Western Carolina University Office of Assessment A Division of the Office of the Provost.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Culture of Collaboration Cultivating a Campus Environment for Assessment.
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
A Practical Guide. The Handbook Part I BCCC Vision of Assessment Guiding Principles of Assessment Part II The Assessment Model Part III A guide on how.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year (4-year institutions) Salisbury University Project Description of Review Process of First College.
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Accrediting Commission for Schools Western Association of Schools and Colleges ACS WASC Postsecondary Visiting Committee Final Presentation Accrediting.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
HLC Writing Team 0 Mike Schaefer - Chair of SPARC 0 Lynn Burley - Director of Academic Assessment 0 Janet Wilson - Faculty Senate President 0 Dianna Winters.
The Nuts and Bolts to Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUOs) Franklin P. Ow, Ph.D East Los Angeles College Assistant Professor, Chemistry Learning Assessment.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
PREPARING FOR SACS Neal E. Armstrong Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs July 13, 2004.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Knowing What We Learn and Demonstrating Our Success: Assessment and Evaluation of FLCs Andrea L. Beach, Ph.D. Western Michigan University Presented at.
The Academic Assessment Process
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
1 Presentation Ivy Tech Community College Terre Haute, IN Jackie McCracken April 21, 2007.
Institutional Effectiveness at CCC The Journey The Priority  It is always important to know if what you are doing is effective. This is the story of.
Continuing Competence in Nursing
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Learning Centers Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Some Best (Promising?) Practices for Learning Support Centers in Higher Education 1.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Chancellor’s Cabinet September 28, 2004.
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
SCC Faculty Vision and Core Values Statements 2011.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
Washington State University Strategic Plan Overview and Implementation Process On web site at
Creating a Culture of Student Affairs Assessment Katie Busby, Ph.D. Jessica Simmons Office of Student Affairs Assessment & Planning University of Alabama.
Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
“PLANNING” CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Elizabeth Noel, PhD Associate Vice President, Research Office of Research and Development.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Institutional Effectiveness Building on MUSC Excellence.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
Self-Study Report in Support of Reaffirmation of Accreditation Final Discussion and Approval Academic Senate Executive Committee June 13 and 20, 2011.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
SACSOC ACCREDITATION AND INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS STUDENT AFFAIRS LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 17, Allan Aycock.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Dr. ERINDA PAPA.  This manual is a clear proof of “Fan S. Noli” University’s commitment to assure its internal quality. It demonstrates not only that.
Accreditation Update Rebecca Kenney, Ph.D. Vice President of Instruction (Int.) College of Alameda Flex Day August 19, 2010.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation Overview Western Carolina University Carol Burton, Director, SACS Review.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Indiana University Kokomo Strategic Enrollment Management Consultation Final Report Bob Bontrager December 8, 2007.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
Student Affairs Division Meeting September 19, 2012.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
University Career Services Committee
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Accreditation Summary
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
Internal Quality Assurance in Higher Education Institutions
Presentation transcript:

Western Carolina University Office of Assessment A Division of the Office of the Provost

Mission Statement The Office of Assessment at Western Carolina University serves to promote excellence in student learning, educational practices and quality of service by establishing and maintaining a campus culture of self evaluation and improvement at all levels of the institution. The office provides leadership and support to the campus community in efforts to demonstrate that the University is fulfilling its institutional mission and to enhance Western Carolina University as a community of scholarship.

Function #1 Coordinate and support an ongoing, systematic program of institutional evaluation and assessment of student achievement, and facilitate the incorporation of the findings into the planning and accreditation processes;

Function #2 Work with academic and administrative programs to develop and implement outcomes-based assessment plans in order to improve programs and services at all institutional levels;

Function #3 Engage the campus community in a dialogue about assessment through a variety of avenues, including workshops, presentations, newsletters, development and maintenance of an assessment website, and service on campus committees; and

Function #4 Publish assessment research and maintain an active role in professional organizations.

Administrative Structure Provost & Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Director of Assessment Administrative Assistant Planning & Assessment Analyst (University Planning)

Goals for Support the SACS reaffirmation process Support all academic and administrative units in developing meaningful and manageable assessment plans Clarify the role(s) and function(s) of the Office of Assessment to the campus community Develop a model for communicating campus assessment efforts and key assessment results

Gen’l Thoughts on Assessment #1: I assume that all faculty and staff desire to provide the best possible education and services to our students; thus, I presume that you have some processes in place (either formal or informal) to make informed decisions about your program. It is my goal to work with you to find the most manageable and effective way to document those processes.

Gen’l Thoughts on Assessment #2: An effective process of assessment must be sensitive to and reflective of institutional values and resources. Ultimately, a manageable and effective assessment process must achieve a balance among several key factors including internal and external mandates, cost, and faculty/staff time and effort.

Gen’l Thoughts on Assessment #3 Meaningful assessment is not a bureaucratic burden. If we engage in assessment ‘just’ to satisfy SACS or any other internal or external mandate, then we are wasting our collective time. We should engage in this process because it is the right thing to do and provides us with the tools to make informed decisions to improve our programs and services.

Gen’l Thoughts on Assessment #4: It is oft stated that education is the one product for which the consumer does not wish to receive his/her money’s worth. I believe that this statement reflects a situation in which the primary stakeholder in the education process (i.e., the student) is not empowered to take charge of their learning process. A comprehensive process of learning outcomes assessment CAN affect change in this attitude.