COURSE ON PROFESSIONALISM ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ETHICS. Business Conduct  The Agent agrees to conform to all applicable federal, state and local laws in conducting business under this agreement.
Advertisements

Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
Mark Radford, Partner, Colin Biggers & Paisley, Australia Conflicts of interest faced by reinsurance brokers and duties owed by producing and placing brokers.
Financial Statements Audit
Course on Professionalism ASOP 43 – Property / Casualty Unpaid Claim Estimates.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
1 Code of Professional Conduct Darrell Knapp Kansas City Actuaries Club Seminar June 24, 2009.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
1 Tax Practice, Regulation, and Ethics  Elements of tax practice  Rules and ethics in tax practice  Circular 230  AICPA Code of Professional Conduct.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
Scott F. Johnson Maureen MacFarlane.  Attorneys have a myriad of ethical obligations  This presentation covers some of those obligations and considers.
Evidence and Argument Evidence – The asserted facts that the arbitrator will consider in making a decision – Information – What is presented at the hearing.
The Actuary as Expert Witness Purdue University March 3, 2008 Stuart Klugman, FSA, Actuarial Education Consultant, SOA and Professor of Actuarial Science,
COURSE ON PROFESSIONALISM ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries.
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia by Gay & Simnett Slides prepared by Roger Simnett.
Mª ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 4. EXTERNAL AUDIT BASIS CONCEPTS.
Purpose of the Standards
EXPERT EVIDENCE UNDER THE NEW RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ARTHUR ROBERT CAMPORESE Camporese Sullivan Di Gregorio.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Certification of Accounts. Certification of accounts » Audit Report on Financial (Attest) Audit is about expression of Auditor’s Opinion on the Financial.
Skit on Reserving Committee on Professionalism Education.
Planning an Audit The Audit Process consists of the following phases:
The Actuary as Expert Witness Chuck McClenahan, FCAS MMC ENTERPRISE RISK CAS Seminar on Ratemaking - March, 2002.
Course on Professionalism ASOP Presentation. 2 Contents Introduction Introduction ASOP Highlights ASOP Highlights ASOP in Asia ASOP in Asia.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
Expert Witnesses Texas Rules of Evidence Article VII. Opinions and Expert Testimony Judge Sharen Wilson.
1. Evidence Professor Cioffi 2/22/2011 – 2/23/
Appendix E – Checklist for Review of Performance Audits Presented by: Ashton Coleman Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General August 16, 2012.
1 Peer Review Casualty Actuaries of New England Spring Meeting April 2, 2008 Jeff Kucera.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
Actuarial Communication is not an Oxymoron Philadelphia Actuarial Club November 11, 2009 Alan D. Ford, Actuarial Standards Board.
PAB/ICAJ Seminar1 The Public Accountancy Board & The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Jamaica Sustaining the Knowledge of Public Accountants - Seminar.
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants of HKICPA
The Actuarial Standards Board and Actuarial Standards of Practice Actuaries’ Club of Boston Annual Meeting September 16, 2010 Kathleen A. Riley, FSA, MAAA,
Unit 3 Seminar! K. Austin Zimmer Any question from Unit 2! Please make sure you have completed your Unit 1 & 2 Papers!
Ratemaking ASOPS By the CAS Committee on Professionalism Education.
Course on Professionalism ASOP 1 – Introductory Actuarial Standard of Practice (ASOP)
2008 Revised Qualification Standards Southwest Actuarial Forum Catherine Taylor, FCAS, MAAA June 2008.
1 Internal Audit. 2 Definition Is an independent activity established by management to examine and evaluate the organization’s risk management processes.
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard  Raji Bhagavatula  Mary Frances Miller  Jason Russ November 13, 2006 CAS Annual Meeting San Francisco,
Managing Discipline Risk CAS Ratemaking and Product Management Seminar Philadelphia March 21, 2012 Michael L. Toothman, FCAS, MAAA 230 E. Golf View Rd.
S21: Reporting. Audit Reporting » The main objective is to ensure clear and informative reporting to the users of financial statements. » Audit Reports.
Texas-Wide Underwriting Conference, April 2011 UNDERWRITERS & DEPOSITIONS: Don’t be made to look the “Fool” Daniel Perkins, JD, MBA, FALU Attorney and.
Basic Business Communications Nick Mercuro, Austin Moore, John Skinner.
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Conflicts of Interest Peter Hughes IESBA June 2012 New York, USA.
Practice Standards. Topic 77: Practice Standards Learning Objectives Describe the Practice Standards employed during each step of the financial planning.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Materiality And Audit Reporting Audit Report Audit Opinion
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
1$1001 2$2002 3$3003 4$5004 6$2,0006 7$4,0007 8$8,0008 9$16, $50, $100, $250, $500, $1, $25, $1 Million15.
Auditing & Investigations I
15 $1 Million 14 $500, $250, $100, $50, $25,000 9 $16,000 8 $8,000 7 $4,000 6 $2,000 5 $1,000 4 $500 3 $300 2 $200 1 $100.
UNITED ADVISORY PARTNERS.
INTRODUCTION TO Compliance audit METHODOLGY and CAM
Limited Scope Representation
TIPS FOR IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF YOUR DEPOSITIONS
Inn of Court: Trial Practices
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
Civil Pretrial Practice
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
Civil Pretrial Practice
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Conf.univ.dr. Victor-Octavian Müller.
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
Presentation transcript:

