A Modified Rishon Model Patrick S. Walters AAPT-CPS Spring Meeting 2009 Penn State – Mont Alto March 27 th – 28 th 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The search for the God Particle
Advertisements

Schleching 2/2008Präzisionsphysik mit Neutronen/5. Theorie n-Zerfall Neutron Decay St.Petersburg 1 5. zur Theorie β-Zerfall des Neutrons.
Announcements 11/14 Today: 9.6, 9.8 Friday: 10A – 10E Monday: 10F – 10H 9.6 Only do differential cross-section See problem 7.7 to do most of the work for.
The Standard Model and Beyond [Secs 17.1 Dunlap].
FLAVOURS 50 Years After SU(3) Discovery Djordje Šijački.
Tony Liss Saturday Physics for Everyone November 9, 2013 (With debts to Chris Quigg, Leonard Susskind, Hitoshi Murayama)
Nuclear Physics Part 1: The Standard Model
Sub-Atomic Particles Another building block of matter?? Richard Lasky – Summer 2010.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
P461 - particles VII1 Glashow-Weinberg-Salam Model EM and weak forces mix…or just EW force. Before mixing Bosons are massless: Group Boson Coupling Quantum.
Smashing the Standard Model: Physics at the CERN LHC
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
8:00am 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00pm 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Apr 25??? Make up schedule April 11 catch a.
P461 - particles VII1 Glashow-Weinberg-Salam Model EM and weak forces mix…or just EW force. Before mixing Bosons are massless: Group Boson Coupling Quantum.
PH 103 Dr. Cecilia Vogel Lecture 24 From the particle adventure webpage.
Chiral freedom and the scale of weak interactions.
Modern Physics LECTURE II.
Particle Physics FOR Introducing Particle Physics Pablo del Amo Sanchez.
A New Theory of Neutrino Oscillations Netta Engelhardt
Fundamental Particles (The Standard Model) Nathan Brown June 2007.
Particle Physics Intro. What’s Stuff Made Of…Really? All particles can be grouped into two categories: Fermions and Bosons Things to know about Fermions:
J.5.1State what is meant by deep inelastic scattering. J.5.2Analyze the results of deep inelastic scattering. J.5.3Describe what is meant by asymptotic.
THE STANDARD MODEL  What’s fundamental  What’s in a name.
Discovery of the Higgs Boson Gavin Lawes Department of Physics and Astronomy.
Electroweak interaction
ROY, D. (2011). Why Large Hadron Collider?. Pramana: Journal Of Physics, 76(5), doi: /s
BY: BRETT SLAJUS Particle Physics. Standard Model of Elementary Particles Three Generations of Matter (Fermions)
Particle Physics J4 Leptons and the standard model.
Joseph Haley Joseph Haley Overview Review of the Standard Model and the Higgs boson Creating Higgs bosons The discovery of a “Higgs-like” particle.
ParticleZoo. The Standard Model The body of currently accepted views of structure and interactions of subatomic particles. Interaction Coupling Charge.
Subatomic Particles The poet, too, is not nearly so concerned with describing facts as with creating images and establishing mental connections. - Niels.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
PARTICLE PHYSICS Particles and Interactions. Classifying Particles Most particles fall broadly into two types which can then be broken down further The.
IB Physics Mr. Jean April 16 th, The plan: SL Practice Exam questions HL Particle Physics –Electrons –Protons –Neutrons –Quarks –Gluons –Photos.
Dr. Bill Pezzaglia Particle Physics Updated: 2010May20 Modern Physics Series 1 ROUGH DRAFT.
Particles and how they interact
© John Parkinson 1 e+e+ e-e- ANNIHILATION © John Parkinson 2 Atom 1x m n n n n Nucleus 1x m U Quarks 1x m U D ? ? ?
Subatomic Particles Lesson 10. Objectives describe the modern model of the proton and neutron as being composed of quarks. compare and contrast the up.
The Nucleus Nucleons- the particles inside the nucleus: protons & neutrons Total charge of the nucleus: the # of protons (z) times the elementary charge.
QFD, Weak Interactions Some Weak Interaction basics
Modern Physics. Reinventing Gravity  Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity  Theorizes the space time fabric.  Describes why matter interacts.  The.
The Higgs Boson Observation (probably) Not just another fundamental particle… July 27, 2012Purdue QuarkNet Summer Workshop1 Matthew Jones Purdue University.
[Secs 16.1 Dunlap] Conservation Laws - II [Secs 2.2, 2.3, 16.4, 16.5 Dunlap]
STANDARD MODEL class of “High Energy Physics Phenomenology” Mikhail Yurov Kyungpook National University November 15 th.
Lecture 2: The First Second Baryogenisis: origin of neutrons and protons Hot Big Bang Expanding and cooling “Pair Soup” free particle + anti-particle pairs.
A photon with a wavelength of 2
ELECTROWEAK UNIFICATION Ryan Clark, Cong Nguyen, Robert Kruse and Blake Watson PHYS-3313, Fall 2013 University of Texas Arlington December 2, 2013.
SYNTHESIS The Standard Model 1.Elementary particles 2.Strong nuclear force 3.Weak nuclear force 4.The Standard Model.
Take out hwk & tables. Compare answers to hwk sets.
1 The Standard Model of Particle Physics Owen Long U. C. Riverside March 1, 2014.
2 nd International Conference on Particle Physics in Memoriam Engin Arık and Her Colleagues Doğuş University, Istanbul, Turkey June nd International.
Nuclear Physics, JU, Second Semester,
Physics 222 UCSD/225b UCSB Lecture 12 Chapter 15: The Standard Model of EWK Interactions A large part of today’s lecture is review of what we have already.
Monday, Apr. 11, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday, Apr. 11, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu Symmetries Local gauge symmetry Gauge fields.
10/29/2007Julia VelkovskaPHY 340a Lecture 4: Last time we talked about deep- inelastic scattering and the evidence of quarks Next time we will talk about.
 All elementary particles in physics are classified as either fermions or bosons. Quantum physics demonstrates the particles may have an intrinsic non-zero.
The Standard Model of Particle Physics
Introduction to the Standard Model
Unit 7.3 Review.
The Standard Model strong nuclear force electromagnetic force
Quarks Throughout the 1950 – 1960s, a huge variety of additional particles was found in scattering experiments. This was referred to as the “particle zoo”.
Patterns in Baryons and Mesons
Elementary particles Spring 2005, Physics /24/2018 Lecture XXV.
Do Now An electron in a hydrogen atoms drops from n=5 to n=4 energy level. What is the energy of the photon in eV? What is the frequency of the emitted.
Section XI - The Standard Model
The Standard Model By: Dorca Lee.
Introduction to Particle Physics
Physics 4 – April 18, 2019 Agenda:
Presentation transcript:

