NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Danielson Framework: Review and Card Sort Activity
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Enhancing Professional Practice
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
1. On an index card, please jot down facts you already know about the Danielson FfT. Turn to someone sitting near you and share what you have written.
C HARLOTTE D ANIELSON ’ S F RAMEWORK FOR T EACHING Overview for Arkansas TESS Teacher Training.
Activity: Introducing Staff to Danielson’s Framework for Teaching
PD Plan on the Danielson Framework ADSUP 731 Kelli McDaniel May, 2013
Introduction Framework for Teaching by Charlotte Danielson
Cinnaminson Township Public Schools November 6, 2012 INTRODUCTION TO THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE FOR TEACHERS.
Danielson Rubric Kim Oakes Staff Development Specialist E2CCB/IES Kim Oakes Erie2 BOCES - Adopted ©2010 McKay Consulting, LLC.
August 2014 The Oregon Matrix Model was submitted to USED on May 1, 2014 and is pending approval* as of 8/8/14 *Please note content may change Oregon’s.
Matrix 101: The Oregon Matrix and Summative Evaluations Spring 2015 Technical Assistance Webinar.
Assessment Literacy & Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) The goal of this session is to make visible.
Lesson Planning and Preparation
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Differentiated Supervision
Quote The whole art of teaching is only the art of awakening the natural curiosity of young minds for the purpose of satisfying it afterwards. Anatole.
Teacher Evaluation Ashley Greene 10/29/13.
QUALITY TEACHING & EVALUATION METHODOLOGY Presented By Dr. PERUMAL UMA, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Computer Science Academic Campus for Girls
Continuous Improvement of Evaluation: Fifth Year With the Framework for Teaching Laura Dancer, Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Arkansas Teacher Evaluation Pilot Program
The Danielson Framework and Your Evaluation AK Teaching Standard DP_8c: Engages in Instructional Development Activities Danielson Domain 4e: Growing and.
Using LDC to Support Student Growth SREB College-and Career- Readiness Standards Networking Conference JULY 13-15, 2015 Tweet about this session at #CCRS15.
A Summary of Wisconsin’s Educator Effectiveness System for West De Pere.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
BHS Administration “Back to Basics – This is Our time” Part I
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/21/14 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must be.
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 10/12/2015pbevan 1.
James P. B. Duffy School #12 State of the School Address November, 2012.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers Training Module 2 The Delaware Framework Review and Components 1-5 Training for Teachers.
The Danielson Framework Emmanuel Andre Owings Mills High School Fall 2013.
SESC Mathematics Leadership Network
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our teachers and those in school districts,
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
The Effective Teacher Chapter 1 James M. Cooper. Do Now In your notes answer the following question: –What makes a teacher effective?
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
A framework for teaching (Danielson, 1996) Domain 2: The classroom environment – 2a: Creating an environment of respect and rapport – 2b: Establishing.
Materials Needed: Videos: – Wisdom of Practice – Levels of Performance – (optional) Classroom video to look for engagement Mr. Holland’s Opus ( Chapter.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction Communicating Clearly and Accurately Using Questioning.
Introduction to... Teacher Evaluation System Teacher Effectiveness 12/6/
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.
Assessing Teacher Effectiveness Charlotte Danielson
Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements: Evidence.
1 WI Educator Effectiveness System Understanding Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
1 Teacher Performance Assessment Lynn Sawyer Director of Professional Development P.O. Box Reno, NV December.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION PRIORITIES PREPARED & PRESENTED S. SUPERVISOR HELENA MOHAMMAD Ministry of Education ELT General Supervision
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
Welcome: BISD Teacher Evaluation System 8/26/2015 "A commitment to professional learning is important, not because teaching is of poor quality and must.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
Make It Happen The Power of Communication and Thinking
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Enhancing Professional Practice
Welcome to... Introduction to A Framework for Teaching 7/8/2016pbevan 1.
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Presentation transcript:

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness B. Examining the Framework Mini-module #2, 30 minutes Materials needed: this deck; copies of the rubric components; component exploration organizers

Objectives Participants will be able to articulate what the components are and how they can support improving teacher practice. Facilitator should read the objective, or ask a participant to do so.

