Development Charges June 2011. BACKGROUND Presently new external infrastructure costs for new and upgraded capacity for developments are in the main subsidised.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STATE REVOLVING FUNDS: THE INDIAN CONTEXT PARIS 2003.
Advertisements

Public Debt Management with emphasis on PPP 1 Ministry of Finance 08 th Dec 2014.
Regulatory Proposal December We provide distribution services to 1.4 million residential and business customers We deliver electricity to.
Comments on the OCE Solar Transition – Next Steps: Draft Staff Positions for Discussion Alfredo Z. Matos Vice President – Renewables & Energy Solutions.
International Civil Aviation Organization Funding of Regional Safety Oversight Organizations Simon Clegg General Manager Government & Strategy Civil Aviation.
Paying A Fair Rate. Notice Regarding New WATER & SEWER RATES  Council Meetings (Open Session) June 18, 2007 – Special Meeting June 18, 2007 – Special.
2010 Draft Municipal Budget
1 RATE SETTING WORKSHOP February 23, RATE CHANGES In accordance with Section of the Charter Plan of the District, any proposed rate change.
Development Contributions Witzenberg Municipality 30 October 2013.
Distribution Charging Methodologies Forum DCC Charging Methodology 4 th April 2013.
What IHE Delivers 1 Business models - sustainability IHE Australia Worhshop – July 2011 Peter MacIsaac & Paul Clarke.
Considering Tax-Supported Debt May 10, 2004 Presentation to City Council Roger Rosychuk Corporate Services Department.
Road charging and vehicle taxation - the EU perspective
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
RESPONSE TO SAPOA MUNICIPAL SERVICES COST REPORT.
The Urban Infrastructure Challenge in Canada: Focusing on Housing Affordability and Choice Presentation by CHBA – [Name] to The Municipal Council of [Name]
Planning Legislation – Prof. H. Alshuwaikhat ZONING Zoning is the division of a municipality, city or town into districts for the purpose of regulating.
Forest Practices Code Transition Larry Pedersen Chief Forester, MOF.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
Financing Urban Public Infrastructure
The Role of Local Government in implementing Biogas Projects Barry Coetzee, Head: Integrated Waste Management, Strategy & Policy Solid Waste Management.
National Investment in Water and Waste Water Infrastructure, Funding & Pricing Mid-West Regional Authority Annual Conference 2009.
Chairpersons for Finance Portfolio committees The role of Council in Supply Chain Management (SCM) 29 May
Why are economic and financial instruments needed? A presentation made by Noma Neseni, IWSD.
Development Contributions George Municipality. BASIS FOR DETERMINING DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PSDFPSDF George Municipality’s SDFGeorge Municipality’s.
Presentation by: Alwyn Laubscher Pr. Eng. Pr. CPM REPORT TO MUNICIPAL WORKSHOP 31 OCTOBER 2013.
1 Impact Fees in Virginia Virginia Municipal League Annual Conference October 15, 2007 Jeffrey S. Gore Hefty & Wiley, P.C.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
Water Services Reform – the Durban experience : successes and challenges Neil Macleod Durban South Africa.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force March 29,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
1 World Water Congress and Exhibition - Montréal, Canada WATER AND POWER UTILITY PUBLIC SECTOR FINANCING Presented by: James B. McDaniel, Senior Assistant.
Cape Town Spatial Development Framework PEPCO MEETING 14 th October ND May 2012.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
1 February 2005 Briefing Sessions Draft Regulations Using Water for Recreational Purposes.
Seminar "Imovinski standard", 29. i 30. lipnja Spatial Planning in Ireland Farannán Tannam, MRICS, Dip.A&F.
PRESENTATION TO THE ROAD PAVEMENT FORUM 09 November 2010 Progress & Update since the Road Construction & Maintenance Summit.
1 Exploring economic potential opportunities in our lakes and dams 26 August 2011 Recreational water use and the NWA Anet Muir.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force May 15,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
February 2, 2011 Joe Yew City of Oakland California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission Debt 2: Accessing the Market Debt Policy and Plan of Finance.
APPA’s Financial Planning for Municipals Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA September 27, 2005 Business & Finance Workshop.
Visioning process Followed by the visioning exercise: what do we want transport to be like in 2055 To focus on themes such as: – How will we travel? –
Achieving the MDGs: RBA Training Workshop Module 7: Synthesis of sector needs assessments and preparation of 10 year framework 9-12 May 2005.
Trends in Intergovernmental Finances: 2000/01 – 2006/07 Agriculture & Land Aditi Maheshwari National Treasury 06 October 2004.
1 Belarus CEM Discussions Energy Sector Stable sector structure and governance over the past decade together with recent macro economic performance of.
PPP Legal & Regulatory Framework. PPP Policy In July 2008 GOK approved the PPP policy directive through which: PPPs are identified as a method for investing.
NATMAP 2050 Synopsis Update Colloquium 30 October 2015 Breakaway Session 2: Transport Financing and Funding.
Reform of Land Development Fee in Serbia Marko Paunović Center for Liberal-Democratic Studies.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
Municipal involvement in the energy crisis Select Committee on Labour & Public Enterprises.
SPATIAL PLANNING & LAND USE MANAGEMENT BILL Human Settlements Portfolio Committee 11 October 2012.
1 Local Government Budgets and Expenditure Review 2001/02 – 2007/08.
City of Pitt Meadows Taxation 101– Townhall Meeting February 4, 2016.
Comments on FFC Annual Submission for 2006/07. COMMENTS ON RECOMMENDATIONS –Local Government Equitable Share Allocation –Infrastructure Grants –Health.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
Cost recovery study for the Seine Normandie RBMP.
Health Care Financing Health Economic Course Series
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
New Customer Contributions for the Water Sector: Workshop 4 August 2004.
AVIATION TARIFF REVIEW PROCESS AND METHODOLOGY
Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Energy
REPORT ON URBAN SETTLEMENTS DEVELOPMENT GRANT
National Treasury Special Pensions Administration
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
Mangawhai Wastewater Strategy and Options 7 August 2017.
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
COMMENTS ON THE DEBT OWED BY MUNICIPALITIES TO WATER BOARDS SALGA INPUT 20 MARCH 2007 BY WILLIAM MORAKA.
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view
The Role of Local Government in implementing Biogas Projects Barry Coetzee, Head: Integrated Waste Management, Strategy & Policy Solid Waste Management.
Presentation transcript:

Development Charges June 2011

BACKGROUND Presently new external infrastructure costs for new and upgraded capacity for developments are in the main subsidised by all ratepayers and not on a user pays principle. Durban has applied a simplistic “Development Charge” across the Metro from 1 July 2010 (applied in the Outer West from 2003). The other Metro Municipalities in the country, i.e. Joburg, Ekurhuleni, Tshwane and Cape Town, are currently levying development charges of one form or another, hence some recovery of costs. National Treasury Policy is to introduce Development Charges on a rational basis, across the entire country. The Municipal Fiscal Powers and Functions Act of 2007 is to be amended to better provide for a Development Charge. Spatial Planning and Land-use Management Bill, 2011 (SPLUMB) makes specific provision for a Development Charge. This is set to be enacted in 2012.

KEY POLICY OBJECTIVES  Equity and Fairness - DC must be reasonable, balanced & practical so as to be equitable to all stakeholders.  Predictability – DC must be predictable, legally certain & reliable.  Spatial & Economic Neutrality – DC primary role is to ensure timely, sustainable financing of required urban infrastructure.  Administrative Ease & Uniformity – The determination, calculation and operation of the DC should be administratively simple and transparent.  Specific Use of Development Charge – Can only be used for effecting changes to infrastructure and for no other purpose.

