Department of Bioengineering Tendon Stiffness and Strain Distribution GROUP 4B Dipal Patel – Background & Hypothesis Joe Frey – Methods & Protocol Chrysta.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Displaying data and calculations  How many trials have been performed?  Were there enough to satisfy the IB Internal Assessment criteria? FYI: IB wants.
Advertisements

The Effects of Edema & Self Adhesive Wrap on the Work of Flexion in a Cadaveric Hand Samuel D Buonocore MD.
7. MOMENT DISTRIBUTION METHOD
Cracking, Deflections and Ductility Code Provisions and Recent Research October 2006 Serviceability and Ductility The Other Limit States.
Professor Joe Greene CSU, CHICO
Chapter 11 Mechanical Properties of Materials
Department of Bioengineering FRACTURE PROPERTIES OF CHICKEN BONES WITH AND WITHOUT MARROW 101A1 Edwin Akrong – Background & Hypothesis Ping-Chien (Sam)
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
Detection and Measurement of Pavement Cracking Bagas Prama Ananta.
Department of Bioengineering A Comparison of Suture Type: Dermabond Liquid Adhesive vs. Traditional Sutures Group: TA4 Hannah Zelman – Background & Hypothesis.
ENGR 225 Section Saint-Venant’s Principle When loading is applied at a point on a body, it tends to create a stress distribution that becomes.
Department of Bioengineering BRIEF PROJECT TITLE/TOPIC (font 32) Group 101-A2 Joseph Kimmel – Background & Hypothesis Jon Wang – Methods & Protocol George.
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE HEAT OF COMBUSTION OF SUGAR AND FAT Elizabeth Hines (Background & Hypothesis) Edward Swanson (Methods & Protocol) Karishma Mehta.
Department of Bioengineering Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing: Mechanical Failure Properties of Suturing and Steri-Strips GROUP #5 Seungyon Kim – Background.
Aims, Objectives and Hypotheses Aims/Objectives Aims/Objectives To determine the effects of surrogate meat (rubber) thickness and loading rate on fracture.
Lab 10: Simple Harmonic Motion University of Michigan Physics Department Mechanics and Sound Intro Labs.
Sewing Terms. Cutting and Measuring Equipment Seam Ripper: A small tool used to remove stitches that are sewn. Tape Measure: a measuring device used to.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis: UHMWPE Tensile Testing GROUP 2WB UHMWPE main component of THA acetabular.
10 Pure Bending.
7A1 Friction & Galling Test
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Show relationship of stress and strain using experimental methods to determine stress-strain diagram of a specific material Discuss.
Elasticity and Strength of Materials
Testing Effectiveness of Common Antacids
3-Point Bending Device to Measure Transmural Strains for Multilayer Soft Tissue Composite Jennifer Olson Sarah Rivest Brian Schmidtberg Sponsor: Dr. Wei.
Department of Bioengineering Modeling of Wound Closures Under Uniaxial Tensile Loading 101A3 Tefesehet Mesfin – Background & Hypothesis Ryan Stuckert –
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis(es): Quantifying Chicken Bone Decalcification by Mass Section 102 GROUP.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis: Bone Decalcification and Fracture Strength GW4B The objective of this.
Department of Bioengineering FAILURE ENERGY: COMPARING SUTURE PERFORMANCE UNDER UNIAXIAL TENSION GROUP 101B1 Alison Agres – Background & Objective Ted.
Fatigue behavior of the foam Load and displacement are monitored throughout the test at a rate of 150Hz. The data collected are then analyzed using a custom.
50X Image of southern pine demonstrating differences in earylwood (left side) and latewood (right side) structure Abstract/Background The wood products.
BACKGROUND Biomechanical properties of cartilage vary throughout joint surface Manual positioning & testing of each site is time- consuming Proposed Robotic.
STRUCTURES Outcome 3 Gary Plimer 2008 MUSSELBURGH GRAMMAR SCHOOL.
Techniques used for Functional and Multi-segmental Spinal Unit Functional Spinal Unit (Motion Segment) –the smallest segment of the spine that exhibits.
This project is focused on the establishment of a novel data collection methodology that involves high resolution, full-field optical techniques. The aim.
Manufacturing Processes
Department of Bioengineering Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing and Image Analysis of Suture Performance in Chicken Skin 102B 5 Bari Dane Megan Liszewski.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Objectives & Hypotheses: Analysis of the Effect of Calcium Content on Chicken Bone Fracture Energy.
Department of Bioengineering Effect of Decalcification on Fracture Strength in Chicken Bones Group 102A5 Tim Bakke Vincent Cina Jonathan Lee Wee Siong.
1.5 AVERAGE SHEAR STRESS Shear stress is the stress component that act in the plane of the sectioned area. Consider a force F acting to the bar For rigid.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypothesis: Fracture Energy of De-calcified Chicken Bones Group WA2 Central Hypothesis:
Department of Bioengineering Buffering Capabilities of Guinea Pig Blood GROUP MB3 Kim Coughlan, Barry Huang, Laura Michelis, Le Truong.
Department of Bioengineering Bone Repair Techniques: Fracture Testing of Chicken Bones 102-1B Ted Lee – Background & Hypothesis Nikhil Deshmukh – Methods.
Department of Bioengineering Brandon Chen Stephen Cifelli Robert Metter Ek Kia Tan Uniaxial Suture Strength Testing Group TB2.
Department of Bioengineering Tensile Properties of Chicken Skin Treated with Trypsin-EDTA Group 3A Sakil Chundydyal – Background & Hypothesis Arnav Mukherjee.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Objectives & Hypotheses: REINFORCED BONE SURROGATE FRACTURING 101-A3 Objectives: To determine the.
Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation
Hand Sewing Buttons and Things.
Department of Bioengineering SUTURE PERFORMANCE 102 A Gyong Min Bak – Background & Hypothesis Heather Forquer – Methods & Protocol Kelvin Leung – Deliverables.
Department of Bioengineering Suture Performance Under Uniaxial Tensile Testing Group: 101A5 Ilan Epstein – Background & Hypothesis Neha Jha – Methods &
Department of Bioengineering Suture Performance of Stitches and Medical Adhesives 102 A2 Valerie Meausoone David Solomon Indraneel Gowdar Sarah Casey.
Lecture 1 Stress 16 July 2007 ENT 450 Mechanics of Materials Dr. Haftirman 1 ENT 450 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS (MoM) RC. Hibbler Lecture: DR. HAFTIRMAN Teaching.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Objective To even force distribution over all stitches and thus increase force needed for system.
Department of Bioengineering Structural Properties of Glued-Wood Surrogates 102B_4 Yang Zhang – Background & Hypothesis Kevin Clark – Methods & Protocol.
A NEW ALGORITHM FOR THE VISUAL TRACKING OF SURGICAL INSTRUMENT IN ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY 1 Interdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, Graduate.
University of Pennsylvania Department of Bioengineering Aims/Objective & Hypotheses: Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing of Suture Performance Group: TA2.
Department of Bioengineering Instron Uniaxial Tensile Testing: Structural & Material Properties of Sutures Group 102 3B Leia Harbour Julianne Huegel Will.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES Show relationship of stress and strain using experimental methods to determine stress-strain diagram of a specific material Discuss.
Pure Bending.
Pre-clinical evaluation of novel socket materials
Contents Introduction Identification of the knowledge gap
Virtual Screening.
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Impact of Stitch Density on Suture Performance
Alejandra M. Ruiz-Zapata, Andrew J
Bone Density and Impact Energy
Material Testing.
Give It a Lift with a Lever
ANALYSIS OF BEAM BY USING FEM
Experimental Mechanics - assignment
Presentation transcript:

