California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 CIWMB Board Meeting - Item 12 (Presented at the Strategic Policy Development Committee) Consideration Of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debt Affordability Committee 1 Debt Affordability Committee August 15, 2013.
Advertisements

FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT Presentation Prepared for the Appropriations Committee and the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee by the.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Finance Committee Budget Overview April 26, 2010.
1 General Fund Outlook * Shortfall line is the amount that cannot be funded using the assumed revenues & expenditures. The shortfall is only created after.
JLBC Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona October 26, 2007.
1/30/ SB 20 E-Waste Recovery and Recycling Payments Hypothetical Examples and Discussion Draft February 6, 2004 Meeting.
CIWMB Electronic Waste Recycling Program R.W. Beck, Inc. Humboldt State University Net Cost Report Training.
Clark County Budget & Economic Outlook July 22, 2015 Work Session: Board of Clark County Councilors.
DMH1 Overview of Mental Health Services Act Funding: Collection to Expenditure Tom Greene, Chair, Mental Health Funding and Policy Committee Mark Heilman,
CITY OF SANTA BARBARA Budget Overview APA Citizens Academy Paul Casey, Assistant City Administrator October 15, 2013.
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
FUNDING MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA August 13, 2015.
Slide 2.1 Accounting and Reporting on an Accrual Accounting Basis Chapter 2.
1 A Review of MCPS Budget Category 12 Office of Legislative Oversight Report Presentation to Montgomery County Board of Education Fiscal Management.
Recommendation for Board approval of updated nodal fee filing Steve Byone Overview –Historical summary –Highlights from approved interim Nodal Surcharge.
1 Presentation Overview The national economic recession has had significant impacts on the Rio Rancho economy, which can be seen in employment levels,
CMS Budget Update March 10, CMS Budget Update.
Independent Review of FY 2008 Proposed Rates D.C. Water and Sewer Authority Public Hearing June 13, 2007.
FY12 Spending Plan Process Finance and Administration Advisory Group January 18, 2012.
FY12 Budget and Caseload Update Fiscal Committee June 4, 2012.
The Economy and Budget: Minnesota and the Nation Legislative Conference February 10, 2010 Scott Pattison Executive Director National Association of State.
Dylan Roth ( ) Patrick Gormley ( ) Maclean Patterson ( ) Kunle Tosin Idris ( )
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration Of Scope Of Work, Contractor, And Augmentation Of Contract Allocation For The At-Store Recycling.
Initiative 1100: Summary & Impact 1 Rick Garza Deputy Administrative Director.
Middle Management Scott Pattison Executive Director NASBO April 15, 2015.
1 Covered Electronic Waste Recycling System Update ESJPA Meeting May 17, 2007 Jeff Hunts / Matt McCarron
State Fiscal Outlook NAMM Washington, DC May 11, 2010 Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies National Association of State Budget Officers 444.
California’s Electronic Waste Recycling Program SB 20/50: An Update on the CEW Collection & Recycling System Implementation CIWMB E-waste Group
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Discussion of the Continuing Implementation of the Covered Electronic Waste Recycling Program CIWMB Board.
1 CIWMB Board Briefing California’s Electronic Waste Recycling Program January 2007 Agenda Item 15 CIWMB Electronic Waste Recycling Program
1 An Implementation Update Status of the Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003 September 13, 2005 CIWMB Electronic Waste Recycling Program
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 E-Waste Recycling Program Program Update and Analysis of Net Cost Report Data July 17, 2007 Electronic Waste.
1/9/2004CIWMB - SB 20 Implementation - Payment System Workshop1 Proposed Phase 1 System for Covered Electronic Devices (CEDs) Authorized Recycler Waste.
FY12 BUDGET PRESENTATION January 25, Key Revenue Assumptions  Property Tax Change per 2 1/2  State Aid is level funded  Estimated Receipts.
FY2015 Supplemental Operating Budget FY2015 Operating Budget Board of Trustees Meeting – June 27,
Californians Against Waste. What works for California? Fee-based producer responsibility California policy makers prefer fee-based producer responsibility.
MHSA Revised Fiscal Policies California Department of Mental Health Carol Hood January 17, 2008.
Commission Meeting November 18, 2015 WSSC Customer Use and Pricing.
Texas Impact Advocacy Camp Revenue Background January 13, 2009 Dick Lavine
California Integrated Waste Management Board Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding Between the California Integrated Waste Management Board and.
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 250, Sacramento, CA fax presented to Fort Ord Reuse Authority.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 CIWMB Board Meeting - Item 10 (Presented at the Strategic Policy Development Committee) Discussion of Possible.
California Integrated Waste Management Board California Integrated Waste Management Board Update on SB 20.
1. FY Proposed Budget Jamie Justice, Town Manager & Piet Swart, Finance Director April 26, 2016 Fiscal Year Proposed Budget 2.
Fiscal Year 2015/16 Proposed Budget - Recap City of Barstow June 15, 2015 Barstow City Council The crossroads of opportunity… where the best is yet to.
Presented By: Budget & Research Department Karen Rhodes-Whitley FY STATUS REPORT & THREE-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST SUMMARY FISCAL YEARS
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Cedar Sinai Park FY 2015 Financial Report and FY2016 Budget Report Sandra C. Simon, Chief Operating Officer Bobbie J. Jenkins, Chief Financial Officer.
State of the States Brian Sigritz Director of State Fiscal Studies NASBO NASACT Middle Management April 12, 2016.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Lina Williams Budget & Financial Analyst Tuesday, June 7 th 2016.
City of Rosenberg DEBT SERVICE FISCAL YEAR 2016 BUDGET JULY 28,
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
FY 2016 Budget Workshop June 11, 2015 Brian Maxwell, City Manager Dan Buckley, Deputy City Manager Mike Loftin, Finance Director 1.
Public Hearing: Fiscal Year 2017 Recommended Operating Budget City Council Meeting, May 9, 2016 Item 7.
Overview and Discussion Proposed Budget Fiscal Year-End June 30, 2016.
City of Sequim Long Range Financial Plan City Council Study Session June 27, 2011.
FY 2012 General Fund 5-Year Forecast Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners Multnomah County Budget Office November 9, 2010.
Lincoln Finance Committee
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Finance & Investment Committee June 2016 and 4th Quarter Results
CLATSOP COUNTY 4th QUARTER REPORT
Washington Metropolitan Area GFOA
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Board of Trustees March 16, 2011
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Agenda FYE June 30, 2020 Operating Budget
Commonwealth of Virginia
Presentation transcript:

