Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
June 24, 2010 Special Education Strand Morgantown, West Virginia WVEIS Data Conference.
Advertisements

Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Transition (Indicators C-8 and B-12)
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the. Regulatory Requirements IDEA Statue 2004 December 3, USC 1400 Part B Regulations August 14, 2006.
OF ECSE COMPLIANCE PRESENTATION FOR THE 2014 MO-CASE CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 23, 2014.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
From Referral Through Exit
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Early Childhood Transition Presenters: Kimberly Mitchell Ginger Sheppard Jessica Spataro NOVEMBER 2011.
Potpourri: Summary of Important Points to Remember Presenters: Jill Harris Laura Duos NOVEMBER 2011.
Kathy T. Whaley, NECT AC Presentation for the Utah Special Education Law Conference August 2011 UPDATED January 2012.
Produced by NICHCY, 2013 D evelopment of the Transition Plan.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
Presented by the Part C- Kristie Musick, Part C Coordinator Dr. Lesly Wilson, Part C Data Manager Part B- Lori James, Part B Data Manager Part C & B March.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
Road blocks & remedies for linking & using data Follow the Yellow Brick Road: Part C to part B 619 Mary Peters, DaSy, ECTA Center Debbie Cate, ECTA Center.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
MSDS Report: Student Count by Primary Ed Setting Sample Report Center for Educational Performance and Information - Michigan Student Data System Student.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
KYLA PATTERSON, M.S. CREATING CONNECTIONS TO SHINING STARS CONFERENCE JULY 23, 2013 What If…? Understanding Part C Eligibility Determination, Assessment.
Creating Supports for Transition Ann Hains, UW-Milwaukee Sarah Hadden, UW-Eau Claire Jill Haglund, DPI Donna Miller, DHFS.
Supporting Early Childhood Transition: State of the Evidence and Implications for Policy and Practice Beth Rous Caroline Gooden.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Michigan State Plan for Early On ® February
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
2005 B. Mullins, D. Scheler 1 Movin’ On Up Effective Transition from Early Intervention into Preschool (Revised May 2005)
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Transition from PSEI to Kindergarten or First Grade November 17, 2011.
07/20/2007 State Performance Plan Indicators Jessica Wolf Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Michigan.
CT Speech Language Hearing Association March 26, 2010.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Timely and Effective Transition at Age 3 David P. Lindeman, Peggy Miksch & Phoebe Rinkel Kansas Division for Early Childhood Conference Wichita, Kansas.
Early Development Network Conference June 10, 2015 Kearney, NE Amy Bunnell & Cole Johnson, NDE Julie Docter, DHHS.
Evaluation IEP Development, Review and Revision Placement
Transitioning Children from Part C to Part B Toby Long, PhD, PT, FAPTA Rachel Brady, PT, DPT, MS January 14, 2011 Office of State Superintendent of Education,
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Florida’s Participation in the National Transition Initiative WHY US? Strand 3 – Collaborative Leadership Session # S3 107 &
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
TA Call CCBs and Child Find June 12, Welcome ! Purpose: EI Colorado and CDE Preschool Special Education Child Find staff will review changes in.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Integrated Data to Support the Transitions in Special Education Wednesday, July 13, :00 –
1 Early Childhood Transition: Facts, Figures, Fantasies and the Future Objectives 1. To share selected findings based on the SPP/APR and NECTC study 2.
ARC Chairperson Training
Special Education Division Data Identified Noncompliance (DINC) Overview Presented by the Assessment, Evaluation, and Support Unit.
Eligibility Determination IFSP Meetings IFSP Service Implementation
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
ARC Chairperson Training
Early Childhood Transition APR Indicators and National Trends
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010

2 Proposed Outcomes of Session Participants will understand: Information on TA resources developed by the priority team that can be used to support effective transition Information on future national TA and state networking opportunities to discuss issues and share strategies Selected highlights of synthesis of key points from December 1, 2009 ‘OSEP Early Childhood Transition FAQs: SPP/APR indicators C-8 and B-12’ and ‘Late Referral to Part C’ timeline

3 Existing Early Childhood Transition Training and TA Resources The National Early Childhood Transition Initiative Website

4 Additional Transition Resources SPP/APR Calendar – Resources Organized by Indicator NECTAC Part C to Part B Transition Resource Collection National Early Childhood Transition Center

5 Sequence of TA Opportunities to Support State Efforts Development of ‘Synthesis of Key Points from the OSEP Early Childhood FAQs” Development of ‘Late Referral to Part C’ timeline Early Childhood Transition conference sessions at the OSEP Collaborative Conference on August 4 th Conference Call August 11, 2010 Cross-state conference call networking and discussion opportunities in Fall 2010 with Priority Team members Ongoing responsive TA

6 Overview and Purpose of the Synthesis Document Contains key information from FAQ and is companion document to FAQ Organized by implementation of steps in sequence of transition requirements Correlates with pertinent APR indicators for Part C (C- 8) and Part B (B-11 and B-12)

