Sending Scores Back Policy SEEs and S2E2s in the 2014-2015 School Year.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
Advertisements

Reporting Student Data Early Middle Colleges. Educational Entity Master (EEM)
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Educational Services and Choices: Information for Parents Florida PIRC at USF (Parental Information and Resource Center)
Georgia Special Needs Scholarship Program.  What is it?  Parental choice program for students with special needs who attend Georgia public schools.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Graduation, Completion, & Dropout. Re-Alignment Accountability Graduation Completion Dropout District Practice PEIMS Reporting.
Feeder Student Data File Instructions for Filtering & Usage Guidelines.
Accountability Programs MICHIGAN SCHOOL TESTING CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 19, 2014.
Update: Proposal to Reset MEAP Cut Scores Report to the Superintendent Roundtable February 23, 2011.
Changes from Fall  ACT Composite has been removed from the EASIER extract  FAY remains on the Barcode extract but will not be used.
Best Practices for MSDS & Accountability Steps to Success and Timeline for Accountability.
An Introduction to the Individual Student Enrollment System ISES Segment 2 Department of Public Instruction Spring 2008.
1 School Year 2006–07 Accounting and Budgeting Committee Video Teleconference Kim Thompson OSPI - School Apportionment and Financial Services
1% MI-ACCESS PROFICIENCY CAP & EXCEPTIONS Important Information for the School Year ***APPLICATION CURRENTLY AVAILABLE IN THE SECURE SITE!*** Office.
(Host Club) CLUB QUALIFICATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING THE ROTARY FOUNDATION.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
Summary of EMIS Changes for October FY09 NWOCA Fall EMIS Meeting October 2, 2008.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
{ Shared Educational Entities and the Sending Scores Back Policy School Year.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum November 4, 2013.
MINUTIAE OF MICHIGAN’S ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS INCLUDING 1% CAP WAIVERS, FLEP, FSE, SEES, AND MSDS REPORTING Accountability Systems Details.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
ISES UPDATES August 28, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
MSDS Report: Student Count by Primary Ed Setting Sample Report Center for Educational Performance and Information - Michigan Student Data System Student.
ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY Updates to Student Testing and School Accountability for the school year.
Medicaid Allowable Expenditure Report- MAER Amy Kanter, SBS Auditor Michigan Department of Health and Human Services 2015 MDHHS SBS Conference – Traverse.
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
1 ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures Fall 2009 Michigan Department of Education.
ISES UPDATES April 16, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
BAA Web Conference Series 2012 Michigan Merit Examination (MME): Fall Update and Upcoming Activities.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
1 Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System pending legislative approval Venessa A. Keesler, Ph.D. March 16, 2011.
FY 2010 Data Collections Workshop Follow Up Q & A Session.
July 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education State Performance Plan Annual Performance Report Indicators 8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 July 2009.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
MPAAA/CEPI MSDS Workshop 10:00 AMMSDS Update & Grad Rate review 12:00 PMLunch 1:00 PM3Win collection 2:00 PMTeacher / Student Data Linkage Status 3:00.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Special Education Federal Child Count Reporting NOVEMBER 2015.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens and Sara Berscheit Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services UPDATES October 2010.
January 2009 Copyright © 2009 Mississippi Department of Education Intervention Screen and Reports January 13, 2009.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
SLIP January 24,  Scorecard Summary  Scorecard Change Analysis for SY  House Bill 5112 Overview  Shared Educational Entities Overview.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
According to information provided through the Texas Education Agency website, "The state's goal is to ensure that students who participate in services.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). Agenda  Overview of MI School Data Portal  Navigation 101  Sample Reports  Training and TA  Q & A 2.
Sending Scores Back Policy SEEs and S2E2s in the School Year.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Accountability for Alternative Schools
High School Application Process School Year
MACAE Summer Institute June 2010
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
OEAA Accountability Update
Application for State School Aid (ASSA) October 2018
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Michigan School Accountability Scorecards
Presentation transcript:

Sending Scores Back Policy SEEs and S2E2s in the School Year

What is the “Sending Scores Back” policy?  Policy created to attribute student scores to district-level accountability, rather than to a school building or program.  Created to help “good deed” schools and programs have some flexibility on how school accountability is distributed. Sending Scores Back

“Good deed” school & program types  Alternative Education  Early/Middle College  Gifted & Talented  Special Education Sending Scores Back

Two perspectives districts have for these schools/programs  Districts releasing students to attend specialized programs want high- performing scores back  Districts running programs that take challenging students from other districts want to send those scores back Sending Scores Back

The solution:  MDE and CEPI created two vehicles to accommodate flexible accountability for these “good deed” schools and programs. 1) SEEs: “ S hared E ducational E ntities” 2) S2E2s: “ S hared S pecialized E ducational E ntities” Sending Scores Back

SEEs  Entity is a REAL, LIVE school!  Entity has building code S2E2s SEEs & S2E2s: The Basics  Entity is NOT a school!  Entity has building code

1) SEEs  “Shared Educational Entity”  A separate school that “stands alone” and does not serve a mix of SEE and non-SEE students  SEE students enroll in the SEE building, using the SEE building code  SEE students test at the SEE building  SEE building is MME test center if 11 th /12 th graders are served A SEE is a School! Sending Scores Back

Sparty’s Special Education Center Bdlg. in Sparty’s School District East Lansing School District Special Ed. Students Lansing School District Special Ed. Students Sparty’s School District Special Ed. Students SEEs: Conceptually A SEE is a School!

School A ***Entire population of SEE building is students with disabilities*** School B “Elem. School” School C “Middle School” School D “High School” SEEs: Conceptually School A serves only SEE students. A SEE is a School!

2) S2E2: A Special Kind of SEE o Only for those entities who are in a relationship to deliver educational services to students in classrooms spread among multiple locations o One code per ISD or consortium; can use class/group codes or research codes to differentiate students by program for assessment results o Will be used in a special way during MSDS reporting S2E2 is NOT a School! Sending Scores Back

What is a S2E2?  “Specialized Shared Educational Entity”  An ISD or consortium program structure where students are served in multiple classrooms among member districts  S2E2 students enroll in the school building in which they are educated  S2E2 students test in the school building in which they are educated  Buildings that house S2E2 classrooms must be in a MME test center approved school if 11 th /12 th graders are served S2E2 is NOT a School! Sending Scores Back

S2E2 is NOT a School! Mild CI Classroom in East Lansing School District’s High School “Go Green, Go White S2E2” a cooperative program of Sparticus Intermediate School District Severe CI Classroom in Waverly School District’s Middle School SWD Classroom in Sparty’s School District Elementary School Lansing District SWD Students East Lansing District SWD Students Okemos District SWD Students S2E2s: Conceptually

School A Mild CI Classroom School BSevere CI Classroom School C Mild CI Classroom School D Mild CI Classroom S2E2s: Conceptually Classrooms exist in multiple buildings/districts. S2E2 is NOT a School!

School A Mild CI Classroom School BMild CI Classroom School C Mild CI Classroom School D Mild CI Classroom S2E2s: Conceptually These classrooms makeup the S2E2! S2E2 is NOT a School!

SEEs & S2E2s Critical Points for Successful Implementation of the Sending Scores Back Policy

SEEs  Entity is a REAL, LIVE school!  Entity has building code S2E2s SEEs vs. S2E2s Basics  Entity is NOT a school!  Entity has building code

SEEs & S2E2s: Eligibility  Only schools and programs that accept students from 2 or more districts are eligible to participate in the Sending Scores Back policy (and not solely through Schools of Choice)  Parent district(s) and member districts must have a signed cooperative agreement outlining assessment, accountability, and funding practice SEEs vs. S2E2s Basics

SEEs & S2E2s: Eligibility  Public School Academies (PSAs) are NOT eligible to become a SEE  PSAs must be held accountable and thus we cannot grant SEE status for them SEEs vs. S2E2s Basics

Helpful Definitions  Parent district: districts that the SEE/S2E2 is established under  Member district: district that is part of the cooperative agreement but is not the parent district  Operating district: district responsible for the SEE/S2E2 student’s education (receives $ and usually, the accountability)  Resident district: district in which the student lives SEEs vs. S2E2s Basics

SEEs vs. S2E2s and MSDS FunctionSEES2E2 MSDS Submission Operating district submitted Students submitted by school district where student’s classroom is located (operating district of student’s classroom) “School Facility Number” EEM Entity Code of SEE School EEM Entity Code of school where student’s classroom is located PEPE (Primary Education Providing Entity) PEPE District: Operating district PEPE School: SEE school PEPE District and School: Operating school and operating district of student’s classroom “S2E2Code”S2E2Code NOT Reported Students submitted with MSDS field “S2E2Code” populated with S2E2 entity code **This field tells us a student is a S2E2 student**

SEEs vs. S2E2s and Testing FunctionSEES2E2 Pre-IDPre-ID students at SEE school Pre-ID students in school where student’s classroom is located ALL Testing Test students at SEE school Pre-ID students in school where student’s classroom is located MME Test Center SEE school must be approved MME Test Center for 11 th /12 th graders School building where student’s classroom is located must be approved MME Test Center for 11 th /12 th graders ***S2E2 itself cannot register to be an MME Test Center*** Tested Roster & Expected to Test Handled by SEE schoolHandled by schools where student’s classroom is located Students Not Tested Handled by SEE schoolHandled by schools where student’s classroom is located

