Identifying Wildlife Linkages and Wildlife Collision Hot Spots on Oregon Highways Oregon Department of Transportation Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc. Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Advertisements

Designing Highways for Wildlife Connectivity. Course Introductions.
ODOT Wildlife Hotspot Study Pilot Study: ODOT District 10 Prepared by: Melinda Trask Oregon Department of Transportation, Geo- Environmental Section, Salem.
ODOT Wildlife Hotspots Study RESULTS OF STATEWIDE ANALYSIS July 21, 2008 Melinda Trask Oregon Department of Transportation, Geo-Environmental Section,
Update from Oregon Wildlife Linkage Workshops, 2007 Oregon Chapter of The Wildlife Society February 14, 2008 – Salishan Resort, Oregon.
Keeping It Simple - Easy Ways to Help Wildlife Along Roads Critter Crossings Linking Habitats and Reducing Roadkill
Oregon Wildlife Movement Data CETAS Meeting June 16, 2009.
Oregon Wildlife Habitat Connectivity: A National Perspective Sandra Jacobson USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Redwood Sciences Lab.
Mule Deer Plan Population Objective Strategies h & k Implement a method to collect annual adult doe and fawn mortality estimates on representative units.
South Dakota Deer- Vehicle Collision Data Art Smith Dept. of Game, Fish & Parks 523 E. Capitol Ave, Pierre
Establishing GIS for Management in the Sauvie Island Wildlife Management Area, Oregon Jeremy Hruska Masters Degree in GIS Candidate Penn State University.
Photo credit: Reno SommerhalderBanff National Park, Alberta NCHRP Update: Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of Wildlife Crossings in North.
Addressing Deer Vehicle Accidents at the Community Scale Elizabeth I. Rogers, Ph.D. Dean B. Premo, Ph.D. White Water Associates, Inc. Amasa, MI.
Global Mapping Technology Corvallis, Oregon Products and Training for GPS/GIS/SURVEY Tel:
Santa Fe County Focal Species Workshop Thank you all for participating with a special thanks to: –Santa Fe County –NM Department of Game and Fish –The.
CRASH SCENE MANAGEMENT A partnership between the Oregon Department Of Transportation and the Oregon State Police.
Spatial Statistics II RESM 575 Spring 2010 Lecture 8.
Virginia Wildlife Action Plan David K. Whitehurst Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries.
Geoinfosys Technologies New Delhi 9 th February 2012 Development of ‘Geographical Information System’ (GIS) based “Decision Support System for Transport”
Winter Ecology – Spring 2008 Mountain Research Station – University of Colorado, Boulder David Rosengarten.
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Plan (CWCP) and Citizen-based Monitoring Signe Holtz Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
1 Spatial and Spatio-temporal modeling of the abundance of spawning coho salmon on the Oregon coast R Ruben Smith Don L. Stevens Jr. September.
ODOT Wildlife Collision Hotspots Study RESULTS OF STATEWIDE ANALYSIS August 26, 2008 Melinda Trask Oregon Department of Transportation, Geo-Environmental.
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Introducing the Oregon Conservation trategy Oregon Wildlife Movement Data Oregon Chapter Wildlife Society Meeting.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
ODOT Wildlife Program_RTL_ Initiating the Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy Melinda Trask, ODOT Geo-Environmental Section,
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Introducing the Oregon Conservation trategy Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy Pacific Northwest Wildlife Connections.
Urban Green Network Mapping in Brighton and Hove.
Wildlife and Washington Highways Ungulate Vehicle Interactions Olympia, Washington February 25, 2007 Marion Carey Fish and Wildlife Program Manager Environmental.
Esri Southeast User Conference Lara Hall May 5, 2014.
Development and validation of models to assess the threat to freshwater fishes from environmental change and invasive species PIs: Craig Paukert Joanna.
There are many kinds of animals. Animals can be put into groups based upon their characteristics. Some animals do not have backbones.
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission
Extending Spatial Hot Spot Detection Techniques to Temporal Dimensions Sungsoon Hwang Department of Geography State University of New York at Buffalo DMGIS.
EEES4760/6760 Landscape Ecology Jiquan chen Feb. 25, Fragmentation 2.Island Biogeographic Theory (IBT)
Need for Hunting Laws By the 1930s activities had destroyed much of the habitat of wildlife Some species had been nearly wiped to extinction from uncontrolled.
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
Paving Over Paradise.  Fragmentation of Conservation Landscape  Degradation of Conservation Potential of lands  Barrier to Wildlife Movement  Sink.
State of the Forest: Data harmonization and management Helping us to know whether we are getting the job done.
T.E.E.G.S Transportation, Emergency, and Environmental GIS Services Matt Smith Project Manager Lauren Bender GIS Analyst Amanda Magera GIS Analyst Aaron.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:30 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:30 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation November 2014.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Angela Kargel Region 2 Traffic Manager Oregon Department of Transportation January 2015.
The Next Step for Idaho’s CWCS. 9:00 Welcome, overview, and what is expected 10:00 Identifying focal areas 12:00 Lunch - Open discussion 1:00 Identifying.
Wildlife viewing is the activity of watching and enjoying wildlife species in their natural environment. The activity may be as simple as observing.
