Case Study: Saving the San Pedro River Adam Czekanski 17 November 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Borrego Valley Borrego Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Integrated Regional Water Management Planning.
Advertisements

BC’s New Water Sustainability Act Pat Lapcevic, Water Protection Section Head West Coast Region Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Operations Salt.
Western Resource Advocates Linda Stitzer westernresources.org] GUAC Meeting 9/18/2012.
Ecological and Recreational Flows Workgroup Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study Next Steps Urban Water Institute August 14, 2014 San Diego,
Colorado River Basin Water Supply and Demand Study December 10, 2010.
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Central Yavapai Highlands Water Resource Management Study [BOR Appraisal Study] Presented by: Ken Janecek January 28, 2009.
Moving Forward after the Colorado River Basin Water Supply & Demand Study CRWUA Las Vegas, NV December 10-12, 2014.
Illinois RC & D Introduction to R esource C onservation & D evelopment Module 2: Who are the players?
Why was it dammed? How has it affected the lives of the local people?
Water Use and Resources in Arizona – Part 1 Role Playing Project.
Upper Feather River Watershed IRWM. Organizations Audubon Society City of Portola County of Plumas County of Sierra Feather River Coordinated Resource.
NRCS Small Farm Program Program Manager Adolfo Perez Web-site:
HCP Implementation in Pima County, Arizona Julia Fonseca Pima County Office of Sustainability and Conservation Photo by Aaron Flesch.
Water Planning in the Western U.S. Impacts and Opportunities for Investor-Owned Water Utilities Jeffrey Stuck, Environmental Management Director American.
Making the Linkage Between Water Management & Planning Rita P. Maguire, President and CEO ACMA 2006 Summer Conference July 27, Tucson, AZ.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
Arizona Water Resources And Issues Border Legislative Conference December 7, 2006.
SPRNCA: Maintaining Riparian/Wetland Function. What does that mean today? Isn’t SPRNCA already “protected and enhanced?” When will it be “good enough”?
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Sustainability of Ground-Water Use in the San Pedro River Basin, Cochise County, Arizona James Leenhouts,
Yosemite-Mariposa IRWM Planning Region            
1. Natural Resources Conservation Service Strategic Plan Strategic Plan
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
Coordinating Across the Region Presentation to Tahoe-Sierra IRWMP | April 30, 2014 Who We Are What We Do Potential Services Sign our MOU.
Santa Cruz AMA Virtual Tour Santa Cruz AMA Virtual Tour September 2000.
Colorado River Sustainability, Drought Response & Central Arizona Project Urban Water Institute August 27, 2015.
Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Partnerships.
2006 Governor’s Pollution Prevention Awards Bloomington, October 25, 2006 WATER SUPPLY PLANNING IN ILLINOIS Derek Winstanley Chief Illinois State Water.
An Interregional Water Solution with Conjunctive Use of Groundwater Haskell L. Simon President, Coastal Plains Groundwater Conservation District Vice President,
Partnerships in Conservation
Playa Lakes William Grooms. What are Playa Lakes? shallow, depressional wetlands that are generally round and small, shallow, depressional wetlands that.
North Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative
Inyokern Senior Center 1247 Broadway, Inyokern February 12, 2014 Lorelei H. Oviatt, Director, AICP Kern County Planning & Community Development Department.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Environment Committee September 13, 2011 Water Supply Work Plan for Clean Water Fund Activities.
What You Need to Know about Groundwater Conservation Districts In Texas Tyler December 3,2002 Guy Fipps Professor and Extension Irrigation Engineer Dept.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Groundwater Study For Malad and Bear Rivers Drainages, Box Elder County Bear River Water Conservancy.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
WHAT COULD IT INCLUDE? JOHN ZAMBRANO JANUARY 28, 2009 A MITIGATION PLAN.
Creeks & Communities Effort Within the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area.
Flathead River to Lake Initiative Conservation and restoration through a diverse collaborative effort Part I – How it began Part II – Conservation Successes.
Identifying the Role of Government in Forest Management.
Wildlife Co-ops and Groundwater Management in Texas? Matt Wagner, Urs Kreuter and Ronald Kaiser Texas A&M University, Institute for Renewable Natural Resources.
STRATEGIES FOR FRESHWATER. CONTEXT FOR STRATEGIES.
March 21, 2006 Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2860 Columbia River Basin – Water Supply Keith Holliday Watershed Lead Washington State Dept. of.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America Water and Climate Change: Sustainable Management of Natural Resources Eugenio Clariond-Reyes.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
San Gabriel Valley From Stormwater to Supply
Protective Agencies Natural Resources Unit Nontraditional Agriculture.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
Mark Rude Executive Director Southwest Kansas Groundwater Management District No. 3.
The Highlands Region: Partnerships to Conserve Forests & Watersheds Ramapo Mountains, NJ.
> Las Vegas Valley Watershed Advisory Committee Regional Water Quality Plan.
Protecting the Quality of our Water
Sustainable Groundwater Management Act Activities in Butte County
Laurel J. Lacher, PhD, RG October 17, 2013 ISMAR8 Conference
Natural Resources Nontraditional Agriculture
Natural Resources Nontraditional Agriculture
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Reclaimed Water Funding
Earl Lewis, PE Kansas Economic Policy Conference October 24, 2003
Title of Notes: AZ water use p. 6 RS
2018 Kern County Water Summit
FISCAL YEAR Discussion on Mid-Year Budget Adjustment:
IMPLEMENTING AMENDMENT 1
Natural Resources Unit Nontraditional Agriculture
Nebraska Water Infrastructure Funding and Financing Programs
OBJECTIVE HYDROSPHERE
Presentation transcript:

