S CHOOL B OARD W ORK S ESSION S EPTEMBER 21, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Advertisements

Collaborative Leadership: One Districts Story David Hehl, Executive Director of Student Services Teresa Polson, District Coordinator Erica Ekstrom, District.
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
FY16 Budget Discussion 11/03/14
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Compassion. Action. Change. Recommendations for County PEI Funded Activities in Phase II as of June 2015 CalMHSA Board of Directors Meeting June 11, 2015.
1 Knowledge Objectives 1.Define the term strategic management and explain components of strategy formulation and implementation 2.Understand synergy and.
© American Bar Association Effective Strategic Planning Henry F. White, Jr. Executive Director & Chief Operating Officer American Bar Association 10 th.
Redesigning English-Medium Classrooms: Using Research to Enhance English Learner Achievement David Dolson & Lauri Burnham-Massey Presented by Terry Barron,
2013 SFPMA ® South Florida Property Management Association
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Early Childhood Trends and Issues Prepared for the April 20, 2013 GAYC Board Meeting.
1 Presenter: Angela Ward Intro. to Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Student –Focused Dialogue.
Feasibility Study.
Education Policy in Pennsylvania Governance & Leadership.
Campus Plan East & Winter Park Mission Statement East Campus values innovation, creativity and achievement. This Campus Plan provides the initial.
Hortonville Area School District Middle Level Charter School The Hortonville Area School District, in partnership with our community, will provide ALL.
Academic Distress Commissions July 14, Outline Introduction to Academic Distress Commissions (ADCs) Integration of Commissions into Statewide System.
Budget Scenarios.  Your district has recognized a need in the community for an additional Landowner Workshop/AG BMP Tour that cannot go unanswered. The.
Ted Price, Ph.D. West Virginia University Workshop Facilitator September 16, 2010.
Building our Future: Programme Board TOR PURPOSE To be the governing forum for the design & effective delivery of the Building our Future Programme To.
1 Created by Angela Ward Intro. to Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Student –Focused Dialogue.
The School Board of The Future Boards of Education in 2025 NSBA Federation of Trainers and Conference Planners Annual Conference June 25, 2015.
MPS Memorandum of Agreement Renewal with Metropolitan Urban Indian Directors MUID Presentation December 13, 2011.
Achieving Cultural Proficiency – A Leadership Perspective Friday, October 2, 2015 Presenters: Dr. James P. Lee, Superintendent Dr. Drew Davis, Director.
You can replace this text with art Goal Setting Process for the Verona Public Schools Board of Education Facilitated by: Charlene Peterson, NJSBA Field.
District Strategic Technology Committee. Purposes Submit technology bridge plan to MDE by June 30 (original) Evaluate current resources of the district,
Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.
Reviewer Training Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs.
PARENTS ARE OUR PARTNERS Jamilah Fraser Chief of Communications The School District of Philadelphia July 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
EMID Magnet Schools Every Child, Every Day September 21, 2011.
Native Education Work Group Report to the Shelton School District Board of Directors February 28, 2012.
Planning Definitions 9/25/2015. Components of a Strategic Plan Hinton, K.E. (2012). A Practical Guide to Strategic Planning in Higher Education. Society.
Tribal Meeting Strategic Planning Presentation December 5, 2015
March 8, NEWG History and Purpose Started in with a focus on “helping kids walk” Developed a statement of purpose Reached consensus on shared.
Accreditation SCAVENGER HUNT.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
Leading Nottingham Programme update to ACOS 7 September 2010 Angela Probert Director of HR and Organisational Transformation Contributions from Lisa Sharples.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
Future Vision District Challenges. Consultation, Stewardship,& Transparency are essential components.
HRM-755 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF Session: SEVEN 1.
Walters Middle School Conversion STEAM Magnet Proposal
February 24, 2011 Board of Education Workshop
Updating the Education Act 1989 – Education (Update) Amendment Bill
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
SNA Strategic Plan #SNAleadership.
Civic Center Sports Field Study Session & Quarterly Update
Success For Each Child & Eliminate The Opportunity Gap
Native Education Work Group Report to the Shelton School District Board of Directors March 8, 2011.
Kyrene Community/Superintendent Council
Campus Improvement Plans
Kyrene Community/Superintendent Council
Roles and Responsibilities
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
Briefing House Education Educational Service Districts
“Read by Grade Three” Law
Roles and Responsibilities
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Native Education Work Group Report to the Shelton School District Board of Directors March 8, 2011.
Rationale Reforming & strengthening of SA’s water research landscape
School Leadership Team Conference
Presentation transcript:

S CHOOL B OARD W ORK S ESSION S EPTEMBER 21, 2011

INTRODUCTION Purpose: Describe what the superintendents were charged to do; Develop a frame work for a “White Paper” that outlines a recommendation concerning the future service and programs of EMID including the possible utilization of Harambee and Crosswinds. View EMID in its entirety and not fragmented, i.e. ramification to the whole with a change to any part of the system. This power point is the beginning of that “White Paper.”

FRAME WORK It is important for EMID to determine its priorities for inter-district cooperation, The options need to align with the priorities of EMID and its programs, The options need to consider the ramification for students, staff, and other programs, and Determine how better to utilize the limited resources available.

R EVIEW OF THE THREE (3) OPTIONS Option 1 : Strengthen Schools under current structure : EMID schools have the ability to transform into models of integration and high student achievement; however, it may require additional time and investment. Option 2 : Transfer governance of schools to different operator: The nature and environment of the schools seem to be highly valued, though direct student education is a small portion of EMID’s overall purpose and core competency. Therefore, perhaps EMID should refocus its efforts away from operating the schools. Option 3: Merge students back into home district schools : Similar to option 2, in terms of reprioritizing EMID’s focus. Belief that current EMID students could smoothly integrate back into home district schools

O PTION 1 S TRENGTHEN S CHOOLS UNDER CURRENT STRUCTURE : Concerns: The need for additional resources is unknown Only meeting the needs of 800 students out of 122,000 students Question as to whether the sites are aligned with the mission/vision of EMID Concerns if this would meet the needs of all member districts Concerns whether the original purpose of the magnet schools is still relevant The status quo can not continue

O PTION 2 T RANSFER GOVERNANCE OF SCHOOLS TO DIFFERENT OPERATOR : Concerns: Not sure if the board has the authority to consider an alternative management of the sites. However, for discussion purposes, the following are possible considerations: Charter Schools: Who would be the authorizer? EMID should not be in the “business” of authorizing charters Local districts assume operations: Questions if the 2 local districts (Roseville and South Washington) would be willing to assume operations for their own district purpose(s) Perpich Center for the Arts: A state issue which is well beyond the scope of the school board authority Intermediate District 916: Questions if those building can or would serve their purpose Ownership of the buildings: A yet unanswered question. Should the sites remain in the ownership of EMID for a purpose to be determined in the future

O PTION 3 M ERGE STUDENTS BACK INTO HOME DISTRICT SCHOOLS Concerns: Will students return to their home districts How will staff be addressed Can the original purpose of EMID, education in an integrated environment, be met in the home school Can the reasons why the choice was made to transfer students to the 2 sites be addressed in the home district How much revenue will be saved by member districts

R ECOMMENDATION OF THE EMID SUPERINTENDENTS At the conclusion of the school year discontinue using Harambee and Crosswinds as K-10 attendance sites. Rationale: The schools serve less then 1% of the total enrollment in the collaborative (880 of 122,000) The sites do not serve the total membership of EMID The resources allocated to the 2 sites can be repurposed so all members districts are served Unique needs of member districts can be addressed Of the 880 students attending 170 students are from non-member districts ( approximately 20%) Of the 880 students 616 are from 3 member districts Two member districts do not send any students

A DDITIONAL C ONSIDERATIONS Possible repurpose of resources: Early literacy/early childhood Magnets within member district sites Immersion Professional Development site Model schools for addressing the gap and multi cultural competency More extensive staff training Expanded shared services Leadership training A subcommittee be established to continue the strategic planning process that will address the future direction and purpose of EMID that a) reaffirms, or revise as needed, the vision/mission, b) strengths services to all member districts, and c) benefits all students within the collaborative.