Department of Bioengineering Tendon Stiffness and Strain Distribution GROUP 4B Dipal Patel – Background & Hypothesis Joe Frey – Methods & Protocol Chrysta Irolla – Deliverables & Pitfalls Akivaga Tsingalia – Equipment & Budget

Department of Bioengineering Background: Various tendons in the body are subjected to strains that may cause them to rip. These tendons should be repaired in a way that does not limit range of motion and maintains the stiffness of an intact tendon. Additionally, previous suture testing experiments have shown that a repaired material under tension will exert strain on the sutured area. Hypotheses & Aims: The experiment’s primary aim is to assess the difference between the stiffness of sutured tendons and intact tendons. Because intact tendons distribute strain over a larger area than sutured tendons, it is expected that a sutured tendon will have a lower stiffness than that of an intact tendon. Additionally, camera images will be used to assess the distribution of strain in three regions along the length of the tendon. It is expected that the strain will be uniformly distributed in the intact tendon, while the strain will be more highly concentrated around the area of repair for the sutured tendon. Dipal Patel

Department of Bioengineering Methods & Protocol: Remove ten 4-inch tendons from chicken leg samples. Cut 5 of the 10 tendons into 2-inch pieces. Sew the five sets of torn tendons together using the sewing apparatus to create 5 evenly spaced running stitches. Make each stitch 1/2-inches in length. For the sutured tendons, place markings above and below sutured area, making two 1/2-inch lengthwise segments. Also make markings directly above and below stitches. Place markings in similar areas on intact tendons. Use the video camera to isolate the marked regions of each tendon, taking continuous images of each area upon tension application. Test five intact tendons and five sutured tendons with the Instron Model 4444 using the tensile attachment. Record data of applied force and displacement. Gather data and compare, calculating values of stiffness. Use camera images to tabulate total displacements of each section of all tendon samples. Calculate averages of each section for sutured tendons and intact tendons. Analyze data, comparing stiffness values and strains of specific segments of sutured tendons and intact tendons. Joe Frey

Department of Bioengineering Potential Pitfalls: Chrysta Irolla Problems with quantifying strain at specific sites (use camera to isolate sutured area). Difficulty with slipping of tendons within Instron clamps (place extra tendon in clamp to reduce slipping). Difficult to get consistent results without many biological samples (more funding would be required for more samples). According to a Mayo Clinic study 1, the stiffness of an intact tendon was 39.2 N/mm, while the stiffness of tendons with various suture repairs was 25.1 N/mm or less. It is expected that the experimental data will agree with these findings, and the stiffness of intact tendons will be greater than that of the sutured tendons. Proposed Deliverables/Findings: RepairStiffness (N/mm) Kessler23.6 (n=17) MK24.4 (n=18) Modified Savage24.9 (n=18) Lee23.0 (n=18) MGH24.2 (n=18) Running25.1 (n=18) No Repair39.2 (n=7) It is expected that sutured tendons will concentrate strain in the area of repair (the weakest point in the tendon), while intact tendons will evenly distribute strain. 1 Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Various Suture Repair Techniques in a Partially Lacerated Tendon ft/vol_122/iss_6/604_1.html#F4

Department of Bioengineering Equipment/Materials & Budget Justification: Supplies: Supramid suture material Rulers and calipers Marking pen Scissors Cutting board Akivaga Tsingalia Newly purchased equipment and supplies (Total Spending: $1637): Chicken legs ($26): source of tendons Supramid sutures ($75): material commonly used for repair 2 Sewing machine ($180): used for consistency in sutures 3 1/3" Progressive Scan IEEE 1394 Color XGA Camera ($1356): high resolution progressive scan camera needed for constant imaging of displacement measurements productcode%3D3312+Supramid+Pricing&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2&client=firefox-a Equipment: Instron 4444 Instron 4444 tensile attachment Computer LabView program