No Wrong Door An approach to service organization that provides individuals with or links them to appropriate service interventions regardless of where.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Faculty of Health & Social Care Improving Safeguarding Practice: Study of Serious Case Reviews Wendy Rose and Julie Barnes.
Ages & Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
1 National Outcomes and Casemix Collection Training Workshop Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
STAAR Alternate 2 Preparing for the STAAR Alternate 2 Assessment 2015.
Session 1: Overview of the Guidelines and Comorbidity
AHRQ Informed Consent and Authorization Toolkit for Minimal Risk Research Cindy Brach Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Center for Delivery, Organization,
Access To Recovery III GPRA Training Welcome Introductions Agenda
Is Caregiver Depression Associated with Children’s ADHD Symptoms and Overall Functioning? Randi Scott SUMR Final Presentation August 07, 2008.
New Technical Competencies and the Systems Approach Workbook Addictions and Mental Health Ontario 2013 Rod Olfert, CCSA May 28,
WELCOME Good Morning and Welcome. Introduction to Washington State’s Process for the Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co-Occurring Disorders.
Consistent with earlier research, these data found a high rate of co- occurring Axis-I psychiatric disorders. While there was substantial overall agreement,
Iowa Health and Wellness Plan Healthy Behaviors Program.
Developing a Questionnaire. Goals Discuss asking the right questions in the right way as part of an epidemiologic study. Review the steps for creating.
1 Module 3 Understanding Mental Disorders, Treatment, and Recovery.
1 MTN-003 Training General Interviewing Techniques Some specific tips for administering the Screening interviewer-administered CRFs SSP Section 14.
Section 13: Assessment – Addiction Severity Index (ASI)
Illinois Children’s Healthcare Foundation CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE Building Systems of Care: Community by Community Fostering Creativity Through.
Trauma-Informed Care: Perspectives and Resources
1 Reducing the duration and cost of assessment with the GAIN: Computer Adaptive Testing.
Developing a progressive approach to using the GAIN in order to reduce the duration and cost of assessment with the GAIN short screener, Quick, and Computer.
CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
A Collaborative Outcomes Resource Network (ACORN)
Module IV Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co- Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 8 though Step 12 and Case Study.
Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool “Using the PECAT”
Global Appraisal of Individual Needs The Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) is a progressive and integrated family of instruments for:  initial.
The Baton Rouge Area Foundation Mental Health Response.
1 Children and Youth at Risk Branch Ministry of Children and Youth Services March 2012 Working Together for Kids’ Mental Health: Screening tools for early.
Mental Health Update The Referral Process Behavioral Strategies MHP Job Duties.
Presented By: Trish Gann, LPC
Categories of Mental Disorders 1 Child and youth mental health problems can be classified into two broad categories: 1Internalizing problems  withdrawal.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
Questionnaire administration EHES Training material.
2 Misty Schulze, OMNI Institute & the Colorado Division of Behavioral Health Matt Beckett, Grand Futures Prevention Coalition.
Children’s Functional Assessment Rating Scale (CFARS)
Module II Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co- Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 1 and Step 2.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Program Section Training FY 2011.
The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.
President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health Executive Summary Recommendations.
Module IV Introduction to Screening and Assessment of Persons with Co- Occurring Disorders: Screening and Assessment, Step 8 though Step 12 and Case Study.
“The Effect of Patient Complexity on Treatment Outcomes for Patients Enrolled in an Integrated Depression Treatment Program- a Pilot Study” Ryan Miller,
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
ADOLESCENTS IN CRISIS: WHEN TO ADMIT FOR SELF-HARM OR AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR Kristin Calvert.
Assessment. General Points re: Assessment 1. Screening is different than assessment. Identifies whether further attention is warranted. Appendix H Identifies.
Sarah Cordett, M.A. CE240 - Young Children with Special Needs: Unit 3.
SCREENING BRIEF INTERVENTION AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) 1.
The CICC Discovery Tool and Referral System Description of The CICC Discovery Tool and Referral System DESC1.
Dave neilsen Deputy Director. Commitment, Knowledge and Services… The Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP) is committed to providing excellent.
Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale - 2 Understanding and Sharing BERS-2 Information and Scoring with Parents, Caregivers and Youth May 1, 2012.
Facilitate Group Learning
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
Mood Disorder PHQ-9© PHQ-9-OV© SECTION D MOOD January 14, PM.
Chapter 5 Assessment: Overview INTRODUCTION TO CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2E HUNSLEY & LEE PREPARED BY DR. CATHY CHOVAZ, KING’S COLLEGE, UWO.
October 15, 2015 Peter F. Luongo, Ph.D..  Alcohol misuse or abuse often goes undetected with a majority of clinicians citing lack of confidence in alcohol.
1 A School Safety and Violence Prevention Curriculum.
Copyright © The REACH Institute. All rights reserved. Tools to Know and Love.
ASQ-3 HMG Home Visiting July Discussion points What is developmental screening What are the basic features of the ASQ-3 When should you adjust for.
KITS V JUNE , 2014 BREAKING DOWN AND UNDERSTANDING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL : WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW CAN HURT YOU M. Connie Almeida, PhD, LSSP, Licensed Psychologist.
EARLY IDENTIFICATION OF MENTAL ILLNESS IN COUNTY JAILS/DENTENTION CENTERS.
Children’s Functional Assessment Rating Scale (CFARS)
Carolina Health Centers, Inc.
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Virginia Department for the Aging
Bruce Waslick, MD Medical Director UMass / Baystate MCPAP Team
Ethical Considerations for Child Welfare Practice
Maryland Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity #8
Presentation transcript:

No Wrong Door An approach to service organization that provides individuals with or links them to appropriate service interventions regardless of where they enter the system of care. This principle commits all service agencies to respond to the individual’s stated and assessed need through either direct service or a linkage to appropriate programs, as opposed to sending the person from one agency to another. (Co-Occurring Center for Excellence; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration)

The principles of the No Wrong Door approach include: A truly integrated system of care that increases access to services through multiple points of entry where every doorway in the system is the “right door” regardless of the presenting problem. Eliminating gaps in services by promoting interagency partnerships through the development of shared resources. A continuum of services that are culturally and linguistically competent and age appropriate when addressing the complex needs of individuals with co-occurring disorders. A family-driven and youth-guided system of care that minimizes confusion, enhances individual choice, and supports informed decision making for children, adolescents, and their families. A system that addresses significant changes and improvements at the conceptual, organizational, and provider levels.

Entry Point: AOD DMH DOE COC DSS DJJ Health Entity Administe r GAIN SS Decisi on AOD high? AOD/MH equal? MH high? AOD Assesses MH Assesses Staff Tx Recommendations & Referrals: Demo Site Partners Parent Adolescent Staff (phon e)

Using the GAIN Short Screener Administration, Scoring and Interpretation GAIN-SS Version 2.0.1

Objectives At the conclusion of this session, participants will be able to: Administer the GAIN Short-Screener to participants Score and interpret the SS for individuals; as a measure of change; and for program planning Utilize the web version of the SS

Overview of the GAIN-SS A 3- to 5-minute screener Used in general populations to identify or rule-out clients with behavioral health disorders Easy for use by staff with minimal training or direct supervision Provides a measure of change Designed for self- or staff-administration, with paper and pen, computer, or on the web Spanish version available

Tour of the GAIN-SS

Comprised of Four Screeners Internalizing Disorder Screener (IDScr) Externalizing Disorder Screener (EDScr) Substance Disorder Screener (SDScr) Crime/Violence Disorder Screener (CVScr) ______________ TOTAL Disorder Screener

Internalizing Disorder Screening (IDScr)

Externalizing Disorder Screening (EDScr)

Substance Disorder Screening (SDScr)

Crime/violence Disorder Screening (CVScr)

Other Items

Administration

Administration Guidelines Ask the items exactly as printed. You can clarify words/phrases Ask every item. Read each item completely. Repeat items that are misunderstood. Read items at an appropriate pace. Do not suggest answers. Use Common Sense!

