Parameters for Rating Municipal Councillors ParameterMarks Past 1 (Education qualification, PAN Card, Criminal cases)7 Present 2 (Attendance, No. of Question,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Does Local Government Work?
Advertisements

Shri Sanjay Nirupam Indian National Congress Date & Birth PlaceFebruary 06, Rohtas (Bihar) Permanent Address2304, Baverly Hill, Shastri Nagar, Lokhandwala,
1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades. Growing frustration.
Strategic Scholarship Coordination at IUPUI Presented to the IUPUI Enrollment Management Group October 28, 2005 Beth Barnette, Director Office of Student.
Richmond Terrace Resident Satisfaction Survey April - June 2014 Report Results and Action Plans for Richmond Terrace April-June 2014.
STATE OF POLICING AND LAW & ORDER IN MUMBAI November 2013 Supported by FORD FOUNDATION 1.
Info sessions on pay equity February Pay Equity Act The purpose of the legislation is to redress differences in compensation due to the systemic.
Triumphant Institute of Management Education P Ltd Nyayapati Gautam Lok Pal - Basics.
State of Municipal Education in Mumbai December 2014 Supported by FORD FOUNDATION 1.
Inference for Categorical Data Chi-SquareCh.11. Facts about Chi-Square ► Takes only positive values and the graph is skewed to the right ► Test Statistic.
DEMOCRATIC POLITICS POLITICAL PARTIES Presented by S.K.GUPTA T.G.T.(S.St.) O.F.D.R., PUNE.
NGO Council 8 th April 2006 Charter for the MCGM-LACG Partnership w.e.f. 1 st April 2006.
Report on Working of Ward Committees in the City of Mumbai and Civic Problems Registered by Citizens (January 2011 to December 2012) Supported by: FORD.
Taehyun Kwon Econ 539.  “Affirmative Action, Political Representation, Unions, and Female Police Employment.”  Tim R.Sass and Jennifer L.Troyer, 1999.
Status of Municipal Education in Mumbai (AcademicYears to ) Supported by FORD FOUNDATION 1.
1. Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) 2  Steady decline in the quality of governance in the last three decades  Growing frustration.
Report on Working of Ward Committees in the City of Mumbai and Civic Problems Registered by Citizens (January 2012 to December 2014) Supported by: FORD.
1. Common Cents About Common Cents Funded by the Bush Foundation Share information and perspectives about Minnesota’s fiscal situation 50+ workshops around.
PRESENTATION EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH.
Quality of Life - Halifax Quality of life - Top 3 Scores -
Parameters for Rating MLAs (1/4) ParameterMarks Past 1 8 Present 2 52 Perception (through an opinion poll of 14,561 people) 40 Negative for new FIR cases.
Participants: All students enrolled in CHS: male students and 438 female students 198 in 9 th grade, 214 in 10 th grade, 210 in 11 th grade, and.
Mid Day Meal Scheme AWP&B Arunachal Pradesh.
Status of Municipal Education in Mumbai December 2013 Supported by FORD FOUNDATION 1.
MUMBAI REPORT CARD MUNICIPAL COUNCILLORS Why we need to monitor our Elected Representatives (ER’s) 2  Steady decline in the quality of governance.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Lina Williams Budget & Financial Analyst Tuesday, July 14 th 2015.
Report on Ward Committee and Civic Services Provided by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi 1.
“Policing the Police” A Fact-Finding Investigation into the Effectiveness of Charlotte’s Citizens Review Board Professor Jason Huber John S. Arco Lee Miller-Finkel.
Key Highlights of the Report on State of Policing and Law & Order in Delhi December
STATE OF POLICING AND LAW & ORDER IN MUMBAI December
7 th Grade Civics Miss Smith *pgs  Governor- chief executive in each state  Qualifications:  U.S. citizen  Lived in the state for a certain.
Parameters for Rating Municipal Councillors ParameterMarks Past 1 (Education qualification, PAN Card, Criminal cases)7 Present 2 (Attendance, No. of Question,
Role of Technology in Indian Elections. Election in India Biggest Democratic Vote Over 800 Million Indians Voting.
Strategic Objectives Results attained in the financial years 2003/04 and 2004/05 (to date) Strategic Plans: 2004/ /8.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office March 28, 2003.
State of Municipal Education in Mumbai December
E-VOTING SYSTEM PREPARED BY- VISHAL VIRADIYA( ) DHAVAL PANDYA( )
Group exercise to improve indicators from the draft PGA indicator set.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
1. Key insight  Average score of 61.23% of the first report card for the 12 th Assembly in 2011 and average score of 65.11% in 2016 the performance has.
KEY HIGHLIGHTS of The STATE of HEALTH of MUMBAI July
State of Public (School) Education
HOW TO APPLY FOR A NEW PAN CARD FORM[FORM NO. 49A]
Parameters for Rating Municipal Councillors (1/4)
KEY HIGHLIGHTS of The STATE of HEALTH of MUMBAI July 2017
E-courts | Riju Bafna, Akash P..
Report on Working of Ward Committees in the City of Mumbai and Civic Problems Registered by Citizens (March 2012 to December 2015) April 2016.
Academic Associate – IIM Ahmedabad
Executive Department.
State of Municipal Education in Mumbai
Report on Civic Issues Registered by Citizens and Deliberations done by Municipal Councillors in Mumbai (March 2012 to December 2016)   April 2017.
Delhi MLA Report Card First comprehensive and objective annual report card of the performance of MLAs’ of a State Assembly. AAP by winning 67 out of 70.
State of Municipal Education in Mumbai
Statistical management project
Transcripts and GPA College 101 November 7, 2016.
National Political Parties in India
Career & Technical Education Special Programs
We are learning all kinds of new stuff today!
RAJASTHAN ELECTION 2018 Check out the Latest Opinion polls and Analysis of Rajasthan Election 2018 and many more of year 2018 with India Alive.
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program Application Process
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program Application Process
The Presidency: Conventional Wisdom Redefined
Public Hearing on Municipal Tariff Guideline Increase for 2007/08 Financial Year
The Schedule ISSUE OF NOTIFICATION BY DC/SDO 9/11/2018
Parameters for Rating Municipal Councillors Marks Past1 (Education qualification, PAN Card, Criminal cases) 7 Present2 (Attendance, No. of Question,
NO. OF QUESTIONS ASKED PERTAINING TO THE PERIOD IN PRAJA’S REPORT CARDS OF THE CORRESPONDING YEARS In each year three sessions were taken, while in.
The State Executive Branch
Welcome to the February Meeting
Number of students screened & number of malnourished students
Presentation transcript:

Parameters for Rating Municipal Councillors ParameterMarks Past 1 (Education qualification, PAN Card, Criminal cases)7 Present 2 (Attendance, No. of Question, Questions compared to Citizen's Complaints & Importance of questions asked by issues raised, Usage of Area Development Fund 4 ) 63 Perception (through an citizen survey of 22,580 people for their perception on their Councillor’s accessibility/availability, performance, corruption, and satisfaction with quality of life, services provided by government) 30 Negative for new FIR cases till December 2013 post elections 3 Minus 5 Negative for pending Charge Sheet 3 Minus 5 Total100 2 RTI Data Source: 1 Municipal Secretary, MCGM (MCGM Head Office and BEST) and Assistant Engineer (Maintenance), MCGM (from all the 24 Administrative Wards of MCGM); 2 Election Commission Department, MCGM; 3 Mumbai Police. 4 Area Development Fund relates to the period April’12 to March’14 (Rs.1.2 crores).

Mumbai Report Card Municipal Councillors Grade A – Between 100% to 80% Grade B – Less than 80% to 70% Grade C – Less than 70% to 60% Grade D – Less than 60% to 50% Grade E – Less than 50% to 35% Grade F – Less than 35% (Period under consideration – April 2013 to March 2014)

TOP 10 COUNCILLORS by RANK 4 WardC. No.PartyCouncillor name Score 2014 (out of 100) Rank G/S194SSSnehal Ambekar G/S188SSHemangi Worlikar P/N40BJPGyanmurti Sharma R/S21INCRamashish Gupta K/W60SSSanjay Pawar R/S22BJPSunita Yadav R/S23SS Prajakta (Sawant)Vishwasrao R/C9BJPManisha Chaudhari D210INCNoshir Mehta K/W56SSYashodhar Phanse

