DELAY TIMES BETWEEN GEOEFFECTIVE SOLAR DISTURBANCES AND GEOMAGNETIC INDICES Y. D. PARK 1, Y. -J. MOON 1, I. S. KIM 2, H. S. YUN 3 1.Korea Astronomy Observatory,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal phenomena On the link between the solar energetic particles and eruptive coronal.
Advertisements

The Physics of Solar Flares Examining Solar Flares and Radio Bursts By Caylin Mendelowitz and Claire Rosen.
아리랑 위성 1 호 (KOMPSAT-1) 궤도 변화와 우주환경 변화 비교 박진영 1,2, 문용재 2, 조경석 2, 김해동 3, 김관혁 2, 김연한 2, 박영득 2, 이유 1 1 충남대학교, 2 한국천문연구원, 3 한국항공우주연구원 한국우주과학회 춘계 학술대회 2005.
Study of Magnetic Helicity Injection in the Active Region NOAA Associated with the X-class Flare of 2011 February 15 Sung-Hong Park 1, K. Cho 1,
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Solar and Interplanetary Sources of Geomagnetic disturbances Yu.I. Yermolaev, N. S. Nikolaeva, I. G. Lodkina, and M. Yu. Yermolaev Space Research Institute.
On the Space Weather Response of Coronal Mass Ejections and Their Sheath Regions Emilia Kilpua Department of Physics, University of Helsinki
Spatial distribution of the auroral precipitation zones during storms connected with magnetic clouds O.I. Yagodkina 1, I.V. Despirak 1, V. Guineva 2 1.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: introduction.
Flares and global waves, including seismic H. S. Hudson 1, C. A. Lindsey 2, J. Martinez-Oliveros 1 1 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California,
Flare global waves of three kinds H. S. Hudson 1, C. A. Lindsey 2, J. Martinez-Oliveros 1 1 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley,
Towards a European Infrastructure for Lunar Observatories Bremen, Wednesday 23 rd March 2005 A 3D cosmic ray detector on the Moon X. Moussas University.
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
September 2007LWS 2007 Halo CMEs and Configuration of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu – Stanford University
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Solar Activities and Halloween Storms Ahmed Hady Astronomy Department Cairo University, Egypt.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: (Fig.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
The nature of impulsive solar energetic particle events N. V. Nitta a, H. S. Hudson b, M. L. Derosa a a Lockheed Martin Solar and Astrophysics Laboratory.
NADIR – Focus Area V: Forecasting Geomagnetic Activity MURI All-Hands Meeting, Boulder, CO, October, 21-22, 2008 David FalconerUniversity of Alabama &
Prediction on Time-Scales of Years to Decades Discussion Group A.
Solar Irradiance Variability Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Environment Center Derived Total Solar Irradiance Hoyt and Schatten, 1993 (-5 W/m 2 ) Lean et al.,
Three Dimensional Visualization of the Solar Corona and study of coronal cavity observed by Yohkoh/SXT and Hinode/XRT J. Okumura, D. Mineyama, H. Watanabe,
Flares in and their associations with CMEs N.V. Nitta, J.P.Wuelser, M. J. Aschwanden, J. R. Lemen (LMSAL), D. M. Zarro (Adnet, Inc.)
CR variation during the extreme events in November 2004 Belov (a), E. Eroshenko(a), G. Mariatos ©, H. Mavromichalaki ©, V.Yanke (a) (a) IZMIRAN), ,
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
OBSERVATION OF THE JANUARY 1997 CORONAL MASS EJECTION NEAR THE SUN USING RADIO SOUNDING TECHNIQUE WITH GALILEO SPACECRAFT A.I. Efimov, L.N. Samoznaev,
K9LA Vancouver 2003 Disturbances to Propagation Carl Luetzelschwab K9LA CQ DX?Where’d everybody go?
The day after solar cycle 23 IHY 2009 September 23, 2009 Yu Yi 1 and Su Yeon Oh 2 1 Dept. of Astronomy & Space Science, Chungnam National University, Korea.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
A study of flare-associated X-ray plasma ejections. I. Association with coronal mass ejections Yeon-Han Kim, Y.-J. Moon, K.-S. Cho, Kap- Sung Kim, and.
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
A.V. Belov 1, E. A. Eroshenko 1, H. Mavromichalaki 2, V.A. Oleneva 1, A. Papaioannou 2, G. Mariatos 2, V. G. Yanke 1 (1) Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism,
The Sun- Solar Activity. Damage to communications & power systems.
Geoeffectiveness of Solar and Interplanetary Events Yuri I. Yermolaev, Michail Yu. Yermolaev, Georgy N. Zastenker, Anatoli A. Petrukovich, Lev M. Zelenyi.
Solar and STP science with AstroGrid Silvia Dalla School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Manchester A PPARC funded project.
2004 September 11CAWSES Theme 2 Meeting, Beijing Solar Sources of Geoeffective Disturbances N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Greenbelt, MD
Fractal Dimension and Maximum Sunspot Number in Solar Cycle R.-S. Kim 1,2, Y. Yi 1, S.-W. Kim 2, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 2 1 Chungnam national University.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
Improving Space Weather Forecasts Using Coronagraph Data S.P. Plunkett 1, A. Vourlidas 1, D.R. McMullin 2, K. Battams 3, R.C. Colaninno 4 1 Naval Research.
GEOEFFECTIVE INTERPLANETARY STRUCTURES: 1997 – 2001 A. N. Zhukov 1,2, V. Bothmer 3, A. V. Dmitriev 2, I. S. Veselovsky 2 1 Royal Observatory of Belgium.
Evolutionary Characteristics of Magnetic Helicity Injection in Active Regions Hyewon Jeong and Jongchul Chae Seoul National University, Korea 2. Data and.
What we can learn from the intensity-time profiles of large gradual solar energetic particle events (LGSEPEs) ? Guiming Le(1, 2,3), Yuhua Tang(3), Liang.
Helicity-driven sigmoid evolution and its role in CME initiation David Alexander, Rice University SOHO/MDI Magnetograms showing the evolution of a long-lived.
The ICME’s magnetic field and the role on the galactic cosmic ray modulation for the solar cycle 23 Evangelos Paouris and Helen Mavromichalaki National.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Essential Question: How does the position of the Earth in the solar system affect conditions on our planet? Power Standard: Most objects in the solar system.
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Ahmed A. HADY Astronomy Department Cairo University Egypt Deep Solar Minimum of Cycle23 and its Impact and its Impact.
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
A tool for improved space weather predictions: the CME expansion speed. Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau Germany Instituto Nacional.
On Coronal Mass Ejections and Configurations of the Ambient Magnetic Field Yang Liu Stanford University 3/17/ COSPAR 2008.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
The CME geomagnetic forecast tool (CGFT) M. Dumbović 1, A. Devos 2, L. Rodriguez 2, B. Vršnak 1, E. Kraaikamp 2, B. Bourgoignie 2, J. Čalogović 1 1 Hvar.
Relationship between flare occurrence and the Hale Sector Boundary
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Orientations of Halo CMEs and Magnetic Clouds
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Forecasting the arrival time of the CME’s shock at the Earth
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
Yuki Takagi1*, Kazuo Shiokawa1, Yuichi Otsuka1, and Martin Connors2  
Relationship between flare occurrence and the Hale Sector Boundary
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

