Peter A SimmonsA Cindy Carlisle-WilcoxA Perry S BinderB

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GUSTAVO TAMAYO MD CLAUDIA CASTELL MD
Advertisements

Evaluation of Enhancement Rates following Hyperopic LASIK with Femtosecond versus Microkeratome Assisted Flap Creation Raj Rajpara, BS * Richard M. Awdeh,
World Cornea Congress VII Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Versus Cyclosporine 0.05% for Dry-Eye Syndrome After Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Prospective Randomized.
Incidence of Blepharitis in Patients Undergoing Phacoemulsification Jodi Luchs, MD Carlos Buznego, MD William Trattler, MD The authors of this poster have.
InFUSE ™ Bone Graft / LT-CAGE ™ Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device IDE Clinical Results G Hallett H. Mathews, M.D. Richmond, Virginia.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2009 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Boston: April 13, 2010.
W. B. Trattler; C. D. Reilly; D. F. Goldberg; P. A. Majmudar; J. A. Vukich; M. Packer; E. D. Donnenfeld.
Topography-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy for Irregular Astigmatism following Penetrating Keratoplasty Johnson Tan, MBBS MRCSEd (Ophth) FRCSEd (Ophth)
PRK Enhancement with Mitomycin - C after LASIK - a case series
Sze H. Wong Emil W. Chynn, MD, MBA Maximiliano Plana, MD Emily Ceisler, MD ASCRS, May 2013 San Francisco, CA LASEK /Epi-LASIK to treat amblyopes is not.
Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution 1.5% and Degree of Reduced Ocular Itching in a Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Test JI Williams 1, G Torkildsen.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2006 ISRS/AAO Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD ** David Leaming, MD ISRS / AAO Meeting Las Vegas- November 11, 2006 **
Effects of Xalatan® (latanoprost) or Travatan® (travoprost) on Ocular Surface Signs and Symptoms in Ocular Hypertensive or Glaucoma Patients. M.B. McDonald1,
U.S. Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2012 ISRS Survey - Partner of AAO - Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Refractive Subspecialty Day Chicago: November.
Ocular Comfort Assessment of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution 1.5% in Multicenter Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Clinical Trial JA Gow 1, TT Macejko.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2007 ISRS/AAO Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD ** David Leaming, MD Refractive Subspecialty Day New Orleans - November.
Autologous serum eye drops in severe post-LASIK dry eye.
Integrated Trial Results of Bepotastine Besilate Ophthalmic Solution 1.5% on Eyelid Swelling in a Clinical Model of Allergic Conjunctivitis TR McNamara.
Femto-Lasik after corneal transplantation
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2007 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Chicago: April 8, 2008.
Comparison of Bromfenac vs. Ketorolac During the Induction Phase of Treatment with Topical Cyclosporine for Dry Eye Patients Barry A. Schechter, MD Florida.
Comparison of Wavefront and Corneal Aberration Changes after Advanced Corneal Surface Ablation and Femtosecond Thin Flap LASIK Tahra AlMahmoud, MBBS 1,
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: The 2009 ISRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Refractive Subspecialty Day San Francisco - October 24, 2009.
ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.
Evaluation of Systane® versus Placebo in Corneal Epithelial Healing Following Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) Lt Col Charles D. Reilly Major Vasudha.
The authors have no financial interest
Prospective Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus Scott X. Stevens, MD Bend Ophthalmology, LLC Author has no financial interest.
Topical Cyclosporine for Postoperative use in PRK and LASIK: Preliminary Results LCDR David D. Hessert, M.D. Ophthalmology Chief Resident Naval Medical.
Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Custom Flap Formation: Advantages of Elliptical Flaps for LASIK Patients Henry.
March 2011 Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami Elaine Wu, M.D. Ana Paula Canto, M.D. William Culbertson, M.D. Sonia Yoo, M.D. Financial disclosure:
Patient Satisfaction After LASIK: Analysis of Over 15,000 Patients Steve Schallhorn MD Consultant for AMO Medical Director Optical Express.
Refractive outcome after myopic LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser keratome Mark E Johnston, MD, FRCSC No.
Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.
LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue LADARVision4000 Vs VISX CustomVue CustomCornea CustomCornea A Comparison of Wavefront Guided Refractive Surgery outcomes.
M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.
Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease among Elderly Korean Population Sang Beom Han, MD, 1 Joon Young Hyon, MD, 1 Won Ryang Wee, MD, 2,3 Jin Hak Lee, MD, 1, 3.
Refractive Accuracy of LASIK Using the IntraLase and Zyoptix BACKGROUND Wavefront guided customized lasik procedures are designed to correct both lower.
Myoung Joon Kim, MD / Sara Yoon, MD Tracy Purcell, PhD / David J Schanzlin, MD L aser In Situ Keratomileusis versus Photorefractive Keratectomy for the.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2006 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD San Diego: April 28, 2007.
Correlation of Conjunctival and Corneal Staining With Elevated Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 on the Ocular Surface of Dry-Eye Patients Authors: Allister Gibbons,
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Intracorneal Ring Segment (Intacs SK) in Keratoconus Abdulrahman Al-Muammar, MD, FRCSC I have no financial interest.
Comparison of Patient Profiles: Wavefront-Guided LASIK Versus Conventional LASIK Michiho Suzuki-Judge, MD Inouye Eye Hospital Tokyo, Japan Michiho Suzuki-Judge,
10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:
Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,
Comparison of Efficacy of 0.05% Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion
Wavefront-guided Ablation Retreatment in Myopic Eyes Engy M Mohamed MD, Orkun Muftuoglu MD, R.Wayne Bowman MD, V. Vinod Mootha MD, H. Dwight Cavanagh MD,PhD,
Efficacy of Topical Azithromycin & Cyclosporine A(CsA) vs CsA Alone in the Treatment of Dry Eyes Associated with Blepharitis Kenneth A. Beckman, M.D.,
Augenabteilung am St. Franziskus Hospital Münster The Role of the Epithelial Flap in EPI-LASIK and LASEK Suphi Taneri Travel Grant from B&L ASCRS Symposium,
Refractive Outcomes with Advanced Wavefront-Guided LASIK William Trattler, MD Charles Reilly, MD Consultant to the USAF SG for Refractive Surgery Lackland.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2008 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD San Francisco: April 4, 2009.
Omni-Focal Treatment for Correction of Presbyopia in Hyperopes: 1 Year Results Efekan Coskunseven, Baha Toygar, Serife Atun, Haluk Talu, Ebru Arslan Dunya.
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2011 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Chicago: April 21, 2012.
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.
U.S. Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2011 ISRS Survey - Partner of AAO - Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Refractive Subspecialty Day Orlando: October.
THE EBK PROCEDURE FOR CORRECTION OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS
Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.
EVALUATION OF OCULAR SURFACE DISEASE IN PATIENTS AFTER TRABECULECTOMY: COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH AND WITHOUT INTRACAMERAL BEVACIZUMAB Sónia Parreira; Sandra.
CustomVue vs Conventional LASIK: one year study
A Comparison of Visual Acuity, Refractive Outcomes, and Satisfaction Between LASIK Performed with a Microkeratome and a Femto Laser Nauman hashmani (MBBS),
L. Espandar, MD ; M. D. Mifflin, MD; M. Moshirfar MD, FACS
A Randomised Cross Over Comparison of Trehalose/Hyaluronate Eye Drops and Standard Treatment: Patient Satisfaction in the Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome.
Jodi Luchs, MD Carlos Buznego, MD William Trattler, MD
No financial interest for all authors
A presentation to: Meeting name Date
V isual Outcomes and Complications of Mini-Enhancements after Refractive Surgery Lichtinger A, MD; Purcell TL, Ph.D; Bernabe-Ko J, MD; Schanzlin DJ, MD.
Dr Haralabos Eleftheriadis, M.D Ultralase Clinic Bristol UK
Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt
PERRY S. BINDER, MS MD* San Diego, California
University of California, San Diego Shiley Eye Center
Safety and Efficacy of Mapracorat Ophthalmic Suspension in the Treatment of Inflammation Following Cataract Surgery: Adaptive Design Study Timothy L.
Presentation transcript:

Safety, Efficacy, and Acceptability of Optive™ Sensitive for Dry-Eye Treatment After LASIK Surgery Peter A SimmonsA Cindy Carlisle-WilcoxA Perry S BinderB ADr. Simmons and Ms. Carlisle-Wilcox are employees of Allergan, Inc. BDr. Binder has served as a consultant for Allergan, Inc., and AMO, Inc. ASCRS 2009

Background As many as 50% of LASIK surgery patients may suffer from post-LASIK dry eye Dry eye symptoms decrease patient satisfaction with the outcome of LASIK surgery A dry ocular surface affects UCVA, BCVA and refractive errors Artificial tears for dry eye symptoms are an integral part of post-LASIK standard of care Initial use of non-preserved unit-dose artificial tears is recommended, followed by transition to a multi-dose tear, typically at 1-8 weeks post-op Recommended dosing frequency with tears typically decreases during the post-op period ASCRS 2009

Purpose Refresh Plus® is a standard non-preserved tear used in post-LASIK care Optive Sensitive is a new non-preserved tear, containing additional beneficial ingredients Research questions: Is Optive Sensitive safe and effective for use in post-LASIK patients? How does the performance of Optive Sensitive compare with Refresh Plus? ASCRS 2009

Methods Multi-center, double-masked, parallel-group prospective trial. Subjects were myopic LASIK patients without pre-existing dry eye All procedures were performed using wavefront-guided surgery with the VISX S4 excimer laser and iris registration. Eyes with >0.3 µm HOA RMS prior to surgery were excluded. Flaps were created with the IntraLase femtosecond laser in 93% of the eyes and in 7% of the eyes with a mechanical microkeratome. Following uncomplicated bilateral surgergy, subjects were randomized to use either non-preserved OPTIVE™ Sensitive or Refresh Plus® (both Allergan) in both eyes. Standard postoperative antibiotics and steroids were used as per the investigator site and were discontinued by postoperative day 7. Subjects were followed for 90 days post-op Artificial tear dosing was: Day 1 every hour while awake, Days 2-14 every 2 hours while awake, Days 14-90, surgeon option to decrease dosing in steps down to 1-2 per day. Neither the surgeon nor the patient knew which tear they were using. ASCRS 2009