Preparation Find a quiet, private place Read the sample introduction or develop an alternative for your specific situation If the GAIN-SS is self-administered, ask clients if they want your help Consider using the Cognitive Impairment screener if you suspect intoxication or mental problems Develop individualized “anchors” with clients

Introducing the GAIN-SS Explain why the interviewer needs to ask the questions Tell whether the questions are asked of every client, or the basis for which the client is being asked the questions now Inform about confidentiality and any limits to confidentiality or privacy Describe how the client’s answers will be used Convey how long the assessment will take Use your common sense

Check for Cognitive Impairment Helps staff to verify the participant’s ability to locate him/herself in place and time prior to the assessment If there is a problem that appears to be transitory, reschedule the interview If there is a problem but you are continuing with the interview, orally administer it, and avoid over-interpreting the responses. (It will take longer.) Note the client’s problems when reporting the results

Instructions Complete the header Read the introductory paragraph Read each item carefully Do not skip items Choose only 1 response Read the stem at the beginning of each section

Instructions (Continued) Do not accept “sometimes,” “sort of,” or “maybe” as answers Clearly mark any corrections Write verbatim responses neatly Let clients know it’s okay to ask questions Review the form for completion/accuracy

Developing Personalized Anchors Help participants be clear about the time period covered by the questions Clearly state the time period in the question Identify personal “anchors”

Completing the Staff Use Box

Items Record the Site, Staff, and Client ID numbers and names Item 11 - Record the mode of administration Item 12 – Use for scoring past-year symptoms Item 13 - If applicable, check where the client is being referred Item 14 - Record the primary program code of the place where the client is being referred, using project/agency-specific codes Item 15 – Referral comments

Scoring & Interpretation

Types of Scores The GAIN-SS generates two types of scores: DOMAIN scores One score for each of the four domains or subscreeners TOTAL score Score for the entire tool

Scoring the GAIN-SS DOMAIN Scoring Count the number of symptoms the client endorses experiencing in the past year (responses of 3/“Past Month” or 2/“2-12 months ago”). Since there are five items in each domain the maximum score in each domain is five. Adding the four domain scores yields the TOTAL Score. Record the score for each subscale and the TDScr in the staff use box.

Scoring the GAIN-SS (con’t) Low (0): Unlikely to have a diagnosis or need services Moderate (1 to 2): A possible diagnosis High (3 to 20 on the total screener; 3 to 5 on the sub-screeners): High probabilities of a diagnosis

Table 1. Scoring Template Screener Items Past month (3s) Past year (3s, 2s) Lifetime (1s, 2s, or 3s) Internalizing Disorder Screener (IDScr) 1a-1e Externalizing Disorder Screener (EDScr) 2a-2e Substance Disorder Screener (SDScr) 3a-3e Crime/Violence Screener (CVScr) 4a-4e Total Disorder Screener 1a-4e

___ IDScr (items 1a-1e) EDScr (items 2a-2e) SDScr (items 3a-3e) CVScr (items 4a-4e) ______________ TDScr (items 1a-4e) Scoring Amber’s GAIN-SS

Interpretation at the Individual Level Someone with a high score (3 to 20) on the Total Disorder Screener (TDScr) will probably have a diagnosis when given the full GAIN Use scores in the moderate range (1-2) or high range (3-5) on the 4 sub-screeners to identify the specific kinds of behavioral health services that are needed

Interpretation at the Individual Level (Continued) Moderate/high scores on the Internalizing Disorder Screener suggest mental health treatment related to somatic complaints, depression, anxiety, trauma, suicide and serious mental illness.

Interpretation at the Individual Level (Continued) Moderate/high scores on the Externalizing Disorder Screener suggest mental health treatment related to attention deficits, hyperactivity, impulsivity, conduct problems and gambling.

Interpretation at the Individual Level (Continued) Moderate/high scores on the Substance Disorder Screener suggest the need for substance abuse, dependence, and substance use disorder treatment.

Interpretation at the Individual Level (Continued) Moderate/high scores on the Crime/Violence Screener suggest the need for help with interpersonal violence, drug-related crimes, property crimes interpersonal/violent crimes.

Interpreting GAIN-SS Scores as a Measure of Change The past-month symptom count in the TDScr (0-20) or any of the 4 sub- screeners (0-5) can be used as a simple measure of change after intervals of a month or more. The past-year and lifetime measures can be used to create trajectories and predict risk.

Interpreting GAIN-SS Scores as a Measure of Change  High severity in early remission: 3 or more lifetime problems and 0 past- month problems (2s and 1s with no 3s)  High severity in sustained remission: 3 or more lifetime problems and 0 past-year problems (1s with no 2s or 3s)

Interpretation for Quality Assurance and Program Planning The GAIN-SS can be used as a simple form of needs assessment Help guide program development/planning and decisions about the purchase of further training or technical assistance Can compare staff or sites on the extent to which expected diagnoses/referrals turn into actual cases Gives an objective guidepost to compare performance and track it over time