Chapter 4 Validity Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 6 Process and Procedures of Testing
Advertisements

Measurement Concepts Operational Definition: is the definition of a variable in terms of the actual procedures used by the researcher to measure and/or.
 Degree to which inferences made using data are justified or supported by evidence  Some types of validity ◦ Criterion-related ◦ Content ◦ Construct.
Cal State Northridge Psy 427 Andrew Ainsworth PhD
The Research Consumer Evaluates Measurement Reliability and Validity
Chapter 5 Reliability Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006.
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Validity and Reliability Chapter Eight.
VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 Validity.
Chapter 4A Validity and Test Development. Basic Concepts of Validity Validity must be built into the test from the outset rather than being limited to.
Reliability and Validity of Research Instruments
Chapter 4 Validity.
Test Validity: What it is, and why we care.
VALIDITY.
Reliability and Validity
Lecture 7 Psyc 300A. Measurement Operational definitions should accurately reflect underlying variables and constructs When scores are influenced by other.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
Chapter 14 Assessment of Development Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition.
Validity of Selection. Objectives Define Validity Relation between Reliability and Validity Types of Validity Strategies.
Chapter 7 Evaluating What a Test Really Measures
Understanding Validity for Teachers
Presented to: Dr. Ava Clare Marie O. Robles Class Schedule: TFr /1:00-2:30 pm Presented by: Ierine Joy L. Caserial Republic of the Philippines MINDANAO.
Measurement Concepts & Interpretation. Scores on tests can be interpreted: By comparing a client to a peer in the norm group to determine how different.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Ch 6 Validity of Instrument
Instrumentation.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 14 Measurement and Data Quality.
McMillan Educational Research: Fundamentals for the Consumer, 6e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Educational Research: Fundamentals.
Principles of Test Construction
Chapter 3 Understanding Test Scores Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition.
Chapter 9 Aptitude Testing
Validity. Face Validity  The extent to which items on a test appear to be meaningful and relevant to the construct being measured.
Chapter Five Measurement Concepts. Terms Reliability True Score Measurement Error.
Reliability & Validity
Validity Is the Test Appropriate, Useful, and Meaningful?
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4:Reliability and Validity.
Chapter 2 Statistical Concepts Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright.
Measurement Validity.
Chapter 8 Validity and Reliability. Validity How well can you defend the measure? –Face V –Content V –Criterion-related V –Construct V.
Chapter 1 Historical and Philosophical Foundations of Assessment
Concurrent Validity Pages By: Davida R. Molina October 23, 2006.
Session 4 Reliability and Validity. Validity What does the instrument measure and How well does it measure what it is supposed to measure? Is there enough.
Validity Validity: A generic term used to define the degree to which the test measures what it claims to measure.
Presented By Dr / Said Said Elshama  Distinguish between validity and reliability.  Describe different evidences of validity.  Describe methods of.
Research Methodology and Methods of Social Inquiry Nov 8, 2011 Assessing Measurement Reliability & Validity.
Validity Test Validity: What it is, and why we care.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 17 Assessing Measurement Quality in Quantitative Studies.
Validity Validity is an overall evaluation that supports the intended interpretations, use, in consequences of the obtained scores. (McMillan 17)
Validity and Item Analysis Chapter 4. Validity Concerns what the instrument measures and how well it does that task Not something an instrument has or.
Validity and Item Analysis Chapter 4.  Concerns what instrument measures and how well it does so  Not something instrument “has” or “does not have”
Chapter 6 - Standardized Measurement and Assessment
Figure A--1 Thomas L. Floyd Digital Fundamentals, 8e Copyright ©2003 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 11 Measurement and Data Quality.
Criminal Justice and Criminology Research Methods, Second Edition Kraska / Neuman © 2012 by Pearson Higher Education, Inc Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Ch. 5 Measurement Concepts.
Chapter 18 Assessment Issues in Education
Chapter 2 Personality Research Methods
Concept of Test Validity
Construct Validity and Methods for Studying Personality
Tests and Measurements: Reliability
Journalism 614: Reliability and Validity
Week 3 Class Discussion.
پرسشنامه کارگاه.
PSY 614 Instructor: Emily Bullock Yowell, Ph.D.
Construct Validity and Methods for Studying Personality
Cal State Northridge Psy 427 Andrew Ainsworth PhD
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 4 Validity Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Validity The extent to which the test measures what it's supposed to measure  Content Validity  Face Validity  Criterion-Related Validity  Construct Validity Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Content Validity  The items on a test are representative of some defined universe or content domain.  Usually decided by expert judges who evaluate the test’s content to determine if there is a relationship between the test and the content domain. Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Face Validity  Does the test appear superficially to measure what it's supposed to measure? Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Criterion-Related Validity  Are test scores related to one or more external variables (criteria)? Two types:  Concurrent validity: the test score and criterion information are obtained at the same time (e.g., Beck Depression Inventory score predicting a current diagnosis of depression)  Predictive validity: the test is used to estimate criterion scores in the future (e.g., SAT predicting future college success) Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Validity coefficient: indicates the correlation between the test and its criterion score.  A coefficient of 1.00 indicates a perfect positive correlation  The higher the correlation, the better the validity  0 to +0.3 = little or no correlation  +0.3 to +0.7 = moderate positive correlation  +0.7 to +1.0 = strong positive correlation Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

What do these correlations mean? Concurrent Validity:  Correlation between the score on an exam and test anxiety is.73. Predictive Validity:  Correlation between the GRE and success in an Educational Research master’s program is.90.  Correlation between the GRE and success in Counselor Education is.65.  Correlation between the GRE and success in a graduate degree in Drama is.35. Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Construct Validity  What do test scores mean or signify?  What does the score tell us about the individual?  Does the test score correspond with some meaningful trait or construct that will help us understand the person? Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Construct: Defined  Used to describe the grouping of variables or behaviors that make up observed behavior patterns (e.g., intelligence, anxiety, motivation, self-concept)  The construct itself is not measurable; only the behaviors or variables that make up the construct can be measured  Examples: What behaviors make up self-concept? What behaviors or variables make up depression? Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Methods Used in Gathering Construct-Related Evidence  Correlations with other tests  Convergent and discriminant validation  Factor analysis Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Convergent and Discriminant Validity Convergent and discriminant validity are both considered subcategories or subtypes of construct validity. Convergent and discriminant validity are both considered subcategories or subtypes of construct validity.  Convergent validity: correlates highly with other measures designed to assess the same construct.  Discriminant validity: should not correlate with other constructs.  The important thing to recognize is that they work together—if you can demonstrate that you have evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity, then you have, by definition, demonstrated that you have evidence for construct validity.  The important thing to recognize is that they work together—if you can demonstrate that you have evidence for both convergent and discriminant validity, then you have, by definition, demonstrated that you have evidence for construct validity. Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Example of Convergent Validity r 1,1 = 1.00 r 1,2 =.83 r 1,3 =.89 r 1,4 =.91 Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.

Example of Discriminant Validity r 1,2 =.06 Robert J. Drummond and Karyn Dayle Jones Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 6 th edition Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved.