B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April 2006 - p. 1/39 Muon Physics at the Front End of a  Factory An introduction B. Lee Roberts Boston University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flavor Violation in SUSY SEESAW models 8th International Workshop on Tau-Lepton Physics Tau04 Junji Hisano (ICRR, U of Tokyo)
Advertisements

The classically conformal B-L extended standard model Yuta Orikasa Satoshi Iso(KEK,SOKENDAI) Nobuchika Okada(University of Alabama) Phys.Lett.B676(2009)81.
Neutrinoless double beta decay and Lepton Flavor Violation Or, in other words, how the study of LFV can help us to decide what mechanism is responsible.
1 Lepton Flavor Violation Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) October 7, rd International Conference on Flavor Physics National Central University, Taiwan.
International Conference "Discoveries of Higgs and Supersymmetry to Pioneer Particle Physics in the 21st Century" Date: 24 and 25 th November 2005 Place:
1 SUSY breaking studies Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) December 18, 2006 BNMII, Nara Women’s Univ.
Flavor Beyond the Standard Model Zurab Tavartkiladze, Gela Devidze Tbilisi State University Volkswagen meeting 14, 15 March 2013, Tbilisi.
Higgs Quadruplet for Type III Seesaw and Implications for → e and −e Conversion Ren Bo Coauther : Koji Tsumura, Xiao - Gang He arXiv:
Hadronic EDMs in SUSY GUTs
June 18, 2004Mitsuru Kakizaki1 Democratic (s)fermions and lepton flavor violation Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR, University of Tokyo) June 18, 2004 We propose.
May 25, 2004Kakizaki, Mitsuru1 Flavor structure in supersymmetric models Kakizaki, Mitsuru (ICRR, University of Tokyo) May 25, 2004 We proposed a new alignment.
Oct. 25, 2004Mitsuru Kakizaki1 Flavor structure in supersymmetric models Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR, University of Tokyo) Oct. 25, Ochanomizu University.
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact2008 – 4 July p. 1/46 Muon Physics at the Front-end of a Neutrino Factory TexPoint.
1 SUSY and B physics observables Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii, April 20, 2005.
B. Lee Roberts, NuFact WG4: 24 June p. 1/36 Muon (g-2) Past, Present and Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University
B. Lee Roberts, College of William and Mary, 24 March p. 1/61 The Muon: A Laboratory for Particle Physics Everything you always wanted to know about.
K. Kumar, W. Marciano, Y. Li Electroweak physics at EIC - Summary of week 7 INT Workshop on Pertubative and Non-Pertubative Aspects of QCD at Collider.
1 SUSY in B decays Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) Super B factory workshop in Hawaii January 21, 2004, Honolulu.
July 19, 2005Mitsuru Kakizaki1 Hadronic EDMs in SUSY GUTs Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) July 19, IPPP We investigate hadronic EDMs induced.
 B. Lee Roberts, Heidelberg – 11 June p. 154 The Magnetic and Electric Dipole Moments of the Muon Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University.
B. Lee Roberts, Welcome and Overview – Lepton Moments June p. 1/19 Welcome to Lepton Moments 2006! B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics.
B. Lee Roberts, Oxford University, 19 October p. 1/55 The Muon: A Laboratory for Particle Physics Everything you always wanted to know about the.
July 12, 2005Mitsuru Kakizaki1 Hadronic EDMs in SUSY GUTs Mitsuru Kakizaki (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) July 12, Nagoya University We investigate hadronic.
WG4:  physics B. Lee Roberts, on behalf of the Intense Muon Physics Working Group - p. 1/48 WG4 Summary and Future Plans The muon trio and more B. Lee.
B. Lee Roberts, PANIC05, Santa Fe, 27 October, p. 1/35 Muon (g-2) Status and Plans for the Future B. Lee Roberts Department of Physics Boston University.
B. Lee Roberts, HIFW04, Isola d’Elba, 6 June p. 1/39 Future Muon Dipole Moment Measurements at a high intensity muon source B. Lee Roberts Department.