5 WardC. No.PartyCouncillor name Score 2014 (out of 100) Rank S116MNSAvinash Sawant N118NCPHarun Khan N128MNSMangal Kadam F/S198SSSanjay (Nana) Ambole G/N179SPJyotsna Parmar P/N35INCBhomsingh Rathod L155INDLalita Annamalai F/N172INDManojkumar Sansare K/W53INDChangez Multani G/S190MNSHemlata Wange BOTTOM 10 COUNCILLORS by RANK

TOP 10 COUNCILLORS for MOVEMENT 6 Ward C. No.Party Councillor name Score 2014 (out of 100) Rank Move mentReasons H/E91INCGulistan Shaikh No. of questions; Quality of questions M/W144BJP Rajshree Palande No. of questions; Quality of questions; Perceived Performance T99BJP Bhavna Jobanputra Attendance; No. of questions; Quality of questions M/E132SPRais Shaikh Attendance; No. of questions; Quality of questions; Perceived Performance L156SP Mohd. Ishak Shaikh Attendance; No. of questions; Quality of questions D211SS Arvind Dudhwadkar Attendance; No. of questions; Quality of questions P/S52INCKiran Patel No. of questions; Quality of questions H/E84INCBrian Miranda Attendance; No. of questions A224SSGanesh Sanap No. of questions; Quality of questions K/E72SS Sunita Elawadekar No. of questions; Quality of questions

7 War dC. No.Party Councillor name Score 2014 (out of 100) Rank Movem entReasons G/N182MNSVirendra Tandel No. of questions; Quality of questions; Perceived Performance R/C13MNSChetan Kadam Attendance; No. of questions; Perceived Performance P/N35INC Bhomsingh Rathod Attendance; No. of questions; Quality of questions; Perceived Performance S108MNS Rupesh Waingankar Attendance; No. of questions; Quality of questions; Perceived Performance T100NCP Nandakumar Vaity No. of questions; Quality of questions; New FIR & Charge sheet; Perceived Performance T102BJP Prakash Gangadhare Quality of questions; New FIR & Chargesheet; Perceived Performance R/C8INC Shivanand Shetty No. of questions; Quality of questions; Perceived Performance R/C15BJP Mohan Mithbaokar Attendance; No. of questions; Perceived Performance S111SSAshok Patil Attendance; Quality of questions F/N169SSShradha Jadhav Attendance; No. of questions; Quality of questions; Perceived Performance BOTTOM 10 COUNCILLORS for MOVEMENT

Observations: Positive Signs 8 Gender Performance: In the top 10 there are equal Female and Male Councillors The average score of Female Councillors (59.41%) is slightly more than Male Councillors (59.4%) Questions Asked: 27% increase From 2232 questions in FY to 2835 questions in FY More than 50 questions: One Councillor in FY to Six Councillors in FY Maximum questions: Anant Nar (91), Saeeda Khan (85) and Deepak Pawar (73). Quality of Questions: 3.8% increase

Observations : Cause of Concern 9 Attendance: Dropped by 6.7% Questions Asked: 10 Councillors haven’t asked a single question this year (FY ). Three Councillors (Anita Yadav, Jyotsna Parmar, Lalita Annamalai) of them haven’t asked a single question till date (April’12 to March’14). Proportion of questions asked compared to civic complaint's just 26.9%. Criminal Record: 50 Councillors have criminal record as on 31 st Dec’13 34 Councilors had criminal cases before (2012) elections as per their affidavits 16 Councillors have new FIRs/Chargesheets after they were elected 5 Councillors who had criminal record as per their affidavits have new FIRs/Chargesheets 41 (out of the 50) Councillors have been chargesheeted Perceived Performance: Overall perceived performance has dropped by 11.8%. Overall accessibility has dropped by 27.7%.

Overall accessibility has dropped by 27.7%

11 Party Akhil Bharatiya Sena (2) Bharatiya Janata Party (31) Bhartiya Republican Party Bahujan Mahasangha (1) Indepen dent (15) Indian National Congress (52) Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (28) Nationalist Congress Party (13) Republican Party Of India RPI(A) (1) Samajwadi Party (9) Shiv Sena (74) Average Score % Overall score has increased from 58.57% to 59.41%

12 THANK YOU!!!