COURSE ON PROFESSIONALISM ASOP #17 - Expert Testimony by Actuaries

2 Purpose and Scope Focus is on preparation and delivery of sound expert testimony by actuaries Focus is on preparation and delivery of sound expert testimony by actuaries Applies to actuaries testifying as actuarial experts Applies to actuaries testifying as actuarial experts Nothing in this standard is intended to discourage reasonable differences of actuarial opinion or to inhibit responsible creativity in advancing the practice of actuarial science Nothing in this standard is intended to discourage reasonable differences of actuarial opinion or to inhibit responsible creativity in advancing the practice of actuarial science Effective July 15, 2002 with updated deviation language effective May 1, 2011 Effective July 15, 2002 with updated deviation language effective May 1, 2011

3 Definitions Expert - qualified by “knowledge, skill, experience, training or education” to render an opinion Expert - qualified by “knowledge, skill, experience, training or education” to render an opinion Actuarial Opinion - conclusion drawn by actuary from actuarial knowledge or from application of one or more actuarial methods to a body of data Actuarial Opinion - conclusion drawn by actuary from actuarial knowledge or from application of one or more actuarial methods to a body of data Testimony - communication of an actuarial opinion Testimony - communication of an actuarial opinion Oral or written Oral or written Direct or responsive Direct or responsive Formal or informal Formal or informal

4 Standards and Disclosures Actuary should be knowledgeable about this standard, other relevant standards, Qualification Standards for Prescribed Statement of Actuarial Opinion, and the Code of Professional Conduct Actuary should be knowledgeable about this standard, other relevant standards, Qualification Standards for Prescribed Statement of Actuarial Opinion, and the Code of Professional Conduct Conflicts of interest – address real or apparent conflicts of interest in accordance with Precept 7 of Code of Professional Code Conflicts of interest – address real or apparent conflicts of interest in accordance with Precept 7 of Code of Professional Code Advocacy – may act as an advocate, but must use reasonable assumptions and appropriate methods Advocacy – may act as an advocate, but must use reasonable assumptions and appropriate methods

5 Identification and Compliance Identify Client (or Principal) - even though client may have representative (attorney), ultimate responsibility is to client Identify Client (or Principal) - even though client may have representative (attorney), ultimate responsibility is to client Comply with laws and regulations Comply with laws and regulations If believe law conflicts with sound actuarial principles, disclose conflict but follow law If believe law conflicts with sound actuarial principles, disclose conflict but follow law

6 Question #1 The definition of “Testimony” includes the following: The definition of “Testimony” includes the following:  A. Expert Opinions given in a formal setting.  B. Expert Opinions given in an informal setting.  C. Expert Opinions provided through written testimony.  D. All of the above.

7 Answer #1 This is an incorrect answer: This is an incorrect answer:  A. Expert Opinion given in a formal setting. The definition of “Testimony” includes an expert opinion given in a formal setting, however, this is not the most appropriate answer to this question. The definition of “Testimony” includes an expert opinion given in a formal setting, however, this is not the most appropriate answer to this question. Press to retake Question #1

8 Answer #1 This is an incorrect answer: This is an incorrect answer:  B. Expert Opinion given in an informal setting The definition of “Testimony” includes an expert opinion given in an informal setting, but this is not the most appropriate answer to this question. Press to retake Question #1

9 Answer #1 This is an incorrect answer: This is an incorrect answer:  C. Expert Opinions provided through written testimony. The definition of “Testimony” includes an expert opinion provided through written testimony, but this is not the most appropriate answer to this question. The definition of “Testimony” includes an expert opinion provided through written testimony, but this is not the most appropriate answer to this question. Press to retake Question #1

10 Answer #1 The definition of “Testimony” includes all of the following:: The definition of “Testimony” includes all of the following::  A. Expert opinions given in a formal setting.  B. Expert opinions given in an informal setting.  C. Expert opinions provided in written testimony.

11 Assumptions & Methods Unless disclosed otherwise, actuary is responsible for methodology and assumptions Unless disclosed otherwise, actuary is responsible for methodology and assumptions Be prepared to conduct additional calculations in certain forums Be prepared to conduct additional calculations in certain forums If asked to use other assumptions - make clear results don’t represent actuary’s own expert opinion If asked to use other assumptions - make clear results don’t represent actuary’s own expert opinion

12 Communication Keep background of audience in mind when testifying Keep background of audience in mind when testifying Explain technical terminology and concepts so understood by audience Explain technical terminology and concepts so understood by audience It is beneficial for the actuary to provide expert testimony as clearly as possible It is beneficial for the actuary to provide expert testimony as clearly as possible

13 Cross Examination Respond truthfully but need not volunteer information not in best interest of client Respond truthfully but need not volunteer information not in best interest of client Hypothetical questions Hypothetical questions The actuary may refuse to answer hypothetical questions based on unreasonable assumptions, subject to the constraints of the forum The actuary may refuse to answer hypothetical questions based on unreasonable assumptions, subject to the constraints of the forum

14 Other Issues Testimony on opposing actuary’s testimony Testimony on opposing actuary’s testimony Testify objectively, focusing on reasonableness not solely on whether it agrees or disagrees with actuary’s own testimony Testify objectively, focusing on reasonableness not solely on whether it agrees or disagrees with actuary’s own testimony Consistency with actuary’s prior testimony Consistency with actuary’s prior testimony  Be prepared to explain any differences in methodology or assumptions Errors Errors  Disclose material errors in testimony as soon as possible

15 Disclosure of Deviations In addition to those discussed earlier, the actuary should also disclose the following, as applicable In addition to those discussed earlier, the actuary should also disclose the following, as applicable If any material assumption or method was prescribed by applicable law (4.2 of ASOP 41) If any material assumption or method was prescribed by applicable law (4.2 of ASOP 41) If disclaiming responsibility for any material assumption or method selected by a party other than the actuary (4.3 of ASOP 41) If disclaiming responsibility for any material assumption or method selected by a party other than the actuary (4.3 of ASOP 41) Deviation from this ASOP (4.4 of ASOP 41) Deviation from this ASOP (4.4 of ASOP 41)

16 Practical Examples An actuary may be asked to give expert testimony concerning a broad range of issues such as: An actuary may be asked to give expert testimony concerning a broad range of issues such as: Adequacy or appropriateness of reserves, premium rates, pricing or underwriting procedures, or provisions for administrative costs Adequacy or appropriateness of reserves, premium rates, pricing or underwriting procedures, or provisions for administrative costs Cost impact of risk classification systems, tort liability decisions, or legislative/regulatory proposals Cost impact of risk classification systems, tort liability decisions, or legislative/regulatory proposals Relationships between risk and return on investments Relationships between risk and return on investments Value of an insurance company or other entity Value of an insurance company or other entity

17 Question #2 True or False: If necessary to best serve as an advocate for the position of their Principal, an actuary may choose not to follow the Code of Professional Conduct True or False: If necessary to best serve as an advocate for the position of their Principal, an actuary may choose not to follow the Code of Professional Conduct True True False False

