5/2/20071.  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5/2/  Online  Offline 5/2/20072  Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework.
Advertisements

Offline Code for Next Beam Test Jianchun Wang 08/06/01.
Data Quality Monitoring for CMS RPC A. Cimmino, D. Lomidze P. Noli, M. Maggi, P. Paolucci.
1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.
Chiara Zampolli in collaboration with C. Cheshkov, A. Dainese ALICE Offline Week Feb 2009C. Zampolli 1.
O FFLINE T RIGGER M ONITORING TDAQ Training 30 July 2010 On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.
CFT Offline Monitoring Michael Friedman. Contents Procedure  About the executable  Notes on how to run Results  What output there is and how to access.
SVX Software Overview Sasha Lebedev VTX meeting 09/07/ SVX Software web page:
Shuei MEG review meeting, 2 July MEG Software Status MEG Software Group Framework Large Prototype software updates Database ROME Monte Carlo.
Experience with analysis of TPC data Marian Ivanov.
Framework for Raw Data Thomas Kuhr Offline Week 29/06/2004.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 April 2008.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Costin Grigoras ALICE Offline. In the period of steady LHC operation, The Grid usage is constant and high and, as foreseen, is used for massive RAW and.
Offline shifter training tutorial L. Betev February 19, 2009.
OFFLINE TRIGGER MONITORING TDAQ Training 5 th November 2010 Ricardo Gonçalo On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.
Offline report – 7TeV data taking period (Mar.30 – Apr.6) ALICE SRC April 6, 2010.
A Technical Validation Module for the offline Auger-Lecce, 17 September 2009  Design  The SValidStore Module  Example  Scripting  Status.
DQM status report Y. Foka (GSI) Offline week from pp to PbPb.
Andrei Gheata, Mihaela Gheata, Andreas Morsch ALICE offline week, 5-9 July 2010.
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation Mihaela Gheata.
VICOMTECH VISIT AT CERN CERN 2013, October 3 rd & 4 th O.COUET CERN/PH/SFT DATA VISUALIZATION IN HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS THE ROOT SYSTEM.
Planning and status of the Full Dress Rehearsal Latchezar Betev ALICE Offline week, Oct.12, 2007.
AliRoot survey P.Hristov 11/06/2013. Offline framework  AliRoot in development since 1998  Directly based on ROOT  Used since the detector TDR’s for.
1 ITS Quality Assurance (& DQM) P. Cerello, P. Christakoglou, W. Ferrarese, M. Nicassio, M. Siciliano ALICE OFFLINE WEEK – April 2008.
CERN – Alice Offline – Thu, 27 Mar 2008 – Marco MEONI - 1 Status of RAW data production (III) ALICE-LCG Task Force weekly.
CERN – Alice Offline – Thu, 20 Mar 2008 – Marco MEONI - 1 Status of Cosmic Reconstruction Offline weekly meeting.
T0 offline status Alla Maevskaya for T0 team 8 March 2011 ALICE offline week.
David Adams ATLAS DIAL: Distributed Interactive Analysis of Large datasets David Adams BNL August 5, 2002 BNL OMEGA talk.
Guide to MCSE , Enhanced1 Activity 11-1: Using Task Manager to Manage Applications and Processes Objective: To explore managing applications and.
PHENIX and the data grid >400 collaborators 3 continents + Israel +Brazil 100’s of TB of data per year Complex data with multiple disparate physics goals.
PROOF and ALICE Analysis Facilities Arsen Hayrapetyan Yerevan Physics Institute, CERN.
Technical Validation The Technical Validation is a testing framework of the AUGER offline to monitor the code development process. It is not a validation.
Michele de Gruttola 2008 Report: Online to Offline tool for non event data data transferring using database.
1 Checks on SDD Data Piergiorgio Cerello, Francesco Prino, Melinda Siciliano.
1 Outline: Update on muon/dimuon AOD production (R. Arnaldi/E. Scomparin) Other ongoing activities: MUON correction framework (X. Lopez) MUON productions.
Online Monitoring System at KLOE Alessandra Doria INFN - Napoli for the KLOE collaboration CHEP 2000 Padova, 7-11 February 2000 NAPOLI.
A. Gheata, ALICE offline week March 09 Status of the analysis framework.
AliRoot survey: Analysis P.Hristov 11/06/2013. Are you involved in analysis activities?(85.1% Yes, 14.9% No) 2 Involved since 4.5±2.4 years Dedicated.
Status of the Shuttle Framework Alberto Colla Jan Fiete Grosse-Oetringhaus ALICE Offline Week October 2006.
Workflows and Data Management. Workflow and DM Run3 and after: conditions m LHCb major upgrade is for Run3 (2020 horizon)! o Luminosity x 5 ( )
Summary of User Requirements for Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Offline Week Alignment and Calibration Workshop February.
The MEG Offline Project General Architecture Offline Organization Responsibilities Milestones PSI 2/7/2004Corrado Gatto INFN.
Data processing Offline review Feb 2, Productions, tools and results Three basic types of processing RAW MC Trains/AODs I will go through these.
M. Gheata ALICE offline week, October Current train wagons GroupAOD producersWork on ESD input Work on AOD input PWG PWG31 (vertexing)2 (+
Summary of Workshop on Calibration and Alignment Database Magali Gruwé CERN PH/AIP ALICE Computing Day February 28 th 2005.
Alignment in real-time in current detector and upgrade 6th LHCb Computing Workshop 18 November 2015 Beat Jost / Cern.
Online Consumers produce histograms (from a limited sample of events) which provide information about the status of the different sub-detectors. The DQM.
PHOS offline status report Yuri Kharlov ALICE offline week 7 July 2008.
Offline Weekly Meeting, 24th April 2009 C. Cheshkov & C. Zampolli.
ATLAS Distributed Analysis DISTRIBUTED ANALYSIS JOBS WITH THE ATLAS PRODUCTION SYSTEM S. González D. Liko
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
D. Elia (INFN Bari)Offline week / CERN Status of the SPD Offline Domenico Elia (INFN Bari) Overview:  Response simulation (timing info, dead/noisy.
MET Slice Monitoring Xiaowen Lei, Venkat Kaushik Ken Johns.
AliRoot survey: Calibration P.Hristov 11/06/2013.
ALICE Full Dress Rehearsal ALICE TF Meeting 02/08/07.
10/8/ HMPID offline status D. Di Bari, A. Mastroserio, L.Molnar, G. Volpe HMPID Group Alice Offline Week.
1 GlueX Software Oct. 21, 2004 D. Lawrence, JLab.
V4-19-Release P. Hristov 11/10/ Not ready (27/09/10) #73618 Problems in the minimum bias PbPb MC production at 2.76 TeV #72642 EMCAL: Modifications.
CALIBRATION: PREPARATION FOR RUN2 ALICE Offline Week, 25 June 2014 C. Zampolli.
V4-18-Release P. Hristov 21/06/2010.
Monitoring of L1Calo EM Efficiencies
Data Formats and Impact on Federated Access
Analysis trains – Status & experience from operation
Calibrating ALICE.
v4-18-Release: really the last revision!
Analysis framework - status
Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Silicon Strip Tracker Detector
CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring
Use Of GAUDI framework in Online Environment
Presentation transcript:

5/2/20071

 Online  Offline 5/2/20072

 Online  Raw data : within the DAQ monitoring framework  Reconstructed data : with the HLT monitoring framework  Structure of the framework  Collect and calculate parameters, fill histograms while taking data  Live display of histograms and out-of-range check 5/2/20073

 Online  Offline  Simulation: raw data, digits  Reconstruction: all intermediate steps until ESD 5/2/20074

 Online  Offline  Structure of the framework: job level (1) 1. During simulation, calculate parameters and fill histograms, kept on local disk of WN (root session 1) 2. Run the QA tasks after simulation is done and update log file (root session 2) 3. Parse the simulation log, if error: set the job status, update Tags and optionally stop 4. During reconstruction, calculate parameters and fill histograms, kept on local disk of WN (root session 3) 5. Run the QA tasks after reconstruction is done and update log file (root session 4) 6. Parse the reconstruction log, if error: set the job status, update Tags and optionally stop 7. Run the QA on ESD, produce histograms, make tests and update the log file (root session 5) 8. Parse the ESD QA log, if error: set the job status and update Tags 9. Check all QA and optionally stop the run 5/2/20075

 Online  Offline  Structure of the framework: job level (2) 1. Run simulation (root session 1) 2. Run the QA tasks, fill QA histograms from RAW and Digits, and update log file (root session 2) 3. Parse the simulation log, if error: set the job status, update Tags and optionally stop 4. Run reconstruction (root session 3) 5. Run the QA tasks, fill QA and update log file (root session 4) 6. Parse the reconstruction log, if error: set the job status, update Tags and optionally stop the job 7. Run the QA on ESD, produce histograms, make tests and update the log file (root session 5) 8. Parse the ESD QA log, if error: set the job status and update Tags 9. Check all QA and optionally stop the run 5/2/20076

 Online  Offline  Structure of the framework: ≥ event level, ≤run level 1. Run simulations and reconstructions and associated QA tasks until the required statistics is reached 2. Merge the QA histograms (simulation, reconstruction ESD) 3. Run QA tasks 4. Parse the log, if error: set the jobs status and update Tags 5. Check all QA and optionally stop the production 5/2/20077

 Online  Offline  Requirements 1. QA objects per detector produced either during sim/rec or after 2. QA tasks per detector (simulation, reconstruction) 3. QA tasks per detector, per PWG4 (ESD QA) 4. Same QA tasks for real and sim RAW 5. Keep QA histograms in the AliEn catalog 6. New input in Tags 7. The framework must be able to set/update job status 8. The framework must be able to decide what to do in case of errors 5/2/20078