B. Lee Roberts, PSI - 15 August p. 1/54 The Muon: A Laboratory for Particle Physics B.L. Roberts Department of Physics Boston University roberts.
2-nd Vienna Central European Seminar, Nov 25-27, Rare Meson Decays in Theories Beyond the Standard Model A. Ali (DESY), A. V. Borisov, M. V. Sidorova.
Electric Dipole Moment Goals and “New Physics” William J. Marciano 12/7/09 d p with e-cm sensitivity! Why is it important?
Muon and electron g-2 A charged particle which has spin angular momentum s will have also a magnetic moment m. The ratio of the magnetic to angular moments.
Conveneers: M. Grassi (INFN, Pisa), K. Ishida (RIKEN), Y. Semertzidis (BNL) Summary of WG4, Part Two. Yannis Semertzidis, BNL 1 August, 2004 Most muon.
1 Supersymmetry Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) January 14, 2005, at KEK.
1 Lepton Electric Dipole Moments in Supersymmetric Type II Seesaw Model Toru Goto, Takayuki Kubo and Yasuhiro Okada, “Lepton electric dipole moments in.
1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 5. 2 Contents Top quark mass measurements at Tevatron Electroweak Measurements at low energy: –Neutral Currents at low momentum.
Flavor induced EDMs with tanbeta enhanced corrections Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) Aug. 4, 2007 Summer Institute 2007 In collaborated with: J.Hisano.
K.K. Gan The Ohio State University New Results on  Lepton July 17, 2003.
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) February 4, 2005 at KEK
Yingchuan Li Electroweak physics at EIC Brookhaven National Lab Feb. 3rd 2011, BNL.
 B. Lee Roberts, KEK – 21 March p. 1/27 The Magnetic and Electric Dipole Moments of the Muon Lee Roberts for the muon g-2 collaboration Department.
1 Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) “Discoveries of Higgs and Supersymmetry to Pioneer Particle Physics in the 21 st Century”
Huaizhang Deng Yale University Precise measurement of (g-2)  University of Pennsylvania.
CP violation in seesaw mechanism Junji Hisano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) International Conference on the Seesaw Mechanism (SEESAW25) June 2004, Institut.
Flavor and CP violation in SUSY seesaw models Junji Hisano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) The 12th International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of.
Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment --a harbinger of new physics Chang Liu Physics 564.
Family Gauge Bosons with an Inverted Mass Hierarchy Yoshio Koide (Osaka University) in collaboration with Toshifumi Yamashita (Maskawa Insititute, KSU)
EDMs in the SUSY GUTs Junji Hisano (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo) NuFact04 6th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories and Superbeams, Osaka University, Japan.
Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory New opportunities at CERN CERN, 12 May 2009 Storage Ring EDM Experiments The storage ring method can.
EDMs and Lepton Flavor Violation
Lepton Flavor Violation
Hadronic EDMs in SUSY GUTs
CLFV theory and prospect
Exploring SUSY models through quark and lepton flavor physics
Minoru Nagai (ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo)
Lepton Flavor Violation
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) December 18, 2006 BNMII, Nara Women’s Univ.
Searching for SUSY in B Decays
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK/Sokendai) October 18, 2007
Physics at a Linear Collider
Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) FPCP 2004, Deagu, Korea October 7, 2004
Physics beyond the SM in Kaon decays --Theory--
素粒子理論から 岡田安弘(KEK/総合研究大学院大学) 2009年3月26日
Muon Physics Yasuhiro Okada (KEK) November 18, 2005
Searching for New Physics in muon lepton flavor violating processes
Lepton Flavor Violation
Lepton Flavor Violation in muon and tau decays
SUSY and B physics observables
Theoretical Status of LFV and Rare Tau decays
mu-e conversion 理論の最近の成果
A possible interplay between flavor and LHC Physics
Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY
Presentation transcript:

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 1/39 Muon Physics at the Front End of a  Factory An introduction B. Lee Roberts Boston University with some theory projections taken from Yasuhiro Okada KEK bu.edu

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 2/39 Outline Introduction to the muon G F Lepton Flavor Violation Magnetic and electric dipole moments Summary and conclusions.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 3/39 The Muon (“Who ordered that?”) Lifetime ~2.2  s, practically forever 2 nd generation lepton m   m e = (24) produced polarized –in-flight decay: both “forward” and “backward” muons qre highly polarized Paul Scherrer Institut has 10 8  /s in a beam

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 4/39 What can we learn from the  ’s death? The strength of the weak interaction –i.e. the Fermi constant G F The fundamental nature of the low-energy weak interaction –i.e. is it scalar, vector, tensor, pseudo-scalar, pseudo-vector or pseudo-tensor?

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 5/39   helped predict the mass of the top quark Predictive power in weak sector of SM. Difference between the charged current and neutral current propagators The radiative correction shown above depends on m t 2. Comparisons of charged, vrs. neutral currents gives information on m t.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 6/39 The Electro-Weak Working Group Fits: Predicted Input: G F (17 ppm),  (4 ppb at q 2 =0),  M Z (23 ppm), Measured: from G F The  Lan experiment at PSI will accumulate  -decays and measure GF to ~1 ppm. If LHC provides a Higgs Mass, then the precision of the confrontation with the SM will greatly improve

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 7/39 The Muon Trio: LFV, MDM, EDM Lepton Flavor Violation The standard-model gauge bosons do not permit leptons to mix, but new physics at the TeV scale such as SUSY does.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 8/39 SUSY GUT and SUSY Seesaw model The flavor off-diagonal terms in the slepton mass matrix are induced by renormalization effects due to GUT and/or neutrino interactions. M planck GUT Yukawa interaction Neutrino Yukawa interaction CKM matrixNeutrino oscillation L.J.Hall,V.Kostelecky,S.Raby,1986;A.Masiero, F.Borzumati, 1986

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 9/39 Many models beyond the S-M contain sources of LFV Although the simple seesaw or Dirac neutrino model predicts too small generate branching ratios for the charged lepton LFV, other models of neutrino mass generation can induce observable effects. For example: – Generalized Zee model (K.Hasagawa, C.S.Lim, K.Ogure, 2003) – Neutrino mass from the warped extra dimension (R.Kitano,2000) – R-parity violating SUSY model (A.de Gouvea,S.Lola,K.Tobe,2001) –Triplet Higgs model (E.J.Chun, K.Y.Lee,S.C.Park; N.Kakizaki,Y.Ogura, F.Shima, 2003) –Left-right symmetric model (V.Cirigliano, A.Kurylov, M.J.Ramsey-Musolf, P.Vogel, 2004) –SUSY seesaw model (F.Borzumati and A.Masiero 1986)

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 10/39 Experimental bounds ProcessCurrentFuture (Ti)  → e conversion search at the level of is proposed in the future muon facility at J-PARC (PRIME).

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 11/39 Past and Future of LFV Limits +e-→-e++e-→-e+ Branching Ratio Limit

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 12/39  → e  branching ratio (typical example) SU(5) and SO(10) SUSY GUT SUSY seesaw model The branching ratio can be large in particular for SO(10) SUSY GUT model. J.Hisano and D.Nomura,2000 K.Okumura SO(10) SU(5) Right-handed neutrino mass Right-handed selectron mass MEGA

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 13/39 Comparison of three processes If the photon penguin process dominates, there are simple relations among these branching ratios. This is true in many, but not all SUSY modes.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 14/39 Comparison of three muon processes in various new physics models SUSY GUT/Seesaw B(  →e  ) >> B(  →3e) ~ B(  A→eA) Various asymmetries in polarized  decays. SUSY with large tan   →e conv. can be enhanced. Z-dependence in  →e conv. branching ratio. Triplet Higgs for neutrino B(  →3e) > or ~ B(  →eg) ~B(  A→eA) RL model B(  →3e) >> B(  →eg) ~B(  A→eA) Asymmetry in  →3e RPV SUSYVarious patterns of branching ratios and asymmetries want to measure all three LFV processes to disentangle the models

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 15/39 The First  - N  e - N Experiment Steinberger and Wolf After the discovery of the muon, it was realized it could decay into an electron and a photon or convert to an electron in the field of a nucleus. Without any flavor conservation, the expected branching fraction for  +  e+  is about Steinberger and Wolf first looked for  - N  e - N, publishing a null result in 1955, R  e < 2  Absorbs e - from  - decay Conversion e - reach this counter 9”

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 16/39 Z dependence of mu-e conversion branching ratio have calculated the coherent mu-e conversion branching ratios in various nuclei for general LFV interactions to see: (1) which nucleus is the most sensitive to mu-e conversion searches, (2) whether one can distinguish various theoretical models by the Z dependence. Relevant quark level interactions Dipole Scalar Vector R.Kitano, M.Koike and Y.Okada. 2002