18 Answer #2 True is an Incorrect Answer True is an Incorrect Answer Press to retake Question #2

19 Answer #2 The correct answer is False: The correct answer is False: Although the actuary can act as an advocate, the actuary must follow the Code of Professional Conduct Although the actuary can act as an advocate, the actuary must follow the Code of Professional Conduct

20 Practical Examples Actuarial expert testimony may be given in many forums including, but not limited to, the following: Actuarial expert testimony may be given in many forums including, but not limited to, the following: Rate Hearings (filer, regulator, or consumer advocate) Rate Hearings (filer, regulator, or consumer advocate) Civil Litigation (both executive and legislative branch proceedings) Civil Litigation (both executive and legislative branch proceedings) Criminal Trials Criminal Trials

21 Rate Hearing Advantages include general understanding of actuarial issues and reliance on pre-filed testimony Advantages include general understanding of actuarial issues and reliance on pre-filed testimony Disadvantages include the fact that advocacy often trumps expertise and that there could be political issues surrounding the hearing Disadvantages include the fact that advocacy often trumps expertise and that there could be political issues surrounding the hearing It is recommended to know the filing, the history, the environment and not to overstate precision It is recommended to know the filing, the history, the environment and not to overstate precision The classic example, “What is the proper profit provision and how should it be reflected in the rates?” The classic example, “What is the proper profit provision and how should it be reflected in the rates?”

22 Civil Litigation Advantages include adequate time for preparation and tremendous testimony through deposition. There is also less advocacy than rate hearings Advantages include adequate time for preparation and tremendous testimony through deposition. There is also less advocacy than rate hearings Disadvantages include the fact that there is little understanding of actuarial issues, that the jury can lack focus and education, and that cross-examination can be brutal Disadvantages include the fact that there is little understanding of actuarial issues, that the jury can lack focus and education, and that cross-examination can be brutal It is recommended to have through knowledge of the subject matter, triple-check all calculations, be consistent with prior testimony, and document everything It is recommended to have through knowledge of the subject matter, triple-check all calculations, be consistent with prior testimony, and document everything The classic example, “Should the reserving actuary have anticipated all or part of the adverse development?” The classic example, “Should the reserving actuary have anticipated all or part of the adverse development?”

23 Criminal Trial Advantages include the fact that this is an interesting application of actuarial science and a chance to meet a new group of people Advantages include the fact that this is an interesting application of actuarial science and a chance to meet a new group of people Disadvantages include the fact that there is a lot of pressure and threats can be real or implied Disadvantages include the fact that there is a lot of pressure and threats can be real or implied It is recommended to avoid advocacy at all costs, to keep it simple, and to act as though you were the expert for both sides It is recommended to avoid advocacy at all costs, to keep it simple, and to act as though you were the expert for both sides The classic example, “What are the chances that four homes owned by a single individual over a nine year period would be substantially destroyed by fire through random occurrence?” The classic example, “What are the chances that four homes owned by a single individual over a nine year period would be substantially destroyed by fire through random occurrence?”

24 Question #3 True or False: When law conflicts with sound Actuarial Principles, the law should be followed with disclosure of the appropriate actuarial principles. True or False: When law conflicts with sound Actuarial Principles, the law should be followed with disclosure of the appropriate actuarial principles. True True False False

25 Answer #3 False is an Incorrect Answer False is an Incorrect Answer When law conflicts with sound Actuarial Principles, the law should be followed with disclosure of the appropriate actuarial principles. When law conflicts with sound Actuarial Principles, the law should be followed with disclosure of the appropriate actuarial principles. Press to retake Question #3

26 Answer #3 The correct answer is True: The correct answer is True: When law conflicts with sound Actuarial Principles, the law should be followed with disclosure of the appropriate actuarial principles. When law conflicts with sound Actuarial Principles, the law should be followed with disclosure of the appropriate actuarial principles.

27 Conclusion Actuaries benefit the public when they apply their professional skills in a manner that promotes general welfare, and they enhance relationships with their professional peers when they present their work fairly and give credit where appropriate. Actuaries benefit the public when they apply their professional skills in a manner that promotes general welfare, and they enhance relationships with their professional peers when they present their work fairly and give credit where appropriate.