Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Team Space Jam Launch Readiness Review Paul Guerrie, Ben Azlein, Megan Scheele, Bridget Chase, Shane Meikle, Taylor King, & Jamie Usherwood November 2,
Advertisements

Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration (at the final LRR) -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Team 7, Final Presentation December 1, Mission Overview Send up petri dishes containing bacteria Analyze the effects of temperature, pressure, and.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Poptarts Final Presentation Saad Alqahtani Kyle Skjerven Charles MacCraiger Connor Jacobsen Matt Busby Alexa Warly Corinne Desroches 11/29/11.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Paul “Trey” Karsten Marcell Smalley Shunsuke Miyazaki Brynn Larson Terek Campbell Marcus Flores 11/25/09 Final Revision.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
RockSat-C 2011 ISTR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Team R3D3 Final Presentation Devon Campbell Greg McQuie Kate Kennedy Henk Wolda Marisa Antuna Nicole Ela Tyler Smith 12/1/11.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2010 Rev A
Team Name Critical Design Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #23 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #23.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Teamo Supremo Final Presentation Kristen Brenner Kim Fornall Ahna Isaak Nick Martinez Wes Roos Bart Tofany RevD
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #27 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #27 T+3.
Comments on this template -Leave time for questions -Leave time for demonstration -Use your actual hardware in the presentation -Practice your presentation.
Team Cutthroat Critical Design Review Chris Alley Annie Frederick Josh Marshman Julie Price Lance Tokmakian Kent Welborn December 7, 2006.
Team Name Launch Readiness Review Team Members Date Fall 2011 Rev A
Final Presentation Nick Hoffmann Miranda Rohlfing Geoff Morgan Miles Buckman Lauren Wenner Rahul Devnani December 5, 2006.
GONS Final Presentation Steven Benedict Jake Danser Josh Hecht Brock Kowalchuk Erik Shuttlesworth Matthew Zemel December 4, 2007 Steven Benedict Jake Danser.
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date Rev
2011 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Team Hubble Jr. Final Presentation Rachel Small, Holly Zaepfel, Ryan Del Gizzi, Kyle Norman, and Evan Levy December 5, 2006.
Echo  Final Presentation Andrew Berg, Shawn Carroll, Cody Humbargar, Jade Nelson, Jared Russell, Austin Williamson
Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date. User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may.
Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report Team Name 1 Team Name 2 Team Name N Universities/Institutions Team Members Date.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Miscellaneous Notes: This is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here. Basically this.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
Team Hang 7 Final Presentation Lucas Migliorini, Sierra Williams, Chase Goodman, Ethan Hollenbach, Becca Lidvall, Abby Caballero, Paul Smith, Nikhil Desai.
Team Name Flight Readiness Review (this is a bare-bones template – make it fancier if you wish, but be sure to address at least the items listed here)
User notes: –Please use this template to create your Proposal Analysis Review –You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information.
Sam Bukowski, Emily Daugherty, Chris Lewin, Troy Hayes, Natalie Schaefer, Matt Vaninger November, 2011.
User notes: –The purpose of the flight readiness review is to determine if your experiment is ready to fly. If it is not ready – it will not fly –You must.
Team Honey Badger R.A.H.D. Final Presentation Team Members: Kyle Daniels, Logan Harrop, Annie Kelly, Gabe Frank Jason Leng, Karyn Perdue, Josh Whipkey,
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: 2519S02 FOR
GEEN 2850 / REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) NUMBER: _01 FOR DESIGN CONCEPT OF THE CU Balloon Experimental Satellite (CUBESAT)
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Quinn Kostelecky, Vincent Staverosky, Gloria Chen, Roshan Misra, Jacqueline Godina, Raymond Auyeung Fall 2011 Rev C
RockSat-C 2013 FMSTR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
By Team Awesome. Team work was a valuable skill during this task. Making sure all team members contributed was important. As a team we needed to make.
Junk in a Box Final Presentation Frank Becky, Kyle Cummings, Jordan Haines, Villiam Klein, Matt Peoples, Ryan Scott and Aaron Young 4 December 2007.
UPDATE #2.  The predicted altitude was ~9500 feet.  Actual altitude was ~11960 feet.  After investigation the error was found in the simulated weight.
Flight Preparation Boulder Ballooning Workshop 2006 BOREALIS Montana State University.
Progress Report and PAM
NOTETAKING AND STUDY SKILLS The SQRW Method. SQRW – Survey, Question, Read, Write What exactly is SQRW? ◦Well, it’s a study method where you get the best.
Notes on this template You may reformat this to fit your design, but make sure you cover the information requested in this template. Presentations should.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/College Team Members Date.
Tethered Aerostat Program Concept Design Review College of Menominee Nation Conceptual Design Review College of Menominee Nation Marilyn Madosh, Larry.
RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Team S.H.I.E.L.D. Final Presentation
Skillz That Killz Team 3 Final Presentation
Team Super 8: Sat Morpheus Final Presentation
Sweet Adelines International
Launch Readiness Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
Team Name Conceptual Design Review
FRIDAY SLIDES TEMPLATE
SUNDAY SLIDES TEMPLATE
Presentation transcript:

Team Name Final Presentation Team Members Date

User notes –You may reformat to fit your design but make sure you cover the following points –You may want to finalize your Design Document since it will help form your presentation. –This template is the barebones of what is needed. – Don’t focus on provided hardware, focus on your experiment and associated engineering

Mission Overview –Your objective and a summary of your flight –What do you expect to prove and/or discover

Summary of your design and Experiment Summary of RFP compliance

Results and Analysis Compare predicted and actual –Data –Plots –Data –Pictures –Data

Ready to fly again – How problems were fixed – How payload should be stored – How payload should be activated for flight – Other

Conclusions

Lessons learned

Message to next semester