Three-Tier Model of Student Intervention Training (NMPED’s Guidance Framework) An Exploration of the SAT Process October 2, 2015 Presented by: Myra L.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.
RtI Day 2 EXCEED Trainer of Trainers SDUSD October 2011 Linda Trousdale Michelle Crisci Several slides were adapted from: Washoe County School District,
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
July 2007 IDEA Partnership 1 RTI Process What is it?
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Response to Intervention Habersham County Schools.
Multidisciplinary Teams
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Parent Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Supports (SW-PBS)
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Student Assistance Team Training & Support.
Student Support Team (SST) Training A Humanware Strategic Plan Activity Cleveland Metropolitan School District 1.
Response to Intervention RTI September 2014 STAT Training.
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
Timberlane Regional School District
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
HELP!!! Support Team-Triage Section 504Special EdELLG & T Most Common Structure Reading Program A Other effective/ affective intervention systems Classroom.
Intervention Team / Tier III Overview Harding University High School
RTI Implantation Guide Overview Fall Before we begin… Student Intervention Planning is not a pre-referral process. It is the process of collaborating.
4- Step Middletown’s Response to Intervention process.
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Problem Solving and RtI ASCA Conference Denver, 2007 Rich Downs School Counseling Consultant Student Support Services Project Florida Department of Education.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Wake County Student Support Team Process Melissa Bunn
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Information taken from the Kansas Special Education Process handbook. See
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Owingsville Elementary School September 9, 2012
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Data-Based Decision Making
NOTES FOR PRESENTERS VIEW
Student Assistance Team (SAT)
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Three-Tier Model of Student Intervention Training (NMPED’s Guidance Framework) An Exploration of the SAT Process October 2, 2015 Presented by: Myra L. Martinez, Associate Superintendent Vivian Valencia, Instructional Coach Maryellen Fresquez, Instructional Coach

Introductions Please introduce yourself to 4 people that you do not know. Let them know: 1.Who are you? 2.Where do you teach? 3.What is your positon? 4.What do you expect to learn today? Please remember to write down your partners names? You will need a 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock appointment for later activities.

1.Tier 1: All Students Activity 1 2.Tier 2: Referred Students Activity 2 3.Tier 3: Identified Students 4.PED Online Resources and Samples 5.Forms 6.Timeline Expectations Exit Activity

Universal Screening: General health and well-being English language/home language proficiency Academic proficiency using multiple measures Core Instruction with Differentiation and Interventions as Identified by Data: Core instruction for all students High-yield, instructional strategies Differentiated Instruction Enrichment Activities Culturally and linguistically responsive instruction Interventions as identified by data School-Wide Behavioral System with Interventions and Positive Support: School code of conduct Classroom rules School-wide behavioral Programs Bullying prevention policy/programs Monitoring of office discipline referrals (ODRS) and attendance data School wellness policy

Tier I: Notes about English Learners (ELs)

Tier I: Decision Considerations Locally devised implementation plan. The district has developed and outlined its general implementation plan with timelines. Schools are responsible for implementation at the site level within the scope of the district timeline requirements. As each school implements the SAT process at the local level, PLC and SAT teams play an essential role in determining its data-based decision rules for when interventions should be changed and when students should move from Tier 1 to Tier 2 or Tier 3 or reverse course The complete Espanola Public Schools SAT Implementation Plan for Tier I, II and III referral will be presented at the end of this session.

Tier I: Decision Considerations

Page 8

What are your Wows! What have you learned thus far? What are your wonders? What is not clear?

The focus of Tier 2 is to provide strategic and individualized support for at-risk students (struggling or significantly advanced) for whom Tier 1 instruction and universal interventions prove insufficient. A school-based team called the Student Assistance Team (SAT) gathers all available data about a student who is not making sufficient progress in Tier 1, develops an hypothesis regarding a possible cause for the problem, and then designs an individualized SAT intervention plan and/or behavioral intervention plan (BIP), as necessary.

It is important to note that a SAT intervention plan or BIP could be required for a student performing below or above grade level expectations. By identifying students who could benefit from more intensive interventions, the SAT process helps students remain and succeed in the general education program and reduce unnecessary or inappropriate referrals to special education.

Summary Students receiving Tier 2 services continue to receive Tier 1 instruction, but with the benefit of more targeted, intensive interventions prescribed by the SAT intervention plan or BIP. These interventions should be provided by the classroom teacher or in combination with other appropriate staff in the school to address academic skill or behavioral needs. The individualized SAT intervention plan or BIP increases intensity for a student—that is, they increase frequency and duration of the interventions, reduce group size, and/or use specialists to deliver the intervention. Tier 2 also provides for frequent and specific progress- monitoring of interventions, so that timely adjustments can be made for the at-risk student, if needed.

