Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Advertisements

PPT Presentation Template: This PPT includes all slides to present a district-level overview of PVAAS. This was used with a district-wide elementary faculty.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 School Designation Detailed Methodology Reward Identify the “highest-performing schools” and “high-progress schools” based in all-students group over.
Using Growth Models for Accountability Pete Goldschmidt, Ph.D. Assistant Professor California State University Northridge Senior Researcher National Center.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Understanding and Using SGPs to Improve Student Performance 1.
Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
The Use of Trajectory-Modeled Growth as Part of Adequate Yearly Progress: One State's Results Christopher I Cobitz, Ph.D. Reporting Section Chief North.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
SY PVAAS Scatterplots State to IU Region to LEA Public Schools/Charter Schools/Comprehensive CTCs Math, Reading, Writing, Science Template Contact.
SY PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, 11 Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS contact.
PPT Presentation Template: This PPT includes all slides to present a district or building level overview of PVAAS. This was used with a district- wide.
PVAAS – Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System added_assessment_system_(pvaas)/8751.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
Growth. 10/17/2015Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student.
AYP Prediction By Diagnostics in the Educational Data Warehouse.
Will Growth Models Improve School Accountability and NCLB/AYP? Results From New Research Survey and Analysis of Current AYP Growth Proposals Kimberly O'Malley.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Growth. Growth Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student achievement and equity. Objectives.
© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium WIDA Focus on Growth H Gary Cook, Ph.D. WIDA.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
AERA March 25, 2008 Delaware’s Growth Model and Results from Year One.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
PVAAS School Consultation Guide Fall 2010 Session C: 9-12 High School – All Data Tools PVAAS Statewide Core Team
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
American Education Research Association April 2004 Pete Bylsma, Director Research/Evaluation/Accountability Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Teacher SLTs
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Teacher SLTs
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Teacher SLTs
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
Presentation transcript:

Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets)

See your superintendent

Enter District Name and select Certification for Adequate Yearly Progress status

Select Display and District tab to access the district data (see next slide)

District data has been collapsed by grade spans:

Select Display and a Building tab to access building data (see next slide)

Building data is collapsed by the grade spans within a building. For example: and 11 All students for participation Full Academic Year (FAY) only students for assessment

Focus on the proficiency of students who have been in the district or a building for a Full Academic Year (FAY)

Focus on the proficiency of students who have been in the district or a building for a Full Academic Year (FAY) 1. Building Name 7. Met or Missed AYP 6. Percent Proficient 5. Total FAY Students 4. Additional Meeting Growth 3. Number Proficient (including IAA) 2. Grade Configuration

Definition of Adequate Yearly Growth: The improvement (growth) that current non- proficient students are expected to make from one year to the next is depicted in the graph above. This plot shows the category boundaries for non-proficient students across grades NPR* 1-9 NPR NPR* > 41 NPR

* The High Marginal region contains the scale score points that are within one standard error of measurement below the cut score for Proficient. The Lo Marginal region is the remaining part of the Marginal region. So… NPR and NPR are estimations used here for explanation. Accurate calculations are grade level/scale score specific. Refer to the NCLB Growth Model Plan on the DE website for actual scale score ranges NPR* 1-9 NPR NPR* > 41 NPR

This growth model is motivated by two guiding principles. First, Adequate Yearly Growth must be greater than expected growth in order to ensure that students are on track to proficiency. Second, growth trajectories must be maintained over time in order to be considered adequate. A student only makes AYG if that student attains a higher and previously unattained level of achievement. A particular student may only count for AYG a maximum of two times NPR* 1-9 NPR NPR* > 41 NPR

Confidence Interval: 1.Multiple the school’s % proficient by the school’s % non- proficient 2.Divide the result by the average number of students for the biennium period. 3.Take the square root of your result. 4.Multiply that by If you add this to your percent proficient, and it is equal to or greater than the state’s target, you’re OK. 6.If you subtract this from the state’s target, and the result is less than your percent proficient, you’re OK.