Porewater: NJDEP Site Remediation Program regulatory perspective

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) to Assess the Contribution of PAHs to Toxicity of Sediments at a Former Manufacturing Plant Battelle Sediment.
Advertisements

Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
Exposure and Effects Workgroup Study Ideas Five-Year Plan: Risk to Birds Is there clear evidence of pollutant effects on survival, reproduction,
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION AND FLUX IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Brant Whiting, Jeffery S. Horsburgh and Amber S. Jones Utah Water.
LEACHATE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT
New Groundwater Techniques and Technologies 17 th Annual RETS REMP Conference June 25-27, 2007 Eric L. Darois, CHP EPRI Consultant/RSCS Inc.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
1 What is Remediation Process Optimization? How Can It Help Me Identify Opportunities for Enhanced and More Efficient Site Remediation? Mark A. Gilbertson.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
NASSCO and Southwest Marine Sediment Investigation Preliminary Results Thomas Ginn, Ph.D. Dreas Nielsen June 18, 2002.
RISK e Learning Bioavailability – Metals, Organics, and Use at Hazardous Waste Sites June 11 th, 2008 Session 2: “Bioavailability of Organic Compounds:
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 The Utility of the Bays Eutrophication Model in the Harbor Outfall Monitoring Program James Fitzpatrick HydroQual,
Monitored Natural Attenuation of Inorganics USEPA Scientist - to - Scientist Meeting Las Vegas, Nevada June , 2000 Robert W. Puls, Ph.D. National.
Sediment Quality Criteria William Fish Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences And Resources.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Risk e-Learning Webinar Passive sampling for the measurement of freely dissolved contaminants in water: Practical Guidance Upal Ghosh University of Maryland.
WG 3: Impact assessment ► Conceptual framework for impact assessment for xenobiotics in the urban water cycle ► Biotests as analytical tool ► Are we measuring.
The Need for an Integrated View of Water Quality Modeling and Monitoring Bruce Kiselica USEPA, Region 2 Second Workshop on Advanced Technologies in Real.
Porewater Collection and Risk Evaluation 27 th Alabama Water Resources Conference Orange Beach, AL Jacob Gruzalski Environmental Standards, Inc.
Randall Wentsel, Ph.D. 7 September, Background  Problems  PBT process is based on principles developed for organic substances that do not apply.
Lead in Drinking Water EPA’s Lead and Copper Rule Rick Rogers, Chief Drinking Water Branch U. S. EPA Region 3 District of Columbia Council of Governments.
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August xx, 2012.
Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Sediment Quality in the Corpus Christi Bay Natalie Bartosh GIS in Water Resources, Fall 2003 Dr. Maidment, The.
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS.
DEPARTMENT OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PRIMARY INDUSTRY, FISHERIES AND RESOURCES Mine Site Water Quality Monitoring Michael.
Present Development of a Regional Guidance Document for Dredged Material Evaluation Christopher McArthur, P.E. (US Environmental.
23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Case Study Palos Verdes Shelf Judy C. Huang, P.E.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
COMMITMENT & INTEGRITY DRIVE RESULTS Risk Based Corrective Action Using site-specific risk assessment to achieve Regulatory Closure.
RBES Guiding Principles The Department will comply with the requirements of the nation’s environmental laws and regulations. However, the requirement to.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Overview of the Proposed Draft B River Corridor Baseline Risk Assessment Report Public Workshop – January 10 & 11, 2008.
Ammonia Measurement Techniques Ji-Qin (Jee-Chin) Ni, Ph.D. Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering Purdue University October 21, 2008 Albuquerque,
Danny Reible – University of Texas Heidi Blischke - GSI 1 Polydimethyl siloxane 2 Solid Phase Microextraction.
1 Effective Characterization Technologies Deana M. Crumbling, M.S. Technology Innovation Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. (703)
Assessing changes in contaminant fluxes following removal of a dam in the Pawtuxet River Results and Discussion Methods and Approach Passive samplers (polyethylene;
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
Technical Track Work Group Report Out August 22, 2012.
1 ECOS and ITRC Brown Bag Briefing For the USEPA Environmental Technology Council March 10, 2005 Tim Titus.
23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Passive sampling methods (PSMs) for organic contaminants in sediments: State of the Science Keith Maruya Southern California.
Sheen Characterization 2009 Data and Observations July 2010 Progress Meeting McCormick & Baxter Superfund Site Portland, Oregon.
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
NEW ADVANCES IN PASSIVE SAMPLING FOR SEDIMENT RISK ASSESSMENT Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical, & Environmental Engineering UMBC SETAC HDC.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Partitioning and Bioavailability Assessment for Sediments from South Wilmington Wetlands Huan Xia and Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical,
USE OF PORE WATER IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER BIOTIC AND ABIOTIC DATASETS TO EVALUATE REMEDIAL SUCCESS IN A FRESHWATER RIVER ENVIRONMENT Hudson – Delaware.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Dynamic PCB Partitioning in Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio Sediments Andrew Lenox Environmental Engineer US Army Corps.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Surface Water, Inter-Armor and Sub-Armor Sampling Program and Results Oregon DEQ, Hart Crowser, Inc., and GSI Water Solutions 2010 McCormick & Baxter Annual.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
A Comparison of SPME Approaches for the Analysis of Alkylated PAHs in Pore Water Porewater: The Interaction between Sediment, Biota, and Water 2015 Fall.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Brian Hitchens and Sam Williams PCBs in the Urban Environment: Implications for Long-Term Sustainability Of Low-Threshold Remediation.
Review of Annex 1 - GLWQA Doug Spry Workshop convened by the Parties Implementation Work Group of the Science Advisory Board of the International Joint.
In Situ Sediment Treatment: State of the Practice
Proposed Topics for Application of Sediment Quality Objectives.
California Sediment Quality Advisory Committee Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Status of Sediment and Groundwater Remedies. Or… What’s up with that O&F Determination?
Presentation for Office of Surface Mines on Potential Use of the Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework to enhance source terms for use of CCRs in.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Environment and Climate Change Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Regarding Doris North Project Type A Water Licence Amendment Application Nunavut.
A Short Update on Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS)
System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation
Danny Reible Fate and transport of contaminants in the environment
Monitoring Guidance Johannes Grath Rob Ward 12th October 2005.
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
Presentation transcript:

Porewater: NJDEP Site Remediation Program regulatory perspective SETAC - Hudson Delaware Chapter 2015 Fall Workshop October 7, 2015 Princeton, NJ Greg Neumann - NJDEP

NJDEP Regulations NJDEP Technical Requirements for Site Remediation – NJAC 7:26E Minimum regulatory requirements Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance (February, 2015)

Ecological Evaluation Technical Guidance Sections relevant to Porewater: Section 5 Ecological Evaluation (EE) Section 6 Ecological Risk Assessment Risk Characterization – quantify ecological risk Section 6.2.2.3 Sediment Porewater sampling Section 6.4.6 PAHs – USEPA White Paper (2009) SPME – 3 Tiered approach assess risk to benthic community. Appendix F Sediment Porewater Sampling Techniques

Porewater – Why? Bioavailability Arsenic Arsenic Sed. Chemistry 45 ppm 340 ppb Pore Water 100 ppb

Bioavailability/Porewater Bulk sediment chemistry results are not accurate predictors of sediment toxicity. Measure solid phase. Porewater concentrations more accurately predict benthic toxicity by measuring bioavailable fraction Site-specific sediment characteristics influence porewater concentrations (i.e. TOC, AVS, DOC, pH, Eh) Porewater results represent the bioavailable fraction of sediment contamination.

Porewater Sampling Most appropriate during risk characterization stage of ERA Predominately used to evaluate risk to benthic community. GW Surface Water discharges Utilized in a Weight of Evidence approach Sediment toxicity tests Tissue sampling PBTs (PCB/DDT)

Porewater Sampling Post-Remedial Monitoring Baseline Conditions Conventional and Amended Sediment Caps In-situ Treatment – activated carbon, apatite, organophylic clay, ZVI Remedies effective due to sorptive capacity – longevity GW remedy to protect SW Baseline Conditions

Porewater Sampling Devices Trident Probe Ultra Seep System Piezometers Peeper Rigid polyethylene Push-Point Sampler Diffusion Gradient Thin Films

Porewater Sampling Considerations Sampling medium must be capable of detecting site Contaminants Of Concern Deployment time – must be able to achieve equilibrium Performance Reference Compounds In-situ vs. Ex-Situ Data generated must be in line with Data Quality Objectives.

Future Needs Current guidance primarily focuses on the sampling techniques and design factors related to pore water sampling (characterization of risk) Future guidance is needed that clearly documents how porewater sampling results can be used to develop sediment clean-up goals. Much of the porewater info. is housed in literature/research based publications. This info. has to be brought forward and presented in more primary based guidance documents (EPA/SETAC/ITRC Publications)

Future Needs Standardization of sampling devices and protocols. Additional studies to link PW results to benthic toxicity.

NJDEP & Porewater NJDEP Regulations and Guidance support the use of Porewater sampling!! Porewater sampling can effectively be used to better quantify ecologic risk. Porewater sampling can be employed during the risk characterization stage of an ERA and during Post-Remedial Monitoring. Porewater sampling can represent an important line of evidence in an overall weight of evidence approach.

Porewater ? ? ? ? ?