PM Event Detection from Time Series Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep. 2004 Correspondence to R Husar, R PoirotR Husar, R Poirot Coordination Support.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STN Carbon Field Blank Analysis, Derived Organic Carbon Analysis and IMPROVE blank corrected artifact analysis Bret Schichtel.
Advertisements

Mapping of Fires Over North America Using Satellite Data Sean Raffuse CAPITA, Washington University September,
FASTNET Report: 0409RegHazeEvents04 Eastern US Regional Haze Events: Automated Detection and Documentation for 2004 Contributed by the FASNET Community,
Inventory Issues and Modeling- Some Examples Brian Timin USEPA/OAQPS October 21, 2002.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Biomass Smoke Aerosol: Spatial and Temporal Pattern over the US October 2005
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
Partially Supported by Inter-RPO WG – NESCAUM F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET CAPITA September 2004 Natural Aerosol.
Worst 20% Hazes Across the Country Based on IMPROVE Speciation Data by Marc Pitchford August 2001.
Regional Haze Rule Guidance: Tracking Progress & Natural Levels Overview of the concepts currently envisioned by EPA working groups by Marc Pitchford;
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effect of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Second Workshop, October 21-22, 2004, Chapel Hill, NC Intercontinental Aerosol.
IMPROVE Corrects OC and EC for a Positive Artifact The positive artifact correction causes the organic and elemental carbon to approach zero as fine mass.
1 The FASTNET Project Presented by: Sean Raffuse 1 Rudy Husar 2 Rich Poirot and Gary Kleiman 3 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc. 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Lake Champlain & the Adirondacks from Burlington VT CAMNET FASTNET Event Report: NENitrate Winter PM Event over the Northeast and Quebec: Nitrate?
MODIS Rapid Response FASTNET Event Report: TexMexDust Texas-Mexico Dust Event February 19, 2004 Contributed by the FASNET Community Correspondence.
Results of Ambient Air Analyses in Support of Transport Rule Presentation for RPO Workshop November 2003.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Observation-Based Quantification of the PM and Ozone at the US-Global Boundary CAPITACAPITA, Washington University Rudolf B. Husar, PI In Cooperation with.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
TRENDS IN U.S. EXTREME SNOWFALL SEASONS SINCE 1900 Kenneth E. Kunkel NOAA Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites - NC David R. Easterling National.
Technical Support for Exceptional Event Analysis for Volcano Impacts on PM2.5 in Hawaii using the Exceptional Event Decision Support System (EE DSS)EE.
DataFed Support for EPA’s Exceptional Event Rule R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at the workshop: Satellite and Above-Boundary.
DUST WATCH PROPOSAL For consideration by the DEJF November 15, 2004 Las Vega, NV.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
FASTNET Report: 0409FebMystHaze Mystery Winter Haze: Natural? Nitrate/Sulfate? Stagnation? Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence.
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
Chemical Composition of PM2.5 over N. America Big Bend (scale 0-15 ug/m3) G.Smoky Mtn. Yellowstone Mammuth Cave Sequoia ? ?
Presenting Evidence to Justify Data Exclusion as an Exceptional Event Ideas based on how EPA has recently documented events to support regulatory decisions.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
1 The FASTNET Project Presented by: Sean Raffuse 1 Rudy Husar 2 Rich Poirot and Gary Kleiman 3 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc. 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Project Outline: Technical Support to EPA and RPOs Estimation of Natural Visibility Conditions over the US Project Period: June May 2008 Reports:
C ombined A erosol T rajectory T ool, CATT Status Report on Tools Development and Use Project supported by the Inter-RPO Data Analysis Workgroup Project.
Federated Data System DataFed Rudolf Husar, Washington University, St. Louis With may who participated and supported DataFed since National Ambient.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
FASTNET Event Report: July4Haze, July 6, 2004 July 4, 2004 Aerosol Pulse Event Summary by the FASTNET Community Please send PPT slides or comments.
Status Report on CATT and FASTNET R. Poirot, VT DEC & R. Husar, CAPITA, 9/29/04 CATT: Combined Aerosol Trajectory Tools FASTNET: Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools.
C ombined A erosol T rajectory T ool, CATT Status Report on Tools Development and Use Project supported by the Inter-RPO Data Analysis Workgroup Project.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Status Report on CATT and FASTNET R. Poirot, VT DEC & R. Husar, CAPITA, 9/29/04 CATT: Combined Aerosol Trajectory Tools FASTNET: Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution Data Normalization and Temporal Variability.
The Federated Data System, DataFed ESIP Winter MeetingESIP Winter Meeting, Jan 10, 2013, Washington DC Rudolf Husar, Washington University, St. Louis Presented.
Sea Salt comes from the Sea Shore, as She Should. But how can Soil Dust come from the South?
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
Co-Retrieval of Surface Color and Aerosols from SeaWiFS Satellite Data Outline of a Seminar Presentation at EPA May 2003 Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar.
MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: MARAMA/NESCAUM/LADCO Project: Source Apportionment of Air Quality Monitoring Data: Paired Aerosol / Trajectory Database Analysis.
Co-Retrieval of Surface Color and Aerosols from SeaWiFS Satellite Data Outline of a Seminar Presentation at EPA May 2003 Sean Raffuse and Rudolf Husar.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
C ombined A erosol T rajectory T ool, CATT Transport Analyzer for RPO Analysts R. B. Husar and K. Höijärvi, Washington University, St. Louis R.L. Poirot,
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Exceptional Air Pollution Events: Exceedances due to Natural/Non-recurring Events R. B. Husar, Washington U.; R.L Poirot, Vermont Dep. Env. Cons.; N. Frank,
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Assessment of the Speciated PM Network (Initial Draft, November 2004 ) Washington University, St. Louis CIRA/NPS VIEWS Team.
Response to the Bohnecamp memo Rudy Husar Kari Hoijarvi, Washington University, St. EE Detection – Which monitors.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Fire, Smoke & Air Quality: Tools for Data Exploration & Analysis : Data Sharing/Processing Infrastructure This project integrates.
FASOM and Agricultural Regions
Asian Dust Episode (4/26/2001)
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
Asian Dust Episode (4/16/2001)
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Adjusting the Regional Haze Glide path using Monitoring and Modeling Data Trends Natural Conditions International Anthropogenic Contributions.
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Presentation transcript:

PM Event Detection from Time Series Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence to R Husar, R PoirotR Husar, R Poirot Coordination Support by Inter-RPO WG Fast Aerosol Sensing Tools for Natural Event Tracking, FASTNET NSF Collaboration Support for Aerosol Event Analysis NASA REASON Coop EPA -OAQPS Event : Deviation > x*percentile

Temporal Analysis The time series for typical monitoring data are ‘messy’; the signal variation occurs at various scales and the time pattern at each scale is different Inherently, aerosol events are spikes in the time series of monitoring data but extracting the spikes from the noisy data is a challenging endeavor The temporal signal can be meaningfully decomposed into a 1.Seasonal component with stable periodic pattern 2.Random variation with ‘white noise’ pattern 3.Spikes or events that are more random in frequency and magnitude Each signal component is caused by different combination of the key processes: emission, transport, transformations and removal Typical time series of daily AIRNOW PM25 over the Northeastern US

Temporal Signal Decomposition and Event Detection First, the median and average is obtained over a region for each hour/day (thin blue line) Next, the data are temporally smoothed by a 30 day moving window (spatial median - red line; spatial mean – heavy blue line). These determine the seasonal pattern. EUS Daily Average 50%-ile, 30 day 50%-ile smoothing Deviation from %-ile Event : Deviation > x*percentile Median Seasonal Conc. Mean Seasonal Conc. Average Median Finally, the hourly/daily deviation from the the smooth median is used to determine the noise (blue) and event (red) components

Seasonal PM25 by Region The 30-day smoothing average shows the seasonality by region The Feb/Mar PM25 peak is evident for the Northeast, Great Lakes and Great Plains This secondary peak is absent in the South and West

Northeast – Southeast Comparison Northeast and Southeast differ in the pattern of seasonal and event variation Northeast has two seasonal peaks and more events–values well above the median Southeast peaks in September and has few values much above the noise Northeast Southeast

Causes of Temporal Variation by Region The temporal signal variation is decomposable into seasonal, meteorological noise and events Assuming statistical independence, the three components are additive: V 2 Total = V 2 Season + V 2 MetNoise + V 2 Event The signal components have been determined for each region to assess the differences Northeast exhibits the largest coeff. variation (56%); seasonal, noise and events each at 30% Southeast is the least variable region (35%), with virtually no contribution from events Southwest, Northwest, S. Cal. and Great Lakes/Plains show 40-50% coeff. variation mostly, due to seasonal and meteorological noise. Interestingly, the noise is about 30% in all regions, while the events vary much more, 5-30%

‘Composition’ of Eastern US Events The bar-graph shows the various combinations of species- events that produce Reconstructed Fine Mass (RCFM) events ‘Composition’ is defined in terms of co-occurrence of multi- species events (not by average mass composition) The largest EUS RCFM events are simultaneously ‘events’ (spikes) in sulfate, organics and soil! Some EUS RCFM events are events in single species, e.g. 7- Jul-97 (OC), 21-Jun-97 (Soil) Based on VIEWS data

Northeast

Great Lakes

Great Lakes-Plains

Northeast

Great Plains

NorthWest

S. California

Southeast

Southwest

Event Definition: Time Series Approach Eastern US aggregate time series

Sulfate EUS Daily Average 50%-ile, 30 day 50%-ile smoothing Deviation from %-ile Event – Deviation > percentile value Median Seasonal Conc. Mean Seasonal Conc.

Reconstructed Fine Mass RCFM

Organic Carbon

Eelemental Carbon

SOIL

Nitrate

Temporal Pattern Regional Speciated Analysis - VIEWS Aerosol species time series: –ammSO4f –OCf –ECf –SOILf –ammNO3f –RCFM Regions of Aggregation

Dust Seasonal + spikes East – west events are independent East events occur several times a year, mostly in summer West events are lest frequent, mostly in spring US West East

Dust asgasgasfg Northeast Southwest Southeast

Dust dfjdjdfjetyj Northwest S. California Great Plaines

Amm. Sulfate wdthehreherh US West East

Amm. Sulfate stheherheyju Northeast Southwest Southeast

Amm. Sulfate shheherh Northwest S. California Great Plaines

Organic Carbon sdhdfhefheryj US West East

Organic Carbon sdheherh Northeast Southwest Southeast

Organic Carbon erheryeyj Northwest S. California Great Plaines

Reconstructe d Fine Mass estrhertheryu US West East

Reconstructe d Fine Mass werty3rueru Northeast Southwest Southeast

Reconstructe d Fine Mass wthwrthwerhtr Northwest S. California Great Plaines