Nathan D.M. Robertson License Term Encoding and License Expression ICOLC Spring Meeting Montréal, Canada 25 April 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rights Libraries Requirements for Expression Nathan D.M. Robertson Johns Hopkins University NISO Pre-Standards Workshop on Digital Rights Expression 18.
Advertisements

Licensing Digital Content Negotiation Interpretation Application.
© 2005 Rightscom – All rights reserved Rights and Licence Metadata – making DRM happen A presentation for the IDF Members Meeting Bologna, 14 June 2005.
Enabling Access By Permission Standards for rights expression within the ONIX family Brian Green.
CNI April 2006 Standardized License Expression: Clarity, Control and Fair Use CNI April 2006 Sharon Farb, UCLA Daviess Menefee. Elseiver Inc. Christopher.
Standard Licence Expression Sharon Farb, UCLA Daviess Menefee, Elsevier Inc. Christopher McKenzie, John Wiley & Sons Alicia Wise, Publishers Licensing.
Standard License Expression CNI Meeting Arlington, VA April 4, 2006 Christopher McKenzie John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
InterLibrary Loan & TexShare Russlene Waukechon TexShare Database Coordinator February 15, 2008.
Draft JORUM Depositor Licence By Emanuella Giavarra LLM Chambers of Prof. Mark Watson-Gandy Amsterdam and London
DIGITAL POLICY MANAGEMENT IN THE DOM PROGRAMME Richard Masters Programme Manager Digital Object Management Programme Digital Policy Management Workshop.
David Martin Digital Policy Management: JISC/BL Workshop 24 April 2006 ONIX for Licensing Terms.
Coming to terms with e-books Understanding the relationship between e-book licence terms and conditions and Australian copyright laws Ellen Broad Executive.
Cali Bush ©2010 OReilly Media, Inc. Ebook Contracts.
Contract or Copyright? Using Electronic vs. Print Resources for Library Services GIL Users Group Meeting Macon State College May 19, 2005 Lisa A. Macklin.
IMPORTANT READ CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS PRODUCT LICENSE AGREEMENT AND LIMITED WARRANTY BY INSTALLING OR USING THE SOFTWARE, FILES OR OTHER ELECTRONIC.
NEGOTIATING SOFTWARE LICENSES FUNDAMENTALS © 2014, WILSON VUKELICH LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Heather Whitten and Diane Karnay September 17, 2014.
Rights Expression for Serial Content – Explicit and Implied James Mouw The University of Chicago Library
Swets Information Services Agent Perspective Ins and Outs of ERM "Good ideas come when people with different perspectives work together on the same problem."
Please Limit your book requests I only have access to 100 million volumes today 1.
NISO How the information world CONNECTS ALCTS Continuing Resources Section Standards Update ALA Annual June 26, 2011 Judy Luther, Informed Strategies Co-chair,
Research Development for Android Coopman Tom. What is Android?  Smartphone operating system  Google  Popular  ‘Easy to develop’  Open-Source  Linux.
JISC Collections 19/05/2015 | ICOLC Paris 2009 | Slide 1 JISC Collection’s Experience With ERMs ERMs: What went wrong? Liam Earney JISC Collections.
Brian Green EDItEUR Licenses and ERMs: Standards for the expression of publisher/library licenses.
Gathering Data NISO E-Resource Management Forum Denver, Colorado September 24-25, 2007 Oliver Pesch EBSCO Information Services
Trends in Licensing Models NINCH Copyright Town Meeting March 23, 2002 ARLIS-NA/VRA.
Reviewing and Negotiating License Agreements Pamela Kontowicz Reference/Serials Librarian Monmouth College Library Monmouth, İllinois U.S.A.
Hilary Fredette Head, Access Services and Multimedia Services West Virginia University Libraries Can We Lend? Communicating Interlibrary Loan Rights Linda.
ERM Workshop, ELAG 2005 Electronic Resource Management ELAG 2005 Workshop 6.
Keeping Your Copyrights Deborah R. Gerhardt – Fall 2005.
Intellectual Property… …is not copyright Copyright Balances public access rights with author(s)’ right to control and benefit from their work Protects.
