Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress Report July 22, 2009.
Advertisements

1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2007 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Schools in Alert and Schools in Need of Improvement Summary of 2007 Statistics Prepared by NORMES, University of Arkansas Presented to the Joint Adequacy.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Special Education Summit 2010 Board of Education Presentation on Special Education Within District, Out-of-District, and Performance Levels on Mastery.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Barrow County Schools AYP Results AYP Results out of 13 schools met AYP System did not meet AYP out of 13.
Update on Accountability March “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check 95% participation rate for all students and each subgroup. Check percent proficient.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
2012 Accountability Determinations
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Illinois’ Accountability Workbook: Approved Changes in 2005
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
AYP and Report Card.
Presentation transcript:

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The accountability system looks at the degree to which students across schools and districts are mastering the state standards The foundation for the accountability system is based on a state’s assessments. NCLB, now ESEA set the goal of 100% proficiency by the year 2014 with states setting incremental benchmarks. NJ State Board Meeting :12/1/10

Adequate Yearly Progress 95% Participation: Total students and each student subgroup with at least 40 students must have a participation rate of 95% or above on state assessments. Meet or Exceed Proficiency: Total students and each student subgroup with at least 30 students must meet the state's AYP benchmarks for the percentage of students scoring proficient or better on the state assessments. Secondary Measure: Each school, district, and the state as a whole must show progress on an additional measure (graduation rate for high school and attendance rate for elementary and middle schools).

Adequate Yearly Progress Student achievement is determined by grade span and each content area (LAL Math) in grades 3-8 and 11. Schools are judged by the performance of the total population and by the performance of subgroups. There are 40 indicators that must be met (including participation and proficiency rates) plus secondary indicators for each of the elementary, middle and HS grade spans. A safe harbor calculation is applied to determine if a school has made sufficient progress even if it has not met the proficiency target. When a school misses one or more indicator(s) they do not meet AYP in that subject area for that year.

State Benchmarks for AYP Starting Point Language Arts Literacy Elementary Grades 3, 4, * Middle Grades 6, 7, High School MathematicsElementary Grades 3, 4, * Middle Grades 6, 7, High School * Transition year

School In Need of Improvement School Year SINI Schools (Year 2 and up ) Total Schools Percent of SINI Schools (Year 2 and up )24.8%25.1%22.8%19.9%20.7%29.5% When a school misses AYP for two years in a row in the same content area- they are determined a School in Need of Improvement

School Status by Year Status YearNumber of Schools% Hold StatusTitle I schools Year %15 Year 930%(2)3 Year %41 Year %(8)13 Year 6 - R %(2)31 Year 5 - R %(19)31 Year 4 - CA693.1%(5)57 Year 3 - SES1195.3%(23)86 Year 2 - Choice %(36)214 Hold status- met AYP for current year

Students with Disabilities AYPSINI Number of Schools Missed for SE755 Missed for SE only343 Total schools with SE subgroup 1255 Number of Schools Missed this year’s AYP for SE only 104 Total SINI Schools657

District AYP and Yearly Status District does not meet AYP: If the district missed AYP for any indicator in all grade spans by content area. District in Need of Improvement – (DINI) ▫Miss for any indicator in all grade spans for two consecutive years in same content area.

District Status by Year Year in StatusNumber of Districts% DINI 730.5% DINI 600.0% DINI 550.8% DINI 440.6% DINI 340.6% DINI % DINI %

Resources Title I Accountability ▫ y/ayp/1011/ y/ayp/1011/ Understanding Accountability: ▫ y/ayp/1011/understanding.pdfhttp:// y/ayp/1011/understanding.pdf

Resources Schools in need of Improvement: ▫ y/ayp/1011/needimprovement.xlshttp:// y/ayp/1011/needimprovement.xls Districts in need of Improvement: ▫ y/ayp/1011/dini/identified.pdfhttp:// y/ayp/1011/dini/identified.pdf