Udi Dahan – The Software Simplist Session Code: ARC 304
What will you see here? Distributed Systems Architecture UI Design Domain Model What won’t you see here? Code
Distributed Systems Architecture
Common Distributed Architecture DB
Let’s deal with the obvious…
Collaboration is good – isn’t it ? Get data Change data User is looking at stale data
So why go through all the layers? DB Cache
Why transform between tiers? Use EF to map from tables to domain objects Map from DTOs and WS to domain object Map from DTOs & WS to view model DB WSWS UIUI Cache
What was the point of all this again?
Queries – showing data to the user
Why not be upfront about it? Data correct as of 10 minutes ago List of customers
Only data, no behavior: not an object
Keep it simple - 2-Tier Persistent View Model UIUI Query only For each view in the UI, have a view in the DB
Incrementally add from there
Commands – accepting user input
Can we fully trust users decisions?
Validation and Business Rules Validation: Is the input potentially good? Structured correctly? Ranges, lengths, etc Rules:Should we do this? Based on the current system state What the user saw is irrelevant
Command Processing Layers DB
TransactionTransaction Command Processing Tiers DB WSWS InputInput ValidationValidation ValidationValidation Command Get current state RulesRules Persist
Should we do what the user asks?
User Interface Design
Traditional User Interfaces IDTotalDateShippedAccountetc 317$37.871/9/09YesA17T5 318$99.993/7/09YesA17T5 319$ /8/09YesP313Z 320$69.479/9/09NoP599Z Orders CancelCancelSaveSave
Capturing user intent Why is it important? Differentiating between: Correcting a mistyped shipping address The user moved – reroute shipments underway Sometimes users accidentally modify fields when tabbing between columns
Reservation systems
Not capturing user intent In a traditional UI – what we have is the checkbox Why do users select multiple seats? Because they’re reserving for a family / friends But then, concurrency happens Somebody else got in first on one of the seats Try to find a block of seats somewhere else
Capturing user intent Group reservation: Small group – sitting together Large group – several small groups Enter number of people Enter preferred seat type – indicates cost System s back when reservation can be filled Include waiting list functionality
Usability benefits More users get what they want with less clicks
Scalability benefits Thousands of seats, hundreds of thousands of requests No need to show actual status
Revisiting the command
What’s a good command? The kind you can reply with: “Thank you. Your confirmation will arrive shortly” Inherently asynchronous Not really related to an entity
Commands versus Entities It’s easier to validate the command Less data More specific Is this potentially good Validating large entities is complex
Domain Models
What aren’t they for? Validation Commands are validated before the domain model is called Queries Entity relationships for reading are unnecessary
What are they for? Answering the question: Should I do what this valid command is asking? If the answer is yes, change its state
Putting it all together
QueriesQueries CommandsCommands DB WSWS InputInput ValidationValidation ValidationValidation RulesRules View Model QueriesQueries
QueriesQueries CommandsCommands DB WSWS InputInput ValidationValidation ValidationValidation RulesRules QueriesQueries For better scalability, add pub/sub View Model CacheUpdaterCacheUpdater Publish
Summary
Keep queries simple – 2-Tier if possible No data transfer objects Have commands reflect user intent Adjust UI design to capture intent Get the benefits of asynchronous programming Simple validation, focused business rules
Thank you Udi Dahan – The Software Simplist Enterprise Development Expert & SOA Specialist
Sessions On-Demand & Community Resources for IT Professionals Resources for Developers Microsoft Certification & Training Resources Resources Required Slide Speakers, TechEd 2009 is not producing a DVD. Please announce that attendees can access session recordings at TechEd Online. Required Slide Speakers, TechEd 2009 is not producing a DVD. Please announce that attendees can access session recordings at TechEd Online.
Complete an evaluation on CommNet and enter to win an Xbox 360 Elite!
© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION. Required Slide