Study variables Corneal topography primarily on the Humphrey Atlas or Oculus Pentacam Wavefront aberrometry (VISX Wavescan) BCVA, UCVA, manifest refraction Dry eye variables: Schirmer test (w/ anesthesia), corneal staining (unpreserved fluorescein), conjunctival staining (lissamine green), and tear break-up time Subjective variables: Ocular Surface Disease Index© (OSDI) (primary variable), Subjective Evaluation of Symptoms of Dryness (SESoD), Dryness Comfort Level Visual Analog Scale (Dryness VAS), patient acceptability questionnaire Safety variables: biomicroscopy, adverse events ASCRS 2009

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) The OSDI, which was the primary variable in this study, is a 12-item patient-reported outcomes questionnaire designed to provide a quick assessment of dry eye symptoms, related visual functions and environmental triggers OSDI questions are scored on a 0 to 4 frequency scale (0 = None of the time, 1 = Some of the time, 2 = Half of the time, 3 = Most of the time, 4 = All of the time, and N/A) OSDI scores are calculated using this formula: OSDI = Sum of Scores for All Questions Answered x 100 Total Number of Questions Answered x 4 Scores range from 0 to 100 (0 = no disability, 100 = complete disability) ASCRS 2009

Patient Demographics OPTIVE™ Sensitive Refresh Plus® Number of patients 114 randomized, 111 complete 114 randomized, 109 complete Average Age 34.5 years 33.8 years Gender 52 male, 62 female 63 male, 51 female Ethnicity 85.1% Caucasian 78.1% Caucasian Pre-op Spherical Equivalent -4.196 -4.068 Post-op Spherical Equivalent -0.263 -0.057 Pre-op UCVA 20/261 20/244 Post-op UCVA 20/19 20/18 ASCRS 2009

Similar OSDI Scores in Patients Treated with OPTIVE™ Sensitive or Refresh Plus® Optive Sensitive (N = 114) Refresh Plus (N = 114) Primary endpoint of non-inferiority was met at day 90 OSDI Scores Screeninga c Days After LASIK The between-group difference in the OSDI scores at day 2 was likely due to the relatively higher viscosity of OPTIVE ™ Sensitive combined with a QH dose a1-36 days prior to surgery. ASCRS 2009

Corneal Staining Scores Significantly Lower Corneal Fluorescein Staining with OPTIVE™ Sensitive at Day 14 Refresh Plus Optive Sensitive P = 0.039 Corneal Staining Scores Number of patients included in this analysis at each study visit was as follow: Screening: N = 113 for Optive Sensitive and N = 113 for Refresh Plus. Day 2: N = 112 for Optive Sensitive and N = 112 for Refresh Plus. Day 14: N = 110 for Optive Sensitive and N = 110 for Refresh Plus. Day 30: N = 110 for Optive Sensitive and N = 110 for Refresh Plus. Day 60: N = 109 for Optive Sensitive and N = 106 for Refresh Plus. Day 90: N = 111 for Optive Sensitive and N = 109 for Refresh Plus. Screeninga Days after LASIK a 1-36 days prior to surgery. ASCRS 2009

Tear Dosing Assignment and Use More OPTIVE ™ Sensitive subjects were assigned to 1-2 drops per day dosing earlier in the study OPTIVE™ Sensitive subjects reported less drop usage than Refresh Plus® subjects ASCRS 2009

CONCLUSIONS In this group of patients without prior dry-eye history, LASIK-induced dry eye symptoms and findings peak by day 14 and decreased to baseline by month 3 following surgery with the IntraLase femtosecond laser and VISX wavefront-guided excimer laser ablation OPTIVE™ Sensitive was safe and effective for the management of dry eye signs and symptoms following LASIK surgery OPTIVE™ Sensitive demonstrated incremental benefits over standard tear management, including significantly less corneal staining at Day 14 Both treatment groups demonstrated a return to baseline in dry eye signs and symptoms by day 90 Overall, patients in the OPTIVE™ Sensitive group showed a faster trend in the reduction of dose and higher subjective agreement at day 90 that, “I no longer need to use artificial tears” The differential staining at 2 weeks post-LASIK suggests artificial tear formula influences status of (at least) corneal epithelium and supports continued unit-dose use during this “vulnerable” period Additional analysis of wavefront aberrometry and topography results is ongoing ASCRS 2009

Clinical Investigators The following served as surgeons and clinical investigators on this study. The authors wish to thank them for their participation. Perry S. Binder, MD David A. Kinsler, MD Thomas E. Clinch, MD Colman R. Kraff, MD Elizabeth A. Davis, MD Robert K. Maloney, MD Steven J. Dell, MD William Trattler, MD Richard Grutzmacher, MD J. Trevor Woodhams, MD ASCRS 2009