Case Study: Saving the San Pedro River Adam Czekanski 17 November 2005

Agenda Geographic Setting The Water Deficit Saving the San Pedro The Upper San Pedro Partnership Questions

Geographic Setting Flows north from the mountains of Sonora, Mexico Perennial flow from Hereford to Fairbank, AZ (~ 20 miles) due to groundwater forced to the surface by bedrock Remainder of river is primarily ephemeral (Courtesy of the Upper San Pedro Partnership)

The Water Deficit Groundwater that sustains the San Pedro is required by two primary groups: –The local community –The ecosystem of the San Pedro River Recharge of groundwater occurs through: –Mountain front recharge –Streambed infiltration –Groundwater underflow from Mexico

Local Community Greater Fort Huachuca / Sierra Vista community Farmers Ranchers Mining / Industry

San Pedro Ecosystem Over four million birds use the San Pedro basin during yearly migration Supports 80 species of mammals (2 nd most in the world) Home to more than 40 species of reptiles and amphibians (Courtesy of the Aurora Community Watershed Partnership)

The Water Deficit (Courtesy of the Upper San Pedro Partnership, 2005 Water Management and Conservation Plan)

Saving the San Pedro 1988 – Congress designates 69 km stretch of San Pedro as San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area (SPRNCA) Livestock grazing, water diversions, and mining prohibited (Courtesy of the Arizona Bureau of Land Management)

Upper San Pedro Partnership The Upper San Pedro Partnership (USPP) is a consortium of 21 agencies and organizations All agencies and organizations own or control land and/or water use, and have the ability and authority to identify and implement policies and projects

Upper San Pedro Partnership (Land Owners and/or Land or Water Use Controllers) Local Agencies –Cochise County –Sierra Vista –Huachuca City –Bisbee –Tombstone State Agencies –State Land Department, –Dept. of Water Resources Federal Agencies –Fort Huachuca –Bureau of Land Management –U.S. Forest Service –National Park Service –Bureau of Reclamation Other Organizations –The Nature Conservancy –Audubon Arizona –Bella Vista Ranches

Upper San Pedro Partnership (Resource Agencies) State Agencies –Department of Environmental Quality –Arizona Association of Conservation Districts Other Agencies –Hereford NRCD (Natural Resource Conservation District) Federal Agencies –U.S. Geological Survey –USDA Agricultural Research Service –Fish and Wildlife Service

Upper San Pedro Partnership The overall goal of the USPP is to: Ensure an adequate long-term groundwater supply is available to meet the reasonable needs of both the area's residents and property owners (current & future) and the San Pedro Riparian NCA. (USPP Organizational Documents) USPP does NOT make policy decisions, but provides the framework to research, plan, fund, and implement projects and policies through member agencies Publishes annual Water Management and Conservation Plan as a working document to outline planning, research, and progress Seeks to eliminate deficit groundwater pumping by 2011

Upper San Pedro Partnership Planning –Reduce current water use (efficient fixtures, better water practices by the public) –Avoidance of future water use (legislation, ordinances) –Methods to recharge the aquifer (Courtesy of the Aurora Community Watershed Partnership)

Upper San Pedro Partnership Research –Groundwater modeling –Water augmentation studies –San Pedro Riparian NCA studies (Courtesy of the Aurora Community Watershed Partnership)

Upper San Pedro Partnership Implementation of Measures –Recharging of aquifer with treated effluent by Sierra Vista and Fort Huachuca –Purchase and retirement of irrigated and grazing lands –Large scale installation of water efficient fixtures –Local laws governing turf use and care –Coordination with Mexican government for conservation projects in headwater region Net groundwater demand has been cut nearly in half since late 2002 (Courtesy of the Aurora Community Watershed Partnership)

Upper San Pedro Partnership Funding (see chart) Project spending: (Courtesy of the Upper San Pedro Partnership)

Questions What is the most critical feature of the Upper San Pedro Partnership that has enabled it to be so successful in such a short period of time? Will there come a point when the requirements for economic growth and prosperity in the Sierra Vista / Fort Huachuca area will outweigh the need to stringently protect the river and its ecosystem?