WHAT ARE DEVELOPMENT CHARGES? It is a tariff or levy in respect of either new external and upgraded infrastructure and/or the taking up of existing surplus infrastructure capacity in the system The charge is levied against all new residential, commercial & industrial development within Ethekwini, be they in established areas or in undeveloped areas The component costs making up the charge are in respect of municipal roads, water, waste-water and electricity services as may be required for a proposed development The payment of a development charge is not a guarantee of approval unless the development also conforms to the planning guidelines of the city, i.e. Spatial Development Plans, Service Infrastructure Plans, Scheme, etc. All funds collected are to be retained in a dedicated infrastructural fund for the area concerned.

THE NEED FOR DC POLICY – NATIONAL CONTEXT Cities should invest R257 bn (est.) over next 10 years 90% of this for infra expansion or rehabilitation, which is critical to growth and job creation, esp given existing bottlenecks Huge urban infrastructure investment need Inadequate regulatory overarching framework. Different approaches by cities offers opportunities for arbitrage. Shortfall of between R482m and R18,6bn per year! DCs important component of infra finance but: Under-investment by municipalities, compounded each year, that delays development & constrains growth and job creation Unfair, opaque rationing of access to infrastructure Windfall benefit to new developments, paid for by existing ratepayers The “missing contribution” has significant impacts

PRIMARY ROLE Fairly apportion “asset” cost relative to benefits between end users now and in the future For consumption of infrastructure not the service Does not attempt to be redistributory but can provide spatial (dis)incentives if development is beyond Urban Dev Line. User pays for consumption of infrastructure “asset” capacity These recover operating & replacement / replenishment costs (not initial asset installation) e.g: Depreciation included in tariff Supports ongoing equity: user pays Relation to other rates and user fees Is to apportion the installation costs of infrastructure

STRUCTURE & CALCULATION OF DC Structure of the Development Charge Fee is levied for provision of Municipal infrastructure required for essential services to a development CALCULATION OF DC WaterSewage DisposalRoadsElectricity Estimated additional water demand for development in Kilolitres/day X current replacement cost of existing water infrastructure Estimated additional sewage effluent generated by development in Kilolitres/day X current replacement cost of existing sewage disposal infrastructure Costs consists of 2 components: 1.Capacity component – ‘number of lanes on the road network’ 2.Strength component – pavement layers of road network Estimated Development Charge is the Asset Replacement Cost less Outstanding Loans divided by the Average Network Capacity in Rands per kilowatt

STRUCTURE & CALCULATION OF DC WaterSewage DisposalRoadsElectricity Development Charge for Water: DC = ARC – OL ANC Development Charge for Sewage Disposal: DC = ARC – OL ANC Development Charge for Roads CC = SD X TGR X HTL X CR SC = SD X DHTR X AF X CR DC = CS + SC Development Charge for Electricity: DC = ARC – OL ANC DC = Development Charge / ARC = Asset Replacement Costs / OL = Outstanding Loans / ANC = Average Network Capacity CC = Capacity Contribution / SD = Size of Development / TGR = Trip Generation Rate / CR = Cost Rate SC = Strength Contribution / DHTR = Daily Heavy Trip Rate / AF = Axle Factor / HTL = Half Trip Length

DEVELOPMENT CHARGES The landowner is responsible for payment of the development charge, although in most cases the developer (who may also be landowner) will attend to payment thereof Development Charges will be applicable to all developments for which the approval of the Municipality is required in terms of any law, by-law or scheme These relate to land use applications for township development, subdivision applications, change in zoning, change of use of an existing building Who is liable for the Charge? Which developments are affected?

WHEN IS DC EFFECTIVE? Development Charge will become effective from 1 st July 2012 It will be implemented on a phased basis over a number of years to lessen impact of new cost to developers Policy & By Law will be subject to National Treasury directive / National Legislation when promulgated.

WHEN IS DC ASSESSED & PAYABLE?  The Development Charge is to be assessed upfront during the planning application approval stage.  The Development Charge is payable on approval of the development (and only after all appeal processes, if applicable, are exhausted).  The Development Charge is to be assessed upfront during the planning application approval stage.  The Development Charge is payable on approval of the development (and only after all appeal processes, if applicable, are exhausted).

Thank You Questions ??