California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 CIWMB Board Meeting - Item 12 (Presented at the Strategic Policy Development Committee) Consideration Of Adjustments To The Electronic Waste Recycling Fee To Maintain The Solvency Of The Electronic Waste Recovery And Recycling Account June 17,

California Integrated Waste Management Board 2 This item will cover: Recap of program statistics to date Analysis of fund condition & financing models Overview of future uncertainties Staff recommendation Q & A

California Integrated Waste Management Board 3 Electronic Waste Recycling Act System to pay for the recovery and recycling of covered electronic waste (CEW) – Only CEW from CA sources are eligible – Must be recycled (cancelled) in CA – CIWMB sets payment rates to cover average net costs System is funded through a fee paid by consumers of new covered electronic devices (CED) – DTSC determines what constitutes a CED – CIWMB determines fee structure to maintain solvency

California Integrated Waste Management Board 4 CEW Payment System

California Integrated Waste Management Board 5 Revenue, Payments & Volumes FY 2004/05 - $31 million –$11.4 million claimed (~24 million lbs) FY 2005/06 - $78 million –$45.9 million claimed (~95 million lbs) FY 2006/07 - ~$78 million – ~$75 million claimed (>150 million lbs) FY 2007/08 - ~$83 million projected* – ~$105 million projected (>210 million lbs)*

California Integrated Waste Management Board 6 (Note that 2 nd quarter 2008 quantities represent only a portion of anticipated claims. Recyclers may submit a claim up to 45 days after the end of a reporting month.)

California Integrated Waste Management Board 7 Financial Considerations Fund Condition: –At current rates, EWRRA depletion in FY 08/09 –CIWMB has authority to make adjustments Revenue Source: –Current $6, $8, or $10 fee on retail CED sales Cost Demands: –CIWMB, DTSC, BOE operations –Recovery and Recycling Payments $.48/lb  $.43/lb  $.39/lb

California Integrated Waste Management Board 8 Revenue Considerations CIWMB has obligation to adjust fee to ensure fund solvency –Statute provides adjustment direction –CIWMB must act on or before August 1 st –New fees take effect on January 1 st Degree and structure of adjustment is dependent on need and trends –Program growth, payment rate affect need –Evolving mix of CED, total units sold

California Integrated Waste Management Board 9 Revenue Considerations Historical total CED sales: –2005 – 9.9 million units –2006 – 10.6 million units –2007 – 10.1 million units Allocation of CED sales in size categories: –2005 – 23%72%4% –2006 – 24%67%8% –2007 – 25% 64%11%

