South Kitsap School District Policy Governance Ends 1 Presentation Ends 1: The South Kitsap School District will enable all students to achieve academic success by providing a learning environment that nurtures all students.

ELEMENTARY SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT FLEXIBILITY (ESEA) REQUEST A NEW ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM

IMPLICATIONS FOR SKSD  No district improvement  No step 1,2,3,4,5 sanctions for Title I buildings  No “Choice” / SES – No required set asides  Olalla - new Title I building

NEW CATEGORIES/TERMINOLOGY  Priority Schools  Emerging Schools  Focus Schools (Emerging)  Reward Schools (EPO,OH,,SG—BG Close)  Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) – Cutting proficiency gaps in half – NEW state targets 2017  Replaces state uniform bar (100% by 2014)

AMO EXAMPLE  2011 DATA IS BASELINE – SAMPLE High School has a proficiency score of 70% for 10 th grade reading in the “All” student category  PROFICIENCY GAP – is the difference between 100% meeting proficiency and the baseline year. Proficiency gap for this group is 100% minus 70% or 30%  HALF THE PROFICIENCY GAP – represents the growth required to meet 2017 target. In this example, half the proficiency gap is half of 30% or 15%  2017 TARGET – is baseline (70%) plus half the gap (15%) or 85% of this group meeting standard by 2017  ANNUAL INCREMENTS – schools have 6 years ( ) to reach 85% proficiency target. Yearly targets grow by EQUAL increments. In this case, the annual increment is 15% (half the gap) divided into 6 equal parts, or 2.5%  TARGET for 2012 is baseline (70%) plus annual increment (2.5%) or 72.5%, 2013 target is 75%, 2014 target is 77.2%, leading to 2017 target of 85%.

NEW GRADUATION CALCULATIONS  OLD METHOD (estimated cohort) – is a composite cohort. Uses dropout rates for all grades within one school year to determine an ESTIMATE of the number of students graduating. Allows for alternate expected graduation year for Special education/ELL students. Allows adjustment for deficient credits  ADJUSTED COHORT (NEW METHOD) – Is an ACTUAL cohort, students are tracked over 4 years w/ adjustments made for transfers in/out. IMPOSES concept of 4 year time span. NO adjustments for Special education/ELL to take longer. ALL students are expected to graduate 4 years after first entering 9 th grade. Credit deficient transfers MAY NOT be reclassified into lower grade.

2012 SOUTH KITSAP STATE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Elementary and Secondary School Data Comparison to State

2012 WA State Assessment Results Difference in percent meeting standards 2011 to 2012 ReadingMathWritingScience Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade

2012 SK Assessment Results Difference in percent meeting standards 2011 to 2012 ReadingMathWritingScience Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade Grade

2012 MSP Reading Results South Kitsap Elementary StateDistrict 3 rd th th th Above State Scores Below State Scoreswithin 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease)

2012 MSP Math Results South Kitsap Elementary StateDistrict 3 rd th th th Above State Scores Below State Scores within 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease)

StateDistrict 7th th th Above State Scores Below State Scores Within 0-3% of State Data includes: CH, JS, MW, SKHS, Discovery & Explorer 2012 MSP/HSPE Reading Results South Kitsap Secondary

2012 MSP Math Results South Kitsap Secondary StateDistrict 7 th th Above State Scores Below State Scoreswithin 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease) Data includes: CH, JS, MW, SKHS, Discovery & Explorer

2012 MSP EOC Math Results South Kitsap Secondary StateDistrict 8 th EOC th EOC th EOC1PP th EOC th EOCPP th EOC th EOC th EOC2PP

2012 MSP Reading Results South Kitsap Low Income Elementary StateDistrict 3 rd th th th Above State Scores Below State Scoreswithin 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease)

2012 MSP/HSPE Reading Results South Kitsap Low Income Secondary StateDistrict 7th th th Above State Scores Below State Scores Within 0-3% of State Data includes: CH, JS, MW, SKHS, Discovery & Explorer

2012 MSP Math Results South Kitsap Low Income Elementary StateDistrict 3 rd th th th Above State Scores Below State Scores within 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease )

2012 MSP Math Results South Kitsap Low Income Secondary StateDistrict 7 th th Above State Scores Below State Scoreswithin 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease) Data includes: CH, JS, MW, SKHS, Discovery & Explorer

2012 MSP Reading Results South Kitsap Special Education Elementary StateDistrict 3 rd th th th Above State Scores Below State Scores within 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease)

2012 MSP/HSPE Reading Results South Kitsap Special Education Secondary StateDistrict 7th th th Above State Scores Below State Scores Within 0-3% of State (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease) Data includes: CH, JS, MW, SKHS, Discovery & Explorer

2012 MSP Math Results South Kitsap Special Education Elementary StateDistrict 3 rd th th th Above State Scores Below State Scores within 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease)

2012 MSP Math Results South Kitsap Special Education Secondary StateDistrict 7 th th Above State Scores Below State Scoreswithin 0-3% (Any category at +/- 3 percent is considered no increase/decrease) Data includes: CH, JS, MW, SKHS, Discovery & Explorer

SK Elementary Trends

SK Secondary Trends

Targeted Support  Junior High Side-by-Side  High School Special Education Math  Intensive Focused Work at the Elementary Level

Is this January 5, 2010 or what?

High Standards and Expectations

Supportive Learning Environment

Frequent Monitoring of Teaching and Learning