Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Advertisements

Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
March 30, 2000SPIE conference, Munich1 LGS AO photon return simulations and laser requirements for the Gemini LGS AO program Céline d’Orgeville, François.
George Angeli 11 September, 2001 Current Concepts and Status of GSMT Control Systems.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
Laser Guide Stars by Roberto Ragazzoni INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova (Italy)
Na- Laser guide star AO with dynamical refocus
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
PILOT: Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope -performance specifications JACARA Science Meeting PILOT Friday March 26 Anglo Australian.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
LGS WFS Design Status & Issues Dekany, Delacroix, & Velur Caltech Optical Observatories.
1 Laser Guide Star Wavefront Sensor Mini-Review 6/15/2015Richard Dekany 12/07/2009.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
PALM-3000 PALM-3000 Instrument Architecture Antonin Bouchez PALM-3000 Requirements Review November 12, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
NGAO NGS WFS design review Caltech Optical Observatories 31 st March 2010.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
PALM-3000 Systems Engineering R. Dekany, A. Bouchez 9/22/10 Integration & Testing Review.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 Ellerbroek, AO4ELT, Paris, June Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corporation Adaptive Optics for.
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
Dec. 7, 1999Laser Development Meeting1 Laser Requirements and Prospects for Gemini AO Program Céline d’Orgeville Gemini Laser Systems Engineer.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
Center for Astronomical Adaptive Optics Ground layer wavefront reconstruction using dynamically refocused Rayleigh laser beacons C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart,
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
Gemini AO Program October 21, 1999Gemini Science Committee1 The Gemini Adaptive Optics Program MCAO for Gemini-South Gemini Adaptive Optics Team B. Ellerbroek.
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
MCAO System Overview Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Primary subsystems and their characteristics.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
MCAO System Modeling Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Modeling objectives and approach Updated.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
AO4ELT, June Wide Field AO simulation for ELT: Fourier and E2E approaches C. Petit*, T. Fusco*, B. Neichel**, J.-F. Sauvage*, J.-M. Conan* * ONERA/PHASE.
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Atmospheric Turbulence: r 0,  0,  0 François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Adaptive Optics in the.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
Overview Science drivers AO Infrastructure at WHT GLAS technicalities Current status of development GLAS: Ground-layer Laser Adaptive optics System.
Fundamentals of adaptive optics and wavefront reconstruction Marcos van Dam Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Lawrence Livermore National.
AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.
Robo-AO Overview: System, capabilities, performance Christoph Baranec (PI)
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Computationally Efficient Wavefront Reconstruction for Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) Brent Ellerbroek AURA New Initiatives Office IPAM Workshop.
Characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence & Systems engineering François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz)
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Lecture 14 AO System Optimization
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism
NGAO Trade Study GLAO for non-NGAO instruments
Presentation transcript:

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance Predictions for Extremely Large Telescopes Brent Ellerbroek and Francois Rigaut Gemini Observatory SPIE Opto-Southwest / Astronomical Optics September 17, 2001

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 2 Presentation Outline Requirements and AO operating modes Implementation concepts and issues Towards performance estimates Summary

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 3 AO Performance Objectives for GSMT Narrow field AO MCAOLow order AO Field-of-view10”2’ Wavelength range,  m Resolution, arc secDL Strehl, %80 (90)50- Emissivity, %20 10 Stability over 3600 s, %152 Astrometric accuracy, arc sec1e-41e-31e-2 Photometric accuracy, %152 (DL: Diffraction limited)

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 4 Representative Parameters for Narrow Field AO (NFAO) Standard scaling law analysis with nominal Cerro Pachon atmosphere Strehl budget divided equally into: fitting, servo lag, anisoplanatism, WFS noise, implementation errors Target Strehl at  m # Actuators Servo BW, Hz80125 FoV diameter, arc sec NGS magnitude (Hartmann WFS) Implementation errors, nm3423

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 5 Gemini-South design scalable to D = 30 m … … with increased laser power –Increase between O(D) and O(D 2 ) Better correction over wider FoV implies more DM’s, WFS’s –Scaling not yet fully quantified Representative Parameters for MCAO,  m Target Strehl Target FoV, arc sec 12 # of DM’s 35-9? Actuator pitch, m # of sodium LGS or NGS 59? Power/LGS, W 30?120? Servo Bandwidth, Hz 40 Implementation errors, nm 9050

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 6 Representative Parameters for Low Order AO (LOAO) Standard Strehl scaling laws break down for low-order systems Initial parameter estimates can be derived from Hokupa’a performance on Gemini-North –Number of actuators: –Limiting magnitude: –Will achieve near-diffraction limited performance for > 5  m

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 7 AO Imple- mentation concept for GSMT MCAO Inst. LLT LLT? Inst. Adaptive M2 (LOAO) LOAO MOMFOS Elevation Axis M1 Support Prime Focus Inst. NFAO

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 8 Ideas on NFAO Implementation NGS AO on bright guidestars Woofer/tweeter wavefront correction –Adaptive M2 (low order, large stroke) –Fast tip/tilt mirror –MEMS or other high-order DM (limited stoke) Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor or point diffraction interferometer (PDI) –PDI would eliminate reconstructor and reduce detector count, but has limited dynamic range –Two-stage wavefront sensing possible Atmospheric dispersion compensation requirements and implementation TBD

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 9 Guide Star Options for MCAO ProsCons 1) NaturalNo lasers!Questionable sky coverage (at desired Strehls w/o a revolutionary WFS) 2) Rayleigh1.Mature laser tech. 2.Safe for satellites 3.Fixed LGS range 1.Performance questions 2.Many guide stars required 3.Optical design questions 3) Sodium1.Performance predictions 2.Few (5) guidestars required 1.LGS elongation 2.Immature laser tech. 3.Variable LGS range 4.Satellite predictive avoidance 4) Sodium + low- order Rayleigh Enhanced sky coverage (tilt aniso. compensation with a single tip/tilt NGS) 2) 3 and 3) 1-4

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 10 Coping with LGS Elongation LGS Elongation proportional to aperture radius –Increases WFS spot size by factor of ~3 for D = 30 m Increases laser power requirements –Factor of ~3 2 for a Hartmann WFS with 2 2 pixels per subaperture –Factor of ~3 for a Shack-Hartmann WFS with many pixels per subaperture Increased sensitivity to sodium column fluctuations Alternate approaches: –Track short laser pulses through sodium layer? Need ~ 1  sec pulses, duty cycle of –Multiple lasers and launch telescopes per LGS?

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 11 MCAO Optical Design Derived from Gemini-South –Collimated space for DM’s, ADC’s, beamsplitters between off-axis parabolas (OAP’s) Design constrained by magnification ratio tradeoffs –Low magnification permits near-normal angles of incidence on DM’s, but … Requires large diameters for TTM, ADC Increases overall size, complicates packaging –Current design uses M=60 (0.5 m beam diameters)

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 12 MCAO Opto-Mechanical Layout OAP’s Collimated space for ADC’s, beamsplitters DM’s & TTM

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 13 Issues for Further Work LGS WFS optical path –Noncommon path aberrations and pupil distortion with variable LGS range Tip/tilt mirror requirements Explore alternative approaches with reduced surface count

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 14 AO Modeling Issues and Methods First-order system sizing and performance analysis –Number/geometry of guidestars, DM’s, WFS –Performance vs WFS noise, control loop bandwidth  Classical linear systems models Higher order effects and implementation errors –Wave optics propagation (atmosphere, optical train, WFS) –Extended (three-dimensional) laser guide stars –DM-to-WFS misregistration, noncommon path errors,…  Wave optics propagation simulations Computation requirements for ELT’s??

Gemini AO Program Science Instrument LGS + NGS WFS’s Turbulence - Filtered white noise - Taylor hypothesis Science Fields LGS’s NGS’s LGS Pointing Tip/Tilt Offload DM’s TTM Recon- structor Common- and Noncommon Path Errors Strehl Histories Mean PSF’s Wave Optics Simulation for Evaluation of Higher- Order Effects Shack- Hartmann Geometric or Wave Optics Gain/bias calibration 3-D LGS Photon + Read Noise Misregistration Zonal 2 nd order Dynamics Misregistration Minimal Variance

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 16 Sample Modeling Results for MCAO on Gemini-South Strehl Ratio Center FoV Edge FoV Corner FoV J band H band K band D = 8 m, median Cerro Pachon Seeing,  = 0 0, 1’ square FoV, no WFS noise Linear Systems Analysis Wave Optics Simulation Solid: Extended laser beacons and wave optics propagation Dashed: WFS noise, DM misregistration

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 17 Computation Requirements vs. Aperture Diameter Scaling with diameter D for a fixed density of DM actuators and WFS subapertures Optical propagationO(1) (assumes fixed phase screen size of at least twice outer scale) Compute WFS measurementsO(D 2 ) Compute DM actuator commandsO(D 4 ) Compute DM surface figures from commandsO(D 2 )  Compute estimation matrix before simulationO(D 6 ) Conventional matrix computation Factor of 4096 in scaling from D = 8m to D = 32m !

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 18 Sparse Matrix Methods Reduce Computation Requirements First studied in for NGS AO with classical least squares estimators –Scaling with aperture diameter ~O(D 3 ), not O(D 6 ) Features of more elaborate AO configurations and estimators require special treatment –Turbulence-related matrices appearing in optimal estimators –LGS tip/tilt removal and NGS tip/tilt measurements Method to include these terms recently developed –Computing LOAO / NFAO estimators for GSMT almost trivial –Computing MCAO estimators at least feasible

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 19 Conventional NGS AO Results Using Sparse Matrix Methods Aperture Diameter, m Order Actuators RMS WFE, (Optimal Estimator) RMS WFE, (Sparse Estimator) Time to compute sparse Estimator, s RAM to store sparse Estimator, MB NA19.3 Appears scalable to very high order NFAO

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 20 MCAO Results (and Predictions) Using Sparse Matrix Methods NGS MCAOLGS MCAO Aperture, m Actuators (9700) (9700) Subapertures (17120) (17124) Optimal RMS WFE,  m Time, hours0.51(32)(2103)0.51(32)(2103) RAM, MB13.7(176)(2827)13.8(177)(2848) Sparse RMS WFE,  m Time, hours (19.61) (13.44) RAM, MB (4128) (3189) Equivalent Performance Performance a weak function of D Computation times reasonable Memory requirements at least feasible

Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 21 Summary Three AO operating modes defined for GSMT –NFAO with a bright NGS (High Strehls in NIR, 1-10” field) –MCAO using multiple sodium LGS (Good Strehls in NIR, 1-2’ field) –LOAO using a dim NGS (Improved resolution in near- and thermal IR, 2’ field, low emissivity) Top-level implementation approach defined Work on MCAO and NFAO designs in progress Estimators can be efficiently computed/evaluated using sparse matrix methods