SEEs vs. S2E2s: Student Assessment SEES2E2 Fall Assessments SEE school receives student scores included in aggregate files & reports School where student’s classroom is located receives student scores in aggregate files and reports Spring Assessments SEE school receives student scores included in aggregate files & reports School where student’s classroom is located receives student scores in aggregate files and reports Assessment Reporting

SEEs vs. S2E2s: Accountability Designation SEES2E2 Building Accountability Scorecard (previously AYP Status) Not receivedBuildings where student classrooms are receives AYP statuses, but the S2E2 students will not be part their calculation District Accountability Scorecard (previously AYP Status) Yes! SEE students included in resident district’s AYP status Yes! S2E2 students included in resident district’s AYP status Building EdYES! Grade Not receivedBuildings where student classrooms are WILL receive EdYES! grade, but the S2E2 students will not be part their calculation Building Top to Bottom Ranking Not receivedBuildings where student classrooms are WILL likely be ranked, but the S2E2 students will not be part their calculation Accountability Reporting

SEES2E2 Resident District Student Scores Sending Scores Back Student Assessment Proficiency Rates and Assessment Participation Rates are Sent Back to the Resident District.

 SEE and S2E2 students are accountable at their RESIDENT DISTRICTS  SEE & S2E2 students are pulled out of their respective buildings and sent back to the district-level Accountability Scorecard for where they are a resident of  SEE & S2E2 students contribute on scorecards for their RESIDENT DISTRICT AYP Report Card for: Capitol Area School District Sending Scores Back

Special Notes for Accreditation (EdYES!):  Since SEEs and S2E2s for Accountability do not receive an accreditation grade, SPR40/90 and SDP/A reports are not required for AdvancED…  Since SEEs are schools, SIP and SDP/A reports are still required for compliance with the law.  Since S2E2s are not schools, SIP and SDP/A reports are not required. Sending Scores Back

Special Notes for Schools of Choice Students:  SEE/S2E2 students that are also Schools of Choice students will have their scores sent back to the district in they are with through schools of choice.  Example : Student lives in District A, but has been attending District B for several years through schools of choice. This student then transfers to a SEE operated by District C to receive specific educational services. In this situation, District B would receive the student’s scores back. Schools of choice students are identified using the “Student Residency” characteristic of the student’s record in the Michigan Student Data System (MSDS). Sending Scores Back

SEEs & S2E2s Approval Process for Applications

Applications due August 25! SEEs/S2E2s must reapply annually to be SEEs/S2E2s for the coming school year! ***Submit application and all materials with required provisions of the Sending Scores Back Application.***  to:  OR snail mail to: Michigan Department of Education Attn: BAA - Matt Gleason P.O. Box Lansing, MI Sending Scores Back

Special Notes for Early/Middle Colleges: Early/Middle Colleges (EMCs) approved by the MDE Office of Career and Technical Education (OCTE) are SEEs by default if multiple districts are served and they are a “physical school building” and NOT a program. ***BUT scores will NOT be sent back to resident districts for these entities UNLESS EMCs apply to be a SEE for accountability with BAA*** Sending Scores Back

Special Notes for Early/Middle Colleges:  Early/Middle Colleges (EMCs) are NEVER eligible to be a S2E2  EMC students must ALWAYS be reported at the School Facility Number of the EMC and should ALWAYS test at the EMC  EMC students that test in their “home high schools” will have their scores reported with the home high schools (Regardless of whether the EMC is a SEE for accountability)  Only EMCs that apply to be a SEE for accountability will have their students accountable at the students’ resident districts

Once an entity is approved as a SEE or S2E2, what happens? Step 1: EEM is updated- o Entity is flagged as a SEE or S2E2. This is a characteristic of the entity that resides on the entity record Step 2: Entity is notified that they were approved as a SEE/S2E2 Sending Scores Back

Step 3: All assessment functions should happen normally; pre-ID students in the school in which they are physically educated, etc. Step 4: Report students appropriately in the MSDS Step 5: Check your Tested Roster, Expected to Test, and Students Not Tested Step 6: Enjoy SEE/S2E2 scores being sent back for accountability during AYP season! Continued… Sending Scores Back

SEEs & S2E2s Disclaimers and Final Words

Appropriate Use  BAA reserves the right to audit SEE and S2E2 entities for student assessment and reporting compliance  BAA reserves the right to monitor the use of SEE/S2E2 codes Sending Scores Back

Making this policy work…  ONLY successful completion of assessment and student reporting practices will ACTUALLY result in student scores being sent back to resident districts  It is critical your assessment AND pupil accounting staff understand the practices of SEEs and/or S2E2s to make this policy work successfully Sending the Scores Back

SEEs & S2E2s Questions? Comments? Evaluation Research and Accountability Unit Office of Evaluation, Strategic Research and Accountability (OESRA) Call: Sending Scores Back