operational: Evidence indicates practices and procedures are actively implemented 4 Highly Functional: Evidence indicates practices and procedures are fully integrated and effectively and consistently implemented

Core Task #1: Ensure Desired Results In our district, we expect and ensure desired results by Mean Score 1. Implementing a vision for student learning through goals and strategies Maintaining high expectations for student achievement Maintaining a focus on improving student learning that permeates all levels of the district Acting on a compelling, shared belief that, collectively, staff and other stakeholders can impact the desired results of the district. 3.5

Core Task #1: Ensure Desired Results In our district, we effectively monitor performance by Mean Score 5. Using data to inform decision-making about teaching and learning Using a comprehensive assessment system to provide feedback for improvement in instructional practices and student performance Using classroom-based assessments to provide robust measures of students’ academic, cognitive, and metacognitive skills Identifying performance targets, indicators, and measures for comparing and improving effectiveness Taking appropriate and timely action to improve areas of identified needs 3.4

Core Task #2 Improve Teaching and Learning In our district, we support student learning by Mean Score 10. Maintaining district-wide expectations for student learning that reflect academic, cognitive, and metacognitive skills Delivering on the expectations for student learning through a coherent and rigorous curriculum Aligning an assessment system with curriculum that is enacted through instruction Supporting the equitable opportunity of students to learn through individualization and differentiation; Providing student support services and special programs to optimize individual student learning; Supporting a student learning community that includes student involvement Involving families and the community in supporting children as learners 3.2

Core Task #2 Improve Teaching and Learning In our district, we maximize teacher effectiveness by Mean Score 17. Using instructional strategies that provide students with focus, feedback, and sufficient opportunities to master skills Using appropriate strategies to assess the performance of students’ academic, cognitive, and metacognitive skills Adapting instruction to meet individual needs and engage learners Maximizing the use of time for instructions Creating a classroom environments conducive to learning Optimizing technology and multimedia as learning tools 3.1

Core Task #3: Foster a Culture of Improvement In our district, we develop a professional learning community by Mean Score 23. Sharing a common vision and goals that have student learning as the focus Improving individual and collective performance by coming together regularly for learning, decision- making, problem-solving, and celebration Continuously enhancing individual effectiveness through inquiry, practice, and peer reflection Supporting a culture of collegiality, collaboration, respect, and trust 3.3

Core Task #3: Foster a Culture of Improvement In our district, we lead for improvement by Mean Score 27. Sharing leadership for the improvement of teaching and learning throughout the district Articulating a compelling need for improvement and providing meaningful ways for our professional learning community to focus on its performance Engaging in practices that support the ongoing improvement of teaching and learning 3.4

Open-Ended Survey Questions Core Task # 1 How does the district use data to guide improvement and to monitor the results of efforts to improve? Core Task # 2 How does the district provide and ensure support for student learning? Core Task # 3 How does the district foster a community of learners dedicated to improvement?