California Integrated Waste Management Board 10 Model Assumptions Loan dependent on CEW volumes –Repaid by late 2010 Target average revenue per CED sold –Current average revenue is ~$7.64 per CED CED sales volume and size distribution –Assume approx. constant at 2007 levels Aiming to remain solvent for two-plus FYs

California Integrated Waste Management Board 11 Model 1: Assumes no program growth (volume flat at ~50 M pounds per quarter) $6.6 M loan to EWRRA Target $10.00 average revenue per CED sold Possible fee structures to achieve average per device revenue of $10.00: $6 / $10 / $20 $6 / $9 / $26 $7 / $9 / $24 Fiscal YearRevenues Retailer Admin Fee Pounds Recycled Recycling Payments All Other Expenditures Loan Payments Yr End Balance** FY 2008/09* $ 105,378 $ (2,758) 200,000 $ (80,000) $ (17,664) $ (1,700) $ 3,257 FY 2009/10 $ 104,550 $ (3,137) 200,000 $ (78,000) $ (17,664) $ (5,099) $ 3,907 FY 2010/11 $ 104,550 $ (3,137) 200,000 $ (78,000) $ (17,664) $ 9,657 *Revenue in the 2008/2009 fiscal year includes loan amount. ** Includes a 3% prudent reserve provided for by the Act

California Integrated Waste Management Board 12 Model 2: Assumes moderate program growth of ~2 million pounds per quarter $11.5 M loan to EWRRA Target $12.25 average revenue per CED sold Possible fee structures to achieve average per device revenue of $12.25: $6 / $13 / $22 $6 / $12 / $28 $7 / $12 / $26 Fiscal YearRevenues Retailer Admin Fee Pounds Recycled Recycling Payments All Other Expenditures Loan Payments Yr End Balance** FY 2008/09* $ 121,771 $ (3,102) 220,000 $ (87,880) $ (17,664) $ (2,969) $ 10,155 FY 2009/10 $ 128,074 $ (3,842) 252,000 $ (98,280) $ (17,664) $ (8,908) $ 9,535 FY 2010/11 $ 128,074 $ (3,842) 284,000 $ (110,760) $ (17,664) $ 5,342 *Revenue in the 2008/2009 fiscal year includes loan amount. ** Includes a 3% prudent reserve provided for by the Act

California Integrated Waste Management Board 13 Model 3: Assumes historical program growth of ~4 million pounds per quarter $15.6 M loan to EWRRA Target $15.00 average revenue per CED sold Possible fee structures to achieve average per device revenue of $15.00: $6 / $16 / $30 $7 / $16 / $27 $8 / $16 / $25 $8 / $15 / $31 Fiscal YearRevenues Retailer Admin Fee Pounds Recycled Recycling Payments All Other Expenditures Loan Payments Yr End Balance** FY 2008/09* $ 139,952 $ (3,524) 240,000 $ (99,854) $ (17,664) $ (4,041) $ 14,870 FY 2009/10 $ 156,825 $ (4,705) 304,000 $ (118,560) $ (17,664) $ (12,123) $ 18,643 FY 2010/11 $ 156,825 $ (4,705) 368,000 $ (143,520) $ (17,664) $ 9,579 *Revenue in the 2008/2009 fiscal year includes loan amount. ** Includes a 3% prudent reserve provided for by the Act

California Integrated Waste Management Board 14 Staff Recommendation Set new fee structure at $8 / $16 / $25 – Provides for better economic equity across CED categories than current fee – Keeps lowest rate low and highest rate below $30 – Moderate fee on CED category with largest sales volume, stabilizing revenue and reducing risk of volatility

California Integrated Waste Management Board 15 Future Uncertainties Impacts of DTV Broadcasting Transition – Consumer Electronics Association estimates DTV transition will result in 15 million TV discards thru 2010 – Only 48% of OTA households surveyed plan to get converter box and use existing TV – Direct replacement only one source of CEW; obsoletes in storage will emerge

California Integrated Waste Management Board 16 Future Uncertainties Continuing Growth of CEW Volumes? –Growth flattened in 3 rd, 4 th quarters 2007 and 1 st quarter 2008 –Pace has stalled before, only to pick up Large volumes of CEW still to recover –More CEDs sold than CEW recovered –Collection infrastructure robust, growing

California Integrated Waste Management Board 17 Summary Several key factors to consider –Looming fund depletion –Program growth: may be slowing? –Future discard rate unclear; huge volumes in use –DTV impacts not yet fully felt CIWMB has authority to make adjustments Fee adjustment must ensure EWRRA solvency Structure of adjustments can provide equity and stability Ability to adjust annually allows flexibility and prudence Staff recommends adjusting fee to $8 / $16 / $25