Engineering Physics Capstone Course EP4A06 – Design and Synthesis project Shown here are group pictures of the leading teams from 2012/2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Committee? A Primer for New Visiting Committee Members.
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) INTERIM APPLICATION ORIENTATION FOR TRAINERS & HEAR ADMINISTRATORS For more information, visit
 Standards Based Grading Discussion- February 3, 2014.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
Welcome! October VTPBiS Regional Coordinators Meeting.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Assessing Student Learning in EPICS
Fremont Unified School District An Informational Session for Families August 2015 Standards-Based Report Cards.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Project Management for the Public Health Professional Instructor Name
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
IA-DMM Measures and Results for Year 1. Cohort 1 as of 6/23.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
SAISD Office for Professional Learning Advisory Board March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy 623 S. Pecos.
BUILDING SKILLS AND A BOOK OF BUSINESS AS A STUDENT LOAN CONSULTANT (SCL) AN INSTRUCTIONAL PLAN PRESENTED BY JESSICA MATYE.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
TEAM MADRAS: Are YOU on the team? Madras Middle School Professional Development Plan Proposal by Donna Eskut - July 2013 Presented to Madras.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Guide Workshop Tuesday, August 19, Agenda I.MSD Fall 14 Logistics Werth –45 minutes 1.Class Schedule high level 2.Grading Period Highlights 3.MSD.
LONGER SCHOOL DAY PARAMETERS & PLANNING TEMPLATE Longer School Day Design Parameters and Planning Template Tuesday, December 13, :30 – 10:30 AM.
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.
Health Career Recruitment and Retention Service-Based Learning.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Marlene Gukert Experiential Education Program Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences; UofA MARCH 2014.
Understanding the British System of Higher Education.
Learning Assurance School of Business & Industry Faculty Retreat August 19, 2008.
13/14 YEAR OLDS: SOCIAL & LANGUAGE Neatness an issue with appearance, not environment Feelings easily hurt Hang out in large groups, but starting to.
Tablet PC Capstone CSE 481b Richard Anderson Craig Prince.
CSE 436 Software Engineering Workshop Course Overview Christopher Gill CSE 436 January 2007 Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 1 October 21, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report HCAS – Graduate Programs.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
BSc Final Year Projects in Computing Computer Science, Creative Computing, Games Programming, Business Computing Dr Rodger Kibble.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Progress in Graduate Attribute Assessment in Mechanical Engineering at McMaster University M.F. Lightstone July
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
MacArthur Elementary School Curriculum Night September 17, 2015 September 21, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Fulton City School District CDEP Plan Implementation Update Fulton Board of Education October 27, 2015.
Facilitators: Dr. Wanda Zagozdzon-Wosik Dr. Dr. Jung-Uk Lim ECE 4336: CAPSTONE DESIGN II.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Managing and Leading an Instructionally Driven School Culture Part 2 January 2011 Rebekah Marler Consultant, Replications Inc.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 7 – Formative Assessment & Mathematical Standards and Practices Facilitator:
What has been accomplished at the end of MSD 1 & 2?
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
APPLIED ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY I PERIODS: 2,4, AND 7. LOCATION: 43 TEACHER: MR. WILLIAM BALTAZAR MR. WILLIAM BALTAZAR.
When Executive Education is a Process, Not a Program
So what can I expect when I serve on a NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team?
Introduction to CS Senior Design Project I / II
Annual Title I Parent Meeting October 24, 2016
Parent Forum – Elementary Report Card
Find out more! Facilitating the IPE Skills Training Series – Join us!
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
ISTE Illinois Burlington Central #301 School District Credit Recovery Best Practices.
Southeast Title 1 and Student Support
Presentation transcript:

Engineering Physics Capstone Course EP4A06 – Design and Synthesis project Shown here are group pictures of the leading teams from 2012/2013

The Concept and Philosophy The project requires the students to utilize the skills they have acquired, and those that they continue to acquire, during the course of the Engineering Physics Program. All students in the program are aware and excited by the project – we stress the definition of capstone. Emphasis is placed upon a celebration of their achievements. The students work in teams of three of their choosing. Significant guidance and help is provided with regard to management of time and planning. We have failed if students do not complete the project on time; if the students spend an unbalanced amount of time on the project; do not feel a sense of accomplishment at the end of the project. The project outcomes are closely monitored using the graduate attributed model.

Organization One faculty lead, plus three more faculty members acting as a review committee. Three TAs of high quality (usually former EP students who have taken the course). Three organizational lectures at commencement; including safety instruction. The remainder of course is spent in the project room- 3 hours compulsory every week, 8am to 10pm access is available via key card control. On-going assessment via weekly one page reports to TAs (plus 15 minute discussion on progress) Each group meets with faculty review committee every two weeks and makes 15 minute presentation followed by Q and A The aim is to early flag problems within groups such as conflict, failing behind schedule etc. In 2012/ such instances occurred triggering a remedial intervention by faculty lead, and an agreed plan with the group. The teams are required to make an interim demonstration of the working prototype in January (key implementation to 1012/2013 course); followed by a full demonstration on Engineering Physics Race Day in March.

Support offered Dedicated project room which is well-equipped (stock taking responsibility of TAs). Each group has an assigned TA as a working point of contact. Laboratory technicians provide logistical ad-hoc support. Access to Engineering and Science machine shop (good working relationship with Clealand Berwick). Practical workshops offered to the students at beginning of course (PIC programming, soldering, PCB design and manufacture, machine workshop etc.) Safety instruction offered in week 1 of the course.

Assessment and timeline Safety quiz – 5% September 18th proposal/initial design report -15% October 10th weekly letters -20% October 10 th to March 5th bi-weekly committee meetings -10%October 17 th to Feb 26th interim demonstration -10%Jan 8th final report -25%April 11th performance – 15%March 19 th (Race day) The assessment provides a balance between ultimate performance and on-going effort It also provides a means for ‘early warning’ of issues.

The 2012/2013 Project – “The Minesweeper” Teams were required to build an autonomous vehicle which could detect 3 LEDs ( each of different colour) embedded on a grid The vehicle was required to communicate a map of the grid to a remote laptop; indicated the position of each LED and its colour; and then return to one of the LEDs randomly selected by colour prior to the run. To complete the task students were required to address the concepts of sense, feedback, adjust and report. Frame grab from video posted on Engineering facebook page

Final Grades 2012/2013 Average = 79.5 % STD = 6.2 The distribution of final grades shows a higher mean than for other courses; but this is perhaps what we hope for from a capstone project.

Attributes The capstone project is an ideal provider of information of graduate attributes. In 2012/2013 it was used to map (i) Design, (ii) Use of Engineering Tools, (iii) Individual and Team Work and (iv) Sustainability The rubrics consisted of specific achievement on all or part of an assigned task; observation by faculty and TAs; and self-assessment.

Publicity We have found that the capstone project attracts great interest throughout the Engineering Physics cohort Teams volunteer to demonstrate their working prototypes at first year recruitment evening Race days are ‘festival events’ at which beverage food is served and a faculty student ‘get-together’ follows in the evening We post footage of raceday on the Engineering Facebook page and selected runs on YouTube. 4A06 demo