DELAY TIMES BETWEEN GEOEFFECTIVE SOLAR DISTURBANCES AND GEOMAGNETIC INDICES Y. D. PARK 1, Y. -J. MOON 1, I. S. KIM 2, H. S. YUN 3 1.Korea Astronomy Observatory, Daejeon, KOREA 2. Sternberg State Astronomical Institute, Moscow Univ. RUSSIA 3. Seoul National Univ. Seoul, KOREA

I. INTRODUCTION Geomagnetic Activities are associated with Solar Active Features(DSF, CME, Flares….) Solar activity - Geomagnetic activities research : Gosling et al.( 1991), Gosling(1997), Hudson et al.(1998), Zarro et al.(1999), Sterning et al.(2000), Gilbert et al.(2000)….. Primary mechanisms are not fully understood Gosling suggestion (1993 “Solar Flare Myth”) : geomagnetic activities by fast CMEs are not necessarily associated with solar flares.

Delay times of solar disturbances  Several cases using simple correlation tools (e.g., Joselyn and McIn- tosh, 1981; ; Wright, 1983a; 1983b; Mikhailusta and Gnevyshev, 1985;Watanabe and Schwenn, 1989).  Joselyn and McIntosh(1981) : flare- geomagnetic storm relation 3 years data.  Wright(1983a, 1983b) disappearing prominences and Ap index.

Quantitative characteristics of delay times of geoeffective solar disturbances, using data taken for several decades. Cross-correlation measure of point series data most probable delay time Estimate the most probable time for major X-ray flares and disappearing filaments to travel from the Sun to the Earth. Investigate delay time between SSC( storm sudden commencement)s and major geomagnetic storms. Examined the dependence of correlation on the characteristics of solar disturbances such as their strengths, durations and locations.

II. DATA NGDC – more than 2 solar cycle 4836 solar X-ray flares stronger than M1 class recorded from Sep. 1, 1975 to Dec. 31, disappearing filaments occurred from Jan. 1, 1992 to Dec. 31, SSCs recorded from Sep. 1, 1975 to Dec. 31, 1999, 408 major geomagnetic storms from Sep.1, 1975 to Dec. 31, 1999.

III. RESULT and DISCUSSION Examined relationships solar flares - disappearing filaments, - SSCs.  X-ray flares duration –SSC

 X-ray flares strength –SSC Flare duration should be a more significant factor than strength

 traveling time of flare disturbance on heliolongitude

 The cross-correlation between DSFs and SSC

 Cross-correlation : DSFs of heliolongitudes - SSCs.

 Cross-correlation : SSCs - starting time of major geomagnetic storms

 High correlation appearing at zero time lag  SSCs are a good sign of initiation of major geomagnetic storms.  Positive correlation  most of geomagnetic storms take place in about one and half days after SSCs occur.  Cross-correlation : SSCs - starting time of major geomagnetic storms

VI. SUMMARY and CONCLUSION 1.The most probable traveling time of a solar disturbance from the Sun to the Earth is estimated to be about 2 days for solar major (X and M class) flares and about 3 days for disappearing filaments. 1.Long-duration flares are better correlated with SSCs than short duration flares are. This is consistent with that long-duration flares are frequently associated with CMEs and coronal and/or interplanetary shocks. 1.The traveling times of solar disturbances strongly depend on the heliolongitude where they originate. The disturbances associated with flares and laments located at the middle west longitude are approximately two times faster than those associated with flares located at the middle east longitude. 1.We have confirmed that solar disturbances associated with flares and disappearing laments at the western limb can hardly reach the Earth. Finally, our results are expected to be used as quantitative input parameters for predicting solar-terrestrial effects(e.g., Lundstedt, 1992).

1.The traveling times of solar disturbances strongly depend on the heliolongitude where they originate. The disturbances associated with flares and laments located at the middle west longitude are approximately two times faster than those associated with flares located at the middle east longitude. 1.We have confirmed that solar disturbances associated with flares and disappearing laments at the western limb can hardly reach the Earth. Finally, our results are expected to be used as quantitative input parameters for predicting solar-terrestrial effects(e.g., Lundstedt, 1992).