A Framework for Your Pipeline Integrity Program. 2 A Few Thoughts Before Beginning l This rule is new to the pipeline industry although many of the concepts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
Advertisements

QuEST Forum 2006 Requirements Handbook 4.0 Overview.
Environment case Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009 Hellen Foster, Jarlath Molloy NATS, Imperial College London.
Joe Killins & Associates, LLC Pipelines & Risk Based Management How Safe is Safe?
INTRODUCTION TO ISO Joan Kithika. OUTLINE DEFINITIONS WHY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT? LEGAL OVERVIEW HOW TO MANAGE THE ENVIRONMENT-AN ENVIRONMENTAL.
Pipeline Personnel Qualification
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NW Area Committee Meeting Focus on Pipelines PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS.
PODS: a review and the patterns for implementation Janet Sinclair PODS Association.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals –Is there a need for change? Terry Boss Sr. VP Environment Safety and Operations Interstate Natural.
ISO – Environmental Management Standards. Purpose ISO is being designed to achieve several purposes: To make it more difficult for countries.
Overview of Key Rule Features
Overview Lesson 10,11 - Software Quality Assurance
ISO General Awareness Training
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO HAZID 2.
What SMS means for an Operator’s relationship with the CAA
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
Health and Safety Executive IChemE – Process Safety KPIs Workshop session Ian Travers Head of Chemical Industries Strategy Unit Hazardous Installations.
Risk Assessment – An Essential Standard
Key changes from OHSAS 18001:1999
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
SCC DA Program Stress-corrosion-cracking direct assessment (SCCDA) is a structured process that contributes to pipeline company’s efforts to improve.
Integrity Management Inspection Process Don Moore, OPS Central Region.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
SMS Operation.  Internal safety (SMS) audits are used to ensure that the structure of an SMS is sound.  It is also a formal process to ensure continuous.
Lessons Learned….. Were PG&E practices an anomaly or the tip of a bigger problem? How would we know? 2011 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference – Getting to.
Understanding Audit Risk Assessment
Current Inspection Process for Operators of Hazardous Liquids Pipelines Rod Seeley OPS SW Region Director May 18, 2005.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Stephanie Weidman Austin Regional Manager Oversight and Safety Division Pipeline Safety September 2015.
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Regulatory and Compliance Landscape Western Region Gas Conference.
Pipeline Safety New Orleans Nov. 18, 2011 Getting to Zero.
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
ICDA of Gas Transmission, Gathering & Storage Systems GOAL: Develop a protocol for Validation of dry gas ICDA method: –Identify data needs –Develop procedures.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Overview of Integrity Verification Process (IVP) Workshop Held.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
Ensuring Success in Integrity Management Marty Matheson American Petroleum Institute July 24, 2002.
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Incentives for Regulation SARA GOSMAN, UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS SCHOOL OF LAW PIPELINE SAFETY TRUST ANNUAL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20 th, 2015 | New Orleans, LA API RP 1175 Pipeline Leak Detection Program Management – New RP Highlights.
Pipeline Performance Measures Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference
Lessons Learned from Integrity Management Inspections Byron Coy – OPS Eastern Region Derick Turner – OPS Southern Region May 17, 2005.
Office of Pipeline Safety Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity Management July , 2002 Houston, Texas Welcome.
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
OPS Observations, Expectations, and Concerns Zach Barrett (OPS) Direct Assessment Workshop November 4, 2003.
High Consequence Areas & Pipeline Assessment Intervals Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, LA November 20, 2008 Elizabeth Komiskey, P.E. PHMSA/Office of.
Development of IM Inspection Process Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Bruce Hansen August 7, 2001.
Enforcement of Integrity Management Rule Workshop on the Integrity Management Rule for Large Liquid Pipelines Chris Hoidal, Director OPS Western Region.
HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE MONITORING. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION This presentation contains a complete overview of all aspects of Response Monitoring Presenting.
Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Integrity Management Continuous Improvement Project Status and Implementation Process Presentation for: PHMSA Advisory Committees July 11, 2012.
Stress Corrosion Cracking Technical Workshop Office of Pipeline Safety Research and Special Programs Administration SCC Workshop December 2, 2003 Houston,
Presentation to Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 18 & 19, 2015.
Pipeline Safety Management Systems
Tribal Hazard Mitigation Planning
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Utility Technologies International
Distribution Integrity
CR-GR-HSE-302 Management of change
Management of Change GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-302)
Presentation transcript:

A Framework for Your Pipeline Integrity Program

2 A Few Thoughts Before Beginning l This rule is new to the pipeline industry although many of the concepts are not l Many have struggled though the rule’s development l A consistent approach can help

3 Why an Industry Standard? l A systematic approach -- u focuses on risk reduction as a goal u is more effective u is called for by the rule l Provides a framework u for operators in developing their programs u for inspectors in auditing integrity programs l Provides additional “meat”

4 API 1160, “Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines” l Developed under ANSI consensus procedures l Work group included -- u Pipeline operators u OPS regulatory and enforcement u Inspection service providers u Metallurgists, engineers, corrosion specialists, and more

5 API The Process l Drafted by Work Group l Reviewed by peers u Pipeline operators u ASME B31.4 members u Pipeline safety advocates u Environmental interest groups l Comments resolved l Aligned with Final Rule on integrity management

6 API Scope l Hazardous liquid pipelines l Not limited to pipelines regulated in Part 195 l Not limited to pipelines in high consequence areas l Not limited to line pipe l PROVEN INDUSTRY PRACTICES

7 API Contents l Intro, Scope, References, Definitions l Integrity Management Programs -- Overview l High Consequence Areas u Identification u Using HCA info u Affecting HCAs u Documenting HCA info

8 API Contents l Data Gathering, Review and Integration l Risk Assessment Implementation l Initial Baseline Plan Development and Implementation l Mitigation Options l Revision of the Plan l Pump Stations and Terminals l Program Evaluation l Managing Change

9 API Appendixes l Anomaly Types, Causes and Concerns l Repair Strategies l Standard Data Fields u For tracking release information u For tracking system information

10 What the standard is NOT -- l A cookbook for compliance with the rules l A simplified approach to risk or integrity management

11 What the standard IS -- l An aid in developing the framework for your integrity management program l Guidance on the aspects of integrity management you need to be thinking about l A means to make your program comparable to other company programs l A set of standardized measures allowing you to compare your performance with your peers, if you choose to l AND MORE

12 Highlights -- Identifying HCAs l It’s the first thing you have to do l You are partially dependent on OPS but there are some caveats u Population -- Straightforward u Navigable waters -- Straightforward u USAs -- Not so simple u Timing may become an issue l Some guidance in the standard

13 Highlights -- Data l Identifying data sources (lots of examples) l Identifying data needs (different from what you have maybe) l Establishing a common reference system -- THE key to integration

14 Highlights --Risk Assessment l A primer that is specific to the pipeline industry l Defines the characteristics of a sound approach u Structure u Adequacy of resources u Experience-based u Predictive u Uses appropriate data u Importance of feeback mechanisms

15 Highlights -- Baseline Assessment l A tutorial on ILI -- u Anomalies and defects u Internal inspection and testing technologies u Tools u Intervals l A tutorial on hydrostatic testing u Value and limitations u Intervals

16 Highlights -- Baseline Assessment l What should you do with what you find? u What will be your strategy for responding to anomalies identified u Repair overview u Mitigation options -- lots of them

17 Highlights -- Program Evaluation l Recommends specific performance measures l Defines a way to look at the value and utility of performance measures, i.e. methodology l Comparisons u Internal u External u Audits

18 Final Thoughts l The Standard u The standard is not typical u The standard significantly raises the expectation bar, probably more then the rule itself does l The Rule u Requires leak detection capability in the rules for the first time u Is tough

19 To Get Your Copy of the Current Draft --