A Modified Rishon Model Patrick S. Walters AAPT-CPS Spring Meeting 2009 Penn State – Mont Alto March 27 th – 28 th 2009

Rishon Theory First proposed in 1979 by Haim Harari Quarks, leptons, gauge bosons are composite particles in Rishon Theory. Two fundamental particles, T and V, and antiparticles  T and  V. T is charged -1/3 e, V is neutral. [1]

Haim Harari Ph.D. in Physics from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In 1967, became the youngest Professor ever to teach at the Weizmann Institute. Predicted the existence of bottom and top quarks in President of the Wiezmann Institute of Science from 1988 to In 2001, received the Harnack Medal from the Max Planck Institute [3].

Implications Electron (TTT), up quark (  T  T  V), down quark (TVV), and neutrino (  V  V  V) are each three-Rishon states. Additional generations formed by adding T  T pairs, i.e. b quark is TVVT  TT  T. Photons and gluons are four-Rishon states (TV  T  V). W bosons TTTVVV and  T  T  T  V  V  V.

Assumptions Rishons are bound by an SU(3) H hypercolor mechanism [2]. T is massive, V is massless. T and V have opposite hypercharge (±1/3). 4 th generation or higher fermions allowed. No Higgs mechanism is necessary.

Downfalls No explanation of mass origin. Hypercharge assignments are inconsistent, and isospin is ambiguous. No certain explanation of attraction between Rishons. No direct explanation of color forces. Massless photons, gluons, and Z mass are unexplained.