INTERNET and CODE OF CONDUCT
By, Henry “Hank” Abromson, Esq.. Introduction  Henry “Hank” Abromson  Attorney with Miles & Stockbridge P.C. (Frederick)  Intellectual Property, Corporate,
Licensing An overview of the licensing process. 2 Overview of the Licensing Process New players in new roles –Previously bought materials through intermediaries,
How can libraries and rightsholders co-operate to enhance accessibility to copyright works?' Benjamin White Head of Intellectual Property
Certification & Engineering Bureau CB notification Inquiries & Issues Nicolas DesMarais Certification Officer Agent d’Homologation TCB Workshop – February.
CPS Acceptable Use Policy Day 2 – Technology Session.
1 EPICS EPICS Licensing BESSY, May 2002 Andrew Johnson.
Show Us Where You Are! On the toolbar, click on the yellow star, then click on your location!
EVERYTHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT ELECTRONIC RESOURCES Lori Duggan Head, Electronic Resources.
Internet and Computer Rules If you want to use the computers you need to follow the rules.
Copyright and Licensing Legal issues associated with electronic resource access and usage.
Plus ça Change… Current Developments in Licensing Session Coordinator: Ivy Anderson California Digital Library ICOLC Spring 2007.
Contract Law and Copyright Exceptions: What’s at stake? Benjamin White Head of Intellectual Property British Library.
Licensing of Electronic Information Duncan Alford Law Librarian Princeton University.
Ejournals & ILL/DD Help or Hinderence? Rachel L. Frick University of Richmond.
Electronic Resource Management: Licensing and Interlibrary loan Diane Carroll Head, Collections and Acquisitions Washington State University, Pullman September.
© 2009 by Business Process Excellence LLC Certified virus free The Standard Bird A Learning Exercise …a module of the ‘Lean in 60 Minutes’
Nathan D.M. Robertson Using ERM Systems and Standards to Communicate Rights and Permissions “The Changing Standards Landscape:
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R The OAK Law Project Queensland University of Technology CRICOS No J 1.
1 ONIX Serials Standards Update Forum ONIX for Serials Kathy Klemperer EDItEUR ALA, New Orleans, June 25, 2006.
Tilburg University Libraries, Publishers and Licensing Practical experiences and Fundamental issues Hans Geleijnse Librarian Tilburg University The Netherlands.
Licensing Evolution ICOLC October 2006 – Rome Lorraine Estelle.
SCELC and Emerging Standards Rick Burke, Executive Director, SCELC ALCTS Continuing Resources Section Standards Committee Update Forum January 17, 2010.
David M. Klein Partner Building Better Licenses:Building Better Licenses: Common Weaknesses and How to Strengthen.
License, Contract, Memoranda, Oh My! Kevin L. Smith Duke University Libraries Office for Copyright and Scholarly Communications.
Living with Our Contracts: Actualizing e-ILL Katherine A. Perry, VIVA Director November 19, 2003 CONCERT, Taipei.
INTELLECTUAL RIGHTS AND HISTORIC CORPORA Mark Sandler University of Michigan ICOLC, March, 2003.
Diane Grover LIS 550 Fall 2010 Licensing for Electronic Resources.
GIL USERS GROUP MEETING May 20, 2004 Impact on Interlibrary Loan Katharine Calhoun Georgia Tech Library
Legal Issues with Cataloging Supplied by MARCIVE Joan Chapa.
Proactive E-Resource Licensing: Educating Ourselves and Our Vendors Through Negotiation Richard Kearney Electronic Resources Librarian William Paterson.
Using Content Presented by Karen Andrews Physical Sciences & Engineering Librarian, U.C. Davis Tuesday, September 13, :30-9:30 ASIDIC Fall 2005 Meeting.
CC licenses, resources, and current issues in OA publishing Timothy Vollmer 2 March 2016.
EIFL Licensing Training 2: EIFL LICENCE AGREEMENTS
Connectivity to bank and sample account structure
OCUL License Mapping Project Colleen Neely
Applying the EMLS Model
Open Access and Compliance with NIH Public Access Policy
When the license is terminated...
Presentation transcript:

Nathan D.M. Robertson License Term Encoding and License Expression ICOLC Spring Meeting Montréal, Canada 25 April 2007

Licenses Unencoded What staff can and can’t do What users can and can’t do

Licenses Encoded: Inform Users ERM System !!?! ? Oh, good! I can use this for ILL! I’m not supposed to it to my friends? ( whatever, I’ll do it anyway...)

Licenses Encoded: Assist Licensing ERM System It has always been our policy never to agree to indemnify in any contract. Oh, did I mention our upcoming financial and legal audit? How many days (and paper cuts) is it worth to you? I know the answer, but... Uh oh. Do we have any current licenses with indemnification clauses? I can tell you in minutes !

Purpose of License Encoding  Two distinct functions: 1. Inform staff and patrons of rights, responsibilities and restrictions. 2. Facilitate license management through sophisticated reporting and ERM system triggers.

ERMI Encoding Options  Permitted (explicit)  Prohibited (explicit)  Permitted (interpreted)  Prohibited (interpreted)  Silent (no interpretation)  Not applicable 1. Inform Users 2. Facilitate Mgmt. Way too complicated! Just tell me Yes or No! Please. Not nearly sophisticated enough.

ERMI License Term Fields  Governing Jurisdiction  Confidentiality of Agreement Note  Clickwrap Modification Clause Indicator  Termination Requirements  Completeness of Content Clause Indicator  Print Copy  Digital Copy  Scholarly Sharing  Electronic Link Term Note 1. Inform Users 2. Facilitate Mgmt.  Database Protection Override Clause Indicator  Perpetual Access Right  Concurrency with Print Version Clause Indicator  Applicable Copyright Law Good, good….  Content Warranty Aaugh! No! I don’t care about any of this!  Indemnification by Licensee Clause Indicator  Applicable Copyright Law  UCITA Override Clause Indicator  Cure Period for Breach Unit of Measure  Performance Warranty Uptime Guarantee Oh, is that all? A good start, but insufficient.

License Interpretation is Hard Work Can the library use the resource to fulfill Interlibrary Loan requests? LICENSE AGREEMENT … Blah. blah blah blah Interlibrary Loan. Institution may not use Electronic Titles for purpose of interlibrary loans More Blah. blah blah blah. LICENSE AGREEMENT …. 4. PROHIBITED USES. Licensee may not: a) blah blah… b) sell, supply or otherwise distribute data retrieved from the Licensed Resource to third parties; c) blah blah blah….. LICENSE AGREEMENT 1. License: i) blah blah… ii) …you will not re-distribute the materials retrieved from the products to other libraries or third parties… blah blah blah….. v) Notwithstanding the above restrictions, this license shall not restrict your rights to use of the materials under the copyright law of the United States and the doctrine of “fair use.” LICENSE AGREEMENT 1)blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah … 2)blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah… !!?! ?

Questions  Is the “License Management” benefit worth the cost?  Time and effort to interpret and encode  Staff confusion  ERM System development efforts  Is “interpreted” vs. “explicit” useful to staff, or only to licensing managers? … and what if you don’t have to do all the work yourself?

XML License Expression Standard ERM System ONIX-PL Encoding interpret silence and confirm interpretations ? ? ? ONIX PL

Consortium XML License Expression Standard ERM System ERM System ERM System ONIX PL

ONIX Publications License  First manifestation of planned “ONIX for Licensing Terms” family of messages.  One of EDItEUR’s ONIX suite of XML messages.  Flexible “modular” constructions to express concepts. Usages, Agents, Resources….  Ability to encode and express an entire license. 1. Inform Users 2. Facilitate Mgmt. An entire license? Are you insane? Hush.

Rights Supply Chain selected rights transferred all rights transferred My patrons need X and Y rights. I can only transfer rights I have. selected rights all rights selected rights all rights I have (not all rights!) selected rights the remaining rights selected rights My patrons need X and Y rights. Hooray! A product I can license. You have got to be kidding.

ONIX-PL  ?  ERMI Encodings  Create an ERMI “dialect” of ONIX-PL.  Require message suppliers to choose from array of expression “modules” that map to ERMI values.  Some additional constraints on usages can map automatically to ERMI note fields.  ERM systems will communicate with each other using the dialect.  Imperfect metadata crosswalk.  Many concepts expressible in ONIX-PL inexpressible in ERMI dialect.  Precision lost in conversion of encoded values to notes.

Consortium ERM System ERM System Data and Work Flow ERM System “ERMIAN” ONIX-PL with explicit expressions only “ERMIAN” ONIX-PL with interpretations interpret silence and confirm interpretations

Discussion…  Which concepts are worth encoding?  Would automatic load of some data change the cost/benefit analysis?  How much granularity is desirable?  Can you accept upstream interpretations?  Do you need to know that interpretations occurred?  Interpretation might include override of explicit expressions—do you need to know?  What if downstream library prefers more values and more granularity than upstream interpreter?