STEP 1: Referral to SAT Coordinator A student may be referred to SAT for academic and/or behavioral reasons. A teacher must complete a SAT referral packet and submit it to the SAT coordinator at the school site.

STEP 2: SAT Referral Packet Review and Certification The SAT coordinator review the referral packet, collects all relevant information and determines if the data meets the certification for Tier 2 Academic and/or behavioral interventions which have already been implemented must be documented as well as multiple data points demonstrating a lack of student progress over time. The SAT coordinator should consider student work samples; documentation of parent contacts; results of universal screening, including vision and hearing screenings; student attendance data; discipline records; student performance reports, any observations or interviews and any other relevant data. The referral demonstrates that the student has received core instruction with differentiation and interventions and/or behavioral interventions with lack of progress over time, then the SAT coordinator certified the referral.

Step 3: The SAT Meeting SAT coordinator ensures that the student’s parents, teachers, and other SAT members are notified of the meeting in advance. All communication with parents should be conducted in a language the parent can understand. The initial SAT should cover the following items: 1.Referring teacher shares the reason for student’s referral. 2.SAT systematically reviews and discusses all relevant data about the student. 3.Referring teacher should share interventions implemented and the progress monitoring data. 4.SAT (including the parent) develops one or more hypotheses about why the student is struggling. 5.After reviewing the data the SAT makes one or more of the following decisions: The student appears to need no new interventions and no Tier 2 plan is necessary. The student’s challenges suggest a SAT intervention plan or BIP is warranted. The existing data is insufficient for a complete determination. The referring teacher must provide additional information. Refer the student for a multidisciplinary evaluation due to an obvious disability.

Step 4: Implement and Monitor Interventions 1.SAT intervention plan and/or BIP is implemented. 2.A follow up SAT meeting is coordinated. 3.Student’s response to intervention is progress monitored and graphed in two week increments. 4.After approximately nine weeks (with at least four data points) a follow- up SAT should be scheduled to determine the effectiveness of the intervention to determine if there is a positive trend in the student’s learning. 5.After examining the data points at the follow-up SAT meeting, the SAT determines outcomes.

Page 15

What are your Wows! What have you learned thus far? What are your wonders? What is not clear?

The Eligibility Determination Evaluation Process: Data from the SAT must be considered in making the eligibility determination for Tier 3 services. Once a student is referred to Tier 3, with written parental consent and prior written notice, a multidisciplinary evaluation is completed. Following evaluation, the Eligibility Determination Team uses the available data from the multidisciplinary report, the SAT, and any other data sources to determine eligibility for special education and related services under the criteria of one or more of the 13 categories of disabilities as defined by IDEA, the New Mexico Technical Evaluation and Assessment Manual, and or the state criteria for gifted.

Visit and select the A-Z directory. Select Response to Intervention (RtI)

Visit and select the A-Z directory. Select Response to Intervention (RtI), then Select Forms and Resources.

Pre SAT Data Review - TIER I (Teacher Responsibility per the PLC Process) Student Profile Teacher Form Data Collection Universal Vision and Hearing Screening SAT Referral (Teacher Responsibility) - TIER II Elementary School Referral Middle/High School Referral SAT Referral (SAT Chair Responsibility) Student Observation Hearing Screening and Referral Vision Screening and Referral Notice of and Invitation to SAT Meeting Initial SAT Meeting Forms (Team Input, SAT Chair Leads) Initial SAT Meeting Summary SAT Action/Intervention Plan Overview Consent for SAT Assessments/ Interventions SAT Follow Up Meeting Forms (Team Input, SAT Chair Leads) SAT Follow-up Summary (Repeat as necessary) SAT Follow-up Summary SAT Referral to Testing Referral for TIER III consideration (SAT Chair and Principal Responsibility) Confirmation of Fidelity Student Case History Referral for Evaluation SAT Log + “NO, Not Now” PWN is documented by SAT Chair/Principal. Copy of form must be delivered to SPED department within 3 days of SAT Meeting.

SAT Referral Form 1.1 Elementary 1.2 Secondary

Exit Activity: 1.As a school team please complete the Wows! Wonders? School Next Steps and District Next Steps Activity. 2.Group Share 3.Principals and team leaders, please take a picture and the picture to before leaving. Information will be shared with district directors and leadership

Thank You …