Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March 2006 1 Beam Monitoring Basis for Discussion only Beam Rate Beam Rate Beam Profile Beam Profile Beam.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

1 Pion beam tracker for HADES Jerzy Pietraszko CBM Collaboration Meeting, March 9-13, 2009, GSI, Darmstadt.
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
P.-R. KettleMEG-Review February MEG Beam Line Studies  E5 Z-Branch NOW !!! NOW !!!
P.-R. KettleMEG Review July MEG Beam Line Studies.
ISS, 23 September 2005E. Gschwendtner, CERN1 Beam Instrumentation at CNGS 1. Introduction 2. Layout 3. Beam Instrumentation 4. Summary.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 17, 2011.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Progress on the final TWIST measurement of James Bueno, University of British Columbia and TRIUMF on behalf of the Triumf Weak Interaction Symmetry Test.
Luminosity Monitors MICE Video Conference 7 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Accurate  Spectroscopy for Ultracold Neutrons Jeff Martin University of Winnipeg See also: J.W. Martin et al, Phys. Rev. C (2006) J.W. Martin.
1 Heinz-Dieter Nuhn 1 BFW Results June 2009 FAC BFW Results Heinz-Dieter Nuhn – LCLS Undulator Group Leader June 9, 2009.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
 A GEANT4-based simulation was performed of the production target, solenoid, selection channel, and spectrometer.  The acceptance was found to be 8.3x10.
Instrumentation Specifications July 26, 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI Specifications for NuMI Primary Beam Instrumentation.
TWIST Measuring the Space-Time Structure of Muon Decay Carl Gagliardi Texas A&M University TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to the Experiment.
A Fiber Profile Monitor for Low Beam Intensities * G. Tassotto †, H.Nguyen, G. Sellberg, D. Schoo, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL 60510,
May 31, 2008 SuperB PID sessionMarko Starič, Ljubljana Marko Starič J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana Report on hardware tests and MC studies in Ljubljana.
MEG positron spectrometer Oleg Kiselev, PSI on behalf of MEG collaboration.
TWIST A Precision Measurement of Muon Decay at TRIUMF Peter Kitching TRIUMF/University of Alberta TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to.
PSI July 2002MuEGamma Review Meeting1 Beam Line Status update 1.  E5 Test Beam Overview : Aims + RequirementsAims + Requirements Zone Layout + Measurement.
Objectives Determine Detector offsets in hall B reference frame and thus absolute beam position at Hycal Examine Flux calculation and see if beam trips.
Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Peter-Raymond Kettle Beam Line Update End-Caps End-Caps Insertion System Insertion System Target System Target System.
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano An application of the.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
HPS T EST R UN C ONTINGENCY P LAN S. Stepanyan JLAB.
F ERMILAB T EST B EAM F ACILITY Aria Soha March 22, 2011.
Coherent Diffraction Radiation experiment Konstantin Lekomtsev, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman, Pavel Karataev, Maximilian Micheler John Adams Institute at.
October 2005 Qweak Collaboration Meeting Detailed Design of Shield House and Collimators wrt Backgrounds Yongguang Liang Just getting started – will probably.
Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW. Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative.
D. Still-FNAL/Tevatron HALO '03 Tevatron Collider II Halo Removal System Dean Still Fermilab Tevatron Department 5/21/2003 Motives for the Collider Run.
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
Peter-Raymond Kettle MEG Review February BeamBeam LineLine StatusStatus.
A. Zelenski a, G. Atoian a *, A. Bogdanov b, D.Raparia a, M.Runtso b, D. Steski a, V. Zajic a a Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, 11973, USA b.
High Intensity Polarized Electron Gun Studies at MIT-Bates 10/01/2008 PESP Evgeni Tsentalovich MIT.
Imperial College London 1 6. Injection into and ejection from circular machines PREACCELERATOR ACCUMULATORRING PARTICLESOURCE INJECTION 1 EJECTION INJECTION.
P.-R. KettleMEG Review January MEG – Beam Line Studies Present Status & Overview since July 2002.
Developments of the FETS Ion Source Scott Lawrie.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
P.-R. KettleMEG-Review July MEG Beam Line Studies  E5 Z-Branch Collaborative Effort !!! Effort !!!  E5 Z-Branch Collaborative Effort !!! Effort.
Roman Pots and Microstations based on talk by Jaak Lippmaa Helsinki CERN 2005.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Measurements of Intense Proton Beams using Optical Transition Radiation Vic Scarpine, Fermilab TIPP 2011 Chicago, IL June 10, 2011.
Beam on Target Diagnostics Beam on Target Meeting 2013 March Tom Shea.
ESS wire scanner Benjamin Cheymol
Scintillating Fiber Profile Monitor The M-Test Experience Gianni Tassotto 112/15/2014.
Stopped K beam at J-PARC Designed by J.Doornbos 1)Optics design of a K0.8 branch 2)Performance 3)Pion contamination 4)Comments on K1.1 Nov. 4, 2005 Korea.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
g beam test of the Liquid Xe calorimeter for the MEG experiment
An Active TARget for MEG-II, a status report
Investigation of a Scintillating Target for the MEG II Experiment
An active target for MEG2, a status report
Collimation Concept for Beam Halo Losses in SIS 100
From: A fast high-voltage switching multiwire proportional chamber
Entrance Muon Counter (EMC)
Prototype production and test
of secondary light ion beams
of secondary light ion beams
大強度
New MWPC for CB Status Report Oct 2004
Use of Beam Loss Monitor type detectors in CNGS muon station
MWPC’s, GEM’s or Micromegas for AD transfer and experimental lines
C.Octavio Domínguez, Humberto Maury Cuna
CNGS Project Overview Konrad Elsener.
Transition Radiation Studies with Xe GlueX Collaboration Meeting
HE instrument and in-orbit performance
Presentation transcript:

Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Beam Monitoring Basis for Discussion only Beam Rate Beam Rate Beam Profile Beam Profile Beam Normalization Beam Normalization

Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Beam Parameters  Available Parameters Phase Space parameters (x, x ’, y, y ’, p,  p) µ + - & e + - intensity R µ, R beam e, R Michel e µ + - & e + - intensity R µ, R beam e, R Michel e µ + stopping fraction R µ stop µ + stopping fraction R µ stop  Primary Parameters for Monitoring/Calibration x, y, R µ, R µ stop x, y, R µ, R µ stop ideal to measure directly & indirectly ideal to measure directly & indirectlyHardwareHardware Michel decays

Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Beam Rate & Profile Indirect possibility: 1. measured by Michel e + reconstruction using TCs & DCs 2. see Normalization (R µ ·  ·A ccp ), (R µ Stop ·  ·A ccp ) (R µ ·  ·A ccp ), (R µ Stop ·  ·A ccp ) & (x 0, y 0 ) & (x 0, y 0 ) Direct possibility (hardware): 1. measure R µ via (x, y& 1. measure R µ via (x, y ) & R APD at centre using R APD at centre using APD-array mounted on inside APD-array mounted on inside of insertion bellows of insertion bellows (i) Bellows Extended: (x 0, y 0, R µ ) – directly (1 per day C-W Calib.) Disadvantage target must be moved – calibration only ! Disadvantage target must be moved – calibration only ! (ii) Bellows Retracted: Michels only ! R Z  R µ - monitoring Disadvantage constant of proportionality must be measured Disadvantage constant of proportionality must be measuredAPDsy xx

Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Beam Rate & Profile - cont. Direct possibility (hardware): - cont. 2. measure R µ ? & (x, yusing fast, extremely thin MWPC 2. measure R µ ? & (x, y ) using fast, extremely thin MWPC R µ via current & calibration, (x, y) via calibration- monitoring R µ via current & calibration, (x, y) via calibration- monitoring (i) only possible at entrance window – no vacuum (i) only possible at entrance window – no vacuum Disadvantages – (x Z, y Z ), radial Bfield component, Disadvantages – (x Z, y Z ), radial Bfield component, > multiple scattering, rate problematic, potential background > multiple scattering, rate problematic, potential background Typical characteristics: (100x100) mm 2, 1mm wire spacing, 2.5mm half-gap (100x100) mm 2, 1mm wire spacing, 2.5mm half-gap x- y-wire planes, 3 cathode foils (12.5µ), 2 shielding x- y-wire planes, 3 cathode foils (12.5µ), 2 shielding foils (25µ) foils (25µ) 70% CF 4 30% i-C 4 H 10 70% CF 4 30% i-C 4 H 10 live Profile readout type, charge integration & clocked live Profile readout type, charge integration & clocked discharge discharge Examples: µLAN (10x lower rate) Examples: µLAN (10x lower rate) MEG profile Chamber (too thick µ + stop) MEG profile Chamber (too thick µ + stop) Typical characteristics: (100x100) mm 2, 1mm wire spacing, 2.5mm half-gap (100x100) mm 2, 1mm wire spacing, 2.5mm half-gap x- y-wire planes, 3 cathode foils (12.5µ), 2 shielding x- y-wire planes, 3 cathode foils (12.5µ), 2 shielding foils (25µ) foils (25µ) 70% CF 4 30% i-C 4 H 10 70% CF 4 30% i-C 4 H 10 live Profile readout type, charge integration & clocked live Profile readout type, charge integration & clocked discharge discharge Examples: µLAN (10x lower rate) Examples: µLAN (10x lower rate) MEG profile Chamber (too thick µ + stop) MEG profile Chamber (too thick µ + stop)

Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Beam Rate & Profile - cont. Direct possibility (hardware): - cont. 3. upstream, backward-pointing scintillator telescope for Michels from µ-decays-in-flight – beam polarization favours backward from µ-decays-in-flight – beam polarization favours backward decays, R µ via calibration R Tel  R µ - monitoring (i) only possibility between (Triplet II-BTS) (i) only possibility between (Triplet II-BTS) ? Disadvantages – potential background due to re-scattering of discarded beam e + from Separator, at collimator system discarded beam e + from Separator, at collimator system 4.Active Target – would be ideal, polystyrene good material C 6 H 5 CH=CH 2 a~ 0.05 polystyrene good material C 6 H 5 CH=CH 2 a~ 0.05 Disadvantages – rate requires segmentation, light difficult to extract Disadvantages – rate requires segmentation, light difficult to extract 5.Active Degrader – only possible at centre BTS (double waist), MS Disadvantages – rate requires segmentation, light difficult to extract, Disadvantages – rate requires segmentation, light difficult to extract, Bfield Bfield

Peter-Raymond Kettle Tokyo - Topical Meeting, March Beam Normalization Need signal  R µ Stop 1.Proton Signal accelerator counts/mA·s, good monitor, used for normalizing previous mentioned R µ measurements used for normalizing previous mentioned R µ measurements Disadvantage: depends on p-beam centring Tg.E long-term Disadvantage: depends on p-beam centring Tg.E long-term fluctuations ~10%, doesn’t measure µ’s fluctuations ~10%, doesn’t measure µ’s 2.Measurement via Michel e + spectrum (edge) from DCs & TCs Using event Integration & assuming V-A form of spectrum  R µ Stop =  N µ · A ccp – calibration & monitoring  R µ Stop =  N µ · A ccp – calibration & monitoring Advantage: A ccp is same for µ  e  events further “food for thought” necessary… further “food for thought” necessary…