Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Advertisements

Title IA Fiscal Issues Jackie Godbout Title IA Program Consultant
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS ADDENDUM Schoolwide Plans & School Improvement Plans.
ESEA Title I Supplement, Not Supplant, and American Reinvestment and Recover Act (ARRA) funds.
Campus Improvement Plans
Empowering Educators: Planning for Success Office of Student Programs.
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference Consolidating Funds S choolwide P rograms Sandy Brown &
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget March 19, 2013 March 20, 2013 Presenters: GayeLeia King, Supervisory Education Specialist.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
2008 Spring Planning Workshop for the School Year Office of School Improvement Field Services Unit.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
UNDERSTANDING SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING How to account for IDEIA funds.
Title I, Part A Flexibility: Addressing Barriers to Improving Student Achievement Anita Villarreal State Coordinator, Title I, Part A Division of Federal.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Office of Field Services Fiscal Review Process Becky Pennington Susan Szymas February 7, 2013.
Maintenance of Effort, Comparability, and Supplement/Supplant PAFPC April 2011.
Schoolwide Program Presentation New England Comprehensive Assistance Center Steve Hamilton.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Parent Summit 02/21/2014 SAISD Federal Programs Dept. Barbara.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
NRS Financial Jeopardy! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Game Show.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
FISCAL MONITORING OBJECTIVES:  To provide a clearer understanding of the monitoring process;  To provide further guidance for documentation needed for.
Title 1, Part A Local Consolidated Plan (LCP) Application May 2009.
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Consolidated Funding ApplicationConsolidated Funding Application ESEA Directors InstituteESEA Directors Institute October 6-9, 2014October 6-9, 2014.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
MAS/FPS Fall Directors’ Workshop MDE OFS Updates October 2014 Office of Field Services.
1 SCIP and Title I Information Session Fiscal Year
Financial Management  Subgrantees shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures to insure proper distribution of and accounting for Federal.
Schoolwide Programs – New Guidance Karen Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Division New Directors’ Training September 17-18, 2015
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
Kristen Tosh Cowan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit PAFPC Conference April 5, 2011.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
Major Changes to Title I Regulations Public School Choice & Supplemental Educational Services Presented by: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
Priority & Focus School Title I, Part A, Set-Asides and Choice/Transfer Option Requirements Under ESEA Waiver District Coordinators/Administrators Priority.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
Title II, Part D Enhancing Education through Technology Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Office of Field Services MAS/FPS Regional Presentation October 2015.
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #9 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance May 27,
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #4 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance March 18,
Partnering with Parents in using Federal Programs for Quality Education for all Students Federal Programs Department Parent Summit March 10, 2016.
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
New Fiscal Rules for Funding Flexibility with Title I, Part A
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
ESEA Programs | December 2018
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools
Presentation transcript:

Schoolwide Consolidation

Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide (SW) Programs Guidance

Consolidation Legislation and Guidance (cont.) EDGAR Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A FED. REG (JULY 2, 2004)

What Does Consolidation Mean? Schoolwide school treats the funds it is consolidating as a single “pool” of funds. Funds from the contributing programs lose their identity. The school uses funds from this consolidated schoolwide (SW) pool to support any activity of the SW Plan. [Section E2]

What is the Purpose of Consolidation? The purpose of consolidating funds is to help a SW program school effectively design and implement a comprehensive plan to upgrade the entire educational program in the school based on the school ’ s needs identified through its comprehensive needs assessment [E-1].

State Aid and local tax revenue Title I, Part A Title II, Part A Title III Which Funds can be Consolidated? Title VI Section 31a

Federal funds only Federal funds + Section 31a funds Federal funds + Section 31a + State/Local Federal funds + State/Local Consolidation Options

Why Consolidate?

Time and Effort If State/Local funds are consolidated with Federal funds and personnel are solely funded out of the consolidated funds, then Time and Effort documentation is minimized.

A July 1, 2012 submission date of a quality Consolidated Application in MEGS, and a quality School Improvement Plan in the AdvancED Portal, will ensure a review (and, we hope, approval) of the Consolidated Application prior to the start of school. Due Date

When Section 31a funds are consolidated in a SW program, the requirement for Eligibility Worksheets is optional for that school. Eligibility Worksheets

Schoolwide School Improvement Plan (SIP) The emphasis is on a high-quality Schoolwide SIP rather than the level of description included in the budget.

Consolidation Requirements

Initial Eligibility The school must be eligible to receive Title I, Part A funds according to the Title I School Selection application, have greater than 40% poverty and have engaged in a year of planning to become a schoolwide school with an approved facilitator.

Comprehensive Needs Assessment The school must conduct a comprehensive needs assessment (using all four types of data) to identify gaps in student achievement and identify needs of students, staff and other stakeholders.

Schoolwide SIP A comprehensive Schoolwide SIP that is focused on an identified Schoolwide reform and aligned to the comprehensive needs assessment

Basic Program The historical school-level basic educational program must be identified and continued to be offered. If you are consolidating State/Local funds, additional information will be submitted in the Consolidated Application.

Identification of Consolidated Funds SW school must identify in its SW plan which programs are included in its consolidation and the amount each program contributes to the consolidated SW pool [E-2]. This is done on a template that is uploaded under “Additional Requirements” in the SIP in AdvancEd.

Equitable Services Funds must be shared with private schools as required by legislation.

Supplement not Supplant Each school operating a SW program must receive all the State and local funds it would otherwise receive to operate its basic educational program in the absence of Title I, Part A or other Federal education funds [E-2].

Intent and Purposes The school must be able to demonstrate that its SW program contains sufficient resources and activities to reasonably address the intent and purposes of the included programs, particularly as they relate to the lowest-performing students. [E-14].

Intent and Purposes (cont.) The school may only use consolidated funds to meet the intent and purposes of the funding sources that are pooled. Ex., schools may only use funds to support state/local activities if state/local funds are included in the consolidation.

Other Program Responsibilities Annual Title I, Part A meeting Parent involvement Documentation: agendas, sign-ins, bids, contracts, invoices, ledgers District required set-asides

Other Program Responsibilities Maintenance of Effort Title I Comparability Title I School Selection Health and Safety and Civil Rights

Record Keeping

Programmatic Record Keeping Documentation must be maintain that sufficient resources have been allocated to ensure the intent and purposes of programs were fulfilled particularly as they relate to the lowest- performing students.

Financial Accounting The business office must maintain multiple cost objectives. Reimbursements will occur from each funding source. Final Expenditure Reports must align to budgets and expenditures.

State Aid and local tax revenue must be distributed fairly and equitably to all schools–including SW program schools–without regard to whether those schools are receiving Federal and State supplementary funds. [E-18] Distribution of Funds

Comparability Comparability must be completed. There may be a new way to think about comparability.

Carryover The business office must maintain the ability to determine if Federal funds are unspent at the end of the year.

Monitoring

The Schoolwide SIP is the focus of program monitoring and includes: Review of the SIP and Implementation The Schoolwide SIP MUST be closely aligned to the SW budget detail. Schoolwide SIP

Monitoring findings FER deviations Lack of internal controls Ineligibility Criteria Single audit findings Deficit Lack of school-level decision making Late applications or SIPs that do not adequately address all of the required SW components

Eligible targeted schools with a minimum 40% poverty rate that become schoolwide by Fall, 2012, and meet the specified criteria may participate. Will Targeted Schools be able to participate?

QUESTIONS