Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0562r0 Submission May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 CCA – CID 537 discussion Date: 2011-05-03 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1282r0 Submission November 2010 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 PLCP Rx Procedure Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1812r0 Submission November 2006 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 More RX Procedure Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1731r0 Submission November 2006 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Green Field Compromise Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /1731r2 Submission December 2006 Eldad Perahia (Intel)Slide 1 Green Field Compromise Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE p Submission September 2008 Carl Kain, Noblis (USDOT) Response to Comments on Optional Enhanced ACR and AACR Values Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes.
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
Doc.: IEEE /1228r2 Submission Nov Heejung Yu, Yeungnam Univ./NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Protocol and signaling framework for OFDMA
Doc.: IEEE /1228r0 Submission September 2014 xxx, NEWRACOM Issues on 256-FFT per 20MHz Date: Authors: Slide 1.
802.11ac Preamble Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for n/ac.
Doc.: IEEE /0633r0 Submission May 2008 Andrew Myles (Cisco)Slide 1 Discussion of 40Mhz coexistence with 20MHz BSS in secondary channel Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1582r3 Submission October 2006 Eldad Perahia (Intel), Jim Petranovich (CNXT)Slide 1 TGN LB84 PHY Ad Hoc Agenda and Minutes Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission September 2013 Matthew Fischer et al (Broadcom)Slide 1 CID 205 BSSID Color Bits Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE s Submission September 2015 Hidetoshi Yokota and Ruben Salazar, Landis&GyrSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for.
Doc.: IEEE /0231r3 Submission March 2010 John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. & NiCTSlide 1 Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Doc.:IEEE /0359r1 Submission xx. xx, 2010 Il-Gu Lee et al.Slide ac preamble for VHT auto-detection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1523r4 Submission Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1 Jan 2015 Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies)
Doc.: IEEE 11-14/1432r0 Submission Nov Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Proposed ax Specification Framework - Background Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1243r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Sun Bo, ZTE Corporation Nov, 2010.
Doc.: IEEE /618r0 Submission August 2002 Bobby Jose,Slide 1 RRM Requirements discussion on CCA Bobby Jose.
Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission Jan 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Receiver Sensitivity Levels Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission May 2004 Masahiro Takagi and Tomoko Adachi, TOSHIBASlide 1 Simulation Scenarios and Comparison Criteria for Coexistence.
Doc.: IEEE /0363r2 Submission Pilot Value Definitions May 2012 Yongho Seok (LG Electronics), Hongyuan Zhang (Marvell)Slide 1 Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0623r0 Submission May 2007 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Resolutions to 20/40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Issues Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0499r1 Submission May 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Simulation Scenario Floor Plans Date: Authors:
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
SB1000 CID 6304 PHY-CCARESET.request
November 2014 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [SRM related functions in ]
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
<month year> <doc.: IEEE doc> March 2011
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
Coex Ad Hoc January London Agenda and Report
Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac
802.11ac Preamble Discussions
<month year> doc.: IEEE q
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
CCA Sensitivity Date: September 2017
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
White Space Regulatory Issues
Coex Ad Hoc January London Agenda and Report
More Simulations on Secondary CCA
FILS Frame Content Date: Authors: February 2008
CCA- and slot-time relations
802.11ac preamble for VHT auto-detection
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Discussion on PHY CIDs 2773 and 2775
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Counter Proposal to CID 7177
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
False L-STF Detection Issue
Coex Ad Hoc January London Agenda and Report
August 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: 14 August,
Green Field Compromise
September, 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: CID 422 Proposal Date Submitted: Sept.
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 CCA – CID 537 discussion Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission Overview Receive Procedure ( ) describes how to set PHY-CCA.indication when various conditions occur, such as –Signal loss before validating L-SIG –check of the L-SIG parity bit is not valid Language in these two conditions borrows the phase “missed preamble” from 11n, however it is not defined in 11ac CID 537 states: –"missed preamble" language is not used anymore Further discussion questioned whether CCA indication applies to primary or secondary channels May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission Initial Steps in Receive Procedure “… A PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, channel-list) shall also be issued as an initial indication of reception of a signal.” “The channel-list parameter of the PHY- CCA.indication is absent when the operating channel width is 20 MHz and includes the element “primary” when the operating channel width is 40 MHz, 80 MHz, 160 MHz or MHz.” –The channel-list DOES NOT include secondary channels, only primary channel (or absent with 20 MHz) May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission Error Conditions in Receive Procedure “If signal loss occurs before validating L-SIG, the VHT PHY shall maintain PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, channel-list) until the received level drops below the CCA sensitivity level (for a missed preamble) specified in (CCA sensitivity).” “If the check of the L-SIG parity bit is not valid… The VHT PHY shall maintain PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, channel-list) until the received level drops below the CCA sensitivity level (for a missed preamble) specified in (CCA sensitivity).” No definition in for “missed preamble” May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission Example Assume we define “missed preamble” to -62 dBm as in 11n Then consider the case where we have an invalid check of L-SIG parity bit and the level of the signal is -65 dBm on both primary and secondary In this case, PHY-CCA.indication on the primary switches to IDLE However according to the CCA sensitivity section ( ), the PHY shall issue a PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, {secondary}) at -72 dBm So we have a condition in which the PHY-CCA.indication is IDLE on the primary and BUSY on the secondary for the same signal May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission Possible Solution Delete error conditions from Receiver Procedure and simply refer to for CCA sensitivity rules, as follows “… A PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, channel-list) shall is also be issued as an initial indication of reception of a signal, as specified in (CCA sensitivity).” “After the PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, channel-list) is issued, the PHY entity shall begin receiving the training symbols and searching for L-SIG and VHT-SIG-A in order to set the maximum duration of the data stream. If signal loss occurs before validating L-SIG, the VHT PHY shall maintain PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, channel-list) until the received level drops below the CCA sensitivity level (for a missed preamble) specified in (CCA sensitivity). If the check of the L-SIG parity bit is not valid, a PHYRXSTART.indication is not issued. The PHY shall issue the error condition PHY-RXEND.indication(FormatViolation). The VHT PHY shall maintain PHY-CCA.indication(BUSY, channel-list) until the received level drops below the CCA sensitivity level (for a missed preamble) specified in (CCA sensitivity). May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission CCA Sensitivity Modification (1/2) Replace “The start of a PPDU that occupies at least the primary 20 MHz channel under the conditions listed in Table shall be detected with >90% probability within a period of aCCATime (< 4μs).” with “The PHY shall detect the start of a PPDU that occupies at least the primary 20 MHz channel under the conditions listed in Table within a period of aCCATime ( 90% probability.” This permits dropping CCA due to acquisition or L- SIG failure for up to 10% of the packets May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0562r0 Submission CCA Sensitivity Modification (1/2) Remove “Any signal within the primary 20 MHz channel at or above -62 dBm” from Table Add “The receiver shall hold the CCA signal busy for any signal 20 dB or more above the minimum modulation and coding rate sensitivity (– = –62 dBm) in the primary 20 MHz channel.” after Table May 2011 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 8