Washington Comprehensive Fish & Wildlife Conservation Strategy Federal mandate required states to complete Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategies.
Helping Communities Protect Wildlife Habitat Emily Brunkhurst Wildlife Biologist NH Fish and Game Taking Action for Wildlife.
Iron Ore Holdings Ltd Buckland Project & Northern Quoll: adaptive mine design and management 30 July
So, what’s the “point” to all of this?….
AREAS OF CONSERVATION EMPHASIS ACE-II Photos courtesy of USFWS National Image Library Melanie Gogol-Prokurat California Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Phil Hurvitz Avian Conservation Lab Meeting 8. March. 2002
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
Eng UK © TYRÉNS 2016 ROAD ECOLOGY Mårten Karlson Tyréns AB
로드킬. Contents  RoadKill?  로드킬 실태 해외 ( 호주 ) 국내  로드킬 대처방안 해외 ( 미국, the Wildlife Foundation ) 국내.
The Natural Resource Planner and Kansas Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool Dana Peterson, KBS, KDWPT Mike Houts, Gina Ross and Jennifer Delisle, KBS.
Some Wildlife Census Techniques
RoadWatchBC: Citizen Science Supports Solutions
Environmental and Cultural Data Products
Prioritizing Species for Biological Planning in the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NALCC) USFWS Region 5 Strategic Habitat Conservation.
The Monkton Amphibian Underpasses
Julia Kintsch, ECO-resolutions Paige Singer, Rocky Mountain Wild
Washington Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
Point-pattern analysis of Nashville, TN robberies: It’s all about that kernel Ingrid Luffman and Andrew Joyner, Department of Geosciences, East Tennessee.
Oregon Cougar Management Plan 2017 Update
Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. Wyoming DOT
Using Measures to Tell Your Story to Your Legislature and the Public
D1 Species Conclusions.
Environmental and Cultural Data Products
Rodrigo Santos, Sarah Santos and Fernando Ascensão
Hunter Education Independent Study Field Day
Presentation transcript:

Identifying Wildlife Linkages and Wildlife Collision Hot Spots on Oregon Highways Oregon Department of Transportation Mason, Bruce & Girard, Inc. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Introduction Highways restrict wildlife movement across the landscape by fragmenting habitat, thereby limiting or completely severing access to resources that support important life history needs. Given the thousands of miles of state-owned roads across Oregon, ODOT and ODFW developed The Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy to begin addressing wildlife movement issues statewide. The first step was to identify and prioritize areas that presented wildlife movement problems related to highways. The Hot Spot Analysis was conducted to map animal-vehicle collision problem areas, and the Wildlife Linkages Study was conducted to map wildlife movement priority areas. Hot Spots - Methods Step 1: “Scrub” data to create a statewide GIS dataset. Scrubbing removed 44% of the records due to data quality and GIS mapping problems. Step 2: Look for evidence of clustering with a Nearest Neighbor Analysis. Step 3: Spatially analyze the data with a Ripley’s K-Distribution to identify the appropriate scale at which clustering of wildlife carcass occurs. Step 4: Map data using the Kernel Density Method to depict clustering. Hot Spots - Analysis ODOT Maintenance dispatch carcass records were used because these are the most abundant sources of data available for all highways in Oregon. These records do not represent comprehensive data on animal vehicle collisions (AVCs) because the records mainly represent animal carcasses that are a highway safety problem (e.g., large mammals such as deer and elk). Hot Spots - Results and Discussion The Hot Spot Analysis identified and mapped high frequency wildlife carcass incidents on all state highways in Oregon. This was one of the first uses of the Kernel Density Method to map wildlife collision hot spots over such a large study area (7,415 linear miles of highway). The Kernel Density Method provided a useful visual representation of wildlife hot spots (see following figure). * * * * * For more information on the Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy: strategy For GIS data on linkages and collision hot spots: Linkage dataset with current priorities in Oregon Example of a linkage areas that crosses a transportation corridor Wildlife Linkages Study Through a series of workshops, stakeholders identified wildlife linkage (key movement) areas (emphasizing areas that crossed paved roads) for a suite of focal species including big game, small mammals, amphibians, and reptiles. The result of these workshops is mapped information showing wildlife linkage areas across roads in Oregon based on expert opinion. The Wildlife Movement Strategy Working Group then prioritized the linkage areas based on a number of criteria. Next Steps Provide data to transportation managers for project planning/scoping. Conduct additional surveys in hot spots and linkage areas to determine appropriate actions for improving wildlife movement. Use linkage dataset in conjunction with hot spot data set to improve wildlife crossings and wildlife movement across Oregon. Graphic Results of the Kernel Density Analysis (exaggerated for visibility) The Nearest Neighbor Index confirmed clustering of the data (NNI = <1 and p<0.001). The Ripley’s K-Statistic indicated that clustering was significant at all distances between 0 and 10 miles. The Kernel Density Method depicts the widespread nature of wildlife collisions and some distinctive high density hot spots on state highways. Dispatch records are based on personal account of a carcass observation. These records are neither spatially accurate nor verifiable as true AVCs. Statewide records from 1995 – 2006 were used. The final data set included 17,825 mapped carcass records. Wildlife underpass on SR240 in Washington (source: WDOT) Proposed overpass for elk along the I- 90 corridor (source: WDOT)