Chapter 9 Federal Water Agencies

Chapter Headings U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services National Park Service Bureau of Land Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Forest Service Federal Energy Regulatory Commission National Marine Fisheries Service Federal Emergency Management Agency

Chapter Headings U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services National Park Service Bureau of Land Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Forest Service Federal Energy Regulatory Commission National Marine Fisheries Service Federal Emergency Management Agency

US Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Founded in 1794 Early history in removing snags and building levees on the Mississippi –Average lifespan of a steamboat in 1800’s was less than 2 years Great Mississippi River Flood of 1927 stimulated federal role in flood control –Peak discharge of 2.5 million cfs –200 people killed and 600,000 left homeless –Flood Control Acts of 1928 and 1936 –1936 law required cost-benefit analysis

Mississippi Flood

Mississippi Flood 1927

U.S. Army COE: Dams Until 1930’s primary activity was flood control and navigation in Eastern States –Most navigable rivers are in the East –230 locks Federal government began large western dam-building program during Great Depression –Hoover Dam completed in 1935 –Part of purpose was to provide employment

U.S. Army COE: Dams COE began to compete with Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) for western dam projects –Primary purpose was irrigation –Flood control and navigation was secondary Example is Garrison Dam on the Missouri River in North Dakota –USBR had determined that it was uneconomical –Dam would inundate Fort Berthold Indian Reservation land –COE redid cost-benefit analysis and lobbied Congress to approve project –Approved in 1944 for construction by COE

U.S. Army COE: Wetlands Early federal laws encouraged draining of swamps for navigation and disease control –Swamp Lands Act of 1850 and 1860 Clean Water Act Amendments 1972 provided protection of wetlands (swamps) –Section 404 required COE approval of any development that would alter or destroy a wetland

Chapter Headings U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services National Park Service Bureau of Land Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Forest Service Federal Energy Regulatory Commission National Marine Fisheries Service Federal Emergency Management Agency

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation John Wesley Powell ( ) –Promoted federal role in irrigation projects Founded by Reclamation Act of 1902 –Purpose to provide water to promote settlement of arid western states –Irrigation water initially limited to farms < 160 acres –Construction costs to be repaid by farmers –Local irrigation districts set up to control finances Early success in making small projects pay Later large projects catered to corporate farms and special interests –Acre limits were ignored and local districts did not collect finances –Hoover Dam in 1935 and Grand Coulee Dam in 1941

First to explore the Grand Canyon Cautioned that allowing inter-basin transfers of water would leave some basins without water Thought state lines should be drawn along watershed divides to avoid water disputes US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR)

USBR 1960’s to 1970’s heyday of dam building –USBR (and COE) allied with strong Congressional committee leaders and agricultural/corporate special interest groups –Obtained federal funding for western irrigation projects with questionable cost-benefit analysis –Often in direct conflict with Presidents’ wishes

USBR Anti-dam era began in 1970’s –Ralph Nader’s Damming the West critical of USBR –Teton Dam failure in eastern Idaho in 1976 President Jimmy Carter recommend eliminating funding for 18 USBR dam projects Endangered Species Act passed in 1973 –Snail darter vs. Tellico dam in New mission to manage existing water projects and promote conservation

Chapter Headings U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services National Park Service Bureau of Land Management U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Resources Conservation Service U.S. Forest Service Federal Energy Regulatory Commission National Marine Fisheries Service Federal Emergency Management Agency

U.S. EPA Water Quality Act of 1965 –Created first water quality standards –Limited success U.S. EPA created in 1970 –Legislative authority to impose fines and jail sentences for violation of environmental laws Filed suit against Detroit, Cleveland, and Atlanta shortly after being created

U.S. EPA Clean Water Act Amendments of 1972 –Goal of making all waters “fishable and swimable” by 1983 –Strengthened federal water quality standards –Established permit system for point sources (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, NPDES) –Over $20 billion spent on municipal sewage plants –Section 404 protected wetlands –TMDL program

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam Conflict described in Marc Reisner’s Cadillac Dessert and Chapter 12 of textbook

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam Jimmy Carter’s first experience with dams was as Governor in Georgia –Carter had a degree in engineering from U.S. Naval Academy Dam was proposed on Flint River at Sprewell Bluff by COE –Now a state park Carter read COE plan –Wrote blistering 18-page letter to COE accusing it of “computational manipulation” Vetoed plans for the dam

Shortly after election as President in 1976 Carter reviewed federal program to manage water resources –19 new water projects were proposed by USBR and COE Concluded “There is no coherent water resources management policy” Later Carter vetoed a bill to fund the projects Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam

Tennessee Valley Authority Created during the Great Depression by President Franklin Roosevelt –“A corporation clothed with the power of government but possessed of the flexibility and initiative of a private enterprise” First attempt at “watershed approach” to planning Goal was to aid development in poor rural areas by providing cheap electricity, fertilizers, etc. Did this by developing hydroelectric dams

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam TVA started out with a good approach but then outgrew it’s mission –in Reisner’s view By 1970’s much of the electric power was being generated by coal-powered plants –Strip mining coal was destroying the land –Much of the area was still poverty-stricken –Coal-powered plants were contributing to acid rain problems in the northeast

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam Tellico Dam had been proposed by TVA in 1960s Dam would not produce hydropower –Would raise the level in the Little Tennessee River so that extra water could be run through a canal to an existing hydroelectric dam –Would produce relatively insignificant additional power –No flood control benefit –Little recreational benefit (many other reservoirs in surrounding area) Approved for construction in 1969

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam Endangered Species Act passed in 1973 In 1973, professor of zoology from University of Tennessee discovered snail darter in Little Tennessee River 1975 USFW classified snail darter as an endangered species Court ordered dam construction halted Decision upheld by Supreme Court in 1978

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam Congress began considering amendments to ESA that would allow construction of Tellico Dam –Passed a law that set up a Cabinet-level committee that would resolve any case where ESA stopped construction of a dam –Composed of Secretaries of Interior, Agriculture, Army, EPA and others –Called the “God Squad”

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam In 1978 God Squad reviewed case Unanimously decided against dam construction –Based decision on economics, not environmental impact –Cost-benefit analysis was faulty and did not justify construction

Snail Darter vs. Tellico Dam June 1979 Congress approved a little-noticed amendment to House appropriations bill –Exempted Tellico Dam from ESA Congress approved appropriations bill Carter could veto bill –Needed Congressional support for treaty that would return Panama Canal to Panama –Couldn’t afford to alienate key congressmen Tellico Dam was completed in USFW downgraded snail darter from endangered to threatened

Chapter Summary Principal federal agencies dealing with water resources are –Army Corps of Engineers –Bureau of Reclamation –Environmental Protection Agency Historical trend has been toward greater federal involvement Water resources development in the west has tended to benefit special interest groups Recent focus is on environment and conservation