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 17/39 The branching ratio is largest for the atomic number of Z=30 – 60. For light nuclei, Z dependences are similar for different operator forms. Sizable difference of Z dependences for dipole, scalar and vector interactions. This is due to a relativistic effect of the muon wave function.  -e conversion rate normalized to Al dipole scalar vector providing another way to discriminate different models Kitano, Koike, Okada

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 18/39 The Muon Trio: MDM, EDM Muon MDM (g-2) chiral changing Muon EDM

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 19/39 Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments Transformation properties: An EDM implies both P and T are violated. An EDM at a measureable level would imply non-standard model CP. The baryon/antibaryon asymmetry in the universe, needs new sources of CP.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 20/39 SUSY connection between a , D μ, μ → e  → e MDM, EDM ~ ~

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 21/39 Magnetic Dipole moments Field invented by Otto Stern in 1921

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 22/39 (in modern language)

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 23/39 Dirac + Pauli moment

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 24/39 Non-Standard Model Value for Muon (g-2) ? e vrs.  : relative contribution of heavier things ? S

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 25/39 a μ is sensitive to a wide range of new physics substructure SUSY (with large tanβ ) many other things (extra dimensions, etc.)

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 26/39 The hadronic contribution to a   has to come from data

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 27/39 E821 achieved 0.5 ppm and the e + e - based theory is also at the 0.6 ppm level. Both can be improved. All E821 results were obtained with a “blind” analysis. world average

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 28/39 Based on the latest report on e + e - → hadrons there is an apparent discrepancy at the level of 2.9 ... A new experiment at BNL (E969) could improve the confrontation with theory by a factor of 2 What implications might the possible (g-2) discrepancy have for muon physics at a neutrino factory? –New physics at the TeV scale? Could one do 10 times better? A few words about the technique which is important to understand for the EDM experiment

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 29/39 We measure the difference frequency between the spin and momentum precession 0 With an electric quadrupole field for vertical focusing

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 30/39 The 700 ton (g-2)  precision storage ring Muon lifetime t  = 64.4  s (g-2) period t a = 4.37  s Cyclotron period t C = 149 ns Scraping time (E821) 7 to 15  s Total counting time ~700  s Total number of turns ~4000

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 31/39 The magnetic field is measured and controlled using pulsed NMR, and the muon spin precession is measured using  →e  decay

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 32/39 (g-2) ten times better (0.05 ppm) ? Need to know to 0.01 ppm (10 ppb) Need ~10 14 polarized muons at ≥ 3 GeV/c momentum Need substantial improvements in theory for the result to be interpreted

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 33/39 Present EDM Limits ParticlePresent EDM limit (e-cm) SM value (e-cm) n future  exp to *projected

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 34/39 Naïve scaling would imply that but in some models the dependence is greater, e.g.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 35/39 μ EDM may be enhanced above m μ /m e × e EDM Magnitude increases with magnitude of ν Yukawa couplings and tan β μ EDM greatly enhanced when heavy neutrinos non-degenerate Model Calculations of  EDM

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 36/39 a μ implications for the muon EDM

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 37/39 Spin Frequencies:  in B field with MDM & EDM The EDM causes the spin to precess out of plane. The motional E - field, β X B, is much stronger than laboratory electric fields. spin difference frequency =  s -  c 0

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 38/39 Dedicated EDM Experiment With  a = 0, the EDM causes the spin to steadily precess out of the plane. 0 Use a radial E-field to turn off the  a precession 

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 39/39 In the next talk, Klaus Jungmann will give a few more details on a dedicated muon EDM experiment.

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 40/39 Summary and Conclusions There are a number of interesting topics which can be pursued at a high intensity muon source –Lepton Flavor Violation –Search for a permanent EDM of the muon are the most compelling The next talk will cover these topics in more detail

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 41/39 Extra Projections

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 42/39 The error budget for E969 represents a continuation of improvements already made during E821 Field improvements: better trolley calibrations, better tracking of the field with time, temperature stability of room, improvements in the hardware Precession improvements will involve new scraping scheme, lower thresholds, more complete digitization periods, better energy calibration Systematic uncertainty (ppm) E969 Goal Magnetic field –  p Anomalous precession –  a Statistical uncertainty (ppm) Total Uncertainty (ppm)

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 43/39

B. Lee Roberts ISS Plenary Meeting: RAL 26 April p. 44/39