Objectives and Criteria: What are they and how do we use them? Where do they come from? What are the “must-have” criteria? How are market and government.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Step 3: Strategy Development. Learning Objectives Define strategy/strategic approach Understand strategy development process Engage in informed dialogue.
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Transportation Faith Communities Elders/Seniors Government/Elected Officials Health Care Immigrant/Refugees Education Businesses Racial/Cultural Economic.
A Healthy Workplace Canadian HW Criteria & Implementation John Perry (
North Central Regional Center for Rural Development
Working Together for Healthier Communities: A Framework for Collaboration among Community Partnerships, Support Organizations, and Funders.
Cost benefit analysis: introduction and basics Applied Geoscience and Technology Division, SPC Paula Holland Manager, Natural Resources Governance.
Assessing Progress For Sustainable Development
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Value for Your Dollar: The Social Enterprise Impact Assessment Project.
Reducing Child Welfare Involvement: The Promise and Limitations of Early Intervention Deborah Daro.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
What should be the basis of
The ISO 9000 family of standards
TOOLS FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS Goals and Objectives.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Using An Organizational Assessment : A framework to Help Agencies Build on Strengths, Recognize Challenges, and Develop a Comprehensive Work Plan, CWDA.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Presentation to Inclusion Ireland Conference & AGM Pat Healy – National Director Social Care 10 th May, 2014.
Outcomes of Public Health
Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
The First Years Last Forever Building, Growing and Sustaining Partnerships Garrison Kurtz Director of Programs.
Your Strategic Plan Strategic Template.
Adult Care and Support Commissioning Strategies Sarah Mc Bride - Head of Commissioning, Performance and Improvement Ann Hughes – Acting Senior.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
Evaluating the Options Analyst’s job is to: gather the best evidence possible in the time allowed to compare the potential impacts of policies.
Shifting resources: disinvestment and re-investment Craig Mitton, PhD Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research.
Connecticut Department of Public Health Healthy Connecticut 2020 The CT State Health Improvement Planning Process Background,
Slide 1 A product of Turning Point The Turning Point Leadership Development National Excellence Collaborative Vision: Collaborative leadership is used.
Envisioning the Future of Minnesota Transportation Finance Advisory Committee April 20, 2012.
Evaluation framework: Promoting health through strengthening community action Lori Baugh Littlejohns & Neale Smith David Thompson Health Region, Red Deer,
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Goals and Indicators. Sustainable Measures Goals, Principles, Criteria, and Indicators  Goal – a description of future condition community members wish.
Brighter Futures Programme Cheryl Hopkins Independent Consultant.
UNICEF Child Friendly City Framework: a rights based local planning approach Dave Pugh CEO St Luke’s Anglicare.
Expectations What do you expect from: C&I Faculty? Yourself and other students? The Bachelor of Science in Education Program?
 Welcome, introductions  Conceptualizing the evaluation problem  stakeholder interests  Divergent and convergent processes  Developing evaluation.
Welcome to the IPFS Webinar The National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care (The National CLAS.
Performance Management Training October , 2015 Grace Gorenflo, MPH, RN Principal Gorenflo Consulting, Inc.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
WORKSHOP SESSION: PLANNING COMPREHENSIVELY TO PREVENT VIOLENCE San Francisco November 18, 2011 Junious Williams, CEO Urban Strategies Council
Slide 1 A product of Turning Point The Turning Point Leadership Development National Excellence Collaborative Vision: Collaborative leadership is used.
S&I FRAMEWORK PROPOSED INITIATIVE SUMMARIES Dr. Douglas Fridsma Office of Interoperability and Standards December 10, 2010.
Lincoln Trail District Health Department Strategic Plan Our Foundation Strategic Goals & Objectives Measures of Success Mission: The Lincoln Trail District.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Economic Value Added Economic Value Added is the financial performance measure that comes closer than any other to capturing the true economic profit of.
Shared governance Jack Zibluk, Ph.D. Professor of journalism, faculty senate president Arkansas State University (870)
Evaluating Engagement Judging the outcome above the noise of squeaky wheels Heather Shaw, Department of Sustainability & Environment Jessica Dart, Clear.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Models of Community Engagement
Costing and Finance P R Upadhyay.
Broad Social Goals of an Economic System
2-Step Process 1 High level screening of potential alternatives 2
Presentation transcript:

Objectives and Criteria: What are they and how do we use them? Where do they come from? What are the “must-have” criteria? How are market and government failures related to criteria?

What are they and how do we use them? Criteria identify the important impacts, resource requirements, and side-effects of all alternatives They provide a consistent comparison of alternatives Make explicit the basis of our evaluation They are the basis of prediction—NOT outcome measurement Focus attention on important policy trade-offs

Where do criteria come from? Your organization’s mission or performance measures Client and other Stakeholders Public or other collaborative processes Your problem definition Other organizations that generated best practices Economic and political models

Where do we start? What is the key outcome you are trying to change? What do people say the status quo is, or isn't, doing? What are the costs and inputs of the status quo policy? What resources would you need to implement new policies? What other effects might new policies have? Can you assess feasibility, sustainability, uncertainty, and robustness?

What are the “must-have” criteria? All important outcomes identified in problem definition Client mandated outcomes Resource requirements (costs, personnel, etc.) Something to show key distributional impacts (if exist) Anything that shows key differences in outcomes for alternatives

How are market and government failures related to goals and criteria? Efficiency is an overarching goal that adds up people’s interests and tries for “social welfare” Market Failure provides framework for problem definition—efficiency isn’t maximized Model leads to specific criteria and policy options Use model, but leave behind jargon by defining criteria in terms of your outcomes—what will change in the view of stakeholders?

Common Criteria: Efficiency: Equity: Costs: Feasibility: Sustainability:  Your job is to adapt, specify, and define in terms of YOUR problem

Some rules: Do label criteria so they will be understandable to the audience and related to issue (not jargon) Do put most important criteria first Group criteria based on objectives or logical categories Don’t make them binary—isn’t more (or less) better? Don’t include multiple criteria that are measuring the same outcome Don’t include criteria that have same values for all options Don’t “add up” criteria with different scales (e.g., operating and capital expenses or outcomes for very different groups)

Objectives and criteria will determine how you compare potential actions. They must: –Adequately reflect the values of your client and organization –Cover key aspects of the problem and implementation of actions –be as concrete and measurable as is appropriate given that they will be predictions –Have associated data or evidence that allow you to predict outcomes for each policy alternative

Division of Developmental Disabilities VISION Safe, healthy individuals, families, and communities MISSION The Department of Social and Health Services will improve the safety and health of individuals, families and communities by providing leadership and establishing and participating in partnerships. VALUES Excellence in Service Respect Collaboration and Partnership Diversity Accountability

Efficiency? What are key outcomes that DDD is responsible for? How should we capture those in the goals and criteria?

Costs?: What costs and revenues should the analysis consider? How? –Operating costs? –Capital costs? –Potential one-time revenue from sales of assets? –Costs of community based care or other services? –Costs paid by other programs? –Union wages vs. non-union wages? –Economic activity in communities?

Equity? How should we account for the diversity of client needs in our criteria? What about differing family engagement and needs? Annie E Casey Foundation “Race Matters: Racial Equity Impact Analysis”

What tools could help us predict how many clients are likely to be in RHCs over time? Stock is the level at the current time In-flow adds to stock Out-flow subtracts from stock Stocks and Flows handout