7 “Syntheses of Key Points from the OSEP Early Childhood Transition FAQ” (SPP/APR Indicators C- 8, B-11 and B-12)

9 Organization of Key Point Synthesis Transition Plan Local Education Agency (LEA) Notification from Part C Transition Conference for Children Potentially Eligible under Part B Late Referral to Part C Late Referrals from Part C to Part B Part B Initial Evaluation and Eligibility Determination IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C

10 Transition Plan Must be developed after child is age two but before child’s 3 rd birthday Must include steps and services to support smooth transition Is part of IFSP May be developed or updated at Transition Conference

11 LEA Notification Two Steps in LEA Notification Step 1: Notification of all children who will “shortly reach age of eligibility” Step 2: Notification of children deemed “potentially eligible” for Part B

12 LEA Notification – Step 1 Step 1: Notification of all children who will “shortly reach age of eligibility” NOT reported in C 8 -B NOT considered a referral No action by Part B

13 LEA Notification – Step 2 Step 2: Notification of children deemed “potentially eligible” for Part B Children individually determined by IFSP team based on states’ definition of potentially eligible Reported in C 8 -B Considered a referral to Part B Part B provides procedural safeguards to parents and attends transition conference

14 LEA Notification - Implementation Steps 1 and 2 can be separate or combined: List of children (if combined, potentially eligible children can be indicated) Individual children (invitation to transition conference can serve as notification)

15 LEA Notification - Limits For both Steps 1 and 2: Parent consent CANNOT be required Parents can object if state has OSEP-approved opt-out policy

16 Potentially Eligible – State Examples State #1 – Broad Part C eligibility Definition: Some Part C children who meet “selected” Part C eligibility criteria are potentially eligible State #2 - Part C and Part B eligibility criteria align Definition: All Part C Children are potentially eligible State #3 - Part C eligibility more restrictive than Part B Definition: All Part C Children are potentially eligible

17 Transition Conference Develop or revise Transition Plan If Part B does not participate, Part C must provide information about Part B to parent If parent does not approve convening transition conference, LEA notification must be provided (unless OSEP-approved opt-out policy in place)

19 Late Referral Timeline Organized by: Part C and Part B Responsibilities (both include the same collaborative activities) The time period the child is referred to Part C ≥ 90 days prior to child’s 3 rd birthday Between 45 and 90 days prior to child’s 3 rd birthday ≤ 45 days prior to child’s 3 rd birthday

20 Late Referral to Part C – Part C Responsibilities

21 Late Referral to Part C – Part B Responsibilities For children referred to Part C ≤ 90 days from child’s 3 rd birthday and “served” by Part C, Part B: Conducts initial evaluation within 60 days or other state timelines (even if timeline expires after 3 rd birthday) Conducts IEP Meeting (30 days from eligibility determination) Reports in B-11 and in B-12e (subtract B-12e from B12-a in FFY 2009 APR due 2/1/11)

22 Late Referrals from Part C to B - Part B Responsibilities Defined as: Children referred to Part C ≥ 90 days (and served by Part C) BUT referred to Part B ≤ 90 days from child’s 3 rd birthday

23 Late Referrals from Part C to B - Part B Responsibilities Conduct initial evaluation Develop IEP by 3 rd birthday Report all in B-12a but if eligible for Part B and no IEP by 3 rd birthday:  Do NOT report in 12b, c, d, or e (unless parent refusal to consent for evaluation caused delay)  Indicate reason for delay and range of days beyond 3 rd birthday

24 Part B Initial Evaluation & Eligibility Determination Part C assessments and parent information may be used to determine child eligibility: IEP team and other qualified individuals must review existing evaluation data, including evaluations and information provided by parents Based on that review and input by family, team determines what additional data are needed to determine if child is child with disability

25 Children NOT included in B-12 are: Those who have not been evaluated or determined eligible for Part C and have not received any Part C services These children should be included in B-11 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C

26 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C Indicator B-12 = Number of children referred by Part C, found eligible for Part B and have an IEP developed by age three “Referral to Part B” for reporting in B-12a occurs when LEA has been notified that child served in Part C is potentially eligible for services under Part B

27 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C Children reported in B-12a include those: For whom LEA has received LEA Notification prior to child’s third birthday that child will shortly reach the age of eligibility for Part B services AND that child is potentially eligible for services under Part B For whom the LEA has received invitation to the transition conference Served in Part C and referred to Part B even if child was referred to Part C ≤ 90 days before child’s 3 rd birthday

28 IEP Developed and Implemented by 3 rd Birthday for Children Referred by Part C B-12 reporting for “late referrals to Part C” (referred to Part C ≤ 90 days before 3rd Birthday): These children are subtracted out of B-12a per measurement B-12e when calculating percentage of children who have an IEP developed and implemented by their 3 rd birthdays even if :  No transition conference held at least 90 days before the third birthday  Part C completed an evaluation but IFSP was not developed

29 Questions? EC Transition Priority Team