Domain Focus Re-sort your post-its, using the four domains of Danielson’s Framework for Teaching. Planning and Preparation Professional Responsibilities Classroom Environment Instruction What a teacher knows and does in preparation for teaching. Professional responsibilities and behavior in and out of the classroom. Intro - 2 minutes Return to this slide from the session #1 – as a review of the four Domains. In the Danielson Framework for Teaching, a teacher’s practice includes these four categories of actions. All aspects of teaching that lead to a culture for learning in the classroom. What a teacher does to engage students in learning.

Danielson’s Framework for Teaching Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy Demonstrating Knowledge of Students Setting Instructional Outcomes Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources Designing Coherent Instruction Designing Student Assessments Domain 2: The Classroom Environment Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport Establishing a Culture for Learning Managing Classroom Procedures Managing Student Behavior Organizing Physical Space Domain 3: Instruction Communicating With Students Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Engaging Students in Learning Using Assessment in Instruction Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Reflecting on Teaching Maintaining Accurate Records Communicating with Families Participating in a Professional Community Growing and Developing Professionally Showing Professionalism Examining the full Framework - 5 minutes Distribute copies of this slide to participants. Introduce the targeted components the group will be examining/using for the year, highlighted here in red.   Describe the structure of the Framework: The four domains are divided into 22 competencies, each of which has a rubric that identifies core elements and the range of performance from “Ineffective” to “Highly Effective.” Components that are highlighted in red are the priority components being supported centrally this year. The full list of components for use in the new system for evaluation is still being determined. Resources in ARIS Learn will be available for school leaders and teachers on these components.

Example: Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques Domain 3: Instruction Component 3b: Questioning and Discussion Techniques Description (of each level of practice) E.g., “At a Highly Effective level, “The teacher uses a variety or series of questions or prompts to challenge students cognitively, advance high level thinking and discourse, and promote metacognition.” Rubric Review - 4 minutes This slide shows an example of one component (1e) at one level of practice, shown as part of its domain and with its sub-elements (critical attributes and description). Like this example, each component speaks to several elements of teaching. Pass out copies of the rubric for participants to review. Allow the majority of this four-minute period for participants to read on their own.

Reflection In what ways do these components capture classroom practice? Which of the priority components are most relevant to your work? Why? Workshop Reflection – 5 minutes In what ways do these components capture classroom practice? Which…are most relevant to your work?   Reflection can be a turn-and-talk at tables or in small groups, a group share, or a written reflection.

Activity: Danielson Component Exploration In groups Assigned one component from the rubric, Highlight key words that show the difference between levels of practice e.g., some students v. all students; convergent v. open-ended Discuss and record examples of practice at each level of practice, from your own professional experience, on the organizer provided. Activity: Component Exploration - 12 minutes Pass out the component exploration organizer. Assign components – 1e, 3b, and 3d - table by table. (If participants want to explore a component they are less familiar with than the one they are assigned, facilitator may allow them to choose one as a group.) Participants should follow the instructions on this slide, highlighting differences they notice between ratings, and then articulating examples of practice at each rating level. Encourage groups to be explicit in their examples, giving details that show the distinctions between levels of practice. Leave a few minutes for groups to share out.

2. Prepare and Share Feedback A collaborative cycle of observations and feedback drives teacher growth. 1. Observe The school leader gathers low-inference evidence of teacher practice. 2. Prepare and Share Feedback The school leader assesses practice; school leader and teacher prioritize and determine 2-3 next steps. 3. Develop The teacher implements next steps with support from the school leader. Closing - 2 min Preview the next module by overviewing the whole observation, feedback, and development cycle – the rubric comes into play in the second two steps, “prepare and share feedback” and “develop.” School leaders use the rubric to rate and give constructive feedback. The rubric provides a common language about instruction, opening dialogue between the teacher and school leader that leads to targeted development. Let participants now that the coming modules will involve watching a video, taking notes on it, and rating the instructional practice observed.