Proposed Modifications T   P,  T  P, V  N,  V   N, changing the names and particle/antiparticle assignment slightly. Assume that we start out with two equally massive non-natural Rishons P′ and N′ which mix at nearly 45 degrees to produce natural Rishons P (massive) and N (nearly massless). Rishons are attracted strongly to each other, but Rishons and anti-Rishons repel even more strongly, proportional to their masses.

Proposed Modifications P has positive isospin and hypercharge.  P has negative isospin and hypercharge. N has negative isospin and positive hypercharge.  N has positve isospin and negative hypercharge. Isospin comes in units of 1/6, hypercharge in units of 1/3, intrinsic spin is ±1/2. SU(3) color charges a, b, and c for Rishons.

Color Charges

SU(3) Color for Composites

Methodology for Rishon Composites Bag model may be effective for finding masses of composite states, such as quarks, leptons, and bosons. Since chiral symmetry is broken by the bag contents, and not arbitrarily at the edge of the bag, the earlier problems with bag model may be resolved. PP attraction is strong enough to cancel out a P mass, the P  P repulsion is even stronger.

N  N versus P  P N  N repulsion is much weaker than P  P repulsion, proportional to the much smaller N mass. N  N contributes little mass to a composite state, while P  P contributes most of the mass to its composite states. States with N  N pairs will have the same or similar mass to states without it.

Modified Rishon Model Structure

Interactions in Modified Model Rishon interactions come in two types Type 1  (Δg 8 ) 2 + (Δg 3 ) 2 – ΔI 2 = 1/3 Type 2  (Δg 8 ) 2 + (Δg 3 ) 2 – ΔI 2 = 0 Weak nuclear processes proceed via one Type 1 and two Type 2 processes Strong nuclear processes proceed via two Type 1 processes

Weak Interactions

Strong Interactions

Transitions in Modified Model P  N transitions naturally occur 50% of the time in a 45° mixing scheme. Natural mixing between quarks occurs for odd numbers of Rishons changing simultaneously in W-mediated processes 3-Rishon processes = 1/2 3 = 1/8 5-Rishon processes = 1/2 5 = 1/32 7-Rishon processes = 1/2 7 = 1/128 Such as t  b W + or s  u e -  v e

Transitions in Modified Model Natural mixing between quarks occurs for even numbers of Rishons changing simultaneously in Z-mediated processes 2-Rishon processes = 1/2 2 = 1/4 4-Rishon processes = 1/2 4 = 1/16 Such as t  c Z or b  d u  u Fourth-generation composites would instantly fall apart into three first-generation composites; hence, they do not exist.

Quark Transitions by Rishon Mixing

Particle Physics Implications All particle decays and decay ratios can be derived from Rishon Model, and current experimental data may be sufficient to show this. Quark mixing in the CKM matrix can be derived from Rishon Model. Neutrino mixing can be derived from Rishon Model. No new generations of quarks or leptons exist beyond the current three.

Particle Physics Implications Pure B and W 3 fields in electro-weak model mix due to Rishon mixing to form natural photon and Z fields. Z is massive and photon massless due to Rishon mixing. Z branching ratios can be derived from Rishon Model. Isospin symmetry is completely broken, while hypercharge is always conserved. Higgs sector may exist, but is not necessary to explain mass.

Cosmological Implications Natural Abundance; electron plus proton plus neutron plus neutrino. Natural Abundance gives equal numbers of P and N Rishons. Natural Abundance gives equal portions of Rishons and anti-Rishons; matter- antimatter symmetry. 1:3:3:1 structure of matter and antimatter; natural repulsion between matter and antimatter.

Testing the Modified Model Using the quark mixing tables from the modified model, reconstruct the CKM matrix. Using the modified model, compare the generated Z branching ratios to the experimental Z branching ratios. Parameters include probabilities of  PP and  NN production, P and N exchange. Using parameters and phase space, compare generated hadronic branching ratios with experimental hadronic branching ratios.

References [1] H. Harari, Phys. Lett. B86, 83 (1979) [2] H. Harari and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B98, 269 (1981) [3] Wikipedia, (2009)

Thank You for Listening