Nested Quantifiers Section 1.5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nested Quantifiers Section 1.4.
Advertisements

Nested Quantifiers Needed to express statements with multiple variables Example 1: “x+y = y+x for all real numbers”  x  y(x+y = y+x) where the domains.
CS 285- Discrete Mathematics
Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations.
Section 1.3. More Logical Equivalences Constructing New Logical Equivalences We can show that two expressions are logically equivalent by developing.
Section 1.4: Nested Quantifiers We will now look more closely at how quantifiers can be nested in a proposition and how to interpret more complicated logical.
RMIT University; Taylor's College This is a story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody. There was an important job to be done.
CSE 311 Foundations of Computing I Lecture 6 Predicate Logic Autumn 2011 CSE 3111.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/25/11 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Discrete Structures Chapter 3: The Logic of Quantified Statements
First Order Logic. Propositional Logic A proposition is a declarative sentence (a sentence that declares a fact) that is either true or false, but not.
CSE115/ENGR160 Discrete Mathematics 01/20/11 Ming-Hsuan Yang UC Merced 1.
Lecture # 21 Predicates & Quantifiers
1 Predicates and Quantifiers CS 202, Spring 2007 Epp, Sections 2.1 and 2.2 Aaron Bloomfield.
Predicates and Quantifiers
Predicates and Quantifiers
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Discrete Mathematics Goals of a Discrete Mathematics Learn how to think mathematically 1. Mathematical Reasoning Foundation for discussions of methods.
CSci 2011 Discrete Mathematics Lecture 3 CSci 2011.
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Logical Equivalence & Predicate Logic
MATH 213 A – Discrete Mathematics for Computer Science Dr. (Mr.) Bancroft.
Mathematical Structures A collection of objects with operations defined on them and the accompanying properties form a mathematical structure or system.
CS 103 Discrete Structures Lecture 05
(CSC 102) Lecture 7 Discrete Structures. Previous Lectures Summary Predicates Set Notation Universal and Existential Statement Translating between formal.
Section 1.5. Section Summary Nested Quantifiers Order of Quantifiers Translating from Nested Quantifiers into English Translating Mathematical Statements.
Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations.
Chapter 1, Part II With Question/Answer Animations Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the.
Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations.
Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations 1.
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic 1.2 Propositional Equivalences 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.4 Nested Quantifiers.
(CSC 102) Lecture 8 Discrete Structures. Previous Lectures Summary Predicates Set Notation Universal and Existential Statement Translating between formal.
Predicates and Quantified Statements
CompSci 102 Discrete Math for Computer Science January 24, 2012 Prof. Rodger Slides modified from Rosen.
1 Sections 1.3 and 1.4 Predicates & Quantifiers. 2 Propositional Functions In a mathematical assertion, such as x < 3, there are two parts: –the subject,
Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations 1.
1 Georgia Tech, IIC, GVU, 2006 MAGIC Lab Rossignac Lecture 02: QUANTIFIERS Sections 1.3 and 1.4 Jarek Rossignac CS1050:
Lecture Predicates and Quantifiers 1.4 Nested Quantifiers.
Lecture 7 – Jan 28, Chapter 2 The Logic of Quantified Statements.
Fall 2008/2009 I. Arwa Linjawi & I. Asma’a Ashenkity 1 The Foundations: Logic and Proofs Predicates and Quantifiers.
CS 285- Discrete Mathematics Lecture 4. Section 1.3 Predicate logic Predicate logic is an extension of propositional logic that permits concisely reasoning.
Predicates and Quantifiers Dr. Yasir Ali. 1.Predicates 2.Quantifiers a.Universal Quantifiers b.Existential Quantifiers 3.Negation of Quantifiers 4.Universal.
PREDICATES AND QUANTIFIERS COSC-1321 Discrete Structures 1.
Mathematics for Comter I Lecture 3: Logic (2) Propositional Equivalences Predicates and Quantifiers.
1 Introduction to Abstract Mathematics Chapter 3: The Logic of Quantified Statements. Predicate Calculus Instructor: Hayk Melikya 3.1.
Section 1.4. Propositional Functions Propositional functions become propositions (and have truth values) when their variables are each replaced by a value.
Section 1.5. Section Summary Nested Quantifiers Order of Quantifiers Translating from Nested Quantifiers into English Translating Mathematical Statements.
Discrete Mathematical الرياضيات المتقطعة. Example 12 June OR Q(x,y): x+y=x-y a) Q(1,1): 2=0 False b) Q(2,0): 2+0=2-0 True c) Q(1,y): 1+y=1-y False(take.
Chapter 1, Part II: Predicate Logic With Question/Answer Animations 1.
رياضيات متقطعة لعلوم الحاسب MATH 226. Chapter 1 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.4.
CSE15 Discrete Mathematics 01/25/17
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Negations of Quantified Statements
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Chapter 1 The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
1.4 Predicates and Quantifiers
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
Nested Quantifiers Nested quantifiers are often necessary to express the meaning of sentences in English as well as important concepts in computer science.
Introduction to Predicates and Quantified Statements II
Week #2 – 4/6 September 2002 Prof. Marie desJardins
ICS 253: Discrete Structures I
Predicates and Quantifiers
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Presentation transcript:

Nested Quantifiers Section 1.5

Nested Quantifiers Nested quantifiers are often necessary to express the meaning of sentences in English as well as important concepts in computer science and mathematics. Example: “Every real number has an additive inverse” is x y(x + y = 0) where the domains of x and y are the real numbers. We can also think of nested propositional functions: x y(x + y = 0) can be viewed as x Q(x) where Q(x) is y P(x, y) where P(x, y) is (x + y = 0)

For every student in this class, there is a CS class that student has taken. Students in this class CS Courses

There is a CS course that every student in this class has taken. Students in this class CS Courses

For every CS course, there is a student in this class who has taken the course. Students in this class CS Courses

There is a student in this class who has taken every CS class. Students in this class CS Courses

Nested Quantification as Loops To see if xyP (x,y) is true: bool flag = true; for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) { for (int j = 0; j < m; ++j) if (!P(x[i],y[j])) { flag = false; break; } if (!flag) break; }

Nested Quantification as Loops To see if x yP(x,y) is true: for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) { bool flag = false; for (int j = 0; j < m; ++j) if (P(x[i],y[j])) { flag = true; break; } if (!flag) break; }

Questions on Order of Quantifiers Example 1: Let U be the real numbers, Define P(x,y) : x ∙ y = 0 What is the truth value of the following: xyP(x,y) Answer: False xyP(x,y) Answer: True xy P(x,y) x  y P(x,y)

Questions on Order of Quantifiers Example 2: Let U be the real numbers, Define P(x,y) : x / y = 1 What is the truth value of the following: xyP(x,y) Answer: False xyP(x,y) Answer: True xy P(x,y) x  y P(x,y)

Quantifications of Two Variables Statement When True? When False P(x,y) is true for every pair x,y. There is a pair x, y for which P(x,y) is false. For every x there is a y for which P(x,y) is true. There is an x such that P(x,y) is false for every y. There is an x for which P(x,y) is true for every y. For every x there is a y for which P(x,y) is false. There is a pair x, y for which P(x,y) is true. P(x,y) is false for every pair x,y

Translating Nested Quantifiers into English Example 1: Translate the statement x (C(x )∨ y (C(y ) ∧ F(x, y))) where C(x) is “x has a computer,” and F(x,y) is “x and y are friends,” and the domain for both x and y consists of all students in your school. Solution: Every student in your school has a computer or has a friend who has a computer. Example 1: Translate the statement xy z ((F(x, y)∧ F(x,z) ∧ (y ≠z))→¬F(y,z)) Solution: There is a student none of whose friends are also friends with each other.

Translating Mathematical Statements into Predicate Logic Example : Translate “The sum of two positive integers is always positive” into a logical expression. Solution: Rewrite the statement to make the implied quantifiers and domains explicit: “For every two integers, if these integers are both positive, then the sum of these integers is positive.” Introduce the variables x and y, and specify the domain, to obtain: “For all positive integers x and y, x + y is positive.” The result is: x  y ((x > 0)∧ (y > 0)→ (x + y > 0)) where the domain of both variables consists of all integers

Translating English into Logical Expressions Example Example: Use quantifiers to express the statement “There is a woman who has taken a flight on every airline in the world.” Solution: Let P(w,f) be “w has taken f ” and Q(f,a) be “f is a flight on a .” The domain of w is all women, the domain of f is all flights, and the domain of a is all airlines. Then the statement can be expressed as: w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a))

Questions on Translation from English Choose the obvious predicates and express in predicate logic. Example 1: “Brothers are siblings.” Solution: x y (B(x,y) → S(x,y)) Example 2: “Siblinghood is symmetric.” Solution: x y (S(x,y) → S(y,x)) Example 3: “Everybody loves somebody.” Solution: x y L(x,y) Example 4: “There is someone who is loved by everyone.” Solution: y x L(x,y) Example 5: “There is someone who loves someone.” Solution: x y L(x,y) Example 6: “Everyone loves himself” Solution: x L(x,x)

Negating Nested Quantifiers Example 1: Recall the logical expression developed three slides back: w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) Part 1: Use quantifiers to express the statement that “There does not exist a woman who has taken a flight on every airline in the world.” Solution: ¬w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) Part 2: Now use De Morgan’s Laws to move the negation as far inwards as possible. Solution: ¬w a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) w ¬ a f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for  w  a ¬ f (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for  w  a f ¬ (P(w,f ) ∧ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for  w  a f (¬ P(w,f ) ∨ ¬ Q(f,a)) by De Morgan’s for ∧. Part 3: Can you translate the result back into English? “For every woman there is an airline such that for all flights, this woman has not taken that flight or that flight is not on this airline”